October 2015 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [1/4] psapi/tests: Disable tests which crash on win10
by Marvin Oct. 3, 2015

Oct. 3, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=16969 Your paranoid android. === w1064 (32 bit psapi_main) === psapi_main.c:157: Test failed: cbNeeded=136 psapi_main.c:644: Test failed: wrong length 3 psapi_main.c:660: Test failed: wrong length 3 === w1064 (64 bit psapi_main) === psapi_main.c:644: Test failed: wrong length 3 psapi_main.c:660: Test failed: wrong length 3

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] reg: simplify root key search
by Stefan Dösinger Oct. 3, 2015

Oct. 3, 2015

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Thanks, this time the patches apply OK for me. I've told Alexandre that the patches look OK to me, let's see what he says. Cheers, Stefan Am 2015-09-03 um 21:51 schrieb Michel Zou: > Split patch from Jonathan Vollebregt: > https://github.com/jnvsor/wine/commit/ea0e2fc70db6ce4904655ea4a27ee34531d96… > --- > programs/reg/reg.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/programs/reg/reg.c b/programs/reg/reg.c > index 4ec25bc..0f28b63 100644 > --- a/programs/reg/reg.c > +++ b/programs/reg/reg.c > @@ -22,6 +22,32 @@ > > #define ARRAY_SIZE(A) (sizeof(A)/sizeof(*A)) > > +static const WCHAR short_hklm[] = {'H','K','L','M',0}; > +static const WCHAR short_hkcu[] = {'H','K','C','U',0}; > +static const WCHAR short_hkcr[] = {'H','K','C','R',0}; > +static const WCHAR short_hku[] = {'H','K','U',0}; > +static const WCHAR short_hkcc[] = {'H','K','C','C',0}; > +static const WCHAR long_hklm[] = {'H','K','E','Y','_','L','O','C','A','L','_','M','A','C','H','I','N','E',0}; > +static const WCHAR long_hkcu[] = {'H','K','E','Y','_','C','U','R','R','E','N','T','_','U','S','E','R',0}; > +static const WCHAR long_hkcr[] = {'H','K','E','Y','_','C','L','A','S','S','E','S','_','R','O','O','T',0}; > +static const WCHAR long_hku[] = {'H','K','E','Y','_','U','S','E','R','S',0}; > +static const WCHAR long_hkcc[] = {'H','K','E','Y','_','C','U','R','R','E','N','T','_','C','O','N','F','I','G',0}; > + > +static const struct > +{ > + HKEY key; > + const WCHAR *short_name; > + const WCHAR *long_name; > +} > +root_rels[] = > +{ > + {HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, short_hklm, long_hklm}, > + {HKEY_CURRENT_USER, short_hkcu, long_hkcu}, > + {HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT, short_hkcr, long_hkcr}, > + {HKEY_USERS, short_hku, long_hku}, > + {HKEY_CURRENT_CONFIG, short_hkcc, long_hkcc}, > +}; > + > static const WCHAR type_none[] = {'R','E','G','_','N','O','N','E',0}; > static const WCHAR type_sz[] = {'R','E','G','_','S','Z',0}; > static const WCHAR type_expand_sz[] = {'R','E','G','_','E','X','P','A','N','D','_','S','Z',0}; > @@ -95,51 +121,26 @@ static int reg_message(int msg) > return reg_printfW(formatW, msg_buffer); > } > > -static int reg_StrCmpNIW(LPCWSTR str, LPCWSTR comp, int len) > +static inline BOOL path_rootname_cmp(const WCHAR *input_path, const WCHAR *rootkey_name) > { > - int i; > + DWORD length = strlenW(rootkey_name); > > - for (i = 0; i < len; i++) > - { > - if (!str[i]) > - { > - len = i + 1; > - break; > - } > - } > - > - return CompareStringW(CP_ACP, NORM_IGNORECASE, str, len, comp, len) - CSTR_EQUAL; > + return (!strncmpiW(input_path, rootkey_name, length) && > + (input_path[length] == 0 || input_path[length] == '\\')); > } > > -static HKEY