January 2010 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 12859] New: HideThreadFromDebugger in NtSetInformationThread
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 24, 2021

July 24, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12859 Summary: HideThreadFromDebugger in NtSetInformationThread Product: Wine Version: 0.9.60 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ntdll AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: readams(a)readams.net Created an attachment (id=12555) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=12555) Add HideThreadFromDebugger to winternl.h and to NtSetInformationThread This API exists in the windows NtSetInformationThread for some reason. The sensible thing to do in wine here seems to be to just ignore this call. Patch attached is against 0.9.60. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 20

[Bug 21562] New: Multiple init/deinit of msvcrt (std fd's) causes pluto app installer to hang
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 24, 2021

July 24, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21562 Summary: Multiple init/deinit of msvcrt (std fd's) causes pluto app installer to hang Product: Wine Version: 1.1.37 Platform: x86 URL: http://pluto.brain-killer.org/download/pluto_FE_w32_en _0036.exe OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: msvcrt AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: focht(a)gmx.net Hello, an interesting one... WINEDEBUG=+tid,+seh,+loaddll,+msvcrt,+server,+relay wine ./pluto_FE_w32_en_0036.exe >>log.txt 2>&1 The app installer creates an additional worker (unpack) thread from its main thread: --- snip --- 0009:Call KERNEL32.CreateThread(00000000,00000000,0042b674,00000000,00000000,00436718) ret=0042c3e8 0009: *fd* 6 <- 22 0009: new_thread( access=001f03ff, attributes=00000000, suspend=1, request_fd=6 ) 0009: new_thread() = 0 { tid=001b, handle=0004 } ... 001b:Starting thread proc 0x42b674 (arg=(nil)) ... 0009:Ret KERNEL32.CreateThread() retval=00000004 ret=0042c3e8 --- snip --- The app installer main thread contains a loop to check if the (unpack) worker thread (handle = 0x4) is still alive. While doing so, it pumps messages and delays the next check, illustrated by following code snippet: --- snip --- 0009:Ret KERNEL32.Sleep() retval=00000000 ret=004167e4 0009:Call KERNEL32.GetExitCodeThread(00000004,0032fd9c) ret=0042c40f 0009: get_thread_info( handle=0004, tid_in=0000 ) 0009: get_thread_info() = 0 { pid=0008, tid=001b, teb=7ffd4000, affinity=ffffffffffffffff, creation_time=1caa28d3911cf76 (-0.0285120), exit_time=0, exit_code=259, priority=0, last=0 } 0009:Ret KERNEL32.GetExitCodeThread() retval=00000001 ret=0042c40f 0009:Call user32.PeekMessageA(0032fd0c,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000001) ret=004167d9 ... 0009:Ret user32.PeekMessageA() retval=00000000 ret=004167d9 0009:Call KERNEL32.Sleep(00000001) ret=004167e4 --- snip --- Unfortunately something goes wrong and the app installer refuses to terminate - because the worker checking loop suddenly became a forever loop: --- snip --- ... 0009:Call KERNEL32.Sleep(00000001) ret=004167e4 0009:Ret KERNEL32.Sleep() retval=00000000 ret=004167e4 0009:Call KERNEL32.GetExitCodeThread(00000004,0032fd9c) ret=0042c40f 0009: get_thread_info( handle=0004, tid_in=0000 ) 0009: get_thread_info() = INVALID_HANDLE { pid=0000, tid=0000, teb=00000000, affinity=00000000, creation_time=0, exit_time=0, exit_code=0, priority=0, last=0 } 0009:Ret KERNEL32.GetExitCodeThread() retval=00000000 ret=0042c40f 0009:Call user32.PeekMessageA(0032fd0c,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000001) ret=004167d9 0009: get_message( flags=00000001, get_win=00000000, get_first=00000000, get_last=ffffffff, hw_id=00000000, wake_mask=00000000, changed_mask=00000000 ) 0009: get_message() = PENDING { win=00000000, msg=00000000, wparam=00000000, lparam=00000000, type=0, time=00000000, active_hooks=80000000, total=0, data={} } ... 