- Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [LostWages] make winehq.org HTML 4.01 Transitional + XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid
by Brian Vincent March 30, 2004

March 30, 2004

> Dimi, I still don't get you, what you are saying is: > changing class=todo to class=done is considerably easier then > changing class="todo" to class="done" Rule #1: whoever is willing to do the thankless job of maintaining pages on the web site gets to tell anyone else how they'd like the formatting to be. Since this issue has directly affected me in the past I will point out a real argument for making this stuff compliant: If I copy and paste the HTML into a WWN it would be nice if I didn't have to do a ton of markup to make it well-formed. In fact, I almost never reference anything on WineHQ for that very reason. For example, in issue #143 I went through the markup for the original to-do list and corrected it (which is interesting to look at now, btw). Likewise, it's simple to copy things into the documentation. A good example of which is: http://www.winehq.com/site/status_options Parts of which may end up in the User Guide. But that's just me, and I ain't the one maintaining it. So if Dimi doesn't want it then I guess the best thing to do would be to resubmit with those parts left out. -brian

1 0

Re: [LostWages] make winehq.org HTML 4.01 Transitional + XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid
by Dimitrie O. Paun March 30, 2004

March 30, 2004

On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, hatky wrote: > Yes, this time with the patch... > > Change log: > Ofir Petruska <hatky(a)users.sf.net> > Validate the site as HTML 4.01 Transitional + XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid > (still declaring declaring HTML 4.01 Transitional) > * Case fixes (all html tags should be lower case) > * Quote all attributes > * End empty tags as " />" Jeremy, Please don't apply this patch to the pages I maintain: TODO, Fun Projects, Janitorial, Winelib, Status | Options, Status | Porting As I've tried to explain in the past, these changes are totally unnecessary for manually maintained pages: it makes it harder to maintain, for the benefit of making it easier for the machine to parse. Bad tradeoff, especially given that we maintain these pages daily, and the machine has absolutely no problem parsing them. Thanks. -- Dimi.

2 1

RE: Handling dialogs created without using templates
by Santosh Siddheshwar March 30, 2004

March 30, 2004

Hi, Yes attached is a sample which is pretty similar to what I described below. Regards Santosh Siddheshwar <<GetParent.zip>> > -----Original Message----- > From: Dmitry Timoshkov [SMTP:dmitry(a)baikal.ru] > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 12:51 PM > To: Santosh Siddheshwar > Cc: wine-devel(a)winehq.com > Subject: Re: Handling dialogs created without using templates > > "Santosh Siddheshwar" <santosh.s(a)sonata-software.com> wrote: > > > I have an application that creates dialogs without using any of the > Win32 > > Dialog creation APIs. I find that a lot of the > > functionality in DEFDLG_Proc (DM_SETDEFID, DM_GETDEFID & WM_NEXTDLGCTL) > is > > unavailable for use with > > dialogs created this way. This is because we allocate the DIALOGINFO > > structure only in the dialog creation APIs. Dialogs > > created without using these APIs have NULL DIALOGINFO structure. I also > find > > that allocating this structure and initializing > > the members of the structure will get around this problem. Does anyone > > visualize any problems with this approach? > > Also where would the best place to put such code? > > Do you have a small, self-contained sample code which demonstrates > what you have described? > > -- > Dmitry. ********************************************************************* Disclaimer: The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential / privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee or addressees. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message, you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. *********************************************************************

2 1

Handling dialogs created without using templates
by Santosh Siddheshwar March 30, 2004

March 30, 2004

Hi, I have an application that creates dialogs without using any of the Win32 Dialog creation APIs. I find that a lot of the functionality in DEFDLG_Proc (DM_SETDEFID, DM_GETDEFID & WM_NEXTDLGCTL) is unavailable for use with dialogs created this way. This is because we allocate the DIALOGINFO structure only in the dialog creation APIs. Dialogs created without using these APIs have NULL DIALOGINFO structure. I also find that allocating this structure and initializing the members of the structure will get around this problem. Does anyone visualize any problems with this approach? Also where would the best place to put such code? Regards Santosh Siddheshwar ********************************************************************* Disclaimer: The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential / privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee or addressees. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message, you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. *********************************************************************

2 1

Re: [LostWages] make winehq.org HTML 4.01 Transitional + XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid
by Maxime Bellengé March 30, 2004

