July 2015 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [1/2] ole32: Add a storage test using a custom ILockBytes.
by Marvin 07 Jul '15

07 Jul '15

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15093 Your paranoid android. === w7u (32 bit storage32) === Failure running script in VM: timed out waiting for the child process

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/8] winex11.drv: implement DoDragDrop on top of XDND
by Ken Thomases 06 Jul '15

06 Jul '15

On Jul 4, 2015, at 8:36 AM, Damjan Jovanovic <damjan.jov(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Implements DoDragDrop on top of XDND. While some of DoDragDrop() and > supporting functions are copied from ole32, they were modified to be > non-blocking and event-driven. > > The clipboard is patched to allow searching its clipboard formats for > X11 atoms, export data in X11 format, and forward selection requests > for the XdndSelection selection to XDND. > > We support XDND version 3 to 5 (although we still need XdndProxy > support for version 4). XdndPosition messages are rate-limited to at > most 1 unreplied message and at least every 50 milliseconds apart, so > that we don't flood slow X11 clients like the spec warns. In set_XdndTypeList() and X11DRV_XDND_SelectionRequest(), you use FIXMEs for most unsupported format properties, but just a TRACE for dwAspect != DVASPECT_CONTENT. Is there a reason for that? > + * When we ask for feedback from the drop source, sometimes it will > + * do all the necessary work and sometimes it will not handle it > + * when that's the case, we must display the standard drag and drop > + * cursors. Copy-pasted typo. There should be a period after "handle it" and we should capitalize "when that's the case". (Or change to "When it doesn't handle it" to be clearer.) > + /* > + * All the return valued will stop the operation except the S_OK > + * return value. > + */ Copy-pasted typo: "return valued" should be "return values". > + /* > + * When keyboard messages are sent to windows on this thread, we > + * want to ignore notify the drop source that the state changed. > + * in the case of the Escape key, we also notify the drop source > + * we give it a special meaning. > + */ Copy-pasted typo: "ignore notify". I'm not sure if the fix is to just drop "ignore" or to expand the sentence to explain that we swallow key events except to notify the drop source about the Escape key. -Ken

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/8] ole32/user32/winemac.drv/winex11.drv: try using native drag and drop if possible
by Ken Thomases 06 Jul '15

06 Jul '15

Hi, > On Jul 4, 2015, at 8:36 AM, Damjan Jovanovic <damjan.jov(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > If possible, try using the drag and drop implemented by the native > windowing system instead of the one implemented by our ole32. This > patch just provides the framework, the next patch actually implements > all drag and drop over XDND. Thanks for doing this redesign. For this patch, is it necessary to add the driver entry point to the user drivers (winemac, winex11)? Since the null driver already returns E_NOTIMPL, it would seem the user drivers don't need to provide an entry point that just does the same thing. Is there a reason there's no loaderdrv_DoDragDrop()? Is it not possible for DoDragDrop() to be called before the driver has been loaded? -Ken

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] shell32/tests: Win XP splits the args if there are spaces in the path.
by Marvin 06 Jul '15

06 Jul '15

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15076 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:2447: Test failed: ShellExecuteEx(mask="0x500", file="C:\Documents and Settings\winetest\Local Settings\Temp\wt1.tmp\test file.sde") failed: rc=33 err=1400 shlexec.c:2447: Test failed: ShellExecuteEx(mask="0x500", file="C:\Documents and Settings\winetest\Local Settings\Temp\wt1.tmp\test file.sde") failed: rc=33 err=1400 shlexec.c:2447: Test failed: ShellExecuteEx(mask="0x500", file="C:\Documents and Settings\winetest\Local Settings\Temp\wt1.tmp\test file.sde") failed: rc=33 err=1400 shlexec.c:2447: Test failed: ShellExecuteEx(mask="0x500", file="C:\Documents and Settings\winetest\Local Settings\Temp\wt1.tmp\test file.sde") failed: rc=33 err=1400 shlexec.c:2447: Test failed: ShellExecuteEx(mask="0x500", file="C:\Documents and Settings\winetest\Local Settings\Temp\wt1.tmp\test file.sde") failed: rc=33 err=1400 shlexec.c:2447: Test failed: ShellExecuteEx(mask="0x500", file="C:\Documents and Settings\winetest\Local Settings\Temp\wt1.tmp\test file.sde") failed: rc=33 err=1400 === w8 (32 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:139: Test failed: ShellExecute(verb="", file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtD94A.tmp\test file.noassoc") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:139: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtD94A.tmp\test file.noassoc") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:1545: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtD94A.tmp\test file.noassoc") failed: rc=33 err=2 shlexec.c:1577: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtD94A.tmp\test file.noassoc', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:139: Test failed: ShellExecute(verb="", file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtD94A.tmp\test file.shlexec.noassoc") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:139: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtD94A.tmp\test file.shlexec.noassoc") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:1545: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtD94A.tmp\test file.shlexec.noassoc") failed: rc=33 err=2 shlexec.c:1577: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtD94A.tmp\test file.shlexec.noassoc', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:139: Test failed: ShellExecute(verb="", file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtD94A.tmp\test file.noassoc", params="shlexec "C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtD94A.tmp\wtD96A.tmp" Exec") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:139: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtD94A.tmp\test file.noassoc", params="shlexec "C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtD94A.tmp\wtD96A.tmp" Exec") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:2115: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtD94A.tmp\test file.noassoc", params="shlexec "C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtD94A.tmp\wtD96A.tmp" Exec") succeeded: rc=42

