March 10, 2026
7:37 p.m.
On Tue Mar 10 19:37:35 2026 +0000, Elizabeth Figura wrote:
Given the amount of ad-hoc code we already have, and what's introduced here, wouldn't it be simpler to just use the directory name "windows.foo.bar.dll" for these instead of "windows.foo.bar"? Idk, honestly. Another way could be to store the name in the spec file itself.
-- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/10290#note_131740