September 2002 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 90] - Compile Wine with -DSTRICT
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 6, 2002

Sept. 6, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=90 This bug depends on bug 509, which changed state: What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=90>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1014] - unimplemented function advapi32.dll.IsValidAcl called in 32-bit code (0x40830056).
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 6, 2002

Sept. 6, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014 eduardo.pires(a)embasa.ba.gov.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|wine-bugs(a)winehq.com |eduardo.pires(a)embasa.ba.gov. | |br DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 987] - Age of empires 2 trial dosn't install correctly
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 6, 2002

Sept. 6, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987 puoti(a)inwind.it changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|20020710 |20020804 ------- Additional Comments From puoti(a)inwind.it 2002-09-06 09:20 ------- It carshed in the same way, like this: $wine AoE2demo.exe --debugmsg +shell32 wine: Unhandled exception, starting debugger... wine: Unhandled exception, starting debugger... wine: Unhandled exception, starting debugger... wine: Unhandled exception, starting debugger... wine: Unhandled exception, starting debugger... wine: Unhandled exception, starting debugger... wine: Unhandled exception, starting debugger... wine: Unhandled exception, starting debugger... And so on until I close the shell. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1008] - SETUPX_CreateStandardLDDs unimplemented
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 6, 2002

Sept. 6, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|wine-bugs(a)winehq.com |andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2002-09-06 06:09 ------- Hmm, this FIXME should be moved from SETUPX_CreateStandardLDDs() (which is *not* a Windows function - it's Wine internal) to the functions *actually* requesting a LDID_SRCPATH value. In this case the program probably doesn't even request it, yet we still print the FIXME. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 987] - Age of empires 2 trial dosn't install correctly
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 6, 2002

Sept. 6, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987 ------- Additional Comments From mcbridematt(a)hotmail.com 2002-09-06 05:11 ------- Try running the installer with: $wine (setup.exe?) --debugmsg +shell32. And put what it says here DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1017] New: - Unhandled exception
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 6, 2002

Sept. 6, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017 Summary: Unhandled exception Product: Wine Version: 20020904 Platform: PC URL: http://www.rom-logicware.com/demo.htm OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-loader AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com ReportedBy: infomails(a)gmx.net Hello there, I tested a Office Package called "Papyrus Office" for a friend which plans to migrate his system to linux. Now i'd take the beta from the page and want install it but it was rapidly stopped with this message: manuel(a)prodigy7:/tmp > wine PAPWDEMO.EXE Warning: unprotecting the first 64KB of memory to allow real-mode calls. NULL pointer accesses will no longer be caught. wine: Unhandled exception, starting debugger... I think it have not the highest priority to solve this problem but maybe there's an bug in wine, how like ever Happy wineing :-) Greetings Manuel P.S.: Sorry for my bad and maybe not best understandable english DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1008] - SETUPX_CreateStandardLDDs unimplemented
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 6, 2002

Sept. 6, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 mcbridematt(a)hotmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FIXME Summary|Recent Microsoft installers |SETUPX_CreateStandardLDDs |unable to find Win Version |unimplemented ------- Additional Comments From mcbridematt(a)hotmail.com 2002-09-06 03:59 ------- After doing some tracing using: wine --debugmsg +shell32 ie6setup.exe This was the debug output: fixme:win32:PE_CreateModule Security directory ignored fixme:process:CreateProcessA (E:\IXP001.TMP\ie6wzd.exe,...): NORMAL_PRIORITY_CLASS ignored fixme:cursor:CURSORICON_SimulateLoadingFromResourceW Animated icons not correctly implemented! 0x413d0000 fixme:cursor:CURSORICON_SimulateLoadingFromResourceW icon entry found! 0x413d0000 fixme:cursor:CURSORICON_SimulateLoadingFromResourceW icon size ok. offset=0x413d0074 _______________________________________________________________________________ fixme:setupapi:SETUPX_CreateStandardLDDs LDID_SRCPATH: what exactly do we have to do here ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This is the call that recent MS installers are asking for. This function call was not present in Windows 95, and was first seen in Windows 98, then NT SP6, then 2000,then ME then XP, then of course the current beta Blackwood. attaching FIXME DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 999] - MSFlightSim2002 : PE_CreateModuleSecurity ignored
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 6, 2002

