April 2014 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 22950] New: nokia music player installation failed
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22950 Summary: nokia music player installation failed Product: Wine Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: loader AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: versterj(a)gmail.com when running setupoviplayer.exe to install nokia music player the installation hangs after terms and condition page has been "ok". i want to start to download the music asap. thanks -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 15

[Bug 36146] New: valgrind shows several leaks in dlls/jscript/tests/caller.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36146 Bug ID: 36146 Summary: valgrind shows several leaks in dlls/jscript/tests/caller.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.17 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: jscript Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ==32653== 12 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 69 of 753 ==32653== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==32653== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==32653== by 0x697611F: ??? ==32653== by 0x69764DD: ??? ==32653== by 0x6976548: ??? ==32653== by 0x6977213: ??? ==32653== by 0x69793E6: ??? ==32653== by 0x6979560: ??? ==32653== by 0x69796F5: ??? ==32653== by 0x6979D90: ??? ==32653== by 0x6972401: ??? ==32653== by 0x4E4DA12: _call_change_type (dispex.h:686) ==32653== by 0x4E4DC08: test_change_type (caller.c:139) ==32653== by 0x4E4DFD6: test_change_types (caller.c:196) ==32653== by 0x4E4E3B6: test_caller (caller.c:238) ==32653== by 0x4E4EADA: Test_InvokeEx (caller.c:363) ==32653== by 0x695D3E5: ??? ==32653== by 0x69621D9: ??? ==32653== by 0x6966B58: ??? ==32653== by 0x6966F33: ??? ==32653== ==32708== 18 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 129 of 768 ==32708== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==32708== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==32708== by 0x6A2F11F: ??? ==32708== by 0x6A2F4DD: ??? ==32708== by 0x6A2F548: ??? ==32708== by 0x6A312DE: ??? ==32708== by 0x6A32C08: ??? ==32708== by 0x6A2B401: ??? ==32708== by 0x4E4E1D2: test_change_types (dispex.h:686) ==32708== by 0x4E4F1E2: run_scripts (caller.c:549) ==32708== by 0x4E4F3CB: func_caller (caller.c:585) ==32708== by 0x4E5ED5F: run_test (test.h:584) ==32708== by 0x4E5F14E: main (test.h:654) ==32708== ==2241== 28 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 233 of 768 ==2241== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==2241== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==2241== by 0x6A2F11F: ??? ==2241== by 0x6A2F4DD: ??? ==2241== by 0x6A2F548: ??? ==2241== by 0x6A2F1E3: ??? ==2241== by 0x6A2FE69: ??? ==2241== by 0x6A2BC3E: ??? ==2241== by 0x6A4ABD4: ??? ==2241== by 0x7BC52F48: ??? (loader.c:138) ==2241== by 0x7BC55586: MODULE_InitDLL (loader.c:1068) ==2241== by 0x7BC55904: process_attach (loader.c:1157) ==2241== by 0x7BC5856A: LdrLoadDll (loader.c:2129) ==2241== by 0x7B85A735: load_library (module.c:933) ==2241== by 0x7B85A8A3: LoadLibraryExW (module.c:990) ==2241== by 0x544D69A: COMPOBJ_DllList_Add (compobj.c:495) ==2241== by 0x544FB62: apartment_getclassobject (compobj.c:1335) ==2241== by 0x54532AC: get_inproc_class_object (compobj.c:2894) ==2241== by 0x545376B: CoGetClassObject (compobj.c:3032) ==2241== by 0x5453D2D: CoCreateInstance (compobj.c:3197) Also, possibly: ==2205== 64 bytes in 2 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 411 of 768 ==2205== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==2205== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==2205== by 0x4FE80B4: alloc_bstr (oleaut.c:162) ==2205== by 0x4FE844A: SysAllocStringLen (oleaut.c:324) ==2205== by 0x4FE8161: SysAllocString (oleaut.c:232) ==2205== by 0x6A15E31: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A1730E: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A174E2: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A17DBF: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A18017: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A18088: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A19957: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A17F2E: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A19D84: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A1A5F8: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A3A6D1: ??? ==2205== by 0x4E4EE13: _parse_script_a (activscp.h:1290) ==2205== by 0x4E4F186: run_scripts (caller.c:541) ==2205== by 0x4E4F3CB: func_caller (caller.c:585) ==2205== by 0x4E5ED5F: run_test (test.h:584) ==2205== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 3

