March 2017 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [PATCH 2/2] comctl32/propsheet: Make the PROPSHEET_RemovePage function similar to PROPSHEET_CleanUp
by Nikolay Sivov March 9, 2017

March 9, 2017

On 09.03.2017 23:20, Hermès BÉLUSCA-MAÏTO wrote: > [PATCH 2/2] comctl32/propsheet: Make the PROPSHEET_RemovePage function > similar to PROPSHEET_CleanUp: > > - Use an auxiliary psp pointer to hold the psInfo->proppage[index].hpage; > > - Check psInfo->proppage[index].hwndPage before destroying the > associated window. > > /* Destroy page dialog window */ > - DestroyWindow(psInfo->proppage[index].hwndPage); > + if(psInfo->proppage[index].hwndPage) > + DestroyWindow(psInfo->proppage[index].hwndPage); Why is this important?

1 0

Re: [1/4] webservices: Unlock critical section before returning.
by Alexandre Julliard March 9, 2017

March 9, 2017

Sebastian Lackner <sebastian(a)fds-team.de> writes: > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Lackner <sebastian(a)fds-team.de> > --- > > Do I have to send feedback to the patches list to make sure it is not missed? ;) Sorry about that. Having replies go to the patches list would make things easier for me, but I expect others prefer to keep wine-patches only for patches. OTOH we already have signoffs in there... -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

5 5

Re: [PATCH] user32: Always send WM_NCACTIVATE when changing the foreground window.
by Alexandre Julliard March 9, 2017

March 9, 2017

Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24(a)gmail.com> writes: > + if (send_msg_old) /* old window belongs to other thread */ > + SendNotifyMessageW( previous, WM_WINE_SETACTIVEWINDOW, 0, 0 ); > + else if (send_msg_new) /* old window belongs to us but new one to other thread */ > + ret = set_active_window( 0, NULL, mouse, TRUE ); > + > + if (GetActiveWindow() == hwnd) > { The active window is per-thread but SetForegroundWindow works across threads, so this can't do the right thing. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH 10/10] wininet/tests: Added more HTTP read tests.
by Marvin March 9, 2017

March 9, 2017

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=29364 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit http) === http.c:5050: Test failed: http.c:314: Test failed: InternetReadFileExW failed: 997 http.c:314: Test failed: unexpected status 100 (INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_COMPLETE) http.c:4634: Test failed: expected status 100 (INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_COMPLETE) 1 times, received 2 times === wvistau64 (32 bit http) === http.c:5050: Test failed: InternetReadFileExW failed: 997 http.c:5056: Test failed: InternetQueryDataAvailable returned: 1(997) http.c:5056: Test failed: size = 10 http.c:314: Test failed: unexpected status 100 (INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_COMPLETE) http.c:5060: Test failed: dwBufferLength = 10 http.c:5061: Test failed: expected status 50 (INTERNET_STATUS_CLOSING_CONNECTION) 1 times, received 0 times http.c:5062: Test failed: expected status 51 (INTERNET_STATUS_CONNECTION_CLOSED) 1 times, received 0 times http.c:314: Test failed: unexpected status 50 (INTERNET_STATUS_CLOSING_CONNECTION) http.c:314: Test failed: unexpected status 51 (INTERNET_STATUS_CONNECTION_CLOSED) http.c:5104: Test failed: expected status 50 (INTERNET_STATUS_CLOSING_CONNECTION) 1 times, received 2 times http.c:5105: Test failed: expected status 51 (INTERNET_STATUS_CONNECTION_CLOSED) 1 times, received 2 times === w2008s64 (32 bit http) === http.c:5050: Test failed: InternetReadFileExW failed: 997 http.c:314: Test failed: unexpected status 100 (INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_COMPLETE) http.c:5061: Test failed: expected status 50 (INTERNET_STATUS_CLOSING_CONNECTION) 1 times, received 0 times http.c:5062: Test failed: expected status 51 (INTERNET_STATUS_CONNECTION_CLOSED) 1 times, received 0 times http.c:314: Test failed: unexpected status 51 (INTERNET_STATUS_CONNECTION_CLOSED) http.c:314: Test failed: unexpected status 100 (INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_COMPLETE) http.c:4634: Test failed: expected status 100 (INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_COMPLETE) 1 times, received 2 times http.c:5105: Test failed: expected status 51 (INTERNET_STATUS_CONNECTION_CLOSED) 1 times, received 2 times === wvistau64 (64 bit http) === http.c:5050: Test failed: InternetReadFileExW failed: 997 http.c:314: Test failed: http.c:382: 0364:Callback 0000000000CC0014 0xdeadbeef INTERNET_STATUS_CLOSING_CONNECTION 0000000000000000 0 http.c:4731: Test failed: expected status 100 (INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_COMPLETE) 1 times, received 2 times === w2008s64 (64 bit http) === http.c:5050: Test failed: http.c:314: Test failed: unexpected status 100 (INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_COMPLETE) http.c:5062: Test failed: expected status 51 (INTERNET_STATUS_CONNECTION_CLOSED) 1 times, received 0 times http.c:314: Test failed: unexpected status 100 (INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_COMPLETE) http.c:4634: Test failed: expected status 100 (INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_COMPLETE) 1 times, received 2 times

