May 2016 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: imm32, user32: Create and destroy the default IME window implicitly. (try 3) (resend)
by Alexandre Julliard May 30, 2016

May 30, 2016

Akihiro Sagawa <sagawa.aki(a)gmail.com> writes: > + /* create default IME window */ > + > + if (imm_register_window && needs_ime_window( hwnd )) > + { > + struct user_thread_info *thread_info = get_user_thread_info(); > + thread_info->ime_win_refs++; > + TRACE("ime_win_refs=%u\n", thread_info->ime_win_refs); > + if (thread_info->ime_win_refs == 1) > + { > + HWND win = imm_register_window( hwnd ); > + TRACE("create ime window (hwnd=%p)\n", win); > + } > + } > + > /* send WM_NCCALCSIZE */ Do you have a test showing that this is supposed to happen between WM_NCCREATE and WM_NCCALCSIZE? If not, I think it would be useful to add one. Also since the window class is in user32 now the window creation could probably happen there too. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 2

Re: [PATCH] kernel32/tests: Fix a leak in tests (Valgrind)
by Marvin May 29, 2016

May 29, 2016

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23231 Your paranoid android. === w1064 (32 bit locale) === locale.c:2367: Test failed: LCMapStringEx should fail with bad locale name locale.c:2368: Test failed: unexpected error code -559038737 locale.c:2459: Test failed: Expected lcid == 0, got got 00001000, error -559038737 locale.c:4189: Test failed: IsValidLocaleName should have failed locale.c:4191: Test failed: IsValidLocaleName should have failed locale.c:4558: Test failed: For id 7, expected ret == 4, got 1, error 87 locale.c:4560: Test failed: For id 7, Expected IVC, got '' === w1064 (64 bit locale) === locale.c:2367: Test failed: LCMapStringEx should fail with bad locale name locale.c:2368: Test failed: unexpected error code -559038737 locale.c:2459: Test failed: Expected lcid == 0, got got 00001000, error -559038737 locale.c:4189: Test failed: IsValidLocaleName should have failed locale.c:4191: Test failed: IsValidLocaleName should have failed locale.c:4558: Test failed: For id 7, expected ret == 4, got 1, error 87 locale.c:4560: Test failed: For id 7, Expected IVC, got ''

1 0

Re: ddraw/tests: A spelling fix for a d3d ok() message.
by Marvin May 29, 2016

May 29, 2016

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23226 Your paranoid android. === w864 (32 bit d3d) === d3d.c:2326: Test failed: Unexpected destination texture level pixels; 2031 differences at 0 level d3d.c:2326: Test failed: Unexpected destination texture level pixels; 518 differences at 1 level d3d.c:2326: Test failed: Unexpected destination texture level pixels; 138 differences at 2 level d3d.c:2326: Test failed: Unexpected destination texture level pixels; 46 differences at 3 level d3d.c:2510: Test failed: Unexpected destination texture level pixels; 257 differences d3d.c:2657: Test failed: Unexpected destination texture level pixels; 256 differences at 2 level d3d.c:2657: Test failed: Unexpected destination texture level pixels; 64 differences at 3 level d3d.c:2657: Test failed: Unexpected destination texture level pixels; 16 differences at 4 level d3d.c:2657: Test failed: Unexpected destination texture level pixels; 4 differences at 5 level === w1064 (32 bit d3d) === d3d.c:2326: Test failed: Unexpected destination texture level pixels; 2031 differences at 0 level d3d.c:2326: Test failed: Unexpected destination texture level pixels; 518 differences at 1 level d3d.c:2326: Test failed: Unexpected destination texture level pixels; 138 differences at 2 level d3d.c:2326: Test failed: Unexpected destination texture level pixels; 46 differences at 3 level d3d.c:2510: Test failed: Unexpected destination texture level pixels; 257 differences d3d.c:2657: Test failed: Unexpected destination texture level pixels; 256 differences at 2 level d3d.c:2657: Test failed: Unexpected destination texture level pixels; 64 differences at 3 level d3d.c:2657: Test failed: Unexpected destination texture level pixels; 16 differences at 4 level d3d.c:2657: Test failed: Unexpected destination texture level pixels; 4 differences at 5 level

1 0

Re: d3d9/tests: Fix a trailing ok() '\n'.
by Marvin May 29, 2016

May 29, 2016

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23225 Your paranoid android. === w864 (64 bit device) === device.c:4351: Test failed: cw is 0xf60, expected 0x7f. device.c:4360: Test failed: Callback cw is 0xf60, expected 0x7f. === w1064 (64 bit device) === device.c:4351: Test failed: cw is 0xf60, expected 0x7f. device.c:4360: Test failed: Callback cw is 0xf60, expected 0x7f.