Sept. 6, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999 ------- Additional Comments From mcbridematt(a)hotmail.com 2002-09-06 02:15 ------- does anybody know what PE_CreateModuleSecurity does? DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1008] - Recent Microsoft installers unable to find Win Version
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 6, 2002

Sept. 6, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 mcbridematt(a)hotmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |89, 997 Keywords|download | Summary|Internet Explorer 6 does not|Recent Microsoft installers |install |unable to find Win Version ------- Additional Comments From mcbridematt(a)hotmail.com 2002-09-06 02:07 ------- Changes: This also appears in the Microsoft Flight Simulator 2002 installer. Adding a dependency on Bug 997 (FlightSim2002 related metabug) Adding a dependency on Bug 89 (Installer Metabug) DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1016] New: - Drawing with crosshatching doesn't crosshatch - it fills
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 6, 2002

Sept. 6, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016 Summary: Drawing with crosshatching doesn't crosshatch - it fills Product: Wine Version: CVS Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-binary AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com ReportedBy: wowbagger(a)sktc.net The app I am using is Delorme's AAA MapNGo 4.0, a mapping program (so I don't have the source). The program can draw crosshatched highlights for user objects as well as map features. When a crosshatched object is drawn, the area covered by the object is filled in black. This is independant of the requested object being drawn - ask for a crosshatched blue circle, get a black circle. I can tell that the items behind the object are drawn, then the object overwrites them. This has been the case for as long as I've been able to run MN4 under Wine, and I have confirmed it on a CVS pull of a few minutes ago (5 Sept 2002 at 20:00 CDT). DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 421] - Implement a DIB engine
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421 ------- Additional Comments From aljones(a)lbl.gov 2002-09-05 14:07 ------- from the description: >* the X bitmap has to be in the format of the X display. So if X is running in > 15bpp, a 32bpp DIB is converted to 15bpp, the operation is performed in 15bpp, > and the bitmap is then converted back to 32bpp. Obviously this implies that > each operation occurs a loss of color resolution (fortunately they should not > accumulate). for my version of X this no longer seems to be required: vendor string: The XFree86 Project, Inc vendor release number: 40199001 XFree86 version: 4.1.99.1 ... supported pixmap formats: depth 1, bits_per_pixel 1, scanline_pad 32 depth 4, bits_per_pixel 8, scanline_pad 32 depth 8, bits_per_pixel 8, scanline_pad 32 depth 15, bits_per_pixel 16, scanline_pad 32 depth 16, bits_per_pixel 16, scanline_pad 32 depth 24, bits_per_pixel 32, scanline_pad 32 depth 32, bits_per_pixel 32, scanline_pad 32 even though my screen is only in depth 15, i can manipulate pixmaps of any depth. i haven't yet figured out how to manipulate color information in these other pixmaps (save for just setting the pixel values directly -- works ok for TrueColor), but drawing seems to work fine... arthur DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1013] New: - Dropdown buttons in WordPerfect look bad
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013 Summary: Dropdown buttons in WordPerfect look bad Product: Wine Version: 20020804 Platform: PC URL: http://www.garrett.d2g.biz/images/winewp9Fontselectprobl em.png OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: wine-gui AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com ReportedBy: gkajmowi(a)tbaytel.net

1 0

[Bug 1012] New: - Some fonts under WordPerfect 9 look bad
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012 Summary: Some fonts under WordPerfect 9 look bad Product: Wine Version: 20020804 Platform: PC URL: http://www.garrett.d2g.biz/images/winewp9settingsproblem .png OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: wine-gui AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com ReportedBy: gkajmowi(a)tbaytel.net