2 1

Re: [PATCH 05/10] wininet: Rewrite InternetReadFileEx for http protocol to make use of non-blocking reads.
by Marvin March 9, 2017

March 9, 2017

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=29362 Your paranoid android. === w2008s64 (64 bit http) === http.c:628: Test failed: req_error = 12029 http.c:652: Test failed: expected status 30 (INTERNET_STATUS_SENDING_REQUEST) 1 times, received 0 times http.c:653: Test failed: expected status 31 (INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_SENT) 1 times, received 0 times http.c:654: Test failed: expected status 40 (INTERNET_STATUS_RECEIVING_RESPONSE) 1 times, received 0 times http.c:655: Test failed: expected status 41 (INTERNET_STATUS_RESPONSE_RECEIVED) 1 times, received 0 times http.c:664: Test failed: flags = 8, expected 0 0b30:http: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000000004162E8

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/5] winebus.sys: Handle linux input event device via udev
by Sebastian Lackner March 9, 2017

March 9, 2017

On 27.02.2017 16:09, Aric Stewart wrote: > Signed-off-by: Aric Stewart <aric(a)codeweavers.com> > --- > dlls/winebus.sys/bus.h | 3 + > dlls/winebus.sys/bus_udev.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > dlls/winebus.sys/main.c | 26 ++++++++ > 3 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > I assume this is meant as a fallback, if we don't have access to hidraw, right? If you plan to use this as a replacement for dinput, it would be better to implement it without fixed dependency on udev. > > > 0001-winebus.sys-Handle-linux-input-event-device-via-udev.txt > > > diff --git a/dlls/winebus.sys/bus.h b/dlls/winebus.sys/bus.h > index effbd4afd0..fed35e8c1e 100644 > --- a/dlls/winebus.sys/bus.h > +++ b/dlls/winebus.sys/bus.h > @@ -43,3 +43,6 @@ DEVICE_OBJECT *bus_find_hid_device(const platform_vtbl *vtbl, void *platform_dev > void bus_remove_hid_device(DEVICE_OBJECT *device) DECLSPEC_HIDDEN; > NTSTATUS WINAPI hid_internal_dispatch(DEVICE_OBJECT *device, IRP *irp) DECLSPEC_HIDDEN; > void process_hid_report(DEVICE_OBJECT *device, BYTE *report, DWORD length) DECLSPEC_HIDDEN; > + > +/* General Bus Functions */ > +DWORD check_bus_option(UNICODE_STRING *registry_path, const UNICODE_STRING *option) DECLSPEC_HIDDEN; > diff --git a/dlls/winebus.sys/bus_udev.c b/dlls/winebus.sys/bus_udev.c > index 415bd3db08..2dcc7fb442 100644 > --- a/dlls/winebus.sys/bus_udev.c > +++ b/dlls/winebus.sys/bus_udev.c > @@ -42,6 +42,14 @@ > # include <sys/ioctl.h> > #endif > > +#ifdef HAVE_LINUX_INPUT_H > +# include <linux/input.h> > +# undef SW_MAX > +# if defined(EVIOCGBIT) && defined(EV_ABS) && defined(BTN_PINKIE) > +# define HAS_PROPER_INPUT_HEADER > +# endif > +#endif > + > #define NONAMELESSUNION > > #include "ntstatus.h" > @@ -65,11 +73,15 @@ WINE_DECLARE_DEBUG_CHANNEL(hid_report); > > static struct udev *udev_context = NULL; > static DRIVER_OBJECT *udev_driver_obj = NULL; > +static DWORD disable_hidraw = 0; > +static DWORD disable_input = 0; > > static const WCHAR hidraw_busidW[] = {'H','I','D','R','A','W',0}; > +static const WCHAR lnxev_busidW[] = {'L','N','X','E','V',0}; > > #include "initguid.h" > DEFINE_GUID(GUID_DEVCLASS_HIDRAW, 