1 0

Re: setupapi: Add stub for setupapi.dll.CM_Get_DevNode_Status
by André Hentschel May 28, 2016

May 28, 2016

Am 28.05.2016 um 15:55 schrieb Rob Walker: > Fixes https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40691 The Ex function is wrong, have a look at msdn

1 0

AW: setupapi: Add stub for setupapi.dll.CM_Get_DevNode_Status
by siro＠das-labor.org May 28, 2016

May 28, 2016

Sent from BlackBerry Z30mcfmrrmf Originalnachricht Von: Rob Walker ef Cm f fmrc Fmrrrfmcfmf J efmf‎ Gesendet: Samstag, 28. Mai 2016 15:56 An: wine-patches R‎ Antwort an: wine-devel(a)winehq.org Betreff: setupapi: Add stub for setupapi.dll.CM_Get_DevNode_Stmcv Fcmmcfvefgermfrrfcm rrfmr Fmatus Ff 4M fete c‎ Ec Fixes https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40691 The application launches cleanly without a backtrace dialog generated by FabCheck.exe (which calls CM_Get_DevNode_Status). Tested on Gentoo Linux (wine - without staging patches). Signed-off-by: Rob Walker <bob.mt.wya(a)gmail.com> --- dlls/cfgmgr32/cfgmgr32.spec | 4 ++-- dlls/setupapi/setupapi.spec | 4 ++-- dlls/setupapi/stubs.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/dlls/cfgmgr32/cfgmgr32.spec b/dlls/cfgmgr32/cfgmgr32.spec index f442157..b6e73ac 100644 --- a/dlls/cfgmgr32/cfgmgr32.spec +++ b/dlls/cfgmgr32/cfgmgr32.spec @@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ @ stdcall CM_Get_DevNode_Registry_PropertyW(long long ptr ptr long long) setupapi.CM_Get_DevNode_Registry_PropertyW @ stdcall CM_Get_DevNode_Registry_Property_ExA(long long ptr ptr ptr long ptr) setupapi.CM_Get_DevNode_Registry_Property_ExA @ stdcall CM_Get_DevNode_Registry_Property_ExW(long long ptr ptr ptr long ptr) setupapi.CM_Get_DevNode_Registry_Property_ExW -@ stub CM_Get_DevNode_Status -@ stub CM_Get_DevNode_Status_Ex +@ stdcall CM_Get_DevNode_Status(ptr ptr long long) setupapi.CM_Get_DevNode_Status +@ stdcall CM_Get_DevNode_Status_Ex(ptr ptr long long) setupapi.CM_Get_DevNode_Status_Ex @ stdcall CM_Get_Device_IDA(ptr ptr long long) setupapi.CM_Get_Device_IDA @ stdcall CM_Get_Device_IDW(ptr ptr long long) setupapi.CM_Get_Device_IDW @ stdcall CM_Get_Device_ID_ExA(ptr ptr long long ptr) setupapi.CM_Get_Device_ID_ExA diff --git a/dlls/setupapi/setupapi.spec b/dlls/setupapi/setupapi.spec index 9bfaadd..a336fc2 100644 --- a/dlls/setupapi/setupapi.spec +++ b/dlls/setupapi/setupapi.spec @@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ @ stdcall CM_Get_DevNode_Registry_PropertyW(long long ptr ptr long long) @ stdcall CM_Get_DevNode_Registry_Property_ExA(long long ptr ptr ptr long ptr) @ stdcall CM_Get_DevNode_Registry_Property_ExW(long long ptr ptr ptr long ptr) -@ stub CM_Get_DevNode_Status -@ stub CM_Get_DevNode_Status_Ex +@ stdcall CM_Get_DevNode_Status(ptr ptr long long) +@ stdcall CM_Get_DevNode_Status_Ex(ptr ptr long long) @ stdcall CM_Get_Device_IDA(ptr ptr long long) @ stdcall CM_Get_Device_IDW(ptr ptr long long) @ stdcall CM_Get_Device_ID_ExA(ptr ptr long long ptr) diff --git a/dlls/setupapi/stubs.c b/dlls/setupapi/stubs.c index ffc766b..e315ea9 100644 --- a/dlls/setupapi/stubs.c +++ b/dlls/setupapi/stubs.c @@ -419,6 +419,26 @@ CONFIGRET WINAPI CM_Get_DevNode_Registry_PropertyW(DEVINST dev, ULONG prop, PULO } /*********************************************************************** + * CM_Get_DevNode_Status (SETUPAPI.@) + */ +CONFIGRET WINAPI CM_Get_DevNode_Status(PULONG pulStatus, PULONG pulProblemNumber, DEVINST dnDevInst, + ULONG ulFlags) +{ + FIXME("%p %p 0x%08x 0x%08x: stub\n", pulStatus, pulProblemNumber, dnDevInst, ulFlags); + return CR_FAILURE; +} + +/*********************************************************************** + * CM_Get_DevNode_Status_Ex (SETUPAPI.@) + */ +CONFIGRET WINAPI CM_Get_DevNode_Status_Ex(PULONG pulStatus, PULONG pulProblemNumber, DEVINST dnDevInst, + ULONG ulFlags) +{ + FIXME("%p %p 0x%08x 0x%08x: stub\n", pulStatus, pulProblemNumber, dnDevInst, ulFlags); + return CR_FAILURE; +} + +/*********************************************************************** * CM_Enumerate_Classes (SETUPAPI.@) */ CONFIGRET WINAPI CM_Enumerate_Classes(ULONG index, LPGUID class, ULONG flags) -- 2.8.3

