July 2002 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 846] New: - File dialogs don't use default extention specification
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com July 1, 2002

July 1, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846 Summary: File dialogs don't use default extention specification Product: Wine Version: CVS Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-misc AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com ReportedBy: apa3a(a)yahoo.com Wine file dialogs don't use member lpstrDefExt of the OPENFILENAME DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 395] - Wine Tasklist Meta Bug
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com July 1, 2002

July 1, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=395 fgouget(a)codeweavers.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |845 DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=395>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 845] New: - gcc Remote debugging
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com July 1, 2002

July 1, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845 Summary: gcc Remote debugging Product: Wine Version: CVS Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-debug AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com ReportedBy: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com The idea is to use gdb's remote debugging feature to use it and debug Wine/Winelib applications. There are two main reasons why gdb cannot be used to debug Wine applications directly: * threading (Wine does weird things with threading and gdb does not know about them) * 16-bit support (gdb does not know about segmented 16-bit pointers for instance) (note that despite these issues you can use gdb directly in some cases, but you will not be able to fully take advantage of it) The goal behind this would be to: * hopefully reduce the amount of code we have to maintain (e.g. code to support DWARF2) * benefit from a mature multi-platform debugger * take advantage of the graphical gdb front-ends Relevant discussion threads: * 2001/04/20 - Ove Kaaven - GDB remote debugging for wine http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2001/04/0123.html * 2002/04/13 - Mike Wetherell - benefit from a mature debugger http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&selm=6xUt8.14322%24sL6.2032145%40… * 2002/05/22 - Tijs van Bakel - Improving debugging (gdb) support http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2002/05/0613.html * 2002/05/23 - Eric Pouech - Re: Improving debugging (gdb) support Eric experimented with gdb's remote debugging capabilities and posted an informative thread. http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2002/05/0659.html * See also this comparison matrix by Eric Pouech http://perso.wanadoo.fr/eric.pouech/wine_and_gdb.html * 2002/06/05 - Michael Cardenas - Re: Improving debugging (gdb) support http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2002/06/0005.html DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 831] - Document the new trace-related winedbg commands
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com July 1, 2002

July 1, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831 ------- Additional Comments From fgouget(a)codeweavers.com 2002-07-01 11:23 ------- I think it's good to send to wine-patches, and then, once it's in CVS, you can close this bug. (But it's not in CVS yet) DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 841] - DirectDrawSurface_Blt does not support flag DDBLT_DDFX
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com July 1, 2002

July 1, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841 ------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-01 10:29 ------- This is what MSDN has to say about DDBLT_DDFX DDBLT_DDFX Uses the *dwDDFX* member of the *DDBLTFX* <http://msdn.microsoft.com/archive/en-us/ddraw7/directdraw7/ddref_0xmf.asp> structure to specify the effects to use for this blit. and these are the possible effects that need to be covered. of course we can only fix what we can test so it probably is only a subset of this . *dwDDFX* Type of FX operations. The following types are defined: DDBLTFX_ARITHSTRETCHY Uses arithmetic stretching <http://msdn.microsoft.com/archive/en-us/ddraw7/directdraw7/glossary_459v.as…> along the y-axis for this blit. DDBLTFX_MIRRORLEFTRIGHT Turns the surface on its y-axis. This blit mirrors the surface from left to right. DDBLTFX_MIRRORUPDOWN Turns the surface on its x-axis. This blit mirrors the surface from top to bottom. DDBLTFX_NOTEARING Schedules this blit to avoid tearing <http://msdn.microsoft.com/archive/en-us/ddraw7/directdraw7/glossary_85rn.as…>. DDBLTFX_ROTATE180 Rotates the surface 180 degrees clockwise during this blit. DDBLTFX_ROTATE270 Rotates the surface 270 degrees clockwise during this blit. DDBLTFX_ROTATE90 Rotates the surface 90 degrees clockwise during this blit. DDBLTFX_ZBUFFERBASEDEST Adds the *dwZBufferBaseDest* member to each of the source z-values before comparing them with the destination z-values during this z-blit. DDBLTFX_ZBUFFERRANGE Uses the *dwZBufferLow* and *dwZBufferHigh* members as range values to specify limits to the bits copied from a source surface during this z-blit. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 837] - program fails b/c fails to detect Win 98/Win NT entry
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com July 1, 2002

July 1, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837 tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-01 10:06 ------- Marking bug as CLOSED DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 770] - Halts during an install shield wizard installation with fixme:ole:CoTreatAsClass
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com July 1, 2002

July 1, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770 mulac(a)ics.muni.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW everconfirmed|0 |1 ------- Additional Comments From mulac(a)ics.muni.cz 2002-07-01 10:01 ------- *** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. *** DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 811] - crash in DefDlgProcW
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com July 1, 2002

July 1, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811 apa3a(a)yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From apa3a(a)yahoo.com 2002-07-01 09:24 ------- Closing per Juergen's report DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 824] - \0 character is added to REG_MULTI_SZ registry values
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com July 1, 2002

July 1, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824 ------- Additional Comments From apa3a(a)yahoo.com 2002-07-01 09:13 ------- I came across this bug while implementing support of REG_MULTI_SZ strings in Wine regedit. I do not want to have these values in the test .reg file because they will cause a whole test to fail. Definitely I'll add the values as soon as the bug is fixed. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 843] New: - CreateFile returns ERROR_SHARED_VIOLATION instead of ERROR_ALREADY_EXISTS
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com July 1, 2002

July 1, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843 Summary: CreateFile returns ERROR_SHARED_VIOLATION instead of ERROR_ALREADY_EXISTS Product: Wine Version: 20020310 Platform: PC URL: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en- us/wcesdkr/htm/_wcesdk_win32_createfile.asp OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-files AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com ReportedBy: staroverov(a)radiocom.net.ua CreateFileA returns ERROR_SHARED_VIOLATION instead of ERROR_ALREADY_EXISTS. In all versions of Windows return code is ERROR_FILE_EXISTS, even if file is in use. For some applications it's critical. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0