- Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: wine/ misc/registry.c documentation/samples/config
by Steven Edwards March 14, 2005

March 14, 2005

Hi, --- Mike McCormack <mike(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > People would moan and complain, but in the end Wine and Wine users would > be better off, as they would no longer depend on anything but Wine to > run their Windows software. I have to agree. Short term being able to load the Windows registry and Windows system dlls helped Wine but long term it has led to stagnation. Most of the recent growth in Wine in past few years has been because we are being forced to not be dependant on a existing Windows install or Windows componates such as DCOM IE, MSI, etc which is a good thing. Thanks Steven __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Make Yahoo! your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

8 13

[ARTWORK] icon: "My Computer"
by egore March 14, 2005

March 14, 2005

Hi list, I drew a simple icon that COULD be used as a replacement for the current one. I don't know if anyone of you likes it, so please tell me what you think. Tell me if you like it, if you hate if, what could be done better, etc. The icon can be found in different sizes (and in a scalable format) at http://www.egore911.de/vype/wine/ Regards, Christoph Brill aka egore911

6 6

Re: Wine Start Menu in the Desktop Applications Menu
by Dan Kegel March 14, 2005

March 14, 2005

Jeff Waugh (jeff.waugh_at_ubuntu.com) wrote: >> The PowerPC version of the packages, however, is another issue. >> Obviously, we can't make Wine work with i386-compiled apps on PPC, > > (There's an awesome opportunity for qemu integration there...) Yeah, that's something the folks at http://darwine.opendarwin.org have been thinking about for some time, and to some extent trying. You might give them a shout... - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

1 0

Re: [X11DRV] Fix X11 Device list leak
by rob March 14, 2005

March 14, 2005

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Raphael fenix-at-club-internet.fr |Wine Mailing Lists| wrote: |Hi, | |Changelog: | - XListInputDevices spec say that device list should be freed using |XFreeDeviceList | - better robustness on X11DRV_AttachEventQueueToTablet | |I hope it helps to fix bug 2017 (http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017) | |Regards, |Raphael Thanks for submitting this patch. These are exactly the fixes I was about to submit! Your patch should should have a major impact on users of applications which use the wintab library: They should all start to function to some degree. Apologies for not commenting on patch/ submitting a fix earlier.... A major knee operation has put me out of action for the last few weeks. P.S. Please don't expect timely responses to mails for at least another week. I'll try my best to respond, but can't promise anything. Cheers ~ -Rob. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCNPgCKeDvIR8zB68RAgQ3AJ9BA00ZgtZd/HXWy0nOPa3xpWaO3QCfcvVJ RC2lSu6lgqZocJkohkYi/WE= =fFJD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Re: Borland C++ Buildeer under Wine
by Oliver Stieber March 14, 2005

March 14, 2005

--- Andrew Neil Ramage <nrsc16850(a)blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > It's an old version - 3 IIRC. It starts, but the > Borland window (menu > bar across top) flickers and no other windows open. > I'll see if I've got a copy on a cover disk. CBuilder defiantly used to work. > Andrew > > > > Oliver Stieber wrote: > > --- Andrew Neil Ramage > <nrsc16850(a)blueyonder.co.uk> > > wrote: > > > >>Below is the last three lines of error messages > >>printed when I tried to > >>run Borland C++ Builder under wine. (There were > >>pages and pages of > >>error messages after I hit Ctrl-C in the terminal > I > >>had started BCB.EXE > >>from.) > >> > >>Is this a known bug in Wine ? > >> > >>err:syslevel:_EnterSysLevel (0x40797840, level 2): > >>Holding 0x4083ccc0, > >>level 3. Expect deadlock! > >>err:syslevel:_CheckNotSysLevel Holding lock > >>0x4083ccc0 level 3 > >>err:seh:setup_exception stack overflow 176 bytes > in > >>thread 0009 eip > >>004078d5 esp 405b0f50 stack 0x405b0000-0x406b0000 > >>[andrew(a)zeus BIN]$ > >> > > > > The stack overflow looks like somethings got stuck > in > > a loop, which is problably why there were pages > and > > pages of messages. > > > > What version of CBuilder are you using, CBuilder > <=5 > > used to work. > > > > > http://www.borland.com/products/downloads/download_cbuilderx.html > > CBuilder X claims to run on linux OOTB. > > > > > > I've got standard on the shelf, > > > >>-- > >> > >>Andrew > >> > >>[hackcoughsniffle] > >>Internal Virus Database corrupt > >> > >> > > > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends > http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com > > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