0009:Ret user32.PeekMessageA() retval=00000000 ret=004167d9 --- snip --- The installer code doesn't evaluate the return code of GetExitCodeThread() but instead accesses the exit code variable directly, comparing it to 0x103 -> STILL_ACTIVE. Because the thread once lived in this state, this variable is never touched by Wine in case the thread handle becomes invalid. GetExitCodeThread() fails but the variable still contains the last known "good" value -> STILL_ACTIVE (the app doesn't reinit it). The app still thinks the worker is alive and goes into forever loop. Now the culprit: the thread handle, delivered to caller upon returning from CreateThread() is _never_ closed by app explicitly -> CloseHandle() so GetExitCodeThread() should be successful in any case. We have to go back in time to unearth the problem ... lets look what happens to this thread handle (0x4). --- snip --- ... 001b:Call KERNEL32.FreeLibrary(10000000) ret=004242bb 001b:Call PE DLL (proc=0x10001148,module=0x10000000 L"unpack.dll",reason=PROCESS_DETACH,res=(nil)) 001b:Ret PE DLL (proc=0x10001148,module=0x10000000 L"unpack.dll",reason=PROCESS_DETACH,res=(nil)) retval=1 001b:Call PE DLL (proc=0x5de0cc9c,module=0x5de00000 L"crtdll.dll",reason=PROCESS_DETACH,res=(nil)) 001b:Ret PE DLL (proc=0x5de0cc9c,module=0x5de00000 L"crtdll.dll",reason=PROCESS_DETACH,res=(nil)) retval=1 001b:Call PE DLL (proc=0x5c7cd8b4,module=0x5c790000 L"msvcrt.dll",reason=PROCESS_DETACH,res=(nil)) ... 001b:trace:msvcrt:DllMain (0x5c790000, DLL_PROCESS_DETACH, (nil)) pid(8), tid(1b), tls(4) 001b:trace:msvcrt:msvcrt_free_mt_locks : uninitializing all mtlocks ... 001b:trace:msvcrt:MSVCRT__close :fd (3) handle (0xfffffff6) 001b:Call KERNEL32.CloseHandle(fffffff6) ret=5c7ad9fc 001b: close_handle( handle=0004 ) 001b: close_handle() = 0 001b:Ret KERNEL32.CloseHandle() retval=00000001 ret=5c7ad9fc 001b:trace:msvcrt:msvcrt_free_fd :fd (3) freed 001b:trace:msvcrt:MSVCRT__close :ok ... 001b:trace:msvcrt:MSVCRT__close :fd (4) handle (0xfffffff5) 001b:Call KERNEL32.CloseHandle(fffffff5) ret=5c7ad9fc 001b: close_handle( handle=0008 ) 001b: close_handle() = 0 001b:Ret KERNEL32.CloseHandle() retval=00000001 ret=5c7ad9fc 001b:trace:msvcrt:msvcrt_free_fd :fd (4) freed 001b:trace:msvcrt:MSVCRT__close :ok ... 001b:trace:msvcrt:MSVCRT__close :fd (5) handle (0xfffffff4) 001b:Call KERNEL32.CloseHandle(fffffff4) ret=5c7ad9fc 001b: close_handle( handle=000c ) 001b: close_handle() = 0 001b:Ret KERNEL32.CloseHandle() retval=00000001 ret=5c7ad9fc 001b:trace:msvcrt:msvcrt_free_fd :fd (5) freed 001b:trace:msvcrt:MSVCRT__close :ok 001b:trace:msvcrt:MSVCRT__fcloseall :closed (3) handles ... 001b:trace:msvcrt:MSVCRT__close :fd (0) handle (0x8) 001b:Call KERNEL32.CloseHandle(00000008) ret=5c7ad9fc 001b: close_handle( handle=0008 ) 001b: close_handle() = INVALID_HANDLE 001b:Ret KERNEL32.CloseHandle() retval=00000000 ret=5c7ad9fc ... 001b:warn:msvcrt:MSVCRT__close :failed-last error (6) ... 001b:trace:msvcrt:MSVCRT__close :ok ... 001b:trace:msvcrt:MSVCRT__close :fd (1) handle (0xc) 001b:Call KERNEL32.CloseHandle(0000000c) ret=5c7ad9fc 001b: close_handle( handle=000c ) 001b: close_handle() = INVALID_HANDLE 001b:Ret KERNEL32.CloseHandle() retval=00000000 ret=5c7ad9fc ... 