July 2009 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 17973] New: explorer: Spaces in desktop title on CLI cause both wrong window title and command
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org May 21, 2022

May 21, 2022

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17973 Summary: explorer: Spaces in desktop title on CLI cause both wrong window title and command Product: Wine Version: 1.1.13 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: programs AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: shacklein(a)gmail.com When using the form: $ wine explorer /desktop=Title,WxH program.exe Title currently cannot contain spaces. Example: $ wine explorer /desktop=My\ Program,800x600 myprogram.exe This correctly detects the size 800x600 for the virtual desktop, but it sets the title of the window to "My" and tries to run "Program" as the command line. I've submitted a patch to wine-patches that fixes this problem (and afaik, doesn't introduce any new ones), though I'm not sure if it's really "neat" enough. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-March/070776.html So far, I've had no feedback about it. At the least, I'd like to be told why it's not suitable for inclusion, or if there's any cleaning up I need to do to it :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 7

[Bug 14841] New: ntdll: file.ok fails in OpenSolaris but not Linux
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14841 Summary: ntdll: file.ok fails in OpenSolaris but not Linux Product: Wine Version: 1.1.2 Platform: PC OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Keywords: testcase Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ntdll AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=15384) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=15384) +file in git, bzip2 -9'ed austin(a)opensolaris:~/wine-git/dlls/ntdll/tests$ make testclean ; rm -rf ~/.wine ; make file.ok rm -f atom.ok change.ok env.ok error.ok exception.ok generated.ok info.ok large_int.ok file.ok om.ok path.ok port.ok reg.ok rtl.ok rtlbitmap.ok rtlstr.ok string.ok time.ok ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M ntdll.dll -T ../../.. -p ntdll_test.exe.so file.c && touch file.ok wine: created the configuration directory '/export/home/austin/.wine' err:iphlpapi:getNumWithOneHeader Unable to open '/proc/net/route' to count entries! err:iphlpapi:getRouteTable unimplemented! file.c:169: Test failed: wrong status deadbabe file.c:170: Test failed: wrong info 3735928559 file.c:194: Test failed: wrong status deadbabe file.c:195: Test failed: wrong info 3735928559 file.c:196: Test failed: read handle is signaled file.c:284: Test failed: wrong status deadbabe file.c:285: Test failed: wrong info 3735928559 file.c:286: Test failed: event is signaled make: *** [file.ok] Error 8 +file attached -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 11

[Bug 19183] New: "make test" still fails on d3d9/tests/visual.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org May 20, 2022

May 20, 2022

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19183 Summary: "make test" still fails on d3d9/tests/visual.c Product: Wine Version: 1.1.25 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: directx-d3d AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: dank(a)kegel.com (This is a sequel to bug 10221; perhaps we closed that one too soon.) Running i=0 while test $i -lt 10 do ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M d3d9.dll -T ../../.. -p d3d9_test.exe.so visual.c > visual-$i.log 2>&1 i=`expr $i + 1` sleep 1 done cat visual-*.log | grep "Test failed" | sort | uniq -c | sort -n produces 1 visual.c:9439: Test failed: stretchrect: Pixel 160,360 has color 0x00ff00ff, expected 0x00ff0000 1 visual.c:9441: Test failed: stretchrect: Pixel 480,360 has color 0x00ff00ff, expected 0x0000ff00 1 visual.c:9443: Test failed: stretchrect: Pixel 480,120 has color 0x00ff00ff, expected 0x000000ff 1 visual.c:9445: Test failed: stretchrect: Pixel 160,120 has color 0x00ff00ff, expected 0x00000000 2 visual.c:8978: Test failed: Offscreen failed for D3DFMT_A32B32G32R32F: expected no color blending but received it anyway. 3 visual.c:6883: Test failed: SRCALPHA on texture returned color 00000000, expected 0x00bf4000 3 visual.c:6887: Test failed: DSTALPHA on texture returned color 00000000, expected 0x000000ff 3 visual.c:8978: Test failed: Offscreen failed for D3DFMT_G32R32F: expected no color blending but received it anyway. 3 visual.c:8978: Test failed: Offscreen failed for D3DFMT_R32F: expected no color blending but received it anyway. 4 visual.c:8969: Test failed: Offscreen failed for D3DFMT_A16B16G16R16F: Got color 00000000, expected 0x181800. 4 visual.c:8978: Test failed: Offscreen failed for D3DFMT_G16R16F: expected no color blending but received it anyway. 5 visual.c:8326: Test failed: Pixel 14/18 has color 0x00000000, expected 0x0000ff00 5 visual.c:8329: Test failed: Pixel 18/14 has color 0x00000000, expected 0x000000ff 5 visual.c:8332: Test failed: Pixel 18/18 has color 0x00000000, expected 0x0000ffff 5 visual.c:8978: Test failed: Offscreen failed for D3DFMT_R16F: expected no color blending but received it anyway. 5 visual.c:9439: Test failed: stretchrect: Pixel 160,360 has color 0x00000000, expected 0x00ff0000 5 visual.c:9441: Test failed: stretchrect: Pixel 480,360 has color 0x00000000, expected 0x0000ff00 5 visual.c:9443: Test failed: stretchrect: Pixel 480,120 has color 0x00000000, expected 0x000000ff 7 visual.c:8800: Test failed: Texture 1(output color 1) has color 0x00000000, expected 0x0000ff00 7 visual.c:8802: Test failed: Texture 2(output color 2) has color 0x00000000, expected 0x000000ff lspci | grep -i vga says 00:10.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation GeForce 7100/nForce 630i (rev a2) and this is on Jaunty x86-64 with the proprietary nvidia 180 driver. I'll attach the output of glxinfo. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 13