get_rootkey(LPWSTR key) > +static HKEY path_get_rootkey(const WCHAR *path) > { > - static const WCHAR szHKLM[] = {'H','K','L','M',0}; > - static const WCHAR szHKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE[] = {'H','K','E','Y','_','L','O','C','A','L','_','M','A','C','H','I','N','E',0}; > - static const WCHAR szHKCU[] = {'H','K','C','U',0}; > - static const WCHAR szHKEY_CURRENT_USER[] = {'H','K','E','Y','_','C','U','R','R','E','N','T','_','U','S','E','R',0}; > - static const WCHAR szHKCR[] = {'H','K','C','R',0}; > - static const WCHAR szHKEY_CLASSES_ROOT[] = {'H','K','E','Y','_','C','L','A','S','S','E','S','_','R','O','O','T',0}; > - static const WCHAR szHKU[] = {'H','K','U',0}; > - static const WCHAR szHKEY_USERS[] = {'H','K','E','Y','_','U','S','E','R','S',0}; > - static const WCHAR szHKCC[] = {'H','K','C','C',0}; > - static const WCHAR szHKEY_CURRENT_CONFIG[] = {'H','K','E','Y','_','C','U','R','R','E','N','T','_','C','O','N','F','I','G',0}; > - > - if (!reg_StrCmpNIW(key, szHKLM, 4) || > - !reg_StrCmpNIW(key, szHKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, 18)) > - return HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE; > - else if (!reg_StrCmpNIW(key, szHKCU, 4) || > - !reg_StrCmpNIW(key, szHKEY_CURRENT_USER, 17)) > - return HKEY_CURRENT_USER; > - else if (!reg_StrCmpNIW(key, szHKCR, 4) || > - !reg_StrCmpNIW(key, szHKEY_CLASSES_ROOT, 17)) > - return HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT; > - else if (!reg_StrCmpNIW(key, szHKU, 3) || > - !reg_StrCmpNIW(key, szHKEY_USERS, 10)) > - return HKEY_USERS; > - else if (!reg_StrCmpNIW(key, szHKCC, 4) || > - !reg_StrCmpNIW(key, szHKEY_CURRENT_CONFIG, 19)) > - return HKEY_CURRENT_CONFIG; > - else return NULL; > + DWORD i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(root_rels); i++) > + { > + if (path_rootname_cmp(path, root_rels[i].short_name) || > + path_rootname_cmp(path, root_rels[i].long_name)) > + return root_rels[i].key; > + } > + > + return NULL; > } > > static DWORD wchar_get_type(const WCHAR *type_name) > @@ -237,7 +238,7 @@ static int reg_add(WCHAR *key_name, WCHAR *value_name, BOOL value_empty, > } > p++; > > - root = get_rootkey(key_name); > + root = path_get_rootkey(key_name); > if (!root) > { > reg_message(STRING_INVALID_KEY); > @@ -307,7 +308,7 @@ static int reg_delete(WCHAR *key_name, WCHAR *value_name, BOOL value_empty, > } > p++; > > - root = get_rootkey(key_name); > + root = path_get_rootkey(key_name); > if (!root) > { > reg_message(STRING_INVALID_KEY); > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJV6XG1AAoJEN0/YqbEcdMwWysP/0BvR0rXG67sd/NC5pPItrVv R2bGZceGH8yJpBuYOxpp2W5p9sCRMfoc2giTXrhmvUwVrutXrUbI9c/SqOlLZL6I YLOObNIo/DI6MxBwGaZ2jKGJKWEW3kzg5qKkJWzPIMg92zfbgtQxiTxhvAvd1xaR MxXLzKt+mhMWjPwyFR3omSFCTkvTguWxnXIVEf2S6TRshJnI0A10vJQUj1AC4dsX ZnHZkuXOAgwzgzmvkEnxbNsgkRzqmXCZaUbapcgJ5TXwwuiLMr4AuPbEcYmdf2g+ CqIYeIUYVtbg3pga/9WFdSki0YaAcJJ7kYTt5lEYRN3/V93W6QsPp/SaUXyx1J1B UOCbuj1UNx8OvRRvmABLrTvgbUQMrjlDXPP9QeNBHe8xQCQ1iV/AJ02DdbLrRleJ a/+CgisljGNzuH6Mu+5bKoKAEyEV3KAF3CIz6dJyBB5KQRY6Rk5AZMhWSQAhkJke ICBh+ITIBWYCsm+NDF+RuYutXhtstxvbewRHmwg4KnF2ouOTtQ2ypV+N2Z9JLNQ8 I25+6YB+1WDuDKYa87MPzbac6DX5IyzIPKiGsvLBngMiUcpfSDj6mgJTS4DkTwSM O+JYL5v8x7TIOmxKLGUfXXnvA+aiZ29/nrlLrZY8QoKLvHvpAxOz/SjUhDZa02IC twXso6DreRFxb4DyflTj =BizJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 4

Re: [1/2 v2 resend] user32: Implement semi-stub for FlashWindowEx.
by Marvin Oct. 2, 2015

