May 2010 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

How to Create a Windows shared link in Wine(Ubuntu)
by Harsha Angadi May 26, 2010

May 26, 2010

Hi, I have installed Windows 2003 Server, on that i have installed VMware and in VMware i have installed Ubuntu.Now my requirement is i want to run a Windows Application shortcut from Ubuntu, for that i have installed wine on Ubuntu.Now i have copied and pasted the Shortcut of that Windows Application on Ubuntu's Desktop. When i check the Windows Application shortcut properties its path will be something like this * \\192.168.1.15\Application\Application.exe*, but i am unable to run that Application shortcut in Ubuntu. If i try samething on the other windows system on network it works fine. Actually its a thin client server architecture where i want my thin client to use ubuntu and access the windows application shortcut and run the windows application shortcut on ubuntu.Please help me in this regard. If this is not clear please tell me how should be my input. Thanking you in advance. With Regards, Harsha S Angadi http://www.google.com/profiles/harsha.angadi http://www.linkedin.com/in/harshaangadi http://www.nammagokak.com/discuss

2 1

Re: Voting for own bugs not allowed?
by James Mckenzie May 25, 2010

May 25, 2010

> >On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Vitaliy Margolen ><wine-devel(a)kievinfo.com> wrote: >> On 05/25/2010 03:50 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >>> I'm for a patch to remove voting altogether. >> +1 >> Actually no patch needed. Voting can be disabled via option "usevotes". > >Let's disable it then, but that's no reason to close otherwise valid >bugs as invalid. > Actually, I like Rosanne's idea. Make the field 'Can you reproduce this bug' and not allow the 'confirmed by votes' function. Only a bug report that has been confirmed by an interested developer should be moved into that status and immediately followed by a work-in-progress type status with a dev name associated with it. And I agree that people who report bugs should not be able to confirm, but they can supply hacks/patches that fix the problem... James McKenzie

1 0

Voting for own bugs not allowed?
by Florian Köberle May 25, 2010

May 25, 2010

Hello, just someone informed me that I MUST NOT vote for my own bugs. Is there a reason for it? I like to vote for those of my own bugs which are important to me. It really surprised me that there is this kind of rule and that it can make your bug being closed as invalid: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22857 Best regards, Florian

8 12

Re: atl: reuse code of AtlModuleRegisterWndClassInfoW for AtlModuleRegisterWndClassInfoA (try 2)
by Andrey Turkin May 25, 2010

May 25, 2010

25.05.2010 18:51, André Hentschel wrote: > --- a/dlls/atl/atlwin.h > +++ b/dlls/atl/atlwin.h > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ typedef struct _ATL_WNDCLASSINFOW_TAG > WCHAR m_szAutoName[14]; > } _ATL_WNDCLASSINFOW; > > -ATOM WINAPI AtlModuleRegisterWndClassInfoA(_ATL_MODULEW *pm, _ATL_WNDCLASSINFOA *wci, WNDPROC *pProc); > +ATOM WINAPI AtlModuleRegisterWndClassInfoA(_ATL_MODULEA *pm, _ATL_WNDCLASSINFOA *wci, WNDPROC *pProc); > ATOM WINAPI AtlModuleRegisterWndClassInfoW(_ATL_MODULEW *pm, _ATL_WNDCLASSINFOW *wci, WNDPROC *pProc); > > HDC WINAPI AtlCreateTargetDC(HDC hdc, DVTARGETDEVICE *ptd); > Are you sure about this change?

2 2

Re: winemenubuilder: use the full path to start.exe (try 2)
by Alexandre Julliard May 25, 2010

May 25, 2010

Damjan Jovanovic <damjan.jov(a)gmail.com> writes: > Changelog: > * use the full path to start.exe Why do you need this? -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 2

Re: [4/4] wininet: Add tests for setting and retrieving the context value.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org May 25, 2010