2 1

Re: [2/10]hidclass.sys: add hidclass.sys
by Henri Verbeet 06 Jul '15

06 Jul '15

I didn't really look at the rest of the series, but here are a few things that caught my eye. On 6 July 2015 at 17:46, Aric Stewart <aric(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > +struct list minidriver_list = LIST_INIT(minidriver_list); You don't seem to access this outside of main.c anywhere in this series, and it seems somewhat unlikely that you'll ever have to. Shouldn't this just be static? > +static VOID WINAPI UnloadDriver(DRIVER_OBJECT *driver) "void" > + TRACE("Driver Unload\n"); > + LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY_SAFE(md, next, &minidriver_list, minidriver, entry) > + { > + if (md->minidriver.DriverObject == driver) > + { > + if (md->DriverUnload) > + md->DriverUnload(md->minidriver.DriverObject); > + list_remove(&md->entry); > + break; > + } > + } > +} Did you intend to use find_minidriver() here? > +minidriver* find_minidriver(DRIVER_OBJECT* driver) > +{ > + minidriver *md; > + LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY(md, &minidriver_list, minidriver, entry) > + { > + if (md->minidriver.DriverObject == driver) > + return md; > + } > + return NULL; > +} As the code currently is this isn't actually used until patch 10/10. You could potentially use it from UnloadDriver() as mentioned above, but it should still initially be static in that case. Your '*' placement is inconsistent. > +NTSTATUS WINAPI HidRegisterMinidriver(PHID_MINIDRIVER_REGISTRATION registration) "HID_MINIDRIVER_REGISTRATION *registration" > +BOOL WINAPI DllMain(HINSTANCE hInstDLL, DWORD fdwReason, LPVOID lpv) > +{ > + switch(fdwReason) > + { > + case DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH: > + DisableThreadLibraryCalls(hInstDLL); > + break; > + } > + return TRUE; > +} As long as you don't do anything special in here, you don't need an explicit DllMain(). (But if you did, "void *" instead of LPVOID, and parameter naming.) > +/* These are from hidport.h but are only used here anyway */ > +typedef struct _HID_MINIDRIVER_REGISTRATION { The brace placement is inconsistent with the rest of the code. > + ULONG Revision; > + PDRIVER_OBJECT DriverObject; > + PUNICODE_STRING RegistryPath; "UNICODE_STRING *RegistryPath;" > + ULONG DeviceExtensionSize; > + BOOLEAN DevicesArePolled; > + UCHAR Reserved[3]; > +} HID_MINIDRIVER_REGISTRATION, *PHID_MINIDRIVER_REGISTRATION; If this is really only used inside hidclass.sys, you shouldn't need the PHID_MINIDRIVER_REGISTRATION typedef. > +NTSTATUS WINAPI HidRegisterMinidriver(PHID_MINIDRIVER_REGISTRATION MinidriverRegistration); The whitespace is odd here. Also, "HID_MINIDRIVER_REGISTRATION *registration". > +typedef struct _minidriver > +{ > + struct list entry; > + > + HID_MINIDRIVER_REGISTRATION minidriver; > + > + PDRIVER_UNLOAD DriverUnload; > +} minidriver; I suppose it's somewhat up to personal style, but you don't need a typedef for this. Aside from saving you from typing "struct" a few times it only obfuscates the code. I suspect some of the imports and includes aren't actually used until later in the series, but I didn't explicitly check that.

