http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59765 --- Comment #5 from Zeb Figura <z.figura12@gmail.com> --- (In reply to mcsordas from comment #4)
For a single stream, recv() is roughly:
Windows: ~1.2 us average Wine 5: ~21-24 us average Wine 11.8: ~420-460 us average So compared to Wine 5, recv() is roughly 18-22x slower on Wine 11.8.
Hmm. I tested locally on this machine and I see roughly 10 ns with 5.0 vs 20 ns with 11.8. It's different hardware but I'd still expect to be able to reproduce something close to that 20x difference. What kind of parameters are you looking at, buffer size and whatnot? Is this just TCP loopback? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.