October 2010 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: Surprise surprise, "Tmax Window OS" was a complete hoax
by James Mckenzie Oct. 19, 2010

Oct. 19, 2010

Scott Ritchie <scott(a)open-vote.org> wrote: > >About a year or so ago a Korean company called Tmax was claiming to have >developed a new operating system that was 100% fully Windows compatible. > They also claimed to have their own office suite, web browser, and >more, all developed with their own special Korean engineering to keep >the license proprietary. > And they would be 'busted' anyway as Korea is one of the signaturs to the World Digital Copyright agreement. Thanks for seeing them for what they were: False. James McKenzie

1 0

About: d3dx9: Store transform matrix per-sprite.
by Joris Huizer Oct. 19, 2010

Oct. 19, 2010

Hello, In this patch ID3DXSpriteImpl_Flush is adapted; the new loop being like: int i, count, start; /* ... */ for(start=0;start<This->sprite_count;start+=count,count=0) { i=start; while(i<This->sprite_count && (count==0 || This->sprites[i].texture==This->sprites[i-1].texture)) { /* filling in array */ } /* rest of the outer loop, using array and count */ } It seems count is used uninitialised here on the first iteration ? HTH, Joris

2 1

Re: [PATCH 3/3] jscript: Add index, input and lastIndex properties to regexp funtions results
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Oct. 19, 2010

Oct. 19, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6322 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: user32: FindWindow() should treat an empty title same way as NULL. (Resend)
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Oct. 19, 2010

Oct. 19, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6315 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (32 bit win) === win.c:2684: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = 00000000 win.c:2684: Test failed: GetFocus() = 00000000 win.c:2710: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = 00000000 win.c:2710: Test failed: GetFocus() = 00000000 win.c:2769: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = 00000000 win.c:2769: Test failed: GetFocus() = 00000000 === W7PROX64 (64 bit win) === win.c:2684: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = 0000000000000000 win.c:2684: Test failed: GetFocus() = 0000000000000000 win.c:2710: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = 0000000000000000 win.c:2710: Test failed: GetFocus() = 0000000000000000 win.c:2769: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = 0000000000000000 win.c:2769: Test failed: GetFocus() = 0000000000000000

1 0

Surprise surprise, "Tmax Window OS" was a complete hoax
by Scott Ritchie Oct. 19, 2010

Oct. 19, 2010

About a year or so ago a Korean company called Tmax was claiming to have developed a new operating system that was 100% fully Windows compatible. They also claimed to have their own office suite, web browser, and more, all developed with their own special Korean engineering to keep the license proprietary. This lead some here to justifiably worry that they were using Wine code without permission, as well as dozens of other free software projects. At the time I called it an obvious fraud. Anyway I check backed in on it and, no surprise, Tmax Soft has disavowed all knowledge of the project -- the website is dead, no news about it has appeared since the "launch", and although there are several quicksearches on their main website for the product they return no results. Fortunately, with the exception of a few particularly bad tech journalists, no one seems to have been actually fooled. -Scott Ritchie

1 0

Re: [PATCH 6/8] jscript: Added VBArray.getItem() implementation
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Oct. 19, 2010

Oct. 19, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6284 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 8/8] jscript: Added VBArray handling to to_object()
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Oct. 19, 2010

Oct. 19, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6286 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Fwd: Invitation: Apply to be a Mentoring Organization for GCI
by Austin English Oct. 19, 2010

Oct. 19, 2010

I hadn't see any talk about this, so passing this along from Google: -- -Austin ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Carol Smith <carols(a)google.com> Date: Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:10 AM Subject: Invitation: Apply to be a Mentoring Organization for GCI To: Google Summer of Code Mentors List <google-summer-of-code-mentors-list(a)googlegroups.com> Hi everyone, Starting today we are accepting applications from organizations who have participated in a previous Google Summer of Code (you!) to get involved with our contest for 13-18 year olds, Google Code-in [0]. If you haven’t read up about Google Code-in, you can check out our announcement [1] to this list from a couple weeks ago or read our blog post [2] about the contest. If your org has decided it would like to apply to participate in the contest, you can fill out the application [3] on Melange now. The deadline for applications is 29 October at 23:00 UTC. Also, if you want to look over the rules for the contest before applying to participate they can be found on the organization application [3] at the bottom. They will also be posted on the Google Code-in website [0] in the next couple days in other languages. We hope your org will consider participating. [0] - http://code.google.com/gci [1] - http://groups.google.com/group/google-summer-of-code-mentors-list/msg/0985e… [2] - http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2010/10/google-code-in-schools-out-co… [3] - http://socghop.appspot.com/gci/org_app/take/gci_program/google/gci2010/orga… Cheers, Carol

1 0

Apps for Wine on ARM
by Detlef Riekenberg Oct. 18, 2010

Oct. 18, 2010

Here is a free compiler to create apps on ARM: http://www.smorgasbordet.com/pellesc/ (Untested, how this app works in Wine) -- By by ... Detlef

1 0

Re: [PATCH 7/8] jscript: Added VBArray.toArray() implementation
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Oct. 18, 2010

Oct. 18, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6285 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0