March 30, 2004

Hello, I think you forgot the patch On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 00:08, hatky wrote: > Change log: > Ofir Petruska <hatky(a)users.sf.net> > Validate the site as HTML 4.01 Transitional + XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid > (still declaring declaring HTML 4.01 Transitional) > * Case fixes (all html tags should be lower case) > * Quote all attributes > * End empty tags as " />" -- Maxime Bellengé <maxime.bellenge(a)laposte.net>

2 1

Re: systray in desktop mode [unified resend]
by Mike Hearn March 30, 2004

March 30, 2004

On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 22:19, Martin Fuchs wrote: > Then I don't see how you want to be able to handle shell applications > like Explorer and enable the systray icons in them. Explorer isn't really a useful app to run for us, so if systray handling doesn't work quite right for it we won't be losing sleep over it. However, we do want native shell32 to work, so it'll be using the same protocol. > Well, let's see how far Mike's upcoming rewritten systray can handle this. > I may have a look in the new code, and see if I it's possible to do it > without knowing about the desktop mode. Getting explorer/systray to work in Wine may not be easy, however ReactOS and Wine should be able to share the same shell32 which I think is the idea, yes?

2 1

kernel32 test failures under Cygwin
by Dmitry Timoshkov March 30, 2004

March 30, 2004

Hello all, today I decided to play a bit with Wine compilation under Cygwin. This time I decided to run kernel32 tests as well. I've got the following failures: generated.c:542: Test failed: TYPE_ALIGNMENT(*(LPWIN32_STREAM_ID)0) == 8 (expected 4) generated: 842 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 1 failure. * NOTE: the same test compiled by cl.exe (MS compiler) works as expected, * so that's most likely a gcc bug. (gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special)) pipe: 5614 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 4869 failures. * NOTE: the same test compiled by cl.exe hangs forever at: * pipe.c:285:Server done writing. process: 373 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 97 failures * NOTE: the same test compiled by cl.exe gives different result: * process: 376 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 10 failures. Since this is a fresh Cygwin install made from scratch I'd blame this particular Cygwin distribution. Cygwin1.dll marked as "1.5.7-cr-0x9e" in its version resources. Could anybody else with a relatively fresh Cygwin or MinGW installation try it and report the result? P.S. I have one more bug in Cygwin: it can't correctly handle makefiles. So 'make' for some reason doesn't want to call 'dlltool' to produce a .def file in dlls/d3d9 after it did run it in dlls/d3d8. Changing order of d3d9 and d3d8 in dlls/Makefile,SUBDIRS exchanges failure dirs. Manually chdir'ing to dlls/d3d9 and running 'make' there does help. An old Cygwin (1.3.17) from a backup does not have that nasty bug. -- Dmitry.

3 2

Re: [LostWages] make winehq.org HTML 4.01 Transitional + XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid
by Vincent Béron March 30, 2004

March 30, 2004

Le lun 29/03/2004 à 17:08, hatky a écrit : > Change log: > Ofir Petruska <hatky(a)users.sf.net> > Validate the site as HTML 4.01 Transitional + XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid > (still declaring declaring HTML 4.01 Transitional) > * Case fixes (all html tags should be lower case) > * Quote all attributes > * End empty tags as " />" Would be better with the patch... Vincent

1 0

Re: [dx101] extensions fixes
by Vincent Béron March 30, 2004

March 30, 2004

Le lun 29/03/2004 à 18:57, Raphael a écrit : > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > Changelog: > - more Extensions work (begin to detect ATI extensions) > - try to fix D3DTADDRESS_BORDER, D3DTADDRESS_MIRROR, D3DTADDRESS_MIRRORONCE > using OpenGL extensions > - better set_tex_op: now use Runtime Extension support (and not compile > support) Would be better with the patch... Vincent

1 0

Re: systray in desktop mode [unified resend]
by Mike Hearn March 29, 2004

March 29, 2004

On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 15:17:20 +0100, Martin Fuchs wrote: > Changelog: > SHELL_NotifyIcon() implementation for Wine's desktop mode I'm not sure it makes any sense to do this: the system tray code is on my hit list for things to rewrite. It's already been mostly done, the work remaining is moving the code into a separate process then using the messages to poke wineshell. System tray in desktop mode is tricky anyway because we have no explorer/shell program - so where do they get put? thanks -mikek

3 3