Hi, On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 07:40:21PM -0600, Jeremy White wrote:
So I thought I was politely, and silently, declining to accept your help with video recording.
I see now that, instead, I was rudely ignoring your call for unanimity.
As I say, we do have a small group of people who are interested in recording the talks. I'll put a call out and see if we can get some volunteers to help.
Urk. There were no volunteers, and I remain a video grinch.
To be clear, I refuse to volunteer myself, as I am hostile to the whole idea.
We have all attendees on high alert on an email list here: http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wineconf
You could put out your own direct appeal and see if someone will respond to your cry for help. They ignored mine: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wineconf/2014-January/000854.html
Right, here's a request, then. We really need someone to look after the video gear in the Wine devroom. Starting this year, we really want to record *everything*. Including your devroom. That requires at least one, but preferably two or more, volunteers to man the video gear. It's not difficult. I've already sent out a few mails with details to all our other volunteers; please see <https://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/video/2014-January/000078.html> and <https://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/video/2014-January/000163.html>. If you're going to be in the Wine devroom most of the day anyway, you would be a perfect candidate -- even if you have no prior A/V experience: there will be a training session, there will be documentation on how everything works, and we'll be there to help you should things go wrong. If you don't have the time to put in a whole day, but can do half a day or even just a few talks, that's also helpful; if there's more than one of you doing so, you'll probably manage a full day. Note that if there is no video volunteer at all this year, this will be taken into account when we need to decide whether Wine will be able to get a devroom next year. Thanks, -- This end should point toward the ground if you want to go to space. If it starts pointing toward space you are having a bad problem and you will not go to space today. -- http://xkcd.com/1133/
Folks, I think this email is bound up in moderation, but I also think it's time critical, so I am lazily choosing to forward it rather than figure out how to get it out of moderation. Cheers, Jeremy -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Wine developer room recordings Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:32:56 +0100 From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter(a)fosdem.org> Organization: none To: Jeremy White <jwhite(a)codeweavers.com> CC: Philip Paeps <philip(a)fosdem.org>, wineconf(a)winehq.org Hi, On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 07:40:21PM -0600, Jeremy White wrote:
So I thought I was politely, and silently, declining to accept your help with video recording.
I see now that, instead, I was rudely ignoring your call for unanimity.
As I say, we do have a small group of people who are interested in recording the talks. I'll put a call out and see if we can get some volunteers to help.
Urk. There were no volunteers, and I remain a video grinch.
To be clear, I refuse to volunteer myself, as I am hostile to the whole idea.
We have all attendees on high alert on an email list here: http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wineconf
You could put out your own direct appeal and see if someone will respond to your cry for help. They ignored mine: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wineconf/2014-January/000854.html
Right, here's a request, then. We really need someone to look after the video gear in the Wine devroom. Starting this year, we really want to record *everything*. Including your devroom. That requires at least one, but preferably two or more, volunteers to man the video gear. It's not difficult. I've already sent out a few mails with details to all our other volunteers; please see <https://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/video/2014-January/000078.html> and <https://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/video/2014-January/000163.html>. If you're going to be in the Wine devroom most of the day anyway, you would be a perfect candidate -- even if you have no prior A/V experience: there will be a training session, there will be documentation on how everything works, and we'll be there to help you should things go wrong. If you don't have the time to put in a whole day, but can do half a day or even just a few talks, that's also helpful; if there's more than one of you doing so, you'll probably manage a full day. Note that if there is no video volunteer at all this year, this will be taken into account when we need to decide whether Wine will be able to get a devroom next year. Thanks, -- This end should point toward the ground if you want to go to space. If it starts pointing toward space you are having a bad problem and you will not go to space today. -- http://xkcd.com/1133/
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:15:20PM +0100, Jeremy White wrote:
Folks,
I think this email is bound up in moderation, but I also think it's time critical, so I am lazily choosing to forward it rather than figure out how to get it out of moderation.
I would volunteer to help out here. Excepting the 1400 keysigning session.
Cheers,
Jeremy
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Wine developer room recordings Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:32:56 +0100 From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter(a)fosdem.org> Organization: none To: Jeremy White <jwhite(a)codeweavers.com> CC: Philip Paeps <philip(a)fosdem.org>, wineconf(a)winehq.org
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 07:40:21PM -0600, Jeremy White wrote:
So I thought I was politely, and silently, declining to accept your help with video recording.
I see now that, instead, I was rudely ignoring your call for unanimity.
As I say, we do have a small group of people who are interested in recording the talks. I'll put a call out and see if we can get some volunteers to help.
Urk. There were no volunteers, and I remain a video grinch.
To be clear, I refuse to volunteer myself, as I am hostile to the whole idea.
We have all attendees on high alert on an email list here: http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wineconf
You could put out your own direct appeal and see if someone will respond to your cry for help. They ignored mine: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wineconf/2014-January/000854.html
Right, here's a request, then.
We really need someone to look after the video gear in the Wine devroom. Starting this year, we really want to record *everything*. Including your devroom. That requires at least one, but preferably two or more, volunteers to man the video gear.
It's not difficult. I've already sent out a few mails with details to all our other volunteers; please see <https://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/video/2014-January/000078.html> and <https://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/video/2014-January/000163.html>. If you're going to be in the Wine devroom most of the day anyway, you would be a perfect candidate -- even if you have no prior A/V experience: there will be a training session, there will be documentation on how everything works, and we'll be there to help you should things go wrong.
If you don't have the time to put in a whole day, but can do half a day or even just a few talks, that's also helpful; if there's more than one of you doing so, you'll probably manage a full day.
Note that if there is no video volunteer at all this year, this will be taken into account when we need to decide whether Wine will be able to get a devroom next year.
Thanks,
-- This end should point toward the ground if you want to go to space.
If it starts pointing toward space you are having a bad problem and you will not go to space today.
_______________________________________________ wineconf mailing list wineconf(a)winehq.org http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wineconf
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:15:20PM +0100, Jeremy White wrote:
Folks,
I think this email is bound up in moderation, but I also think it's time critical, so I am lazily choosing to forward it rather than figure out how to get it out of moderation.
I would volunteer to help out here. Excepting the 1400 keysigning session.
I can give you a hand, except during the WineTestBot talk obviously. -- Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> http://fgouget.free.fr/ A particle is an irreducible representation of the Poincaré Group - Eugene Wigner
participants (4)
-
Francois Gouget -
Jeremy White -
Marcus Meissner -
Wouter Verhelst