June 2003 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 1004] Error during Eudora Pro 4.2 installation
by Wine Bugs June 23, 2003

June 23, 2003

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004 ------- Additional Comments From z_god(a)wanadoo.nl 2003-23-06 05:21 ------- Bug comments restored from Gmane.org: Attempting to install Eudora Pro 4.2, I got the following error popup: Eudora Pro Email 4.2 Setup An error occurred during the move data process: -160 Component: Eudora\Shared DLLs File Group: Shared DLLs File: Wininet.dll If you need more info, let me know what you want and how to generate it... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1003] random pixels in imagelist backgrounds
by Wine Bugs June 23, 2003

June 23, 2003

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003 ------- Additional Comments From z_god(a)wanadoo.nl 2003-23-06 05:21 ------- Bug comments restored from Gmane.org: I first noted this in ACCPAC but have attached a minimal case that demonstrates the same problem. The issue requires a native comctl32.dll (specifically I used a Windows NT one). If an image list is created and no background is set (or, in the ACCPAC case if the background is not white) then random pixels appear in the background of the icon. I believe that this has to be something to do with the gdi and the bitmap code. ------- Additional Comments From billmedland <at> look.ca 2002-08-29 15:31 ------- Created an attachment (id=281) --> (http://bugs.winehq.com/attachment.cgi?id=281&action=view) source for program demonstarting the problem. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1002] fixme:msvcrt:MSVCRT_sscanf unhandled: %[
by Wine Bugs June 23, 2003

June 23, 2003

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002 ------- Additional Comments From z_god(a)wanadoo.nl 2003-23-06 05:20 ------- Bug comments restored from Gmane.org: As in title .... it was for string "-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--*-120-*-*-*-*-iso8859" and to mach "-%30[^-]-%100[^-]-%30[^-]-%30[^-]-%30[^-]-%n" maches for [] paterns are not implemented. ------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon <at> yahoo.com 2002-10-12 19:42 ------- please be more specific in your bug report ------- Additional Comments From michal.seliga <at> visicom.sk 2002-10-14 04:32 ------- Created an attachment (id=313) --> (http://bugs.winehq.com/attachment.cgi?id=313&action=view) Wine log (shortened) ------- Additional Comments From michal.seliga <at> visicom.sk 2002-10-14 04:34 ------- I see the same message while installing game Incubation (it worked perfectly with wine version 20020605, it doesn't work now with 20021007) I sent wine log as attachment, I hope it will help U&zdot;ytkownik wine-bugs <at> winehq.com napisa&lstrok;: >http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002 > > > > > >------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon <at> yahoo.com 2002-10-12 19:42 ------- >please be more specific in your bug report > >DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG >RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT ><http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002>. >ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND >INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > > As i wrote function call looks like sscanf("-%30[^-]-%100[^-]-%30[^-]-%30[^-]-%30[^-]-%n","-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--*-120-*-*-*-*-iso8859", ... rest of the line) runing program which contains this calls causes message "fixme:msvcrt:MSVCRT_sscanf unhandled: %[" I've looked in code and for me it looks like patterns [abc...z], [a-z], [^xgd] etc,etc are not handled at all. Jacek Bator ------- Additional Comments From nog <at> sdf.lonestar.org 2002-11-02 02:37 ------- I have implemented the [ format specifier in the scanf functions, I havn't been able to look at the log because when I click on the link then it asks me it I wan't to save the showattachment.cgi. I suppose this bug should be closed, anyone? nog. ------- Additional Comments From nog <at> sdf.lonestar.org 2002-11-13 11:44 ------- I suppose I should have been more clear: Someone should close this bug. ------- Additional Comments From andi <at> rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2002-11-13 15:48 ------- Yep, closed. ------- Additional Comments From andi <at> rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2002-11-13 15:49 ------- Now close it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1537] Wine reports 0 MHz CPU speed to applications
by Wine Bugs June 23, 2003

June 23, 2003

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537 mike(a)theoretic.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 ------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-23-06 05:00 ------- Looking again after my morning cup of tea, I think the problem is that timeGetTime always returns the same value: 0009:Ret winmm.timeGetTime() retval=00000e2a ret=004014ec 0009:Ret winmm.timeGetTime() retval=00000e2a ret=004014ec etc I think the return figure should be ticking up, at least a little bit. Another suspect is this line: 0009:Call kernel32.Sleep(00000000) ret=00401527 0009:Ret kernel32.Sleep() retval=00000102 ret=00401527 A value of zero here means relinquish for the remainder of the timeslice. Maybe this is how it measures clockspeed, ms between timeslices? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1537] Wine reports 0 MHz CPU speed to applications
by Wine Bugs June 23, 2003

June 23, 2003

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537 ------- Additional Comments From khalek(a)scummvm.org 2003-23-06 04:54 ------- Created an attachment (id=293) --> (http://bugs.winehq.com/attachment.cgi?id=293&action=view) gzip'd text file of everything before "mhz" excluding CriticalSection calls Hopefully this attaches properly... I'm not sure exactly what may/may not be of interest so here is everything before and including the first "mhz" line, with Enter/LeaveCriticalSection calls filtered out. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1533] THREED20.OCX - Unhandled exception: page fault on read access
by Wine Bugs June 23, 2003

June 23, 2003

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533 ------- Additional Comments From ed(a)centralmanclc.com 2003-23-06 04:47 ------- I can provide the locked, 30-day trial installation files. They are however about 40Mb. There are all sorts of data files associated with the program. If this is too large I could try and work out which files, as well as the binary, are required to reproduce the problem -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1537] Wine reports 0 MHz CPU speed to applications
by Wine Bugs June 23, 2003

June 23, 2003

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537 ------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-23-06 04:43 ------- IIRC timeGetTime is known to report values differently to the Microsoft version. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1537] Wine reports 0 MHz CPU speed to applications
by Wine Bugs June 23, 2003

June 23, 2003

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537 ------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2003-23-06 04:41 ------- Those timeGetTime() calls might actually be the MHz measuring calls I suspect. Can you check through the trace if anything interesting is before that sequence? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1537] Wine reports 0 MHz CPU speed to applications
by Wine Bugs June 23, 2003

June 23, 2003

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537 khalek(a)scummvm.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #291 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From khalek(a)scummvm.org 2003-23-06 04:37 ------- Created an attachment (id=292) --> (http://bugs.winehq.com/attachment.cgi?id=292&action=view) 500 lines of output with CriticalSection calls filtered out should I do another with winmm.timeGetTime and kernel32.Release/RestoreThunkLock filtered out? they seem to be repeated quite a bit with the same numbers.... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1537] Wine reports 0 MHz CPU speed to applications
by Wine Bugs June 23, 2003

June 23, 2003

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537 ------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2003-23-06 04:05 ------- hmm, either the winmmGetTime calls ... the end was correct, but can you quote 500 lines before it and filter out the RtlEnterCriticalSection and RtlLeaveCriticalSection calls please? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0