[Bug 18635] New: Menu bar is hidden in Adobe Lightroom 2.3
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18635 Summary: Menu bar is hidden in Adobe Lightroom 2.3 Product: Wine Version: 1.1.22 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: thomas+wine(a)stromberg.org With the Adobe Lightroom 2.3 demo, the menu bar titles (File, etc.) do not display. If you click on the area that they should be, the menu does appear however. Lightroom 2.3 can be downloaded from https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/tdrc/index.cfm?product=photoshop_lightroom (free Adobe login required) I'm not sure where to go about tracing the issue down to, but I did notice the following calls that show that it is calling DrawMenuBar(). 0009:Call user32.GetMenu(0002003c) ret=60030cbe 0009:Ret user32.GetMenu() retval=000000f0 ret=60030cbe 0009:Call user32.GetMenuBarInfo(0002003c,fffffffd,00000000,0032e1a4) ret=60030cec fixme:menu:GetMenuBarInfo (0x2003c,0xfffffffd,0x00000000,0x32e1a4) 0009:Ret user32.GetMenuBarInfo() retval=00000000 ret=60030cec 0009:Call user32.GetSystemMenu(0002003c,00000000) ret=60030beb 0009:Ret user32.GetSystemMenu() retval=00000280 ret=60030beb 0009:Call user32.GetSystemMenu(0002003c,00000000) ret=60030c06 0009:Ret user32.GetSystemMenu() retval=00000280 ret=60030c06 0009:Call user32.GetMenuItemInfoW(00000280,0000f060,00000000,0032e08c) ret=60030c22 0009:Ret user32.GetMenuItemInfoW() retval=00000001 ret=60030c22 0009:Call user32.DrawMenuBar(0002003c) ret=6008d171 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 21

[Bug 19092] New: Missing background in Civilization 4 launch window
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org April 20, 2022

April 20, 2022

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19092 Summary: Missing background in Civilization 4 launch window Product: Wine Version: 1.1.24 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: jaimerave(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=22037) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=22037) Screenshot in Ubuntu Well the tittle says everything. I'm attaching a screenshot. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 17

[Bug 18027] New: Check support for application switching by keybord shortcuts
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org April 18, 2022

April 18, 2022

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18027 Summary: Check support for application switching by keybord shortcuts Product: Wine Version: 1.1.19 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: Markus.Elfring(a)web.de I am used to the shortcut "Alt+Tab" with the effect of switching between application windows. This is usually also supported in X sessions (like KDE or GNOME). But it does not work if the game "Civilization 4" was started in full screen mode. How much has this behaviour got to do with an option "Managed windows using X11"? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 22

[Bug 16221] New: Nota Bene requires AUTOEXEC.NT
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org March 26, 2022

March 26, 2022

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221 Summary: Nota Bene requires AUTOEXEC.NT Product: Wine Version: 1.1.9 Platform: PC URL: https://www.notabene.com/download/demos/nbdemo80.exe OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, Installer Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: dos AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Nota Bene, on install, checks for AUTOEXEC.NT in system32. If it doesn't find it, it restores its own copy, but we should have our own copy. Shouldn't take much to implement. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 16

[Bug 16222] New: Nota Bene requires CONFIG.NT
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org March 25, 2022

March 25, 2022

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16222 Summary: Nota Bene requires CONFIG.NT Product: Wine Version: 1.1.9 Platform: PC URL: https://www.notabene.com/download/demos/nbdemo80.exe OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, Installer Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: dos AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Nota Bene, on install, checks for CONFIG.NT in system32. If it doesn't find it, it restores its own copy, but we should have our own copy. Shouldn't take much to implement. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 12

[Bug 11112] New: Does the fatal error if the config directory isn' t owned by the user make sense?
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org March 21, 2022

March 21, 2022

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11112 Summary: Does the fatal error if the config directory isn't owned by the user make sense? Product: Wine Version: CVS/GIT Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: bero(a)arklinux.org Created an attachment (id=10147) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=10147) Proposed fix Recent wine versions abort on startup if the config directory isn't owned by the user running wine. This breaks setups where several users share a common wine prefix (e.g. to make applications that make heavy use of the registry available to several users without installing them several times) and they have the right access to the configs through group permissions. Unless I'm overlooking a better way to do this, it would make more sense to check proper permissions than to check ownership. I'm attaching a patch that does that. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 50

[Bug 18905] New: Nvda In Wine
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org March 9, 2022

March 9, 2022

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18905 Summary: Nvda In Wine Product: Wine Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: bluescale1976(a)aol.com This is more of a feature request, I hope I completed the form correctly. I was wondering if it would be possible to either add the screen reader NVDA in to a default installation of Wine, or make it so that NVDA can be installed in to Wine. NVDA would give blind Linux users access to applications in Wine. It does not use video hooks, so it is probably the best choice for a Wine screen reader. It is open source and can be found at: http://www.nvda-project.org/ The installer talks, so if it could be made to work, installing it with out sighted assistance would be no problem. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 27