July 2006 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

IE and MSN Messenger 7.0
by Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes July 19, 2006

July 19, 2006

Hello, In WIne version 0.9.14 and earlier, MSN Messenger can be installed without installing IE6, but starting with 0.9.15, it complains about missing IE unless this is installed. I tested this is the same .wine directory (created by Wine 0.9.17); to my knowledge, registry keys are only created when 'wineprefixcreate' is run, so that means the problem must be somewhere else. My question is: is this a known side-effect due to the ongoing work on builtin IE and WIne's Gecko engine, or is it a nasty regression that should be tracked down? http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&FamilyID=744… Regards, Alexander N. Sørnes

3 2

Re: "assumed" graphic card memory
by Jesse Allen July 19, 2006

July 19, 2006

On 7/14/06, Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger(a)gmx.at> wrote: > Am Donnerstag 13 Juli 2006 22:07 schrieb Frank Richter: > > I think the article exaggerates. (a) it refers to one driver which > > exhibits the problem - Matrox G400 GL, on Win32. Linux drivers may > > actually all properly support that function. (b) you could use a cap - > > e.g. never report more than 50% of the total system ram as VRAM. Or use > > that as a threshold for a heuristic - if more than that amount of > > textures are reported as "resident", assume the logic is broken. > I tried the sample program on my Linux box (radeon M9, 64 mb vram) and I don't > think that it reported correct values. It said 32 mb textures, not all > resident. While I have a 1400x1050 resolution I don't think it eats 32 mb > vidmem. > Yeah, not at all. Graphics card video ram these days far exceed whats needed for video modes. Just a quick number crunch shows 1400x1050(a)32bpp only requires approx 5.6MB. Most of the ram is used for textures, I believe. I think the worst case at detecting amount of video ram is stuffing it with textures and guessing how much went in.

3 2

Re: oleaut32:VatCat fixes initialization and conformance test
by qingdoa daoo July 19, 2006

July 19, 2006

--- Benjamin Arai <me(a)benjaminarai.com>: > Changelog: > - Helps address http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3628 > - Addresses variant initialization and missing conformance test > issues brought up by Qingdoa Daoo > - Fixes VarCat conformance test failures exposed by Rob Shearman: > "oleaut32: Test the return value of VarCat in the tests." > > A test may pass on Windows because it returned without any errors > (S_OK) but on Wine that same test can technically fail but be > misinterpeted as a correct result in Wine if the expected error code > is returned. Temporary variants may be uninitialized before usage in > specific cases causing unexpected results. > Your patch is hard to read without apply first. Could you also attach the two functions you modified in your local tree ( not in patch form ) @@ -2523,8 +2566,8 @@ HRESULT WINAPI VarCat(LPVARIANT left, LP rightvt == VT_UI2 || rightvt == VT_UI4 || rightvt == VT_I8 || rightvt == VT_UI8 || rightvt == VT_INT || rightvt == VT_UINT)) - return DISP_E_BADVARTYPE; - return hres; + return DISP_E_TYPEMISMATCH; + return DISP_E_TYPEMISMATCH; Why the two consecutive "return DISP_E_TYPEMISMATCH" ? ___________________________________________________________ Mp3疯狂搜-新歌热歌高速下 http://music.yahoo.com.cn/?source=mail_mailbox_footer

1 0

Winlib - Active Scripting
by Luc-Eric Rousseau July 18, 2006

July 18, 2006

Hi, I am starting to investigate if it would be feasible to port some of our applications with WinLib. Presently, we use MainSoft MainWin. I have a few questions: 1) is there a definitive list somewhere what API WinLib implements of Win32, and what it doesn't? I have had some difficulty finding this information. 2) one application we'd like to port uses active scripting (VBScript). Basically we wrote some features in VBScript, which in turn automating our application (like macros in Photoshop CS). What would be our options for this if we were to use WinLib? (MainWin ships with VBscript and JScript) 3) Would the Ole Compound Storage format (StgCreateDocfile) WinLib read/write be binary compatible with the one on Windows? 4) what are the options of an application that embeds the IE web browser control?