001b:warn:msvcrt:MSVCRT__close :failed-last error (6) ... 001b:trace:msvcrt:MSVCRT__close :ok ... 001b:trace:msvcrt:MSVCRT__close :fd (2) handle (0x50) 001b:Call KERNEL32.CloseHandle(00000050) ret=5c7ad9fc 001b: close_handle( handle=0050 ) 001b: close_handle() = 0 001b:Ret KERNEL32.CloseHandle() retval=00000001 ret=5c7ad9fc 001b:trace:msvcrt:msvcrt_free_fd :fd (2) freed 001b:Call KERNEL32.GetStdHandle(fffffff4) ret=5c7ac729 001b:Ret KERNEL32.GetStdHandle() retval=0000000c ret=5c7ac729 001b:trace:msvcrt:MSVCRT__close :ok ... 001b:trace:msvcrt:msvcrt_free_console :Closing console handles --- snip --- *eek* ... the thread handle gets closed as part of msvcrt cleanup! PROCESS_DETACH -> msvcrt_free_io() -> MSVCRT__fcloseall() This will close fd(3), fd(4), fd(5) -> stdin,stdout,stderr Corresponding msvcrt init: --- snip --- ... 001b:Call PE DLL (proc=0x5c7cd8b4,module=0x5c790000 L"msvcrt.dll",reason=PROCESS_ATTACH,res=(nil)) ... 001b:trace:msvcrt:DllMain (0x5c790000, DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH, (nil)) pid(8), tid(1b), tls(0) ... 001b:Call KERNEL32.GetStartupInfoA(0096e4b8) ret=5c7acdd6 001b:Ret KERNEL32.GetStartupInfoA() retval=00000011 ret=5c7acdd6 001b:Call KERNEL32.GetStdHandle(fffffff6) ret=5c7acf77 001b:Ret KERNEL32.GetStdHandle() retval=00000004 ret=5c7acf77 001b:Call KERNEL32.DuplicateHandle(ffffffff,00000004,ffffffff,5c7db2e0,00000000,00000001,00000002) ret=5c7acfc0 001b: dup_handle( src_process=ffffffff, src_handle=0004, dst_process=ffffffff, access=00000000, attributes=00000002, options=00000002 ) 001b: dup_handle() = 0 { handle=0008, self=1, closed=0 } 001b:Ret KERNEL32.DuplicateHandle() retval=00000001 ret=5c7acfc0 001b:Call KERNEL32.GetStdHandle(fffffff5) ret=5c7acff6 001b:Ret KERNEL32.GetStdHandle() retval=00000008 ret=5c7acff6 001b:Call KERNEL32.DuplicateHandle(ffffffff,00000008,ffffffff,5c7db304,00000000,00000001,00000002) ret=5c7ad03f 001b: dup_handle( src_process=ffffffff, src_handle=0008, dst_process=ffffffff, access=00000000, attributes=00000002, options=00000002 ) 001b: dup_handle() = 0 { handle=000c, self=1, closed=0 } 001b:Ret KERNEL32.DuplicateHandle() retval=00000001 ret=5c7ad03f 001b:Call KERNEL32.GetStdHandle(fffffff4) ret=5c7ad075 001b:Ret KERNEL32.GetStdHandle() retval=0000000c ret=5c7ad075 001b:Call KERNEL32.DuplicateHandle(ffffffff,0000000c,ffffffff,5c7db328,00000000,00000001,00000002) ret=5c7ad0be 001b: dup_handle( src_process=ffffffff, src_handle=000c, dst_process=ffffffff, access=00000000, attributes=00000002, options=00000002 ) 001b: dup_handle() = 0 { handle=0050, self=1, closed=0 } 001b:Ret KERNEL32.DuplicateHandle() retval=00000001 ret=5c7ad0be 001b:trace:msvcrt:msvcrt_init_io :handles (0x8)(0xc)(0x50) --- snip --- The culprit: msvcrt is actually loaded and unloaded _two_ times! Upon the first unload sequence all std/fd handles are teared down (including handle 0x4) - this makes the handle values available in server again. When the worker thread is created it gets the unused handle 0x4 assigned from wineserver. This is the handle which is then polled by installers GetExitCodeThread() loop. When msvcrt is loaded a second time, GetStdHandle( STD_XXX) will still deliver its original value from PEB (0x4, 0x8, 0xC). Upon second msvcrt unload, fd(3), fd(4), fd(5) are closed again but this time they close something completely different (indication are also fd close errors following), leaving the app installer in forever loop. Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 7