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/2] shell32/tests: Win 2k doesn't cope with spaces in the path.
by Marvin 06 Jul '15

06 Jul '15

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15077 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:139: Test failed: ShellExecute(verb="", file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDF64.tmp\test file.noassoc") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:139: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDF64.tmp\test file.noassoc") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:1545: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDF64.tmp\test file.noassoc") failed: rc=33 err=2 shlexec.c:1577: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDF64.tmp\test file.noassoc', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:139: Test failed: ShellExecute(verb="", file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDF64.tmp\test file.shlexec.noassoc") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:139: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDF64.tmp\test file.shlexec.noassoc") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:1545: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDF64.tmp\test file.shlexec.noassoc") failed: rc=33 err=2 shlexec.c:1577: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDF64.tmp\test file.shlexec.noassoc', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:139: Test failed: ShellExecute(verb="", file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDF64.tmp\test file.noassoc", params="shlexec "C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDF64.tmp\wtDFB4.tmp" Exec") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:139: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDF64.tmp\test file.noassoc", params="shlexec "C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDF64.tmp\wtDFB4.tmp" Exec") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:2115: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDF64.tmp\test file.noassoc", params="shlexec "C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDF64.tmp\wtDFB4.tmp" Exec") succeeded: rc=42

1 0

Wine Gecko 2.40-beta1
by Jacek Caban 06 Jul '15

06 Jul '15

Hi all, It's time for another Wine Gecko update. I uploaded new builds to SourceForge. The new version is updated to use upcoming Firefox 40 engine and brings a few Wine-specific fixes. It also adds support for building with MSVC, contributed by Austin. If you want to test it, just build Wine with the attached patch. Wine will download Gecko for you. All feedback is appreciated. Thanks, Jacek

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/3]: msvcp110: Add tr2_sys__Rename implementation and test.(try 3)
by Piotr Caban 06 Jul '15

06 Jul '15

On 07/05/15 20:49, YongHao Hu wrote: > + if(!strcmp(old_path, new_path) || MoveFileExA(old_path, new_path, MOVEFILE_COPY_ALLOWED)) The comparison of paths doesn't look right. Why have you added it? Cheers, Piotr

2 1

Adding RID_TYPEHID RawInput support to user32
by Nathan Schulte 06 Jul '15

06 Jul '15

(Apologies if double posting; I wasn't sub'd the first time and it wasn't in the archives.) I'm working to extend Wine's RawInput implementation to support gamepads/controllers (and possibly joysticks, or any non-keyboard/mouse HID device). I found this on the wine-patches list: Vincas Miliūnas wrote: > A comment about going beyond mouse/keyboard for raw input:Other > devices then mouse&keyboard produce undocumented blobs of bytes;to > interpret them, functions from the hid.dll are used. Currently > theyare unimplemented stubs in WINE as well as not the problem I am > solving.There is a recent article about this subject - Using the Raw > Input APIto Process Joystick Input > -http://www.codeproject.com/KB/game/RawInputJoystick.aspx Does this imply then, that if one was to add support for "raw" rawinput (RIM_TYPEHID device type) it could be used in conjunction with a native hid.dll and software that required RIM_TYPEHID input (for e.g. game controllers in games) would start working? Nathan Schulte (me; original post) wrote: > Also, could one create an adaptation from some joystick input libraries > (evdev/x11,rawhid) and make it conform to the API in the CodeProject > example, making modifications similar to Henri Verbeet's for mouse and > keyboard and have built-in support for this? > > (Henri Verbeet's rawinput contributions: > http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=search&st=commit&s=rawinput) > > I see that Wine already has support for joysticks in some other > fashion (the gamepad I'm working with shows up in the `wine control` > Game Controller testing interface), and I bet it's a good idea to > leverage that adaptation (those adaptations...) than to start adding > my own. > > Any direction here would be appreciated. I think I understand the > separation between the wineserver (mainly server/queue.c) and the > dlls (dlls/user32/*), but I see that there are other "dlls" that > don't use (or don't appear to use, given my probably incorrect > understanding) wineserver for their adaptation, and instead talk > directly with the Linux libs to do their work (I'm assuming). It looks like what I was was seeing was "Wine drivers," (winejoystick.drv, for winmm's joystick bits, and DirectInput's joystick bits). Should I follow that route, or should I plumb this through wineserver, like the rawinput keyboard and mouse? Why are those plumbed through wineserver? Are they shared resources, and if so, why doesn't that matter for winmm and DirectInput? I'm thinking this should be fairly easy to get working, by enumerating the rawhid devices and just piping the data through. I'm not sure how well the native hid.dll will work though; can anyone comment? Any help is welcome, as it means my patches are more likely to make it upstream and benefit others. I'm wondering if there's an architecture diagram/doc somewhere to help me understand how the system works. Thanks, -- Nate

3 3

crossover programs missing from source code
by Theodore Dubois 05 Jul '15

05 Jul '15

The following programs in Crossover are absent from the source code download: assocscan autorun ctfmon cxcplinfo cxdummy cxinstallfonts cxmanip cxmklnk cxnative cxwget ddhelp extract findfast icwconn1 imjpmig maildoff mdm mosearch netscape ntoskrnl pstores qttask reboot sendwndcmd winewrapper Can I get an explanation for each of these? ~Theodore

4 3