[Bug 33257] New: Adobe Digital Editions does not recognize KOBO eReader.
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33257 Bug #: 33257 Summary: Adobe Digital Editions does not recognize KOBO eReader. Product: Wine Version: 1.4.1 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: peterharris20(a)sky.com Classification: Unclassified Adobe Digital Editions does not find the KOBO eReader when it is plugged in. Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes it and displays the folder and contents. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

3 13

[Bug 36191] New: valgrind shows some potential leaks in crypt32/tests/cert.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36191 Bug ID: 36191 Summary: valgrind shows some potential leaks in crypt32/tests/cert.c Product: Wine Version: 1.3.13 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: comdlg32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Depends on: 36190 ==17318== 20 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 51 of 334 ==17318== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==17318== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==17318== by 0x4EE398B: CryptMemAlloc (main.c:124) ==17318== by 0x4EF7661: ContextPropertyList_SetProperty (proplist.c:132) ==17318== by 0x4EAC507: CertContext_SetProperty (cert.c:703) ==17318== by 0x4EAB7AF: CertContext_GetHashProp (cert.c:399) ==17318== by 0x4EAB9DB: CertContext_GetProperty (cert.c:445) ==17318== by 0x4EABFDA: CertGetCertificateContextProperty (cert.c:579) ==17318== by 0x4EADEF3: compare_cert_by_sha1_hash (cert.c:1368) ==17318== by 0x4EAE423: cert_compare_certs_in_store (cert.c:1530) ==17318== by 0x4EAEF02: CertFindCertificateInStore (cert.c:1794) ==17318== by 0x4EAAD3C: add_cert_to_store (cert.c:192) ==17318== by 0x4EAB27F: CertAddCertificateContextToStore (cert.c:287) ==17318== by 0x4EAA852: CertAddEncodedCertificateToStore (cert.c:65) ==17318== by 0x4CC9495: testAddCert (cert.c:198) ==17318== by 0x4CD8F2F: func_cert (cert.c:3976) ==17318== by 0x4D33F67: run_test (test.h:584) ==17318== by 0x4D34356: main (test.h:654) ==17318== ==17318== 20 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 52 of 334 ==17318== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==17318== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==17318== by 0x4EE398B: CryptMemAlloc (main.c:124) ==17318== by 0x4EF7661: ContextPropertyList_SetProperty (proplist.c:132) ==17318== by 0x4EF788F: ContextPropertyList_Copy (proplist.c:215) ==17318== by 0x4EBE9AF: Context_CopyProperties (context.c:130) ==17318== by 0x4EAAB6C: Cert_clone (cert.c:139) ==17318== by 0x4F03664: MemStore_addContext (store.c:151) ==17318== by 0x4F03A35: MemStore_addCert (store.c:243) ==17318== by 0x4EAB119: add_cert_to_store (cert.c:263) ==17318== by 0x4EAB27F: CertAddCertificateContextToStore (cert.c:287) ==17318== by 0x4EAA852: CertAddEncodedCertificateToStore (cert.c:65) ==17318== by 0x4CC9495: testAddCert (cert.c:198) ==17318== by 0x4CD8F2F: func_cert (cert.c:3976) ==17318== by 0x4D33F67: run_test (test.h:584) ==17318== by 0x4D34356: main (test.h:654) ==17318== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 10

[Bug 26049] New: ws2_32/sock tests shows some leaks in AcceptEx?
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26049 Summary: ws2_32/sock tests shows some leaks in AcceptEx? Product: Wine Version: 1.3.13 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: winsock AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=33221) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=33221) valgrind log Several leaks like: 36 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost at notify_alloc (heap.c:254) by RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1701) by WS2_AcceptEx (socket.c:1991) by test_AcceptEx (sock.c:4464) by func_sock (sock.c:4703) by run_test (test.h:556) by main (test.h:624) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