1 0

Re: [PATCH] comctl32: Use SetRect() instead of open coding it.
by Nikolay Sivov May 28, 2016

May 28, 2016

if (dis->itemAction & ODA_FOCUS) { - rect.left = xbase + xioff - 1; - rect.right = rect.left + txtsize.cx + 2; - rect.top = dis->rcItem.top; - rect.bottom = dis->rcItem.bottom; + SetRect(&rect, xbase + xioff - 1, dis->rcItem.top, rect.left + txtsize.cx + 2, dis->rcItem.bottom); DrawFocusRect(dis->hDC, &rect); } This change is obviously wrong. I think it's better to leave this one as is.

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/3] msctf: Added Push/Pop context tests.
by Marvin May 27, 2016

May 27, 2016

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23219 Your paranoid android. === w1064 (32 bit inputprocessor) === inputprocessor.c:834: Test failed: Deactivation came unexpectedly

2 1

Re: [PATCH 3/3] msctf: Fixed ref counts in tests.
by Marvin May 27, 2016

May 27, 2016

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23220 Your paranoid android. === w1064 (64 bit inputprocessor) === inputprocessor.c:834: Test failed: Deactivation came unexpectedly

1 0

Re: [v2 3/3] d3dx9: Add test for IsParameterUsed function.
by Matteo Bruni May 26, 2016

May 26, 2016

2016-05-23 12:40 GMT+02:00 Paul Gofman <gofmanp(a)gmail.com>: > Signed-off-by: Paul Gofman <gofmanp(a)gmail.com> > --- > dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/effect.c | 537 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > 1 file changed, 321 insertions(+), 216 deletions(-) You forgot the "/tests" part of the patch subject prefix. > +static void test_effect_isparameterused(IDirect3DDevice9 *device) > +{ > + ID3DXEffect *effect; > + HRESULT hr; > + D3DXHANDLE param, tech, param_child; > + unsigned int i; > + > + hr = D3DXCreateEffect(device, test_effect_preshader_effect_blob, sizeof(test_effect_preshader_effect_blob), > + NULL, NULL, 0, NULL, &effect, NULL); > + ok(hr == D3D_OK, "Got result %#x.\n", hr); > + > + tech = effect->lpVtbl->GetTechniqueByName(effect, "tech0"); > + ok(!!tech, "GetTechniqueByName failed.\n"); > + > + param = effect->lpVtbl->GetParameterByName(effect, NULL, "opvect3"); > + ok(!!param, "GetParameterByName failed.\n"); > + ok(effect->lpVtbl->IsParameterUsed(effect, param, tech), "IsParameterUsed should be TRUE for opvect3.\n"); Pretty minor but I would prefer something like ok(..., "Unexpected IsParameterUsed() result for opvect3.\n"); Same for the other IsParameterUsed() ok() calls. > + param = effect->lpVtbl->GetParameterByName(effect, NULL, "arr2"); > + ok(!!param, "GetParameterByName failed.\n"); > + ok(effect->lpVtbl->IsParameterUsed(effect, param, tech), "IsParameterUsed should be TRUE for arr2.\n"); > + for (i = 0; i < 2; ++i) > + { > + param_child = effect->lpVtbl->GetParameterElement(effect, param, i); > + ok(!!param_child, "GetParameterElement failed.\n"); > + ok(!effect->lpVtbl->IsParameterUsed(effect, param_child, tech), > + "IsParameterUsed should be FALSE for arr2[%u].\n", i); > + } You could make a small function from this and use it through. You would check that IsParameterUsed() for the parameter gives the expected result, then enumerate the parameter elements and members and check that they are all unused. BTW, is there any case where IsParameterUsed() for a child is TRUE?

2 1