- Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: winecfg: Add wine configuration tab
by Dimitrie O. Paun May 5, 2005

May 5, 2005

On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 12:50:50AM -0500, James Hawkins wrote: > [1] http://winehq.org/site/status_options I'm afraid this page is a bit out of date. It needs lots of love, and I think it would be a worthwhile project to update it. -- Dimi.

1 0

Better PolyLine drawing
by Rein Klazes May 5, 2005

May 5, 2005

Hi, cc to wine-devel: I may overlooked something here. The patch fixes a problem in BigJig a jigsaw puzzle game (free download at www.lenagames.com) when it generates the pieces. The jigsaw piece shapes are generated with a series of short (5-7 points) Polyline calls, followed by a call to FloodFill. Unfortunately in Wine there are sometimes gaps between the polyline segments, leaking the floodfill. In Windows if a line or polyline is drawn from x1,y1 to xn,yn , the pixel at x1,y1 is always painted and the one at xn,yn not (unless it is also painted as another part of the segment), that guarantees that there are no gaps. X11DRV_PolyLine refuses to use the pen if the pen width is zero, it changes the width to 1 instead. This causes 'X' to use an alternate line drawing algorithm, more focused on pleasing appearance then on details like mentioned above. Setting the pen width to zero make all the problems go away. I do not know why the pen width is set to zero, this came into wine somewhere in 1998 before the change to cvs. Arguments against it are: - line drawing with pen width 1 are not like in Windows, in contrast to width 0 are very much like in Windows; - line drawing with pen width 1 is slower; - PolyPolyLine, LineTo and all other algorithms in wine do not do this; - Xlib programming manual recommends not to mix pen with 0 and pen width 1 drawing. I have looked at this both on a Debian XFree86 system and a Suse 9.2 with XOrg. Changelog: dlls/x11drv : graphics.c, pen.c Don't set the pen width to 1 in X11DRV_PolyLine. Rein.

1 0

GetExitCodeProcess always returns 1
by Igor Sysoev May 5, 2005

May 5, 2005

2 years ago I reported that on FreeBSD Wine-20030508's GetExitCodeProcess() always returns 1: http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-devel/2003/06/0100.html It was fixed by patch: http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-devel/2003/06/0381.html and I used the patched Wine-20030508 all the time to run MSVC, OpenWatcom C, and Borland C in a command line. However, when I try to run dmc.exe, sc.exe, or make.exe from Digital Mars C/C++ Compiler, I always see the message: wine: Unhandled exception (thread 0009), starting debugger... I build Wine-20050310, but it has the same two problems: 1) GetExitCodeProcess() always returns 1 on FreeBSD 5.3, 2) and wine could not run Digital Mars C/C++ Compiler. Digital Mars C/C++ Compiler is could be downloaded here: http://www.digitalmars.com/download/freecompiler.html Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru/en/

2 1

Cannot compile man pages outside source directory
by William Poetra Yoga H May 5, 2005

