April 2004 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: WININET: move to Windows sockets
by Juan Lang April 6, 2004

April 6, 2004

Hans wrote: > On Monday 05 April 2004 19:24, Alexandre Julliard > wrote: > > There's no real reason that we cannot use Unix > > sockets on Unix and Windows socket on Reactos with > > the same code, it just needs a bit of header magic; > > and this will be useful for Winelib apps too. > > Hmm, I'd like to agree with that. I'd be rather nervous about the mixing of OpenSSL with the use of Winsock, at least as is. OpenSSL is itself using socket read/write calls, and it expects them to be the correct ones: in particular, the UNIX ones. I believe the only way to do this correctly is to write a new OpenSSL BIO that uses the same read/write/open/close calls as the rest of netconnection.c, and this can be combined with the aforementioned header magic to get what you're after. Copying and pasting an existing OpenSSL BIO would probably suffice. --Juan __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/

2 1

Re: wineserver: correctly free the debug ctx
by Alexandre Julliard April 5, 2004

April 5, 2004

Eric Pouech <pouech-eric(a)wanadoo.fr> writes: > when a debugging thread is attached to several processes, the debug > context (shared across all processes) is destroyed when the first > process terminates. This patch destroys it when the last process > attached terminates. It seems to me this will cause the context to never be freed. I don't understand the problem with multiple processes, the context is bound to the debugger thread so it shouldn't make any difference how many processes are being debugged. Could you please give more details on the problem? -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: WININET: move to Windows sockets
by Steven Edwards April 5, 2004

April 5, 2004

Hello Hans, --- Hans Leidekker <hans(a)it.vu.nl> wrote: > > This makes wininet build on MinGW. > > Changelog: > Move to Windows sockets. > I asked Alexandre about a patch to move Wininet to Winsock and he said it took to much of a performance hit to merge. Is there a way we can bench mark it to show how much of a hit Winsock vs Unix sockets is going to give us? He suggested that we find a way to make Wininet use Unix sockets on Unix and Winsock on Windows. Thanks Steven __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/

6 7

CryptoAPI
by unknown＠example.com April 5, 2004

April 5, 2004

Has anybody started implementing CryptoApi in WINE?? If no mayby someone can give me some clues how to start... I am not bad i C++ I think, but I have never make thing like that. I don't promise I will do that, but I can try... :)

3 2

Re: CryptoAPI
by Juan Lang April 5, 2004

April 5, 2004

Jacek wrote: > Has anybody started implementing CryptoApi in WINE?? > If no mayby someone can give me some clues how to > start... I am not bad i C++ I think, but I > have never make thing like that. I don't promise I > will do that, but I can try... :) Hi Jacek, take a look at Wine's rsabase.dll, that DLL doesn't do very much yet. All its functions (CPAcquireContext, etc) are described here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/security/s… If you have access to a Windows box it's easier: you can load the DLL itself and call all the functions and try to reproduce what it's doing. Good luck, --Juan __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/

1 0

Re: Fwd: Re: appdb - improvement in serching out bugs
by tony_lambregts＠telusplanet.net April 5, 2004

April 5, 2004

Quoting hatky <hatky(a)hatky.myz.info>: >> No, no, no... read the patch again. > Ok, sorry wasn't what I tought you are trying to do, this patch is ok > p.s. I didn't think someone actually changed the urls in bugzilla. sweet :). I have been going through them 100 at a time. I've got 1-400 done at this time. I figure I will be done sometime before Christmas :P. If anyone wants to help with this I would be glad to have the help... Check out http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=560 for more more on this. -- Tony Lambregts

1 0

NtPulseEvent
by Robert Lunnon April 5, 2004

April 5, 2004

What is the status of NtPulseEvent it emits a diagnostic messages fixme:ntdll:NtPulseEvent (7c,0) yet it looks to me that NtPulseEvent is implemented but the fixme is bogus Anyone know about this ? BTW Has anyone experience with the Skype application under linux, does it work there ? Bob b

2 1

Should winemaker be able to handle this
by Bill Medland April 5, 2004

April 5, 2004

I haven't been following the winemaker stuff so I don't know whether it is supposed to be able to handle this (and is broken) or not. I am having to play with the "build a builtin dll to wrap a linux so" concept again after a year or so since the last time, as discussed in the Winlib manual, chapter 5. I see that winemaker has changed since then. In particular the bit that is not working for my case is the -D, -I, -L and -l options. What I want is to run winemaker to generate the build environment and then do the build. What I used toi have was: #! /bin/bash # Run this script in order to pass the correct arguments to winemaker so that # it can set up the build environment winemaker --nosource-fix --nogenerated-specs --dll --single-target mytarget --nomfc -DMY_SETTING -I$MY_INC_DIR -L$MY_LIB_DIR -lmylinuxso . I see that we don't bother with generating spec files any longer. However I see that the -D, -I, -L and -l options don't find their way into the Makefile these days. Is that by design or a bug? (i.e. do I have to fix winemaker or do I need to look at a different way of doing it) -- Bill Medland mailto:billmedland(a)mercuryspeed.com http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed

4 5

RE: Handling dialogs created without using templates
by Santosh Siddheshwar April 5, 2004

April 5, 2004

Hi, Thanks. Would you be able to share details of the changes you did for handling MDI windows? Regards Santosh > -----Original Message----- > From: Dmitry Timoshkov [SMTP:dmitry(a)baikal.ru] > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 7:40 PM > To: Santosh Siddheshwar > Cc: wine-devel(a)winehq.com > Subject: Re: Handling dialogs created without using templates > > "Santosh Siddheshwar" <santosh.s(a)sonata-software.com> wrote: > > > Yes attached is a sample which is pretty similar to what I described > > below. > > Thanks. Now I see where the problem is. We have to hook dialog creation > code into common window creation code, something similar to what I've done > recently for MDI. Alexandre, are my thoughts correct? > > -- > Dmitry. ********************************************************************* Disclaimer: The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential / privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee or addressees. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message, you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. *********************************************************************

2 1

Re: Re: dbghelp
by Pouech Eric DMI AEI CAEN April 5, 2004

April 5, 2004

> UnDecorateName is still a stub, while our winedump has some a good > framework for UnDecorateName, also translating into a GCC way and not in a > VC++ way. How should these things go together? See the comment in dbghelp.c !! My first thouhgt would be to make a .a lib out of winedump code, and use it in winedump and msvcrt and / or dbghelp. I haven't studied yet the best way to share the code between msvcrt and dbghelp A+

1 0