Oct. 2, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=16960 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit win) === win.c:3417: Test failed: hwnd 0003014E message 0118 === w1064 (32 bit win) === win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x80/0x1c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6680: Test failed: 0x80/0x1010000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x80/0x81c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0/0x41c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x40000/0x41c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x80/0x41c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x80/0x1c50000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6680: Test failed: 0x80/0x1050000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x80/0x1c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6680: Test failed: 0x80/0x1410000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 === w864 (64 bit win) === win.c:3417: Test failed: hwnd 000000000003012C message 0118 === w1064 (64 bit win) === win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x80/0x1c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6680: Test failed: 0x80/0x1010000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x80/0x81c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0/0x41c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x40000/0x41c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x80/0x41c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x80/0x1c50000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6680: Test failed: 0x80/0x1050000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x80/0x1c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6680: Test failed: 0x80/0x1410000: window rect 0,0-1024,768

1 0

Re: [1/2 v2] user32: Implement semi-stub for FlashWindowEx.
by Ken Thomases Oct. 2, 2015

Oct. 2, 2015

On Oct 2, 2015, at 2:59 AM, Jactry Zeng <jzeng(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > + return FlashWindow( pfwi->hwnd, pwfi->dwFlags ); This has a typo. "pwfi" should be "pfwi". You've fixed it in the next patch, which is why it compiles for you, but you have to not introduce it in the first place. :) -Ken

3 2

What is the monetary value of Wine ?
by Tom Wickline Oct. 2, 2015

Oct. 2, 2015

I just wrote a little article on the monetary value of WineHQ, if any of you guys and gals are interested to read it it's located here : http://www.wine-reviews.net/2015/10/the-glass-of-wine-thats-worth-350.html Cheers, Tom

1 0

Re: [7/9] msvcirt: Implement stdiobuf::setrwbuf
by Piotr Caban Oct. 2, 2015

Oct. 2, 2015

On 10/02/15 15:03, Iván Matellanes wrote: > + if (buffer_size < 0) > + return 0; > + if (read_size == 0 && write_size == 0) { > + this->base.unbuffered = 1; > + return 0; > + } Something like this makes more sense (and matches Windows 7 behavior): if (read_size < 0 || write_size < 0) return 0; if (!buffer_size) { this->base.unbuffered = 1; return 0; } Thanks, Piotr

1 0

Re: wininet: Set Content-Length header to zero if the verb is CONNECT.
by Marvin Oct. 2, 2015

Oct. 2, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=16948 Your paranoid android. === w7u (32 bit http) === http.c:5841: Test failed: HttpAddRequestHeadersA failed 12019 http.c:5847: Test failed: HttpQueryInfoA failed 12019 http.c:5848: Test failed: header missing === w1064 (32 bit http) === http.c:534: Test failed: HTTP_QUERY_RAW_HEADERS: expected length 0, but got 1 http.c:534: Test failed: HTTP_QUERY_RAW_HEADERS: expected length 0, but got 1 http.c:534: Test failed: HTTP_QUERY_RAW_HEADERS: expected length 0, but got 1 http.c:534: Test failed: HTTP_QUERY_RAW_HEADERS: expected length 0, but got 1 http.c:534: Test failed: HTTP_QUERY_RAW_HEADERS: expected length 0, but got 1 http.c:1773: Test failed: Expected 2, got 4 http.c:1774: Test failed: Expected CRLF, got ' http.c:2408: Test failed: count was wrong http.c:2409: Test failed: http data wrong, got: Garbage: Header http.c:3072: Test failed: HttpAddRequestHeaders succeeded http.c:3073: Test failed: Expected error ERROR_HTTP_HEADER_NOT_FOUND, got 0 http.c:3078: Test failed: code = 200, expected 400 http.c:3078: Test failed: code = 200, expected 400 http.c:3078: Test failed: unexpected status code 200, expected 400 http.c:3078: Test failed: unexpected status code 200, expected 400 http.c:534: Test failed: HTTP_QUERY_RAW_HEADERS: expected length 0, but got 1 === w1064 (64 bit http) === http.c:534: Test failed: HTTP_QUERY_RAW_HEADERS: expected length 0, but got 1 http.c:534: Test failed: HTTP_QUERY_RAW_HEADERS: expected length 0, but got 1 http.c:534: Test failed: HTTP_QUERY_RAW_HEADERS: expected length 0, but got 1 http.c:534: Test failed: HTTP_QUERY_RAW_HEADERS: expected length 0, but got 1 http.c:534: Test failed: HTTP_QUERY_RAW_HEADERS: expected length 0, but got 1 http.c:1773: Test failed: Expected 2, got 4 http.c:1774: Test failed: Expected CRLF, got ' http.c:2408: Test failed: count was wrong http.c:2409: Test failed: http data wrong, got: Garbage: Header http.c:3072: Test failed: HttpAddRequestHeaders succeeded http.c:3073: Test failed: Expected error ERROR_HTTP_HEADER_NOT_FOUND, got 0 http.c:3078: Test failed: code = 200, expected 400 http.c:3078: Test failed: code = 200, expected 400 http.c:3078: Test failed: unexpected status code 200, expected 400 http.c:3078: Test failed: unexpected status code 200, expected 400 http.c:534: Test failed: HTTP_QUERY_RAW_HEADERS: expected length 0, but got 1