[Bug 15381] New: CoFreeUnusedLibraries will crash COM server or cause 0x800703E6/I_RpcReceive error 0x3e6
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 20, 2021

July 20, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15381 Summary: CoFreeUnusedLibraries will crash COM server or cause 0x800703E6/I_RpcReceive error 0x3e6 Product: Wine Version: 1.0.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ole32 AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: dmda(a)yandex.ru Created an attachment (id=16230) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=16230) demo illustrating the problem if CoFreeUnusedLibraries is called by COM server, it will break RPC channcel and lead to the errors Attached is client/server code that demonstrates the problem. If you comment out CoFreeUnusedLibraries call, it will start to work. Steps: -comple all 3 projects in the Workspace (Debug target is the only appropriate for the sake of demo) -make sure server and proxy are registered by running testserver.exe -RegServer, regsvr32 testserverPS.dll -run testproject.exe (the client) Expected behaviour: 1. it will show server's message "CServer is created", click ok 2. it will show client's message "press OK when ready", click ok 3. it will show server's message passed by the client "Hello world!", click ok 4. it will show client's message "call succeeded" and client will exit 5. after roughly 6sec it will show that the server is unloaded/ Actual behaviour: 1. it will show server's message "CServer is created", click ok 2. it will show client's message "press OK when ready", click ok 3. it will show server's message passed by the client "Hello world!", click ok 4. it will dump out trouble in the console and show client's message "call failed" You may call CoFreeUnusedLibraries anywhere in the appartment and it will break RPC on the server side. In some cases it will crash whole the server, like in the demo. Tested environment: Fedora Core 8, 32bit, x86, wine 1.0 installed through the updates -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 14

[Bug 12968] New: MS Visual Studio V6 setup error 258 since 0.9.58
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 19, 2021

July 19, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12968 Summary: MS Visual Studio V6 setup error 258 since 0.9.58 Product: Wine Version: 0.9.61. Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P1 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: k.king177(a)ntlworld.com trying to install Visual Studio v6 get MS Msgbox headed "Setup Error 258" with text Your setup files may be damaged. Try restarting the setup program from where you originally ran it. this is probably related or from same issue causing bug# 12967 for Office 97 see that bug for environment details. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 5

[Bug 15948] New: Error generated when trying to install visual studio 6.0 into centos5 via wine
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 19, 2021

July 19, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15948 Summary: Error generated when trying to install visual studio 6.0 into centos5 via wine Product: Wine Version: 1.1.7 Platform: PC-x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P4 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: boniemx(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=17135) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=17135) error-log for installation of visual studio 6.0 via wine into centos5 Hi, am trying to install Visual studio 6.0, but it produces the error that I have attached. Please I need to do this urgently. Please help -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 6

[Bug 15619] New: Visual Studio 2008 Installer Hangs after err:seh:setup_exception_record stack overflow
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 19, 2021

July 19, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15619 Summary: Visual Studio 2008 Installer Hangs after err:seh:setup_exception_record stack overflow Product: Wine Version: 1.1.6 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: peterbelm(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=16642) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=16642) Terminal output When running the Visual Studio 2008 installer the setup window appears, and starts loading installation components, after about 30 seconds full processor usage, err:seh:setup_exception_record stack overflow appears in the terminal output (see attachment) the progress bar increases slightly, and then it seems to hang. Checking with strace on the setup.exe process (the main one, the other one gives me 'Operation not permitted', even when sudo'ing it) shows it is waiting to read from a pipe, which is red when doing 'ls -l', I assume that means the pipe doesn't exist any more? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 6

