March 2015 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: ws2_32: Implement returning the proper time with SO_CONNECT_TIME. (resend)
by Marvin March 4, 2015

March 4, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11869 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit sock) === sock: unhandled exception c0000005 at C0000241

2 1

Re: [PATCH] vbscript: Implemented Asc(try 2)
by Nikolay Sivov March 3, 2015

March 3, 2015

On 03.03.2015 18:00, Shuai Meng wrote: > > > 2015-03-03 18:09 GMT+08:00 Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com > <mailto:bunglehead(a)gmail.com>>: > > You're still leaking memory. > > > Thanks for commenting~ But I would be appreciated if you can explain > this more explicitly, I am not quite familiar with the string functions. Take a look at what to_string() does - you're supposed to free what it returns.

1 0

Re: rpcrt4: Fix argument check in MesEncodeFixedBufferHandleCreate()
by Dmitry Timoshkov March 3, 2015

March 3, 2015

Nikolay Sivov <nsivov(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > + if (((ULONG_PTR)Buffer % 8) != 0) > + return RPC_X_INVALID_BUFFER; Shouldn't this be 'if ((ULONG_PTR)Buffer & 7)' instead? -- Dmitry.

2 1

Re: rpcrt4: Fix argument check in MesEncodeFixedBufferHandleCreate()
by Marvin March 3, 2015

March 3, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11860 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/4] d3d9/tests: Add a test for signed formats.
by Matteo Bruni March 3, 2015

March 3, 2015

2015-03-02 22:29 GMT+01:00 Stefan Dösinger <stefan(a)codeweavers.com>: > + /* The input data was designed for D3DFMT_L6V5U5 and then transfered > + * to the other formats because L6V5U5 is the lowest precision format. > + * It tests the extreme values -1.0 (-16) and 1.0 (15) for U/V and > + * 0.0 (0) and 1.0 (63) for L, the neutral point 0 as well as -1 and 1. > + * Some other intermediate values are tested too. For the 8 bit formats > + * the equivalents of -1 and 1 are -8 and 8, that's why there is no > + * 0xffff input for these formats. The input value -15 (min + 1) is > + * tested as well. Unlike what OpenGL 4.4 says in section 2.3.4.1, this > + * value does not represent -1.0. For 8 bit singed data -127 is tested > + * in the Q channel of D3DFMT_Q8W8V8U8. Here d3d seems to follow the > + * rules from the GL spec. AMD's r200 is broken though and returns a > + * value < -1.0 for -128. The difference between using -127 or -128 as > + * the lowest possible value gets lost in the slop of 1 though. */ For the 8-bit format you mean that 1 is not representable in the signed u/v components, correct? Also "singed" typo, but otherwise good to me. > + static const USHORT content_v8u8[4][4] = > + { > + {0x0000, 0x7f7f, 0x8880, 0x0000}, > + {0x0080, 0x8000, 0x7f00, 0x007f}, > + {0x193b, 0xe8c8, 0x0808, 0xf8f8}, > + {0x4444, 0xc0c0, 0xa066, 0x22e0}, > + }; > + static const DWORD content_v16u16[4][4] = > + { > + {0x00000000, 0x7fff7fff, 0x88008000, 0x00000000}, > + {0x00008000, 0x80000000, 0x7fff0000, 0x00007fff}, > + {0x19993bbb, 0xe800c800, 0x08880888, 0xf800f800}, > + {0x44444444, 0xc000c000, 0xa0006666, 0x2222e000}, > + }; > + static const DWORD content_q8w8v8u8[4][4] = > + { > + {0x00000000, 0xff7f7f7f, 0x7f008880, 0x817f0000}, > + {0x10000080, 0x20008000, 0x30007f00, 0x4000007f}, > + {0x5020193b, 0x6028e8c8, 0x70020808, 0x807ff8f8}, > + {0x90414444, 0xa000c0c0, 0x8261a066, 0x834922e0}, > + }; > + static const DWORD content_x8l8v8u8[4][4] = > + { > + {0x00000000, 0x00ff7f7f, 0x00008880, 0x00ff0000}, > + {0x00000080, 0x00008000, 0x00007f00, 0x0000007f}, > + {0x0041193b, 0x0051e8c8, 0x00040808, 0x00fff8f8}, > + {0x00824444, 0x0000c0c0, 0x00c2a066, 0x009222e0}, > + }; > + /* D3DFMT_L6V5U5 has poor precision on some GPUs. On a GeForce 7 the highest U and V value (15) > + * results in the output color 0xfb, which is 4 steps away from the correct value 0xff. It is > + * not the ~0xf0 you'd get if you blindly left-shifted the 5 bit values to form an 8 bit value > + * though. > + * > + * There may also be an off-by-one bug involved: The value -7 should result in the output 0x47, > + * but ends up as 0x4d. Likewise, -3 becomes 0x6e instead of 0x67. Those values are close to > + * the proper results of -6 and -2. */ > + static const USHORT content_l6v5u5[4][4] = > + { > + {0x0000, 0xfdef, 0x0230, 0xfc00}, > + {0x0010, 0x0200, 0x01e0, 0x000f}, > + {0x4067, 0x53b9, 0x0421, 0xffff}, /* 0x4067, 0x53b9, 0x0421, 0xffff */ > + {0x8108, 0x0318, 0xc28c, 0x909c}, /* 0x8108, 0x0318, 0xc28c, 0x909c */ > + }; What did you mean to put in the comments here? Those currently there match the actual content of the array. > + for (y = 0; y < 4; y++) > + { > + for (x = 0; x < tests[j].width; x++) > + { > + expected_color = expected_colors[y][x]; > + if (!formats[i].blue) > + expected_color |= 0x000000ff; This is clearly my brain failing right now, but why is blue expected to be 0xff when the texture component is missing? > + hr = IDirect3DTexture9_GetSurfaceLevel(texture, 0, &dst_surface); > + ok(SUCCEEDED(hr), "Failed to get surface, hr %#x.\n", hr); > + IDirect3DTexture9_GetSurfaceLevel(texture_sysmem, 0, &src_surface); > + ok(SUCCEEDED(hr), "Failed to get surface, hr %#x.\n", hr); > + > + hr = IDirect3DDevice9_UpdateSurface(device, src_surface, > + &tests[j].src_rect, dst_surface, &tests[j].dst_point); > + ok(SUCCEEDED(hr), "Failed to update surface, hr %#x.\n", hr); > + > + IDirect3DSurface9_Release(dst_surface); > + IDirect3DSurface9_Release(src_surface); > + > + hr = IDirect3DDevice9_Clear(device, 0, NULL, D3DCLEAR_TARGET, 0x00003300, 0.0f, 0); > + ok(SUCCEEDED(hr), "Failed to clear, hr %#x.\n", hr); > + hr = IDirect3DDevice9_BeginScene(device); > + ok(SUCCEEDED(hr), "Failed to begin scene, hr %#x.\n", hr); > + hr = IDirect3DDevice9_DrawPrimitiveUP(device, D3DPT_TRIANGLESTRIP, 2, &quad[0], sizeof(*quad)); > + ok(SUCCEEDED(hr), "Failed to draw, hr %#x.\n", hr); > + hr = IDirect3DDevice9_EndScene(device); > + ok(SUCCEEDED(hr), "Failed to end scene, hr %#x.\n", hr); > + > + for (y = 0; y < 4; y++) > + { > + for (x = 0; x < tests[j].width; x++) > + { > + if (tests[j].width == 4) > + expected_color = expected_colors2[y][x]; > + else > + expected_color = expected_colors3[y]; > + > + if (!formats[i].blue) > + expected_color |= 0x000000ff; > + > + color = getPixelColor(device, 80 + 160 * x, 60 + 120 * y); > + ok(color_match(color, expected_color, 1) > + || color_match(color, expected_color, formats[i].slop_broken), > + "Expected color 0x%08x, got 0x%08x, format %s, location %ux%u.\n", > + expected_color, color, formats[i].name, x, y); > + } > + } Cool additional test for UpdateSurface, thank you for that. Here and in the previous test I guess you might want to put the slop_broken check into a broken(), unless that also fails on Linux.

