August 2010 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

Re: d3dx9_36/tests: Added HLSL test suite. (try 3)
by Henri Verbeet 04 Aug '10

04 Aug '10

On 3 August 2010 21:07, Travis Athougies <iammisc(a)gmail.com> wrote: > dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/Makefile.in | 1 + > dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/hlsl.c | 666 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/d3dx9shader.h | 11 + > 3 files changed, 678 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/hlsl.c > Needs splitting.

1 0

Re: [PATCH 04/10] ddraw/tests: New visual back buffer flipping tests. (try 3)
by Stefan Dösinger 04 Aug '10

04 Aug '10

Am 03.08.2010 um 21:26 schrieb Oldřich Jedlička: > + whiteBrush = CreateSolidBrush(white); > + ok(whiteBrush != NULL, "CreateBrush returned: %p\n", whiteBrush); > + redBrush = CreateSolidBrush(red); > + ok(redBrush != NULL, "CreateBrush returned: %p\n", redBrush); > + > + hr = IDirectDrawSurface_GetDC(Backbuffer, &dc); > + ok(hr == DD_OK, "IDirectDrawSurface_GetDC returned: %x\n", hr); > + ret = FillRect(dc, &rect, redBrush); > + ok(ret != 0, "FillRect failed\n"); > + hr = IDirectDrawSurface_ReleaseDC(Backbuffer, dc); > + ok(hr == DD_OK, "IDirectDrawSurface_ReleaseDC returned: %x\n", hr); It would be more directdraw-ish to use a colorfill blit instead of getDC + gdi drawing. Tests 1-3 and 5 look OK though.

1 0

Re: [PATCH 09/10] ddraw: Add checking of SURFACEDESC type into CreateSurface methods. (try 3)
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org 04 Aug '10

04 Aug '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4262 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit dsurface) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 08/10] ddraw: Allow attaching backbuffers and primaries. (try 3)
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org 04 Aug '10

04 Aug '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4261 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit dsurface) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 07/10] ddraw: Allow creating back buffer for DirectX 1 interfaces. (try 3)
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org 04 Aug '10

04 Aug '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4260 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit dsurface) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: tools/winebuild: add missing separators
by Andrew Nguyen 04 Aug '10

04 Aug '10

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> wrote: > -- > -Austin > > > > The colons aren't decorative separators, but rather determine which short arguments expect a parameter as per the requirements of getopt/getopt_long. With your patch applied: $ tools/winebuild/winebuild -h tools/winebuild/winebuild: option requires an argument -- 'h'

1 0

Re: [PATCH 04/10] ddraw/tests: New visual back buffer flipping tests. (try 3)
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org 04 Aug '10

04 Aug '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4251 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit visual) === visual.c:1497: Test failed: Got color 000a246a, expected 000000ff or near visual.c:1503: Test failed: Got color 006b8bbd, expected 000000ff or near visual.c:1509: Test failed: Got color 00ffffff, expected 00000080 or near visual.c:1515: Test failed: Got color 00ffffff, expected 00000080 or near

1 0

Re: [PATCH 03/10] ddraw/tests: Add test for NULL/bad size of surface caps in CreateSurface. (try 3)
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org 04 Aug '10

04 Aug '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4250 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit dsurface) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH] kernel32/tests: Try harder to crash in the debugger test.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org 04 Aug '10

04 Aug '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4248 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit debugger) === debugger.c:309: Test failed: Timed out waiting for the child to crash debugger.c:323: Test failed: wrong exit code : 00000103 debugger.c:334: Test failed: Timed out waiting for the debugger debugger.c:149: Test failed: wrong size for 'C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtD67.tmp': read=0 debugger.c:339: Test failed: wrong debugger argument count: -32297584 debugger.c:340: Test failed: the child and debugged pids don't match: 2284 != 2046 debugger.c:309: Test failed: Timed out waiting for the child to crash debugger.c:316: Test failed: wrong exit code : 00000103 debugger.c:334: Test failed: Timed out waiting for the debugger debugger.c:149: Test failed: wrong size for 'C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtE239.tmp': read=0 debugger.c:339: Test failed: wrong debugger argument count: -32297584 debugger.c:340: Test failed: the child and debugged pids don't match: 2384 != 2046 Timeout

1 0

Re: [PATCH 02/10] ddraw/tests: New attachment/flipping tests for back buffers. (try 3)
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org 04 Aug '10

04 Aug '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4246 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit dsurface) === No test summary line found

1 0