[Bug 20227] New: msi: Table Join on two tables that have same (non-join) column name causes only first column data to be returned.
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 19, 2021

July 19, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20227 Summary: msi: Table Join on two tables that have same (non-join) column name causes only first column data to be returned. Product: Wine Version: 1.1.30 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: msi AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: ngallaher+winehq(a)deepthought.org Created an attachment (id=23863) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=23863) Patch for TableJoin bug Imagine the following tables Table foo: string color string flavor Table bar: string color string flavor with query "Select foo.color, bar.flavor from foo, bar where foo.color=bar.color" The current version returns the data from columns foo.color and foo.flavor. This is because when the tables are joined, the original tablename identifiers are dropped on the floor, resulting in a table with two 'color' and two 'flavor' columns. The VIEW_find_column() function then returns the first column found that matches the requested name. This can be traced to a deficiency in VIEW_find_column() which only uses the column names in its comparison. Further, the sql parser does not preserve the table identifier, but this is easily fixed. A patch, including test case is attached. This behaviour was observed when trying to install Visual Studio 2008 Standard Edition. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 13

[Bug 15671] New: Visual Studio 2008 Express web install fails with "Sharing violation" on $shtdwn$.req
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 19, 2021

July 19, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15671 Summary: Visual Studio 2008 Express web install fails with "Sharing violation" on $shtdwn$.req Product: Wine Version: 1.1.6 Platform: Other URL: http://www.microsoft.com/express/download/#webInstall OS/Version: other Status: NEW Keywords: download, Installer Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: dank(a)kegel.com To get the installer to even try, you have to do "winetricks volnum". The next problem is while copying file 41 of 41, $shtdwn$.req, it gets a sharing violation. The file it's trying to copy is there, but can't be opened, possibly because it has never been closed. 002f:Call KERNEL32.CreateFileA(0100afa0 "c:\\21309f2f7662773b82c3\\$shtdwn$.req",c0000000,00000003,00000000,00000001,04000002,00000000) ret=0100355e trace:file:CreateFileW returning 0x68 002f:Ret KERNEL32.CreateFileA() retval=00000068 ret=0100355e 002f:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(00000068,0100a5a0,00000314,0032fe70,00000000) ret=010035b5 trace:file:WriteFile 0x68 0x100a5a0 788 0x32fe70 (nil) 002f:Ret KERNEL32.WriteFile() retval=00000001 ret=010035b5 002f:Call KERNEL32.SetEnvironmentVariableA(01002388 "_SFX_CAB_SHUTDOWN_REQUEST",0100afa0 "c:\\21309f2f7662773b82c3\\$shtdwn$.req") ret=010035cb ... ... trace:text:DrawTextExW L"Setup is copying required resources to your temp directory.\r\nCopying file 41 of 41.\r\n\r\nCopying setup file: $shtdwn$.req", -1, [(0,0)-(360,70)] 00000050 ... 0032:Call KERNEL32.CopyFileExW(0033e80c L"C:\\21309f2f7662773b82c3\\$shtdwn$.req",0033e5fc L"C:\\windows\\temp\\SIT42147.tmp\\$shtdwn$.req",3aaed850,0000000 0,0033ddbc,00000002) ret=3aaed716 warn:file:CreateFileW Unable to create file L"C:\\21309f2f7662773b82c3\\$shtdwn$.req" (status c0000043) warn:file:CopyFileW Unable to open source L"C:\\21309f2f7662773b82c3\\$shtdwn$.req" 0032:Call oleaut32.SysAllocString(00787cf0 L"Setup has encountered a problem while trying to copy:\r\nC:\\21309f2f7662773b82c3\\$shtdwn$.req\r\nPress Retry to attempt the copy again. Press Cancel to cancel setup.") ret=3aae49ab Interestingly, even on Windows this file can't be opened sometimes early in an installer; see http://www.digitalformula.net/infrastructure/how-to-perform-an-unattended-i… It's an interesting mystery. What triggers that file to be closed on Windows? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 4

[Bug 14875] New: VS 2008 Express Editions (SP1) installer fails with directory resolution error (bug in msi appsearch action)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 19, 2021