1 0

[Bug 1010] - Unhandled exception in VFP6R.DLL (Visual FoxPro 6)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010 ------- Additional Comments From andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2002-09-05 11:47 ------- Argl, I meant --debugmsg +relay DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1010] - Unhandled exception in VFP6R.DLL (Visual FoxPro 6)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010 ------- Additional Comments From andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2002-09-05 11:46 ------- Did you realize what you just said ? You said it's a *workaround*, not a bug fix. Thus this bug is still valid :) (as I'm damn sure that VFP *should* run on a Win 9x based system) Sounds like there's a problem with some Wine Win9x support code that's being run when the app decides to switch to Win9x mode instead of NT mode. So should that bug be reopened ? (please submit a --debugmsg +Relay log file in win9x mode in this case) DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1010] - Unhandled exception in VFP6R.DLL (Visual FoxPro 6)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010 ------- Additional Comments From oscar.valdez(a)plastipak.com.sv 2002-09-05 11:35 ------- No, that's not exactly the way I would interpret things. At least on Wine, Visual FoxPro "runs" when Wine is imitating NT40, W2K or WXP, but not when it's imitating W9x. It seems like a simple workaround. And I say "runs", because I'm still getting OLE exception errors. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1010] - Unhandled exception in VFP6R.DLL (Visual FoxPro 6)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010 ------- Additional Comments From andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2002-09-05 11:24 ------- So you want to tell us that Visual FoxPro only runs on an NT-based Windows version (NT, Win 2000, XP) and never on a Win 9x system, right ? Or why else would you consider this bug to be closed ? DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1010] - Unhandled exception in VFP6R.DLL (Visual FoxPro 6)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010 oscar.valdez(a)plastipak.com.sv changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Additional Comments From oscar.valdez(a)plastipak.com.sv 2002-09-05 11:11 ------- I've gotten over this problem by setting "nt40", "win2k" or "winxp" as the Windoze version to imitate. The Visual FoxPro application now runs, although with "OLE exception errors". That's a completely different matter though, so I consider this particular case closed. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1008] - Internet Explorer 6 does not install
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 mcbridematt(a)hotmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW everconfirmed|0 |1 ------- Additional Comments From mcbridematt(a)hotmail.com 2002-09-05 03:29 ------- *** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. *** DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1007] - kernel32.dll.Heap32* functions unimplemented
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007 ------- Additional Comments From centaur(a)netmagic.net 2002-09-04 23:55 ------- Here's abbreviated --debugmsg +relay output, though I'm not really sure if I've gotten the part where it starts to barf. I've done some more reading, and it sounds to me like CreateToolhelp32Snapshot and friends are typically used for Windows debugging (is this correct?) so maybe the real culprit is further up the chain. Any help would be greatly appreciated! 08c58100:Call user32.GetCursorInfo(422a6590) ret=40c743a4 08c58100:Call x11drv.GetCursorPos(422a659c) ret=408279ad 08c58100:Ret x11drv.GetCursorPos() retval=00000134 ret=408279ad 08c58100:Ret user32.GetCursorInfo() retval=00000001 ret=40c743a4 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetCurrentThreadId() ret=40c73473 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetCurrentThreadId() retval=08c58100 ret=40c73473 08c58100:Call user32.GetQueueStatus(000000bf) ret=40c743d0 08c58100:Ret user32.GetQueueStatus() retval=00000000 ret=40c743d0 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetCurrentThreadId() ret=40c73473 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetCurrentThreadId() retval=08c58100 ret=40c73473 08c58100:Call kernel32.FreeLibrary(407e0000) ret=40c743f1 08c58100:Ret kernel32.FreeLibrary() retval=00000001 ret=40c743f1 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7f0 "CreateToolhelp32Snapshot") ret=40c74401 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40677000 ret=40c74401 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7e4 "Heap32First") ret=40c7440b 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=4061771c ret=40c7440b 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7d8 "Heap32Next") ret=40c74417 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40617770 ret=40c74417 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7c8 "Heap32ListFirst") ret=40c74423 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40617738 ret=40c74423 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7b8 "Heap32ListNext") ret=40c7442d 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40617754 ret=40c7442d 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7a8 "Process32First") ret=40c74439 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40678d10 ret=40c74439 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe798 "Process32Next") ret=40c74445 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40678d20 ret=40c74445 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe788 "Thread32First") ret=40c74451 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=406797c0 ret=40c74451 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe778 "Thread32Next") ret=40c7445d 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=406797d0 ret=40c7445d 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe768 "Module32First") ret=40c74469 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40678ad0 ret=40c74469 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe758 "Module32Next") ret=40c74475 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40678ae0 ret=40c74475 08c58100:Call kernel32.CreateToolhelp32Snapshot(0000000f,00000000) ret=40c744f7 08c58100:Ret kernel32.CreateToolhelp32Snapshot() retval=000000c4 ret=40c744f7 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetLastError() ret=00443683 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetLastError() retval=00000002 ret=00443683 08c58100:Call kernel32.TlsGetValue(00000009) ret=00443691 08c58100:Ret kernel32.TlsGetValue() retval=41bd01e0 ret=00443691 08c58100:Call kernel32.SetLastError(00000002) ret=004436dd 08c58100:Ret kernel32.SetLastError() retval=00000002 ret=004436dd 08c58100:Call kernel32.UnhandledExceptionFilter(422a60a0) ret=00444eb6 08c58100:Call kernel32.IsBadCodePtr(7800b322) ret=00449078 08c58100:Ret kernel32.IsBadCodePtr() retval=00000000 ret=00449078 wine: Unhandled exception, starting debugger... DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1011] New: - Can't Work In Lycoris Desktop/LX
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 4, 2002

