http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60241 --- Comment #34 from Stian Low <wineryyyyy@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Zeb Figura from comment #33)
Well, no, because the LLM policy only covers actual code that goes into Wine and it's based only on copyright and licensing law.
Right. Report includes suggested fixes to bugs/findings but unclear how they may have been derived: - Fixes from legacy tools predating LLM that may not violate copyright - Fixes from LLM being trained on wine code which may not violate copyright - Fixes from LLM being trained on Microsoft/copyright code which is less clear and risky I believe these inherent risks from lack of transparency are the point by design by AI companies. They operate much like Microsoft which was a significant driver of the free software movement. I consider AI/LLMs by these companies not meant to elevate free software but rather to sabotage it. I do not trust them any more than I've ever trusted Microsoft.
Personally, I'd prefer to extend the policy to forbid any LLM content anywhere,
We are aligned there.
horrible ethical problems and categorically wastes time far worse than anything human-generated
Add waste of scarce energy/resources as LLMs are ironically sold as tools for abundance. Add Enron-like blatant lies and deception as unethical business practices among all the others. Slop era is built on a gambled house of cards. Gamblers were promised a house of royal flushes but got a house of folds that will collapse. I consider limiting dependence on these companies and tools wise to continue business as usual vs those who will collapse with it. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.