March 2011 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 18287] New: User friendly way to delete comments
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Sept. 7, 2017

Sept. 7, 2017

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18287 Summary: User friendly way to delete comments Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk Although this has been improved, deleting comments is still a long, painful, laborious task. Adobe Photoshop CS4, just as one example, has a load of comments. The majority of these are pointless and should be removed. The problem being it would take at least an hour to do so. The current method is: 1. Select a thread to delete. 2. Enter (or paste) a reason. 3. Press delete. 4. Wait for the page (and all the comments) to load again. 5. Go to Step 1. If any comments are worth keeping, you have to be careful not to delete them. In apps like photoshop, this can create a LOT of emails too (I've just remove a load of comments from CS3 and received over a hundred emails). A nice method might be: 1. Select "Edit Comments". 2. Tick the stale comments to remove. 3. Enter a generic reason. 4. Hit delete. 5. Job's a good un. Maybe this could then be reduced to one email per person too? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 23691] New: Autoruns requires Administrator privilege to analyze an offline system
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Sept. 4, 2017

Sept. 4, 2017

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23691 Summary: Autoruns requires Administrator privilege to analyze an offline system Product: Wine Version: 1.2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: wine(a)placesthroughtime.com When attempting to an installation of windows vista on the same machine using the newest feature added to autoruns, having selected appropriate system root and user profile directories, when I click OK to analyze the system it pops up saying "Autoruns requires Administrator privilege to analyze an offline system" -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 10

[Bug 23530] New: Bug link queue: "has maintainer" information sometimes incorrect
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 29, 2017

Aug. 29, 2017

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23530 Summary: Bug link queue: "has maintainer" information sometimes incorrect Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: dimesio(a)earthlink.net The "Has Maintainer" column in the admin bug link queue sometimes says "No" for apps that do have maintainers. An example is Eve Online, which has 5 maintainers listed in the app entry, but currently shows up in the bug link queue as not having any. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 15524] New: Add language field for applications
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 29, 2017

Aug. 29, 2017

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15524 Summary: Add language field for applications Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: jan-winehq(a)hoogenraad.net Please add a selection box to enter the language of the application. If implemented as a version of an application, allow for different titles of the applications in the different languages. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 16031] New: Missing categorising by video driver version in AppDB
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 29, 2017

Aug. 29, 2017

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16031 Summary: Missing categorising by video driver version in AppDB Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: mityukov(a)gmail.com I found the AppDB is a bit unusable, when it comes to quick check on "Which games will run in my system", or "Will this game run for me". The most important thing, when it come to games - is the Video Driver. For example, there are many games, that run for NVidia owners, but don't run for ATI, and so on. Another point, when it comes to specific driver name and version. For example, open-source "radeon" supports only OpenGL 1.3, and Catalyst supports higher implementations. Moreover, different versions of the same, let say Catalyst, may work differently for this or that program. There are also regressions, etc. Again: Video Drivers in Linux, are not ideal. I would say, this point have even higher affect than the Distribution. What I would like to see, near the "Distribution" column -- is another one: "Video" or something like this, where it will say e.g. "Catalyst 8.9". This way it will be possible to link Rating with certain Video Setup, before taking the decision. Some tools for searching Games, that work with specific video driver(s) would also be _HIGHLY_ appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 25157] New: Black Prophecy crashes on unimplemented function msvcr100.dll._wcsupr_s_l
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 26, 2017

Aug. 26, 2017

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25157 Summary: Black Prophecy crashes on unimplemented function msvcr100.dll._wcsupr_s_l Product: Wine Version: 1.3.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: msvcrt AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: dank(a)kegel.com Reported in http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=21946&iTesting… ('winetricks vcrun2010' ought to work around it, but supposedly doesn't?) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 16169] New: Add field for changes to default winecfg settings to AppDB test report form
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 16, 2017

Aug. 16, 2017

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16169 Summary: Add field for changes to default winecfg settings to AppDB test report form Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: dimesio(a)earthlink.net The AppDB test report form currently does not have a specific field to list changes made to default winecfg settings. Reporters can, of course, use the extra comments section for this, but many forget or don't bother, and even when they do, the information may be buried amongst a number of comments. This causes confusion amongst users (esp. new ones) who expect an app to work well based on a gold rating, but may not realize that it requires some tweaking. Adding a separate field would remind reporters to include this information, and highlight it for readers. This field could also be used to automatically restrict platinum ratings to the stated definition of "no changes required in winecfg." -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 25699] New: The URL in the "Test Results submitted" email does not show the Test Results
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 6, 2017

Aug. 6, 2017

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25699 Summary: The URL in the "Test Results submitted" email does not show the Test Results Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: alexandru.balut(a)gmail.com I got an email about Test Results submitted for a (new) version of Total Commander (http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=614) SUBJECT: [AppDB] Test Results submitted for version 7.56a of Total Commander (a.k.a. Windows Commander) by StefanDe BODY: Test Results submitted for version 7.56a of Total Commander (a.k.a. Windows Commander) by StefanDe ------------------------------------------------------- http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=22423&iTesting… This test data has been queued. [...] To be honest, I don't know why I got this email, maybe because I'm a maintainer or I monitor version 7.50a.. The problem is that I cannot view these "Test Results", the AppDB URL from the email, which is supposed to do this, shows: Queued Entry This entry is currently queued, and may not be visible to all users. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 12927] New: Flat comment mode does not display any replies
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 26, 2017

July 26, 2017

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12927 Summary: Flat comment mode does not display any replies Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: MattFinn(a)gmail.com When i view the comments in "flat" mode, the replies are all just missing completely, instead of showing up as new entries like I would imagine is appropriate. There is no mention of their existence. Should be easily reproducible, just click to "flat". If not, then the page I was on is "http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=9901". -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 24497] New: Adding distributions is far too easy
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 25, 2017

July 25, 2017

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24497 Summary: Adding distributions is far too easy Product: WineHQ Bugzilla Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: bugzilla-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk Every day someone adds another duplicate distribution or something that isn't a distribution at all, despite how easy it is to pick from the drop-down list, and has to be merged by an admin. Approving submitted distributions should be done by admin only, or it should be made more obvious that a distro has been submitted in a test result (if possible). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 10