Sept. 4, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011 Summary: Can't Work In Lycoris Desktop/LX Product: Wine Version: 20010112 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: wine-x11driver AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com ReportedBy: bksathesh(a)dacafe.com G'day Everyone, I'm having some problem trying to install codeweaver-wine in Lycoris Desktop/LX. It tells me that the XFree86 lib or sumthin like that is incompatible. Apparently, Lycoris uses version .025 while mandrake uses version .023 So it works well with Mandrake but not in Lycoris. Could you guyz be of much assisatnce to me?. I'm actually writing from a company in Malaysia that serves many of the bluechip companies over here. I sincerely hope you guyz could look into the matter ASAP asI need to do a roll out on the 15.9.2002 and I need to be well prepared before that. Thanx for the help. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1010] New: - Unhandled exception in VFP6R.DLL (Visual FoxPro 6)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 4, 2002

Sept. 4, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010 Summary: Unhandled exception in VFP6R.DLL (Visual FoxPro 6) Product: Wine Version: 20020804 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-binary AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com ReportedBy: oscar.valdez(a)plastipak.com.sv I've been trying to install and run a simple Visual Fox Pro 6 application. At first, I was having trouble registering MSCAL.OCX. I solved that by adding the line "comcat"="builtin,native" to the DLLOverrides section of ~/.wine/config. The application installed, and all the components registered properly. But when I try to run the application, I'm immediately dropped to the debug window, with the following (final) statement: Unhandled exception: page fault on read access to 0x00000000 in 32-bit code (0x0c0b4ce6). In 32-bit mode. 0x0c0b4ce6 (VFP6R.DLL.DllWinMain+0x5e1e9 in C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\VFP6R.DLL): mov1 0x0(%eax),%eax DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1009] New: - Character set of filenames is wrong in Russia
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 4, 2002

Sept. 4, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Summary: Character set of filenames is wrong in Russia Product: Wine Version: 20020804 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P1 Component: wine-files AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com ReportedBy: semzx(a)newmail.ru WINE almost correctly uses charset cp1251 for text in Russia. The only place it takes incorrect is filenames. If I fire an open dialog, I get Russian filenames wrong. To reproduce this kind of distortion in a web browser (just for me to explain easily what it is), create a file with text in koi8-r and view it as if it was in cp1251 - you will have exactly he same distortion of characters. In all places where a program displays the filename, I get the same distortion, but files are opened OK. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1000] - MSFlightSim2002 : Resource Info function Problems
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 4, 2002

Sept. 4, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000 ------- Additional Comments From mcbridematt(a)hotmail.com 2002-09-04 01:59 ------- I've also noticed this in other M$ apps: Microsoft Works 4.0, Microsoft Money for Win95 DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1000] - MSFlightSim2002 : Resource Info function Problems
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 4, 2002

Sept. 4, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000 ------- Additional Comments From mcbridematt(a)hotmail.com 2002-09-04 01:58 ------- Created an attachment (id=284) bzip'ed Debug output DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0