March 2017 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: wine/test.h: Identify the process responsible for test summary lines.
by Sebastian Lackner March 12, 2017

March 12, 2017

On 22.02.2017 15:33, Francois Gouget wrote: > Currently the child process summary lines are indistinguishable from the > main process one. This makes it impossible to automatically detect > when a process exits abruptly, i.e. without printing a summary line, > if it has run a subprocess. > This patch will let analysis tools identify which summary lines > correspond to processes they started and thus when some are missing. > Note also that in case of a crash the 'unhandled exception' play the > same role as the test summary lines. Thus it is important to also tag > them with the pid of the source process. > > Signed-off-by: Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)codeweavers.com> > --- > include/wine/test.h | 8 +++++--- > programs/winetest/main.c | 14 +++++++++----- > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) Ugh... actually it looks like we have a summary line hardcoded in schedsvc tests: --- snip --- if (winetest_debug) { fprintf(stdout, "rpcapi: 0 tests executed (0 marked as todo, 0 failures), 1 skipped.\n"); fflush(stdout); } ExitProcess(0); --- snip --- Is it still recognized by the testbot?

2 1

Re: [v3 03/12] comctl32: Added basic implementation for task dialogs and add tests
by Nikolay Sivov March 12, 2017

March 12, 2017

On 10.03.2017 21:21, Fabian Maurer wrote: > + UINT text_size; /* Length in bytes including null-terminator */ > + UINT class_size; /* Length in bytes including null-terminator */ > + struct list entry; > +}control_info; > + > +typedef struct > +{ > + DLGTEMPLATE template; > + WORD menu; > + WORD class; > + const WCHAR *title; > + > + /* Not part of actual template */ > + UINT titleSize; /* Length in bytes including null-terminator */ > +}dialog_header; About formatting issues, for consistency please add space after bracket, same goes for 'if' and other places. "titleSize" -> "title_size". > +#define MEMCPY_MOVEPTR(target, source, size) memcpy(target, source, size); target += size; I think this one will be better as a function, also this macro assumes that target point is char*, which is impossible to guess. > +static void* align_pointer(void *ptr, unsigned int boundary) > +{ > + boundary--; > + return (void *)(((UINT_PTR)ptr + boundary) & ~boundary); > +} This is usually done with macros in Wine I think, like ((x) + size - 1) & ~(size - 1). > +LPDLGTEMPLATEW dialog_template_create(dialog_header header, struct list *controls) Why is 'header' passed by value? > + void *template_data_start; I think it's better to declare this with a type you're going to return. > + data_size += sizeof(WORD)*2 + header.titleSize; Same formatting issue - please add spaces around operator. > + /* Align on WORD boundary for the strings */ > + template_data = align_pointer(template_data, 2); I don't see how it could be not aligned to WORD, could you explain?

2 3

Interested to contribute to WINE via Outreachy
by Himadri Pandya March 12, 2017

March 12, 2017

Hello Everyone, I'm Himadri, an undergraduate student from India pursuing my bachelors in computer engineering. I'm a newbie to the FOSS community and keen to be a part by contributing to some interesting project. And I guess starting the journey with Outreachy would be the best ! Gsoc project : "Tools - Winetest Graphical User Interface" seems quite interesting to me. I would love to be a part of it. It would be really appreciable if I can get some replies about how can I contribute to it. Regards Himadri Pandya Linked In : https://www.linkedin.com/in/himadri2117

3 3

Re: [PATCH] oledb32: Ignore IRunnableObject in IDataSourceLocator_QueryInterface.
by Sebastian Lackner March 12, 2017

March 12, 2017

On 12.03.2017 05:34, Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote: > + else if (IsEqualIID(riid, &IID_IDataInitialize)) > + { > + TRACE("IID_IRunnableObject returning NULL\n"); > + } You are checking for the wrong IID. Also, the TRACE does not really prevent that the FIXME message shows up.

1 0

Re: [v2] user32: Removed 16-bit windows position and size constraints
by Alex Henrie March 11, 2017

March 11, 2017

+ // truncate x,y to 16-bit in WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING message (only) + // truncate x,y to 16-bit in WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED message (only) C++-style comments are not permitted in Wine patches. See https://wiki.winehq.org/Developer_Hints#Using_only_C89-compliant_code -Alex

1 0

GSoC 2017 : CMD - implement more robust parser
by Kevin Jojo March 11, 2017

March 11, 2017

I am Prateek Bilung , a first year undergraduate student of Mathematics & Computing at BIT Mesra ,Ranchi , India. I am interested in contributing for project "CMD - implement more robust parser" . Please guide me . Thank you !