2 1

Re: [PATCH] vbscript: Implemented Asc(try 2)
by Marvin March 3, 2015

March 3, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11857 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2003std (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w7u (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w8 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH] vbscript: Implemented Asc(try 2)
by Nikolay Sivov March 3, 2015

March 3, 2015

You're still leaking memory.

1 0

Re: [PATCH] uxtheme: Support images in GetThemeBackgroundRegion. (try 2)
by Alexandre Julliard March 3, 2015

March 3, 2015

Mark Harmstone <hellas(a)burntcomma.com> writes: > + /* loop through the image looking for transparent pixels, > + * grouping together horizontal runs into one rect */ > + ptr = bits; > + for (y = 0; y < r.bottom; y++) { > + BOOL trans = FALSE; > + int transstart; > + > + for (x = 0; x < r.right; x++) { > + COLORREF colour = ptr[2] << 16 | ptr[1] << 8 | ptr[0]; > + ptr += 4; > + > + if (colour == transcolour) { > + if (!trans) { > + transstart = x; > + trans = TRUE; > + } > + } else if (trans) { > + rgntemp = CreateRectRgn(transstart, y, x, y+1); > + CombineRgn(hrgn, hrgn, rgntemp, RGN_DIFF); > + DeleteObject(rgntemp); > + trans = FALSE; > + } > + } > + > + if (trans) { > + rgntemp = CreateRectRgn(transstart, y, r.right, y+1); > + CombineRgn(hrgn, hrgn, rgntemp, RGN_DIFF); > + DeleteObject(rgntemp); > + } > + } That's going to be pretty slow. There's a better implementation in winex11.drv:update_surface_region(), you could just copy that. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [1/3] dpnet: Add check for mismatched string lengths (try 2)
by Marvin March 3, 2015

March 3, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11855 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit address) === Failure running script in VM: timed out waiting for the child process

1 0

Re: [1/3] dpnet: Add check for mismatched string lengths (try 2)
by Nikolay Sivov March 3, 2015

March 3, 2015

On 03.03.2015 11:57, Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote: > + hr = IDirectPlay8Address_AddComponent(localaddr, DPNA_KEY_HOSTNAME, &localhost, sizeof(localhost)+2, DPNA_DATATYPE_STRING); > + ok(hr == DPNERR_INVALIDPARAM, "got 0x%08x\n", hr); What happens with size == sizeof(localhost)/2 (or any size that cuts off a string)? Does it make a partial copy? > + hr = IDirectPlay8Address_AddComponent(localaddr, DPNA_KEY_HOSTNAME, "testing", 8+2, DPNA_DATATYPE_STRING_ANSI); > + ok(hr == DPNERR_INVALIDPARAM, "got 0x%08x\n", hr); Please use sizeof() here too.

1 0