August 2006 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 5488] BadMatch when starting WoW 1.11
by Wine Bugs Aug. 23, 2006

Aug. 23, 2006

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5488 ------- Additional Comments From ale.bol(a)tiscali.it 2006-23-08 02:32 ------- I cannot apply the patch, I donwloaded wine-0.9.19 extract to a folder and then in tha folder I copied http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=2759&action=view as patch.diff, but when trying to do: patch -p1 < patch.diff I get this error: GeNtOo wine # cp attachment.cgi wine-0.9.19/patch.diff GeNtOo wine # cd wine-0.9.19 GeNtOo wine-0.9.19 # patch -p1 < patch.diff patching file dlls/opengl32/wgl.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 602 (offset 12 lines). patching file dlls/winex11.drv/opengl.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 623 (offset 16 lines). patching file libs/wine/mmap.c patching file loader/preloader.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 109. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file loader/preloader.c.rej Please help me! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 6035] New: Wine-preloader segfaults when compiled with GCC 4.1 unless using -fno-stack-protector
by Wine Bugs Aug. 23, 2006

Aug. 23, 2006

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6035 Summary: Wine-preloader segfaults when compiled with GCC 4.1 unless using -fno-stack-protector Product: Wine Version: 0.9.19. Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: wine-binary AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: scott(a)open-vote.org https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/wine/+bug/56965 Found on the Ubuntu bug reports: "The problem seems to be that the %gs register that holds the thread local stack is not setup correctly since the normal _start function is not use in wine-preloader. The stack protector uses the %gs register and the stack protector is enabled by -fstack-protector. If you compile the wine-preloader with -fno-stack-protector it will thus not cause segmentation fault." "The real fix is to correct the wine-preloader to follow proper convention, I assume. For now turn off the stack protector as a work-around and file a bug with the wine devs." -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 5985] Missing info -autoconf, asciidoc, proxy, curl support
by Wine Bugs Aug. 23, 2006

Aug. 23, 2006

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5985 ------- Additional Comments From tuharsky(a)misbb.sk 2006-23-08 01:41 ------- Thank You. I'll try. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 5973] regression -Winambulancia Import2000 crashes on start
by Wine Bugs Aug. 23, 2006

Aug. 23, 2006

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5973 ------- Additional Comments From tuharsky(a)misbb.sk 2006-23-08 01:40 ------- It is strange, but I cannot even replicate the bug. The program no more crashes that way. I tested both with old and new Import2000, regression tested between 0.9.18 and 0.9.19 and it all works (except for other reported bugs, such as 5845). Whatever it was, I cannot catch it :-( I upgraded kernel 2.6.17.something to 2.6.17.8 since. Faulty kernel? Electricity shortage? I really don't know. I'm testing on other machine with 2.6.17.7 too. Bug disappeared so quickly as it appeared. Should it be marked as CLOSED/WORKSFORM? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 5849] oleaut32 -WinAmbulancia -couldn't set the actual date
by Wine Bugs Aug. 23, 2006

Aug. 23, 2006

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5849 ------- Additional Comments From tuharsky(a)misbb.sk 2006-23-08 01:30 ------- Created an attachment (id=3396) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=3396&action=view) Logfile, bz2-ed +loaddll,ole,imm,msvcrt,msi OK oleaut32=b Logfile with builtin oleaut32. Again, I aborted the program immediately when the (wrong) date displayed. If I would attemped to change the wrong date, program would just beep upon clicking on "OK" a won't proceed any further. I mean, GETTING the date from system is the first fault, and SETTING is the second. Of course, they may be connected, they may be caused by the same bug. However I feel, that it could be better to first solve the date, that program offers (tat he gets from system). Now, the logs end at the same moment -when program displays the offered "today's date". One can compare, where is the difference between native and builtin oleaut32 behaviour. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 5849] oleaut32 -WinAmbulancia -couldn't set the actual date
by Wine Bugs Aug. 23, 2006

Aug. 23, 2006

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5849 ------- Additional Comments From tuharsky(a)misbb.sk 2006-23-08 01:24 ------- Created an attachment (id=3395) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=3395&action=view) Logfile, bz2-ed +loaddll,ole,imm,msvcrt,msi OK oleaut32=n Logfile with native oleaut32. Everything is OK. I aborted the program immediately when the date was displayed -I haven't attemped to change or confirm the date, because program would start then. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 5849] oleaut32 -WinAmbulancia -couldn't set the actual date
by Wine Bugs Aug. 23, 2006

Aug. 23, 2006

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5849 ------- Additional Comments From tuharsky(a)misbb.sk 2006-23-08 01:22 ------- Created an attachment (id=3394) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=3394&action=view) screenshot -date corrupted A screenshot. Please note, that day, month and year all contain the number of day (today is 23.8.2006)! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 5987] riched20 : CRichEditCtrl::LineFromChar does not return correct value
by Wine Bugs Aug. 23, 2006

Aug. 23, 2006

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5987 renu.rajput(a)tcs.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dank(a)kegel.com Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 4227] QuickTest Pro 8.2 fails to install
by Wine Bugs Aug. 23, 2006

Aug. 23, 2006

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4227 ------- Additional Comments From dank(a)kegel.com 2006-23-08 00:27 ------- Created an attachment (id=3393) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=3393&action=view) Console output from running installer after increasing max handles -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 4227] QuickTest Pro 8.2 fails to install
by Wine Bugs Aug. 23, 2006

Aug. 23, 2006

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4227 ------- Additional Comments From dank(a)kegel.com 2006-23-08 00:25 ------- Created an attachment (id=3392) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=3392&action=view) highlights of +msi -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0