0x3def44ad,0x242e,0x46e5,0x82,0x6d,0x70,0x72,0x13,0xf3,0xaa,0x81); > +DEFINE_GUID(GUID_DEVCLASS_LINUXEVENT, 0x1b932c0d,0xfea7,0x42cd,0x8e,0xaa,0x0e,0x48,0x79,0xb6,0x9e,0xaa); > > struct platform_private > { > @@ -392,6 +404,52 @@ static const platform_vtbl hidraw_vtbl = > hidraw_set_feature_report, > }; > > +#ifdef HAS_PROPER_INPUT_HEADER > + > +static NTSTATUS lnxev_get_reportdescriptor(DEVICE_OBJECT *device, BYTE *buffer, DWORD length, DWORD *out_length) > +{ > + return STATUS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED; > +} > + > +static NTSTATUS lnxev_get_string(DEVICE_OBJECT *device, DWORD index, WCHAR *buffer, DWORD length) > +{ > + return STATUS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED; > +} > + > +static NTSTATUS lnxev_begin_report_processing(DEVICE_OBJECT *device) > +{ > + return STATUS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED; > +} > + > +static NTSTATUS lnxev_set_output_report(DEVICE_OBJECT *device, UCHAR id, BYTE *report, DWORD length, ULONG_PTR *written) > +{ > + *written = 0; > + return STATUS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED; > +} > + > +static NTSTATUS lnxev_get_feature_report(DEVICE_OBJECT *device, UCHAR id, BYTE *report, DWORD length, ULONG_PTR *read) > +{ > + *read = 0; > + return STATUS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED; > +} > + > +static NTSTATUS lnxev_set_feature_report(DEVICE_OBJECT *device, UCHAR id, BYTE *report, DWORD length, ULONG_PTR *written) > +{ > + *written = 0; > + return STATUS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED; > +} > + > +static const platform_vtbl lnxev_vtbl = { > + compare_platform_device, > + lnxev_get_reportdescriptor, > + lnxev_get_string, > + lnxev_begin_report_processing, > + lnxev_set_output_report, > + lnxev_get_feature_report, > + lnxev_set_feature_report, > +}; > +#endif > + > static void try_add_device(struct udev_device *dev) > { > DWORD vid = 0, pid = 0, version = 0; > @@ -400,6 +458,7 @@ static void try_add_device(struct udev_device *dev) > const char *subsystem; > const char *devnode; > WCHAR *serial = NULL; > + const char* gamepad = NULL; > int fd; > > if (!(devnode = udev_device_get_devnode(dev))) > @@ -419,6 +478,26 @@ static void try_add_device(struct udev_device *dev) > version = get_sysattr_dword(usbdev, "version", 10); > serial = get_sysattr_string(usbdev, "serial"); > } > +#ifdef HAS_PROPER_INPUT_HEADER > + else > + { > + struct input_id device_id = {0}; > + char device_uid[255] = {0}; > + > + if (ioctl(fd, EVIOCGID, &device_id) == -1) > + WARN("ioctl(EVIOCGID) failed: %d %s\n", errno, strerror(errno)); > + if (ioctl(fd, EVIOCGUNIQ(254), device_uid) && device_uid[0]) > + MultiByteToWideChar(CP_UNIXCP, 0, device_uid, -1, serial, 255); I don't think this will work as expected. serial is a NULL pointer, and the check if ioctl() was successful is also done wrong. On error a value < 0 is returned. > + > + gamepad = udev_device_get_property_value(dev, "ID_INPUT_JOYSTICK"); > + vid = device_id.vendor; > + pid = device_id.product; > + version = device_id.version; > + } > +#else > + else > + WARN("Could not get device to query VID, PID, Version and Serial\n"); > +#endif > > TRACE("Found udev device %s (vid %04x, pid %04x, version %u, serial %s)\n", > debugstr_a(devnode), vid, pid, version, debugstr_w(serial)); > @@ -429,6 +508,12 @@ static void try_add_device(struct udev_device *dev) > device = bus_create_hid_device(udev_driver_obj, hidraw_busidW, vid, pid, version, 0, serial, FALSE, > &GUID_DEVCLASS_HIDRAW, &hidraw_vtbl, sizeof(struct platform_private)); > } > +#ifdef HAS_PROPER_INPUT_HEADER > + else if (strcmp(subsystem, "input") == 0) > + { > + device = bus_create_hid_device(udev_driver_obj, lnxev_busidW, vid, pid, version, 0, serial, (gamepad != NULL), &GUID_DEVCLASS_LINUXEVENT, &lnxev_vtbl, sizeof(struct platform_private)); Some linebreaks wouldn't hurt. > + } > +#endif > > if (device) > { > @@ -448,8 +533,17 @@ static void try_add_device(struct udev_device *dev) > > static void try_remove_device(struct udev_device *dev) > { > - DEVICE_OBJECT *device = bus_find_hid_device(&hidraw_vtbl, dev); > - struct platform_private *private; > + DEVICE_OBJECT *device = NULL; > + const char* subsystem; > + struct platform_private* private; > + > + subsystem = udev_device_get_subsystem(dev); > + if (strcmp(subsystem, "hidraw") == 0) > + device = bus_find_hid_device(&hidraw_vtbl, dev); > +#ifdef HAS_PROPER_INPUT_HEADER > + else if (strcmp(subsystem, "input") == 0) > + device = bus_find_hid_device(&lnxev_vtbl, dev); > +#endif It might be easier to just check both after each other, like: device = bus_find_hid_device(...); if (!device) device = bus_find_hid_device(...); > if (!device) return; > > IoInvalidateDeviceRelations(device, RemovalRelations); > @@ -483,8 +577,18 @@ static void build_initial_deviceset(void) > return; > } > > - if (udev_enumerate_add_match_subsystem(enumerate, "hidraw") < 0) > - WARN("Failed to add subsystem 'hidraw' to enumeration\n"); > + if (!disable_hidraw) > + if (udev_enumerate_add_match_subsystem(enumerate, "hidraw") < 0) > + WARN("Failed to add subsystem 'hidraw' to enumeration\n"); > +#ifdef HAS_PROPER_INPUT_HEADER > + if (!disable_input) > + { > + if (udev_enumerate_add_match_subsystem(enumerate, "event") < 0) > + WARN("Failed to add subsystem 'event' to enumeration\n"); Why do you add this match when results are not processed anywhere? > + if (udev_enumerate_add_match_subsystem(enumerate, "input") < 0) > + WARN("Failed to add subsystem 'input' to enumeration\n"); > + } > +#endif > > if (udev_enumerate_scan_devices(enumerate) < 0) > WARN("Enumeration scan failed\n"); > @@ -509,6 +613,7 @@ static void build_initial_deviceset(void) > static struct udev_monitor *create_monitor(struct pollfd *pfd) > { > struct udev_monitor *monitor; > + int systems = 0; > > monitor = udev_monitor_new_from_netlink(udev_context, "udev"); > if (!monitor) > @@ -517,8 +622,27 @@ static struct udev_monitor *create_monitor(struct pollfd *pfd) > return NULL; > } > > - if (udev_monitor_filter_add_match_subsystem_devtype(monitor, "hidraw", NULL) < 0) > - WARN("Failed to add subsystem 'hidraw' to monitor\n"); > + if (!disable_hidraw) > + { > + if (udev_monitor_filter_add_match_subsystem_devtype(monitor, "hidraw", NULL) < 0) > + WARN("Failed to add 'hidraw' subsystem to monitor\n"); > + else > + systems++; > + } > +#ifdef HAS_PROPER_INPUT_HEADER > + if (!disable_input) > + { > + if (udev_monitor_filter_add_match_subsystem_devtype(monitor, "input", NULL) < 0) > + WARN("Failed to add 'input' subsystem to monitor\n"); > + else > + systems++; > + } > +#endif > + if (systems == 0) > + { > + WARN("No subsystems added to monitor\n"); > + goto error; > + } > > if (udev_monitor_enable_receiving(monitor) < 0) > goto error; > @@ -589,6 +713,10 @@ NTSTATUS WINAPI udev_driver_init(DRIVER_OBJECT *driver, UNICODE_STRING *registry > { > HANDLE events[2]; > DWORD result; > + static const WCHAR hidraw_disabledW[] = {'D','i','s','a','b','l','e',' ','h','i','d','r','a','w',0}; > + static const UNICODE_STRING hidraw_disabled = {sizeof(hidraw_disabledW) - sizeof(WCHAR), sizeof(hidraw_disabledW), (WCHAR*)hidraw_disabledW}; > + static const WCHAR input_disabledW[] = {'D','i','s','a','b','l','e',' ','i','n','p','u','t',0}; > + static const UNICODE_STRING input_disabled = {sizeof(input_disabledW) - sizeof(WCHAR), sizeof(input_disabledW), (WCHAR*)input_disabledW}; > > TRACE("(%p, %s)\n", driver, debugstr_w(registry_path->Buffer)); > > @@ -602,6 +730,16 @@ NTSTATUS WINAPI udev_driver_init(DRIVER_OBJECT *driver, UNICODE_STRING *registry > driver->MajorFunction[IRP_MJ_PNP] = common_pnp_dispatch; > driver->MajorFunction[IRP_MJ_INTERNAL_DEVICE_CONTROL] = hid_internal_dispatch; > > + disable_hidraw = check_bus_option(registry_path, &hidraw_disabled); > + if (disable_hidraw) > + TRACE("UDEV hidraw devices disabled in registry\n"); > + > +#ifdef HAS_PROPER_INPUT_HEADER > + disable_input = check_bus_option(registry_path, &input_disabled); > + if (disable_input) > + TRACE("UDEV input devices disabled in registry\n"); > +#endif Does it hurt when both hidraw and input event devices are found? If yes, it would be better to filter duplicates somewhere else, instead of using registry keys. > + > if (!(events[0] = CreateEventW(NULL, TRUE, FALSE, NULL))) > goto error; > if (!(events[1] = CreateThread(NULL, 0, deviceloop_thread, events[0], 0, NULL))) > diff --git a/dlls/winebus.sys/main.c b/dlls/winebus.sys/main.c > index 978540bb17..0388f0263c 100644 > --- a/dlls/winebus.sys/main.c > +++ b/dlls/winebus.sys/main.c > @@ -625,6 +625,32 @@ void process_hid_report(DEVICE_OBJECT *device, BYTE *report, DWORD length) > LeaveCriticalSection(&ext->report_cs); > } > > +DWORD check_bus_option(UNICODE_STRING *registry_path, const UNICODE_STRING *option) > +{ > + OBJECT_ATTRIBUTES attr; > + HANDLE key; > + DWORD output = 0; > + > + InitializeObjectAttributes(&attr, registry_path, OBJ_CASE_INSENSITIVE | OBJ_KERNEL_HANDLE, NULL, NULL); > + if (NtOpenKey(&key, KEY_ALL_ACCESS, &attr) == STATUS_SUCCESS) > + { > + DWORD size; > + char buffer[FIELD_OFFSET(KEY_VALUE_PARTIAL_INFORMATION, Data[sizeof(DWORD)])]; > + > + KEY_VALUE_PARTIAL_INFORMATION *info = (KEY_VALUE_PARTIAL_INFORMATION*)buffer; > + > + if (NtQueryValueKey(key, option, KeyValuePartialInformation, info, sizeof(buffer), &size) == STATUS_SUCCESS) > + { > + if (info->Type == REG_DWORD) > + output = *(DWORD*)info->Data; > + } > + > + NtClose(key); > + } > + > + return output; > +} > + > NTSTATUS WINAPI DriverEntry( DRIVER_OBJECT *driver, UNICODE_STRING *path ) > { > static const WCHAR udevW[] = {'\\','D','r','i','v','e','r','\\','U','D','E','V',0}; > > >