May 5, 2005

I realized today that we can't compile man pages outside the source directory, c2man complains about being unable to find .c files. I modified a line in dlls/Makedll.in: $(C2MAN) -o $(TOPOBJDIR)/documentation/man$(api_manext) -R$(TOPOBJDIR) -S$(api_manext) $(INCLUDES) $(MAINSPEC:%=-w %) $(SPEC_SRCS16:%=-w %) $(C_SRCS) $(C_SRCS16) so that it becomes: cd $(SRCDIR) && $(C2MAN) -o $(TOPOBJDIR)/documentation/man$(api_manext) -R$(TOPOBJDIR) -S$(api_manext) $(INCLUDES) $(MAINSPEC:%=-w %) $(SPEC_SRCS16:%=-w %) $(C_SRCS) $(C_SRCS16) Then, because documentation/man3w should be in the build directory, we have to modify TOPSRCDIR and TOPOBJDIR for the makefiles. I modified them to: TOPSRCDIR = @abs_top_srcdir@ TOPOBJDIR = @abs_top_builddir@ Is this correct? I'm testing it (my machine's slow) to see if it breaks anything. I've just done for i in `find -name Makefile.in` do cat $i | sed \ -e s/TOPSRCDIR = .*/TOPSRCDIR = @abs_top_srcdir@/ \ -e s/TOPOBJDIR = .*/TOPOBJDIR = @abs_top_builddir@/ \ > $i.new cat $i.new > $i rm $i.new done and the patch is quite large, about 130k, so maybe I won't post it here (straight to wine-patches if it's ok). Just the first 2: Index: Makefile.in =================================================================== RCS file: /home/wine/wine/Makefile.in,v retrieving revision 1.161 diff -u -p -r1.161 Makefile.in --- Makefile.in 2 Mar 2005 12:18:55 -0000 1.161 +++ Makefile.in 4 May 2005 10:19:18 -0000 @@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ # Directories -TOPSRCDIR = @top_srcdir@ -TOPOBJDIR = . +TOPSRCDIR = @abs_top_srcdir@ +TOPOBJDIR = @abs_top_builddir@ SRCDIR = @srcdir@ VPATH = @srcdir@ LIBEXT = @LIBEXT@ Index: dlls/Makedll.rules.in =================================================================== RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/Makedll.rules.in,v retrieving revision 1.71 diff -u -p -r1.71 Makedll.rules.in --- dlls/Makedll.rules.in 8 Mar 2005 16:55:26 -0000 1.71 +++ dlls/Makedll.rules.in 4 May 2005 10:19:18 -0000 @@ -61,13 +61,13 @@ $(MAINSPEC).c: $(MAINSPEC) $(RC_SRCS:.rc # Rules for auto documentation man: $(C_SRCS) - $(C2MAN) -o $(TOPOBJDIR)/documentation/man$(api_manext) -R$(TOPOBJDIR) -S$(api_manext) $(INCLUDES) $(MAINSPEC:%=-w %) $(SPEC_SRCS16:%=-w %) $(C_SRCS) $(C_SRCS16) + cd $(SRCDIR) && $(C2MAN) -o $(TOPOBJDIR)/documentation/man$(api_manext) -R$(TOPOBJDIR) -S$(api_manext) $(INCLUDES) $(MAINSPEC:%=-w %) $(SPEC_SRCS16:%=-w %) $(C_SRCS) $(C_SRCS16) doc-html: $(C_SRCS) - $(C2MAN) -o $(TOPOBJDIR)/documentation/html -R$(TOPSRCDIR) $(INCLUDES) -Th $(MAINSPEC:%=-w %) $(SPEC_SRCS16:%=-w %) $(C_SRCS) $(C_SRCS16) + cd $(SRCDIR) && $(C2MAN) -o $(TOPOBJDIR)/documentation/html -R$(TOPSRCDIR) $(INCLUDES) -Th $(MAINSPEC:%=-w %) $(SPEC_SRCS16:%=-w %) $(C_SRCS) $(C_SRCS16) doc-sgml: $(C_SRCS) - $(C2MAN) -o $(TOPOBJDIR)/documentation/api-guide -R$(TOPSRCDIR) $(INCLUDES) -Ts $(MAINSPEC:%=-w %) $(SPEC_SRCS16:%=-w %) $(C_SRCS) $(C_SRCS16) + cd $(SRCDIR) && $(C2MAN) -o $(TOPOBJDIR)/documentation/api-guide -R$(TOPSRCDIR) $(INCLUDES) -Ts $(MAINSPEC:%=-w %) $(SPEC_SRCS16:%=-w %) $(C_SRCS) $(C_SRCS16) .PHONY: man doc-html doc-sgml William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

2 3

Re: unix filenames in notepad
by William Poetra Yoga H May 5, 2005

May 5, 2005

--- Paul van Schayck <polleke(a)gmail.com> wrote: > We do need this for winecfg. If you want to setup virtual drive you do > want to see the full unix fs. Winecfg needs to have to unix paths. > Putting conversion code in winecfg was not really acceptable, an > extension to was. > > This extension will become even more valuable because we want winecfg > (or wine in particular) to start without having any virtual drive. > People might have removed all drives (with winecfg). > > Paul > But surely, for this particular winecfg program we don't need to add extensions to all of wine, right? I mean, if we extend the API this way, more will come. And it's actually easier to extend than to trim down, so I say we'd better not add this extension. About winecfg, why not have a unix, text-based version of winecfg? More like Linux's make config IMO. Then when the drives are already set up, we can run the 'real' winecfg. William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

problems with electronics workbench (ewb)
by Zé May 5, 2005

May 5, 2005

When i run Electronic work bench exe with wine i get this: ]$ wine WEWB32.EXE Loading required GL library /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2 fixme:ntdll:TIME_GetTZAsStr Can't match system time zone name "WEST", bias=-60 and dst=1 to an entry in TZ_INFO. Please add appropriate entry to TZ_INFO and submit as patch to wine-patches fixme:font:WineEngRemoveFontResourceEx :stub And when using it, if i click in some icon then it stays black. Any help? Note: im using last wine release -- Zé Linux user #378762

1 0

Re: DirectX 9 patches
by Vincent Béron May 5, 2005

May 5, 2005

Hi Jesse, The failures you see are only whitespace changes. Either make patch skip whitespace changes, or apply the following patch to Olivier's patch prior to apply it to your tree. Vincent

3 6

Re: crypt32: CryptProtectData/CryptUnprotectData
by Alexandre Julliard May 4, 2005

May 4, 2005

Kees Cook <kees(a)outflux.net> writes: > ChangeLog: > Black-box implementation of CryptProtectData/CryptUnprotectData > > This is a resend, since it looks like current patches are making their > way into CVS now. :) It was reviewed last week by several people, and > includes docs, tests, etc. I don't understand while you come up with such an elaborate scheme of storing things in the registry when it's clearly not the way this thing is supposed to work. If you can't figure out what Windows does, then just xoring the data with 0xdeadbeef or something like this would be at least as secure as your solution, and would actually be much closer to the proper behavior. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

3 8

wineconf presentations
by Ivan Leo Puoti May 4, 2005

May 4, 2005

Please send all presentations/PDFs/whatever to ivanleo(a)gmail.com and I'll upload them to the server that will be providing the wineconf videos. Ivan.

2 1

Development method
by David Hemmo May 4, 2005

May 4, 2005

Hello, Right now, each time I make a modification (even one line) I do a 'make' followed by a 'make install'. Is there a faster way ? Thanks David Hemmo

4 5