2 1

wined3d regression
by Vijay Kiran Kamuju July 18, 2006

July 18, 2006

Hi, I think todays check-ins related to wined3d broke Guildwars. Now it complains DirectX 8 could not be found and install it. Before showing that dialog box it show some citical section failure. I think the y'days locking fixes broke guildwars :( Have to do regression testing today bye, Vijay

1 0

Re: msi: Implement MsiSetInstallLevel.
by Dan Kegel July 18, 2006

July 18, 2006

On 7/18/06, Mike McCormack <mike(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > + * MsiGetLanguage (MSI.@) > + */ > +UINT WINAPI MsiSetInstallLevel(MSIHANDLE hInstall, int iInstallLevel) typo. Do we have a tool that sweeps the source for doc - code mismatches?

2 1

Re: PATCH: Re: prelink check
by Vitaliy Margolen July 18, 2006

July 18, 2006

Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 3:07:58 AM, Marcus Meissner wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 10:03:54AM +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote: >> Marcus Meissner <marcus(a)jet.franken.de> writes: >> >> > It seems the PATH usage of AC_CHECK_PROGS is not taken into account. >> > >> > Adding /usr/sbin/prelink to the checked programs does not help, >> > the check always prepends paths. >> >> Replacing AC_CHECK_PROGS by AC_PATH_PROGS should do the trick. > Yes, it did. > I now get "ntdll.dll.so: Unknown stabs code 0x2e", but this is prelinks > fault. Btw this should be fixed. Just have to wait for the fix to make it to us: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198203 Vitaliy Margolen

1 0

Some help needed on basic oleacc implementation
by Stefan Siebert July 18, 2006

July 18, 2006

Hello, currently I'm working to get the Notes Client (7.0.x) running on wine. I've done some work on oleacc and so far it seems to work. As this is my first try on ole maybe someone could help out (ie. reviewing my code and tell me what needs to done), so I don't blame myself on getting this patch checked in. Some info on the internals: The Notes Client is linked against the oleacc.dll. On a call to AccessibleObjectFromWindow there's simply no check if it was successfull (S_OK). Next it calls addref and crashes badly. Normally this should be fixed in the Notes Client itself, but I don't know if someone want's this to be fixed at IBM and if they may such things in the productive code stream (although fixes have been done before in Notes 6.5.1 to get it magically running on wine). - Stefan

1 0

Re: Support SAFEARRAY(type) Syntax in MIDL
by Robert Shearman July 18, 2006

July 18, 2006

Dan Hipschman wrote: >diff --git a/tools/widl/widltypes.h b/tools/widl/widltypes.h >index 508284e..ee73ba6 100644 >--- a/tools/widl/widltypes.h >+++ b/tools/widl/widltypes.h >@@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ struct _type_t { > const attr_t *attrs; > func_t *funcs; > var_t *fields; >+ int safearray; > int ignore, is_const, sign; > int defined, written, user_types_registered; > int typelib_idx; > I think this should be implemented by calling reg_types in parser.y with a constructed SAFEARRAY type. This should allow it to be used by the NDR typeformat generation code too. Adding more and more fields to type_t isn't scalable. -- Rob Shearman

1 0

re: ntdll: enable CreateRemoteThread and RtlCreateUserThread for remote processes
by Dan Kegel July 18, 2006

July 18, 2006

Mike wrote: > ... I'm not sure how this works. You create a new "raw" kernel thread > using clone, then run NT code using it. But that isn't valid and may not > work - only threads created by Wine may use Win32. The right thing to do would be to promote the linux thread to be a win32 thread, but as a temporary stopgap, Thomas had the linux thread just do CreateThread and exit, hoping that the newly create Windows thread was healthy. Maybe we should look more carefully about what it takes to build a normal, healthy win32 thread from a posix thread. > You are using ptrace instead of signals. That seems over complex - > signals are designed to interrupt a thread ... Well, kind of. Signals are only delivered when syscalls return, so they won't work well if the thread you pick to molest happens to not make any syscalls for a long time. (Plus, signals aren't completely reliable... see http://www.opengroup.org/austin/mailarchives/ag/msg07173.html for a 2004 proposal for making signals reliable.) > You don't preserve the register state. Really? What's ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGS, pid, NULL, regs) then, chopped liver? :-) > [Why not queue a windows APC?] Well, if Alexandre thinks that's the way to go, that'd be fine. I thought those only fired when the thread in question performed an alertable wait condition (so says http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dllproc/base/queueuserapc.asp ) so it didn't seem like an obvious way to go. - Dan

5 9