1 0

Re: Borland C++ Buildeer under Wine
by Oliver Stieber March 14, 2005

March 14, 2005

--- Andrew Neil Ramage <nrsc16850(a)blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > It's an old version - 3 IIRC. It starts, but the > Borland window (menu > bar across top) flickers and no other windows open. > I'll see if I've got a copy on a cover disk. CBuilder defiantly used to work. > Andrew > > > > Oliver Stieber wrote: > > --- Andrew Neil Ramage > <nrsc16850(a)blueyonder.co.uk> > > wrote: > > > >>Below is the last three lines of error messages > >>printed when I tried to > >>run Borland C++ Builder under wine. (There were > >>pages and pages of > >>error messages after I hit Ctrl-C in the terminal > I > >>had started BCB.EXE > >>from.) > >> > >>Is this a known bug in Wine ? > >> > >>err:syslevel:_EnterSysLevel (0x40797840, level 2): > >>Holding 0x4083ccc0, > >>level 3. Expect deadlock! > >>err:syslevel:_CheckNotSysLevel Holding lock > >>0x4083ccc0 level 3 > >>err:seh:setup_exception stack overflow 176 bytes > in > >>thread 0009 eip > >>004078d5 esp 405b0f50 stack 0x405b0000-0x406b0000 > >>[andrew(a)zeus BIN]$ > >> > > > > The stack overflow looks like somethings got stuck > in > > a loop, which is problably why there were pages > and > > pages of messages. > > > > What version of CBuilder are you using, CBuilder > <=5 > > used to work. > > > > > http://www.borland.com/products/downloads/download_cbuilderx.html > > CBuilder X claims to run on linux OOTB. > > > > > > I've got standard on the shelf, > > > >>-- > >> > >>Andrew > >> > >>[hackcoughsniffle] > >>Internal Virus Database corrupt > >> > >> > > > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends > http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com > > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

1 0

Re: [documentation] winedev-kernel
by Dmitry Timoshkov March 13, 2005

March 13, 2005

"Eric Pouech" <pouech-eric(a)wanadoo.fr> wrote: > + <title>File management</title> > + <para> > + With time, Windows API comes closer to the old Unix paradigm "Everything > + is a file". Even if it grew better over the years, it's still not 100% > + there (for example, you cannot use <function>ReadFile()</function> over > + a socket handle). Is it really true? >From MSDN: BOOL ReadFile( HANDLE hFile, LPVOID lpBuffer, DWORD nNumberOfBytesToRead, LPDWORD lpNumberOfBytesRead, LPOVERLAPPED lpOverlapped ); Parameters hFile [in] Handle to the file to be read. The file handle must have been created with the GENERIC_READ access right. For more information, see File Security and Access Rights. For asynchronous read operations, hFile can be any handle opened with the FILE_FLAG_OVERLAPPED flag by the CreateFile function, or a socket handle returned by the socket or accept function. -- Dmitry.

3 6

Help fixing updown (comctl32) bug?
by C. Scott Ananian March 13, 2005

March 13, 2005

I have an open-source Windows application I'm trying to get to run under Wine (sd -- it's in the wine applications database). The particular issue I'd dealing with (at the moment) is a UDM_GETPOS message to an updown control. This is the code in the source application. ui_options.sequence_num_override = SendMessage(GetDlgItem(hwnd, IDC_SEQ_NUM_OVERRIDE_SPIN), UDM_GETPOS, 0, 0L); Under windows, when you just click 'ok' on the dialog without touching the updown control, this SendMessage returns '0'. Under wine, it returns 65536. Looking at the code (wine-cvs/dlls/comctl32/updown.c:2049): case UDM_GETPOS: temp = UPDOWN_GetBuddyInt (infoPtr); return MAKELONG(infoPtr->CurVal, temp ? 0 : 1); So, the different between Windows and Wine is that 'GetBuddyInt' (or its equivalent on Windows) is returning TRUE on Windows and FALSE in Wine. Digging down a level, the first lines of code in UPDOWN_GetBuddyInt are (wine-cvs/dlls/comctl32/updown.c:267): static BOOL UPDOWN_GetBuddyInt (UPDOWN_INFO *infoPtr) { WCHAR txt[20], sep, *src, *dst; int newVal; if (!IsWindow(infoPtr->Buddy)) return FALSE; ------- tracing through GetBuddyInt in Wine, this is as far as it gets. IsWindow returns FALSE, and so GetBuddyInt returns FALSE. But this is very puzzling: if I click one of the controls on the updown control, GetBuddyInt will eventually return TRUE. I don't really understand the purpose of the 'IsWindow' call here -- can anyone who understands the code a bit better explain to me how infoPtr->Buddy could get 'de-windowized'? I don't see anyplace in the code where Buddy gets reassigned, and turning on tracing doesn't show anything suspicious, and I've having great trouble getting gdb to set an appropriate watchpoint for me. Does anyone else have any insights? --scott KUCAGE KMPLEBE class struggle Cocaine UKUSA SCRANGER early warning colonel Bejing AELADLE LICOZY for Dummies ammunition ESODIC Treasury ( http://cscott.net/ )

1 0

Winston.exe or Elster-Formular
by Dietrich Teickner March 13, 2005

March 13, 2005

Has anyone tested "Winston" with wine ? This is a replacement for the german tax-program "Elster". If yes, how does the internet-connection works ? Inside Odin(wine-for os\2) overwrites any os-function the WSALastError ( redirected LastError) with any LastError. I know Wine works in the same manner. After redirect the WSALastError to any Tls (only for test), "Winston" will work. Dietrich

2 1

Re: [documentation] winedev-kernel
by Dimitrie O. Paun March 13, 2005

March 13, 2005

On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 09:29:44PM +0100, Eric Pouech wrote: > some DocBook cosmetic stuff, and new docu (file management being the most > important one) Very nice! Does this complete task Documentation/Devel Guide/6 on the TODO list? -- Dimi.

2 2