July 19, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14875 Summary: VS 2008 Express Editions (SP1) installer fails with directory resolution error (bug in msi appsearch action) Product: Wine Version: CVS/GIT Platform: PC URL: http://www.microsoft.com/express/download/ OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: msi AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: focht(a)gmx.net Hello, downloaded full DVD image of Visual Studio 2008 Express Edition with SP1. Minimal set of prerequisites needed to reproduce this bug: 1. sh winetricks volnum (bug 5351) 2. MsiSetExternalUIRecord patch (bug 10547) The installer stops with error "directory resolution failed". --- snip --- 002c:Call msi.MsiGetPropertyW(00000001,00cee4c8 L"VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8",39e262f8,0032ab10) ret=39e55231 002c:trace:msi:MSI_GetProperty 1 L"VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" 0x39e262f8 0x32ab10 .. 002c:trace:msi:MSI_DatabaseOpenViewW L"SELECT `Value` FROM `_Property` WHERE `_Property`='VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8'" 0x32a9c4 .. 002c:Ret msi.MsiGetPropertyW() retval=000000ea ret=39e55231 .. 002c:Call KERNEL32.FormatMessageW(00000b00,3aa70000,0000108e,00000400,0032a7bc,00000000,00000000) ret=39ea74fb 002c:Ret KERNEL32.FormatMessageW() retval=00000024 ret=39ea74fb .. 002c:Call oleaut32.SysAllocString(00cdcd08 L"Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Express Edition with SP1 - DEU") ret=39e4bc58 .. 002c:Call oleaut32.SysAllocString(00cee978 L"VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8: Fehler bei Verzeichnisaufl\00f6sung.") ret=39e4bc58 .. 002c:Call oleaut32.SysFreeString(010ab66c L"ERROR processed; exception was thrown for retail build\n\tDeveloper Comment: \n\tBuild Time: Thu Dec 11 15:04:18 2003\n\tDWORD: 234") ret=39e40e56 .. 002c:Call oleaut32.SysFreeString(010ab5ec L"Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Express Edition with SP1 - DEU") ret=39e40e5f .. 002c:Call KERNEL32.RaiseException(e06d7363,00000001,00000003,0032a9d8) ret=39e80d28 002c:trace:seh:raise_exception code=e06d7363 flags=1 addr=0x7b8433b0 --- snip --- Property "VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" (= Visual Studio install directory) does not exist (anymore) at this install stage. Besides from a bug in dlls/msi/install.c:msi_strcpy_to_awstring(), which results in wrong ERROR_MORE_DATA for empty unicode strings (see previous snippet, str=L"" + len=0), the following sequences lead to this bug... The installation directory property is created/set first here: --- snip --- .. 002c:trace:msi:MsiDoActionW L"CA_SetVcvars32batProp_x86_deu.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" 002c:trace:msi:ACTION_PerformUIAction Performing action (L"CA_SetVcvars32batProp_x86_deu.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8") .. 002c:trace:msi:ACTION_CustomAction Handling custom action L"CA_SetVcvars32batProp_x86_deu.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" (33 L"CA_SetVcvars32bat_x86_deu.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" L"[#FL_vsvars_bat_10582_x86_ln.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8];[#FL_vcvars32_bat_5369_x86_ln.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8];@SET VSINSTALLDIR=[VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8]|@SET VCINSTALLDIR=[VC7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8]|@SET FrameworkDir=[Framework_x86.3643236F_FC"...) .. 002c:trace:msi:MSI_GetPropertyW returning L"C:\\Program Files\\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\\" for property L"VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" .. --- snip --- ("@SET VSINSTALLDIR=[VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8]") But is removed/reset at later install stage, when this custom action is run: --- snip --- 002c:trace:msi:ACTION_CustomAction Handling custom action L"CA_VIntegration_Exec_VS7_x86_deu.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" (33 L"VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" L"[VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8_RO.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8]") 002c:trace:msidb:MSI_CreateRecord 1 .. 002c:trace:msi:MSI_GetPropertyW property L"VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8_RO.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" not found .. 002c:trace:msi:MSI_SetPropertyW 0xbcbec8 L"VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" L"" .. 002c:trace:msi:MSI_GetPropertyW property L"VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" not found 002c:trace:msi:MSI_DatabaseOpenViewW L"DELETE FROM `_Property` WHERE `_Property` = 'VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8'" 0x32b298 .. --- snip --- The removal/reset was due to property L"VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8_RO.