1 0

Wine tests not checking permissions
by Francois Gouget Oct. 2, 2015

Oct. 2, 2015

A number of tests fail if they are not running as an administrator with elevated privileges. These tests should really check they have the needed permissions/privileges and skip if they don't. With Windows 2000 being decomissioned I repurposed it to allow testing running the tests in a regular user account (*) for developers interested in fixing these relatively easy test failures. Bug 39232 - setupapi:install fails if privileges not high enough https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39232 Bug 39231 - setupapi:devinst fails if privileges not high enough https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39231 Bug 39230 - odbccp32:misc fails if privileges not high enough https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39230 Bug 39222 - mstask:task_scheduler fails if privileges not high enough https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39222 Bug 39221 - msi:install fails if privileges not high enough https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39221 Bug 39218 - advpack:advpack fails if privileges not high enough https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39218 Bug 39213 - advapi32:security fails if privileges not high enough https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39213 Bug 39212 - cmd:batch fails if privileges not high enough https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39212 There's also these issues but they cannot be reproduced on that Windows 2000 VM: Bug 39237 - urlmon:sec_mgr fails if privileges not high enough https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39237 Bug 39238 - mscft:inputprocessor fails if privileges not high enough https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39238 Bug 39239 - ole32:compobj fails if privileges not high enough https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39239 Finally the issues below seem to only happen on Windows 2000 though I'm not really convinced that means the tests are right though. Bug 39233 - setupapi:misc crashes if privileges not high enough https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39233 Bug 39234 - setupapi:query fails if privileges not high enough https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39234 Bug 39235 - wintrust:crypt fails on Windows 2000 if privileges not high enough https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39235 Bug 39236 - shell32:shlfileop fails if privileges not high enough https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39236 (*) More precisely Windows 2000 calls that a 'Restricted User Account'. It's an account where the user is not allowed to install applications. This is the sort of accounts that corporate desktops would be configured with. -- Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> http://fgouget.free.fr/ Vote Electronique: Les gens qui votent ne décident rien. Ceux qui comptent les votes décident de tout.

1 1

Re: [PATCH v3] ucrtbase: Make the strtod implementation C99 compatible
by Martin Storsjö Oct. 2, 2015

Oct. 2, 2015

On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Martin Storsjo wrote: > Add a test for ucrtbase that verifies these aspects of the C99 > behaviour of strtod. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjo <martin(a)martin.st> > --- > Changed the overflow checking to use base instead of 10, and added > more test cases, as suggested by Piotr. > --- > configure.ac | 1 + > dlls/msvcrt/string.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++---- > dlls/ucrtbase/tests/Makefile.in | 5 ++ > dlls/ucrtbase/tests/string.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 dlls/ucrtbase/tests/Makefile.in > create mode 100644 dlls/ucrtbase/tests/string.c Any further comments on this? Afaik I've addressed all comments by Piotr so far. // Martin

2 1

Re: [1/2 v2] user32: Implement semi-stub for FlashWindowEx.
by Marvin Oct. 2, 2015

Oct. 2, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=16936 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit win) === win.c:3417: Test failed: hwnd 00030114 message 0118 === w864 (32 bit win) === win.c:3417: Test failed: hwnd 0006012C message 0118 === w1064 (32 bit win) === win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x80/0x1c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6680: Test failed: 0x80/0x1010000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x80/0x81c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0/0x41c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x40000/0x41c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x80/0x41c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x80/0x1c50000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6680: Test failed: 0x80/0x1050000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x80/0x1c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6680: Test failed: 0x80/0x1410000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 win.c:8119: Test failed: msg.message = 31f win.c:8121: Test failed: pos = 008c0078 win.c:8138: Test failed: pos = 01400154 win.c:8140: Test failed: msg.message = 8000 win.c:8142: Test failed: pos = 014a015e win.c:8152: Test failed: msg.message = 8001 win.c:8154: Test failed: pos = 01540140 === w864 (64 bit win) === win.c:3417: Test failed: hwnd 0000000000060100 message 0118 === w1064 (64 bit win) === win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x80/0x1c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6680: Test failed: 0x80/0x1010000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x80/0x81c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0/0x41c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x40000/0x41c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x80/0x41c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x80/0x1c50000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6680: Test failed: 0x80/0x1050000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 win.c:6658: Test failed: 0x80/0x1c10000: window rect 0,0-1024,768 must be in 0,0-1024,728 win.c:6680: Test failed: 0x80/0x1410000: window rect 0,0-1024,768

1 0