September 2005 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 2708] Segmentation Fault - when running Wine - Redhat Fedora FC3 - SMP
by Wine Bugs Sept. 15, 2005

Sept. 15, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2708 dank(a)kegel.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dank(a)kegel.com ------- Additional Comments From dank(a)kegel.com 2005-15-09 07:45 ------- Can you still reproduce this with current Wine? If so, can you give us a symbolic stack dump? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 3334] execute unix binary parameter problem
by Wine Bugs Sept. 15, 2005

Sept. 15, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3334 ------- Additional Comments From jue(a)capaz.de 2005-15-09 03:56 ------- I just realized that our packing mechanism from Win32 (LHA.EXE) doesn't work with wine. No problem: I can execute the native Linux LHA-Binary. That is working on principle but I have a problem to give the parameters with wildcards to the lha - binary. I wrote a test environment to check where the mistake comes from and realized that Windows-Programs have a different way to find wildcard-files in a directory than Linux programs. If I execute a Linuxbinary from shell I get a list of all matched files as separate parameters. But if I execute the Linuxbinary from Wine I get just the wildchard (i.e. "*"). So far so good. I took a look to the function fork_and_exec in process.c in the kernellibrary of wine. I'm not sure but I think we have to call the glob() function to get the wildcards to file-parameters. What do you think? If I'm right please send me a email - I can try to fix it and send you a patch. But I'm not familar with opensource rules. I think you need just the new process.c - file? Thanks! Jürgen -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 3334] New: execute unix binary parameter problem
by Wine Bugs Sept. 15, 2005

Sept. 15, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3334 Summary: execute unix binary parameter problem Product: Wine Version: 20040813 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: wine-kernel AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: jue(a)capaz.de I just realized that our packing mechanism from Win32 (LHA.EXE) doesn't work with wine. No problem: I can execute the native Linux LHA-Binary. That is working on principle but I have a problem to give the parameters with wildcards to the lha - binary. I wrote a test environment to check where the mistake comes from and realized that Windows-Programs have a different way to find wildcard-files in a directory than Linux programs. If I execute a Linuxbinary from shell I get a list of all matched files as separate parameters. But if I execute the Linuxbinary from Wine I get just the wildchard (i.e. "*"). So far so good. I took a look to the function fork_and_exec in process.c in the kernellibrary of wine. I'm not sure but I think we have to call the glob() function to get the wildcards to file-parameters. What do you think? If I'm right please send me a email - I can try to fix it and send you a patch. But I'm not familar with opensource rules. I think you need just the new process.c - file? Thanks! Jürgen -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 3327] Unlike in Windows, the "Hafas" application requires the return key be pressed at start
by Wine Bugs Sept. 15, 2005

Sept. 15, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3327 ------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-15-09 03:16 ------- It likely displays a messagebox behind the splash screen. i can have a look at it if you want. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 3326] Subtitle Workshop & weird errors
by Wine Bugs Sept. 15, 2005

Sept. 15, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3326 ------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-15-09 02:17 ------- on second look these are not coming from our commoncontrol library but from the program itself. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 3326] Subtitle Workshop & weird errors
by Wine Bugs Sept. 15, 2005

Sept. 15, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3326 ------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-15-09 00:47 ------- the call is from dlls/comctl32/imagelist.c WINEDEBUG=+imagelist wine .... ... trace:imagelist:_read_bitmap nRows=4 trace:imagelist:_read_bitmap nRows=4 trace:imagelist:ImageList_Create (16 16 0x10ff 1 4) trace:imagelist:ImageList_CreateImage Creating Bitmap: 16 Bits per Pixel trace:imagelist:ImageList_CreateImage returning 0x89bc trace:imagelist:ImageList_Create created imagelist 0x4041b038 fixme:bitmap:CreateCompatibleBitmap got bad width 1083325559 or height 1083488832, please look for reason fixme:bitmap:CreateCompatibleBitmap got bad width 1083325559 or height 1083488832, please look for reason X Error of failed request: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 3327] Unlike in Windows, the "Hafas" application requires the return key be pressed at start
by Wine Bugs Sept. 14, 2005

Sept. 14, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3327 ------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2005-14-09 22:16 ------- Is this the same application as in the AppDB http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?appId=958 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 3322] Richedit failure - ME_CharOfsFromRunOfs: Assertion
by Wine Bugs Sept. 14, 2005

Sept. 14, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3322 tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2005-14-09 22:13 ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3239 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 3239] Regression with patch id=19048
by Wine Bugs Sept. 14, 2005

Sept. 14, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3239 tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |daniel.leu(a)gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2005-14-09 22:13 ------- *** Bug 3322 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 3326] Subtitle Workshop & weird errors
by Wine Bugs Sept. 14, 2005

Sept. 14, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3326 tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |download, NoAppDBEntry -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0