1 0

Re: [PATCH] user32: Removed 16-bit windows position and size constraints
by Alexandre Julliard March 11, 2017

March 11, 2017

Kees Beets <kbeets68(a)gmail.com> writes: > Fixes https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38231 > > Removed code introduced in 2006 to correctly reflect Win9x 16-bit winpos > behaviour. Newer versions of Windows do not have the 16-bit constraint > and this code is now actually causing a bug in Adobe Lightroom on Wine. > I've not used iswin9x to ensure compatibility with Win9x as: > - Applications that can run on Win9x should take care of this > - Adding such code will over time make wine more complex > > Tested on Ubuntu 16.04, HP Elitebook with AMD A10. > 13 failures before change, 10 failures after change. Test code uses > iswin9x, so to have 0 failures means changes to the test suite or > further introduction of 'if isinw9x' logic. > > Signed-off-by: Kees Beets <kbeets68(a)gmail.com> > --- > dlls/user32/winpos.c | 16 ---------------- > 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-) It breaks the tests: ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -T ../../.. -M user32.dll -p user32_test.exe.so win && touch win.ok win.c:776: Test failed: bad winpos->x -32769 win.c:777: Test failed: bad winpos->y -40000 win.c:795: Test failed: bad winpos->x -32769 win.c:796: Test failed: bad winpos->y -40000 win.c:776: Test failed: bad winpos->x 32768 win.c:777: Test failed: bad winpos->y 40000 win.c:795: Test failed: bad winpos->x 32768 win.c:796: Test failed: bad winpos->y 40000 Makefile:649: recipe for target 'win.ok' failed -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 1

Re: [v3 01/12] comctl32: Move TaskDialogIndirect and tests into own source files
by Nikolay Sivov March 11, 2017

March 11, 2017

On 10.03.2017 21:21, Fabian Maurer wrote: > diff --git a/dlls/comctl32/taskdialog.c b/dlls/comctl32/taskdialog.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000..c26d53bac9 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/dlls/comctl32/taskdialog.c > @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ > +/* > + * Task dialog control > + * > + * Copyright 2017 Fabian Maurer for the Wine project > + * > + * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > + * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public > + * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either > + * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. > + * > + * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU > + * Lesser General Public License for more details. > + * > + * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public > + * License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software > + * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA > + * > + */ > + > +#include <stdarg.h> > +#include <string.h> > + > +#include "windef.h" > +#include "winbase.h" > +#include "winuser.h" > +#include "commctrl.h" > +#include "winerror.h" > +#include "comctl32.h" > +#include "wine/debug.h" > + > +WINE_DEFAULT_DEBUG_CHANNEL(commctrl); > + Since it's move to its own file, let's call new debug channel "taskdlg" for instance.

2 2

Re: [v3 02/12] comctl32: Add notification codes and messages for TaskDialog to header
by Nikolay Sivov March 11, 2017

March 11, 2017

On 10.03.2017 21:21, Fabian Maurer wrote: > Signed-off-by: Fabian Maurer <dark.shadow4(a)web.de> > --- > include/commctrl.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/commctrl.h b/include/commctrl.h > index d176b4fd0e..1bf9c279c5 100644 > --- a/include/commctrl.h > +++ b/include/commctrl.h > @@ -5228,6 +5228,38 @@ typedef struct _TASKDIALOG_BUTTON > PCWSTR pszButtonText; > } TASKDIALOG_BUTTON; > > +enum _TASKDIALOG_NOTIFICATIONS > +{ > + TDN_CREATED = 0, > + TDN_NAVIGATED = 1, > + TDN_BUTTON_CLICKED = 2, > + TDN_HYPERLINK_CLICKED = 3, > + TDN_TIMER = 4, > + TDN_DESTROYED = 5, > + TDN_RADIO_BUTTON_CLICKED = 6, > + TDN_DIALOG_CONSTRUCTED = 7, > + TDN_VERIFICATION_CLICKED = 8, > + TDN_HELP = 9, > + TDN_EXPANDO_BUTTON_CLICKED = 10 > +}; This is not how it's defined in SDK (v10). > + > +/* Taskdialog messages */ > +#define TDM_NAVIGATE_PAGE (WM_USER + 101) > +#define TDM_CLICK_BUTTON (WM_USER + 102) > +#define TDM_SET_MARQUEE_PROGRESS_BAR (WM_USER + 103) > +#define TDM_SET_PROGRESS_BAR_STATE (WM_USER + 104) > +#define TDM_SET_PROGRESS_BAR_RANGE (WM_USER + 105) > +#define TDM_SET_PROGRESS_BAR_POS (WM_USER + 106) > +#define TDM_SET_PROGRESS_BAR_MARQUEE (WM_USER + 107) > +#define TDM_SET_ELEMENT_TEXT (WM_USER + 108) > +#define TDM_CLICK_RADIO_BUTTON (WM_USER + 110) > +#define TDM_ENABLE_BUTTON (WM_USER + 111) > +#define TDM_ENABLE_RADIO_BUTTON (WM_USER + 112) > +#define TDM_CLICK_VERIFICATION (WM_USER + 113) > +#define TDM_UPDATE_ELEMENT_TEXT (WM_USER + 114) > +#define TDM_SET_BUTTON_ELEVATION_REQUIRED_STATE (WM_USER + 115) > +#define TDM_UPDATE_ICON (WM_USER + 116) > + Same here, message numbers are defined as enum members. > typedef HRESULT (CALLBACK *PFTASKDIALOGCALLBACK)(HWND, UINT, WPARAM, LPARAM, LONG_PTR); > > typedef struct _TASKDIALOGCONFIG >

2 2

Re: [PATCH 3/5] usp10: Use heap_alloc_zero() instead of HeapAlloc() with HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY.
by Sebastian Lackner March 11, 2017

March 11, 2017

On 09.03.2017 10:37, Henri Verbeet wrote: > -static inline BOOL heap_free(void *mem) > -{ > - return HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, mem); > -} [...] > +static inline void heap_free(void *mem) > +{ > + HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, mem); > +} I'm not sure if Francois is happy with this change. In other dlls, he has made the exact opposite change in his effort to standardize those functions.

4 3