Jan. 19, 2024
4:43 p.m.
On Thu Jan 18 14:06:53 2024 +0000, Conor McCarthy wrote:
I also vote for the second option. Redundant copies of the same info are best avoided. What about a pass to be called after our passes, that searches for DCL_TEMPS and updates it using `temp_count` if it exists, or creates it if it doesn't (and `temp_count` > 0)?
-- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/vkd3d/-/merge_requests/514#note_58186