3 10

[Bug 36195] New: valgrind shows several leaks in dsound/tests/capture.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36195 Bug ID: 36195 Summary: valgrind shows several leaks in dsound/tests/capture.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.17 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: directx-dsound Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ==12144== 28 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 196 of 816 ==12144== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==12144== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==12144== by 0x4FB883E: COMPOBJ_DllList_Add (compobj.c:526) ==12144== by 0x4FBAB7A: apartment_getclassobject (compobj.c:1335) ==12144== by 0x4FBE2C4: get_inproc_class_object (compobj.c:2894) ==12144== by 0x4FBE783: CoGetClassObject (compobj.c:3032) ==12144== by 0x4FBED45: CoCreateInstance (compobj.c:3197) ==12144== by 0x65A603C: get_mmdevenum (dsound_main.c:178) ==12144== by 0x65A636D: GetDeviceID (dsound_main.c:261) ==12144== by 0x659F7B5: DirectSoundCaptureDevice_Initialize (capture.c:1022) ==12144== by 0x65A07B9: IDirectSoundCaptureImpl_Initialize (capture.c:1284) ==12144== by 0x65A0B21: DirectSoundCaptureCreate (capture.c:1388) ==12144== by 0x4E4FA2E: test_COM (capture.c:692) ==12144== by 0x4E50145: func_capture (capture.c:775) ==12144== by 0x4E6C486: run_test (test.h:584) ==12144== by 0x4E6C875: main (test.h:654) ==12144== ==12144== 28 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 204 of 816 ==12144== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==12144== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==12144== by 0x4FB883E: COMPOBJ_DllList_Add (compobj.c:526) ==12144== by 0x4FBAB7A: apartment_getclassobject (compobj.c:1335) ==12144== by 0x4FBE2C4: get_inproc_class_object (compobj.c:2894) ==12144== by 0x4FBE783: CoGetClassObject (compobj.c:3032) ==12144== by 0x4E4DAFA: test_capture (capture.c:189) ==12144== by 0x4E5014A: func_capture (capture.c:776) ==12144== by 0x4E6C486: run_test (test.h:584) ==12144== by 0x4E6C875: main (test.h:654) ==12144== ==12144== 846 bytes in 47 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 714 of 816 ==12144== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==12144== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==12144== by 0x65ADE25: DSOUND_CopyFormat (primary.c:447) ==12144== by 0x659E392: IDirectSoundCaptureBufferImpl_Create (capture.c:704) ==12144== by 0x65A0409: IDirectSoundCaptureImpl_CreateCaptureBuffer (capture.c:1232) ==12144== by 0x4E4F47E: dscenum_callback (capture.c:564) ==12144== by 0x65A665A: a_to_w_callback (dsound_main.c:319) ==12144== by 0x65A6F2B: enumerate_mmdevices (dsound_main.c:492) ==12144== by 0x65A73EF: DirectSoundCaptureEnumerateW (dsound_main.c:625) ==12144== by 0x65A72ED: DirectSoundCaptureEnumerateA (dsound_main.c:593) ==12144== by 0x4E4F90F: test_enumerate (capture.c:672) ==12144== by 0x4E5014F: func_capture (capture.c:777) ==12144== by 0x4E6C486: run_test (test.h:584) ==12144== by 0x4E6C875: main (test.h:654) ==12144== 88,200 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 813 of 816 ==12144== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==12144== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==12144== by 0x659EC62: IDirectSoundCaptureBufferImpl_Create (capture.c:797) ==12144== by 0x65A0409: IDirectSoundCaptureImpl_CreateCaptureBuffer (capture.c:1232) ==12144== by 0x4E4FD44: test_COM (capture.c:727) ==12144== by 0x4E50145: func_capture (capture.c:775) ==12144== by 0x4E6C486: run_test (test.h:584) ==12144== by 0x4E6C875: main (test.h:654) ==12144== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 3