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" not existing. Using ORCA tool on msi setup database, one can find this property referenced in "AppSearch" table: --- snip --- Property ; Signature VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8_RO.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8 VInt_VS7_X86_____X86.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8 --- snip --- Signature is "VInt_VS7_X86_____X86.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" "CompLocator" table: --- snip --- Signature ; ComponentId ; Type VInt_VS7_X86_____X86.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8 {2883180F-8F0F-4B82-B0BA-D48CE920DFAF} 0 --- snip --- "Component" table: --- snip --- Component ; ComponentId ; Directory ; Attribute ; Condition ; KeyPath VInt_VS7_X86_____X86.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8 {2883180F-8F0F-4B82-B0BA-D48CE920DFAF} VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8 0 --- snip --- Armed with this information, one can find the following in trace log: --- snip --- 002c:trace:msi:iterate_appsearch L"VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8_RO.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" L"VInt_VS7_X86_____X86.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" 002c:trace:msi:ACTION_AppSearchGetSignature package 0xbcbec8, sig 0x32b304 .. 002c:trace:msi:ACTION_AppSearchGetSignature failed to query signature for L"VInt_VS7_X86_____X86.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" 002c:trace:msi:ACTION_AppSearchComponents L"VInt_VS7_X86_____X86.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" .. .. 002c:trace:msi:MsiLocateComponentW L"{2883180F-8F0F-4B82-B0BA-D48CE920DFAF}" 0x32b040 0x32b248 002c:trace:msi:MsiGetProductCodeW L"{2883180F-8F0F-4B82-B0BA-D48CE920DFAF}" 0x32afae .. 002c:trace:msi:MSIREG_OpenUserDataComponentKey L"{2883180F-8F0F-4B82-B0BA-D48CE920DFAF}" .. 002c:trace:msi:MSIREG_OpenUserDataComponentKey squished (L"F0813882F0F828B40BAB4DC89E02FDFA") .. 002c:trace:msi:ACTION_AppSearchReg L"VInt_VS7_X86_____X86.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" .. 002c:trace:msi:ACTION_AppSearchReg failed to query RegLocator for L"VInt_VS7_X86_____X86.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" 002c:trace:msi:ACTION_AppSearchIni L"VInt_VS7_X86_____X86.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" .. 002c:trace:msi:ACTION_AppSearchIni failed to query IniLocator for L"VInt_VS7_X86_____X86.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" 002c:trace:msi:ACTION_AppSearchDr L"VInt_VS7_X86_____X86.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" .. 002c:trace:msi:ACTION_AppSearchDr failed to query DrLocator for L"VInt_VS7_X86_____X86.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" .. --- snip --- This results in property "VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8_RO.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" and depending property "VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" reset. MSDN info for AppSearch table here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa367579.aspx and AppSearch action: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa367578.aspx Specifically: --- quote --- The AppSearch action requires that the Signature table be present in the installation package. [..] A signature that is not in the Signature table denotes a directory and the action sets the property to the directory path for that signature. --- quote --- This "VInt_VS7_X86_____X86.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" key is not present in "Signature" table, it's actually a directory. If we look in the previously posted "Component" table we see the directory is actually "VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" By looking into "Directory" table we find the following: --- snip --- Directory ; Directory Parent ; DefaultDir VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8 ProgramFilesFolder_x86.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8 VS90.NET|Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0 --- snip --- So "VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8_RO.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" should resolve to "VS7.3643236F_FC70_11D3_A536_0090278A1BB8" -> L"C:\\Program Files\\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\\" (install dir) This looks like bug in wine msi appsearch action impl. Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 15

[Bug 20623] New: Swiftkit crashed
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 19, 2021

July 19, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20623 Summary: Swiftkit crashed Product: Wine Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: frt975(a)gmail.com SwiftKit Crashed. I gave vb6run gecko and Java installed. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 16