3 5

Re: [PATCH 2/8] wined3d: Unbind textures in context_bind_shader_resources().
by Henri Verbeet March 9, 2017

March 9, 2017

On 9 March 2017 at 10:03, Józef Kucia <jkucia(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Józef Kucia <jkucia(a)codeweavers.com> > --- > > The WINED3D_LEGACY_TEXTURE_BINDING flag should prevent from generating > the "No resource view bound at index" warnings in D3D9-, allows to > safely unbind resources in context_bind_shader_resources(), and make it > easier easier to add support for more samplers in D3D10+. > The issue is texture bindings set through wined3d_device_set_texture(), right? Could we get rid of wined3d_device_set_texture() and create shader resource views for those textures instead, similar to how we create rendertarget views in d3d9, etc.? IIRC one of the issues was interactions with sampler and texture stage states. Tangentially, how does this work with "Aon9" shaders?

2 3

Re: [PATCH] crypt32/tests: Fix a memory leak in testFindCRL.
by Erich E. Hoover March 8, 2017

March 8, 2017

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24(a)gmail.com> wrote: > ... > + store = CertOpenStore(CERT_STORE_PROV_MEMORY, 0, 0, > + CERT_STORE_CREATE_NEW_FLAG, NULL); > + if (!store) return; > + > ... Would you mind adding an error when this happens? Otherwise we may not know that these tests did not run. Best, Erich

2 2

Re: [PATCH 5/5] d3d9/tests: Fix pixel shader version check in test_pointsize().
by Marvin March 8, 2017

March 8, 2017

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=29312 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit visual) === visual.c:7931: Test failed: Input test: Quad 3(2crd-wrongidx) returned color 0x00ff00ff, expected 0x00ff0080 visual.c:8099: Test failed: Got unexpected color 0x00ff0000 for no color attribute test. === w864 (64 bit visual) === visual.c:7947: Test failed: Input test: Quad 3(2crd-wrongidx) returned color 0x00ff00ff, expected 0x00ff0080 visual.c:7995: Test failed: Got unexpected color 0x00007580 for quad 2 (different colors). visual.c:8099: Test failed: Got unexpected color 0x00ff0000 for no color attribute test.

1 0

Re: [PATCH 4/5] d3d9/tests: Skip test_vshader_input() if PS 3.0 isn't supported.
by Marvin March 8, 2017

March 8, 2017

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=29311 Your paranoid android. === w864 (32 bit visual) === visual.c:8099: Test failed: Got unexpected color 0x00ff00ff for no color attribute test.

1 0