August 2006 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 2918] Electronics Workbench: instruments are not drawn
by Wine Bugs Aug. 22, 2006

Aug. 22, 2006

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2918 ------- Additional Comments From saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.lt 2006-22-08 06:59 ------- * Jonathan Ernst wrote on 2005-10-06: | Seems fixed. I can put all instruments in the panel and nothing is black. Jonathan, do you remember what color depth your X server was running at? I've tried the app on an X at 24 bits and it's measurement/generator instruments get black when expanded. I've branched to Thu, 6 Oct 2005 16:06:04 +0000 (commit 664e4106c6b9a765a4db7ac30ba9a3cf70aeb6ed), but to no effect: expanded instruments are still black. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 6028] New: Rome: Total War too many shaders error (appears to be hardcoded to max of 64)
by Wine Bugs Aug. 22, 2006

Aug. 22, 2006

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6028 Summary: Rome: Total War too many shaders error (appears to be hardcoded to max of 64) Product: Wine Version: CVS Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-directx-d3d AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: djones9960(a)gmail.com Using wine 0.9.19 (and wine CVS from 19/08/2006), Rome: Total War installs fine and you can get all the way to the menu screen. Unfortunately, when it comes to the campaign map the thing crashes out with a 'd3d8: too many shaders' error. Looking in the code, I found in $WINE_SOURCE/dlls/d3d8/d3d8_private.h the following setting: #define MAX_SHADERS 64 This is just to say that I changed that to: #define MAX_SHADERS 256 ...and I got to the campaign map. I don't know what knock-on effect this will have (or indeed why there is a limit) so I'm submitting this as an FYI bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 5835] Sacrifice crashes
by Wine Bugs Aug. 22, 2006

Aug. 22, 2006

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5835 Speeddymon(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 ------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2006-22-08 03:20 ------- I suspect that something around this line is the problem: err:seh:raise_exception Unhandled exception code c0000005 flags 0 addr 0x4077f3 but that is my limited knowledge and is probably obvious anyways.. Tomasz, can you use the instructions provided for running a complete regression test to find out exactly what patch between 0.9.15 and 0.9.16 it was that broke it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 5835] Sacrifice crashes
by Wine Bugs Aug. 22, 2006

Aug. 22, 2006

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5835 ------- Additional Comments From szatkus(a)op.pl 2006-22-08 02:33 ------- Ok, here's the fullest backtrace I can do: http://www.republika.pl/szatkus/hata.tar.bz2 (4,7MB -> 170KB) One more thing, game works in virtual desktop, but very slowly. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 6005] riched20 modify flag incorrectly set
by Wine Bugs Aug. 22, 2006

Aug. 22, 2006

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6005 ------- Additional Comments From mike(a)codeweavers.com 2006-21-08 23:31 ------- Created an attachment (id=3376) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=3376&action=view) Sample diff for test case You can submit your test case to wine-patches as a diff. It needs wine_todo {} around test cases that fail in Wine but pass in Windows... I created an example diff for you and attached it here. The test case is a good start, and will show somebody (perhaps you?) how to fix the richedit code to work correctly. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 6005] riched20 modify flag incorrectly set
by Wine Bugs Aug. 22, 2006

Aug. 22, 2006

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6005 dank(a)kegel.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 ------- Additional Comments From dank(a)kegel.com 2006-21-08 23:17 ------- Excellent. Think you can tackle the fix, too? Tommy has a page with a few notes about richedit internals at http://silenceisdefeat.org/~tkho/seas/wine, don't know if that will help. (I am *so* glad he put together the test framework for richedit this year!) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 6005] riched20 modify flag incorrectly set
by Wine Bugs Aug. 22, 2006

Aug. 22, 2006

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6005 ------- Additional Comments From cjstimpson(a)afinternet.net 2006-21-08 23:04 ------- Created an attachment (id=3375) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=3375&action=view) test_EM_GETMODIFY.c Here's a test case for testing EM_GETMODIFY/EM_SETMODIFY. I ran it under Windows and it passed all the tests. It fails 3 cases under Wine. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 5835] Sacrifice crashes
by Wine Bugs Aug. 22, 2006

Aug. 22, 2006

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5835 jan.wine(a)zerebecki.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|wine-binary |wine-directx ------- Additional Comments From jan.wine(a)zerebecki.de 2006-21-08 22:58 ------- Can you retry with 0.9.19 (or later/cvs/git) and _attach_ the full output? The pasted output in the original report does not contain any backtrace. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 4976] build of wine-docs-0.9.11 fails
by Wine Bugs Aug. 22, 2006

Aug. 22, 2006

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4976 ------- Additional Comments From panov(a)canopus.iacp.dvo.ru 2006-21-08 21:55 ------- The bug still (wine-docs-0.9.19) exists. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 5902] X Error of failed request: BadAlloc
by Wine Bugs Aug. 22, 2006

Aug. 22, 2006

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5902 jan.wine(a)zerebecki.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|wine-binary |wine-misc Keywords| |download, NoAppDBEntry, | |source ------- Additional Comments From jan.wine(a)zerebecki.de 2006-21-08 21:17 ------- Is that the only output on the console? Does that even happen when you stop the app from making any connections (stock emule has a known problem there)? Can you give a direct link to the exact version of that app you get this problem with? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0