May 25, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2306 Your paranoid android. === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit http) === http.c:406: Test failed: expected status 11 (INTERNET_STATUS_NAME_RESOLVED) 1 times, received 0 times http.c:413: Test failed: expected status 30 (INTERNET_STATUS_SENDING_REQUEST) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:414: Test failed: expected status 31 (INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_SENT) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:415: Test failed: expected status 40 (INTERNET_STATUS_RECEIVING_RESPONSE) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:416: Test failed: expected status 41 (INTERNET_STATUS_RESPONSE_RECEIVED) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:418: Test failed: expected status 110 (INTERNET_STATUS_REDIRECT) 1 times, received 0 times http.c:443: Test failed: Wrong URL http://test.winehq.org/testredirect http.c:148: Test failed: unexpected status 10 (INTERNET_STATUS_RESOLVING_NAME) http.c:410: Test failed: expected status 10 (INTERNET_STATUS_RESOLVING_NAME) 0 times, received 1 times http.c:413: Test failed: expected status 30 (INTERNET_STATUS_SENDING_REQUEST) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:414: Test failed: expected status 31 (INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_SENT) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:415: Test failed: expected status 40 (INTERNET_STATUS_RECEIVING_RESPONSE) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:416: Test failed: expected status 41 (INTERNET_STATUS_RESPONSE_RECEIVED) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:418: Test failed: expected status 110 (INTERNET_STATUS_REDIRECT) 1 times, received 0 times http.c:443: Test failed: Wrong URL http://test.winehq.org/testredirect http.c:148: Test failed: unexpected status 10 (INTERNET_STATUS_RESOLVING_NAME) http.c:771: Test failed: expected status 10 (INTERNET_STATUS_RESOLVING_NAME) 0 times, received 1 times http.c:774: Test failed: expected status 30 (INTERNET_STATUS_SENDING_REQUEST) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:775: Test failed: expected status 31 (INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_SENT) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:776: Test failed: expected status 40 (INTERNET_STATUS_RECEIVING_RESPONSE) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:777: Test failed: expected status 41 (INTERNET_STATUS_RESPONSE_RECEIVED) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:780: Test failed: expected status 110 (INTERNET_STATUS_REDIRECT) 1 times, received 0 times http.c:899: Test failed: failed to read any of the document http.c:2719: Test failed: InternetQueryOption failed: 12018 http.c:2720: Test failed: expected INTERNET_HANDLE_TYPE_HTTP_REQUEST, got 0 http.c:2725: Test failed: HttpQueryInfo failed http.c:2726: Test failed: expected size > 0 Timeout

1 0

Re: [3/3] msi: End the search for a directory signature if the parent cannot be found.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org May 25, 2010

May 25, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2305 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (32 bit package) === package.c:7603: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName1", got "" package.c:7609: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName2", got "" package.c:7615: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName3", got "" package.c:7627: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName5", got "" package.c:7633: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\", got "" package.c:7639: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\", got "" package.c:7655: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName8.dll", got "" package.c:7666: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName10.dll", got "" package.c:11676: Test failed: Expected "{2C5EE045-5C09-40BD-93F8-086EC36919FF}", got "apple" package.c:11703: Test failed: Expected first 3 chars of "{2C5EE045-5C09-40BD-93F8-086EC36919FF}", got "apple" package.c:11713: Test failed: Expected first 37 chars of "{2C5EE045-5C09-40BD-93F8-086EC36919FF}", got "apple" package.c:11723: Test failed: Expected "{2C5EE045-5C09-40BD-93F8-086EC36919FF}", got "apple" package.c:11755: Test failed: Expected "{2C5EE045-5C09-40BD-93F8-086EC36919FF}", got "apple" === W7PROX64 (64 bit package) === package.c:8212: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName1", got "" package.c:8223: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\", got "" package.c:8234: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\", got "" package.c:8284: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName3.dll", got "" package.c:8295: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName5.dll", got "" package.c:8304: Test failed: Expected "C:\", got "" package.c:8310: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\", got "" package.c:8331: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName1", got "" package.c:8340: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName1", got ""

1 0

Re: [PATCH] shlwapi: initial implement of SHAutoComplete (Retry)
by Nikolay Sivov May 25, 2010

May 25, 2010

On 5/25/2010 03:29, Hirofumi Katayama wrote: > See attachment. > Hi. > + list = (LPWSTR) malloc(len); > + free(list); Use HeapAlloc()/HeapFree() for that and others allocations. > + fUnicode = IsWindowUnicode(hwndEdit); > + if (fUnicode) > + pProp = (AUTOCOMPLETEPROP *) GetPropW(hwndEdit, szPropNameW); > + else > + pProp = (AUTOCOMPLETEPROP *) GetPropA(hwndEdit, szPropNameA); This is unrelated thing. You can use GetPropW for non-Unicode windows as well.

1 0

Re: gdi32: Properly restore the DC in MF_PlayMetaFile. (RESEND)
by Alexandre Julliard May 25, 2010

May 25, 2010

Gerald Pfeifer <gerald(a)pfeifer.com> writes: > Any reason why this hasn't been applied yet? It's the updated/fixed > patch per Alexandre's guidance. It breaks the tests. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: shell32: Export lowlevel PIDL manipulation calls by name too (try2)
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org May 25, 2010

May 25, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2299 Your paranoid android. === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit shlfileop) === Can't copy TestLauncher to VM: The command is not recognized by the Guest OS tools

2 1