[Bug 26139] New: comdlg32/filedlg shows a few valgrind warnings
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26139 Summary: comdlg32/filedlg shows a few valgrind warnings Product: Wine Version: 1.3.13 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: comdlg32 AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) at EqualRect (uitools.c:1405) by FileOpenDlgProc95 (filedlg.c:1206) by ??? (winproc.c:172) by call_dialog_proc (winproc.c:263) by WINPROC_CallProcWtoA (winproc.c:857) by WINPROC_CallDlgProcW (winproc.c:1041) by DefDlgProcW (defdlg.c:425) by ??? (winproc.c:172) by call_window_proc (winproc.c:242) by WINPROC_call_window (winproc.c:899) by call_window_proc (message.c:2201) by send_message (message.c:3042) by SendMessageW (message.c:3165) by DIALOG_CreateIndirect (dialog.c:694) by DialogBoxIndirectParamAorW (dialog.c:876) by DialogBoxIndirectParamA (dialog.c:887) by GetFileName95 (filedlg.c:317) by GetFileDialog95A (filedlg.c:442) by GetOpenFileNameA (filedlg.c:4173) by test_create_view_window2 (filedlg.c:280) Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation at FileOpenDlgProc95 (filedlg.c:1157) ... 140 bytes in 5 blocks are definitely lost at notify_alloc (heap.c:254) by RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1701) by DIALOG_get_info (defdlg.c:335) by DefDlgProcA (defdlg.c:362) by ??? (winproc.c:172) by call_window_proc (winproc.c:242) by WINPROC_call_window (winproc.c:908) by call_window_proc (message.c:2201) by send_message (message.c:3042) by SendMessageA (message.c:3187) by WIN_CreateWindowEx (win.c:1420) by CreateWindowExA (win.c:1554) by DIALOG_CreateIndirect (dialog.c:651) by CreateDialogIndirectParamAorW (dialog.c:755) by CreateDialogIndirectParamA (dialog.c:764) by CreateTemplateDialog (filedlg.c:786) by FileOpenDlgProc95 (filedlg.c:1189) by ??? (winproc.c:172) by call_dialog_proc (winproc.c:263) by WINPROC_CallProcWtoA (winproc.c:857) ... 144 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost at notify_alloc (heap.c:254) by RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1701) by rpcrt4_conn_np_alloc (rpc_transport.c:120) by RPCRT4_CreateConnection (rpc_transport.c:2939) by rpcrt4_protseq_ncalrpc_open_endpoint (rpc_transport.c:285) by RPCRT4_use_protseq (rpc_server.c:810) by RpcServerUseProtseqEpExW (rpc_server.c:1022) by RpcServerUseProtseqEpW (rpc_server.c:907) by RPC_StartRemoting (rpc.c:1626) by StdMarshalImpl_MarshalInterface (marshal.c:1245) by CoMarshalInterface (marshal.c:1797) by RegisterDragDrop (ole2.c:461) by ShellView_OnCreate (shlview.c:718) by ShellView_WndProc (shlview.c:1682) by ??? (winproc.c:172) by call_window_proc (winproc.c:242) by WINPROC_call_window (winproc.c:899) by call_window_proc (message.c:2201) by send_message (message.c:3042) by SendMessageW (message.c:3165) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 7

[Bug 34694] New: Adobe reader 11.0.4 empty search results in PDF portfolios
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34694 Bug #: 34694 Summary: Adobe reader 11.0.4 empty search results in PDF portfolios Product: Wine Version: 1.7.3 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: nick.payne(a)internode.on.net Classification: Unclassified Created attachment 46244 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=46244 Expanded search results under Wine Reader 11.0.4 with flash support for viewing PDF portfolios installed on Linux Mint 15 amd64. Download of Adobe Reader XI 11.0.4: ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/win/11.x/11.0.04/en_US/AdbeRdr11004_en… Download of Flash player/plugins: http://www.adobe.com/support/flashplayer/downloads.html#fp11 Some example portfolio for testing: http://wwwimages.adobe.com/www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/feature-detai… For installation you need to work around bug 12501 -> 'winetricks mspatcha' After installation you need to work around bug 25834 (disable protected mode), bug 16144 (work around with 'winetricks atmlib'), and richedit component bug with 'winetricks riched20'. You can now search a portfolio and get back a search window showing hits in the various PDF files in the portfolio, but the results are unusable because the expanded results window doesn't contain any text for the search hits and they can't be selected to jump to the relevant location in the PDF file where the hit occurred. See the two uploaded screen dumps, showing the expanded results window from performing the same search on a PDF portfolio using firstly Reader 11.0.4 under wine and then Reader 11.0.4 running on winxp. At the point where I expand the search results (and find they're all empty), I see the following on the console output: fixme:ole:CoInitializeSecurity ((nil),-1,(nil),(nil),1,3,(nil),0,(nil)) - stub! fixme:ole:RemUnknown_QueryInterface No interface for iid {00000019-0000-0000-c000-000000000046} fixme:qmgr:BITS_IBackgroundCopyJob_GetPriority Not implemented fixme:qmgr:BITS_IBackgroundCopyJob_SetPriority (0x59750,0x00000001) stub fixme:qmgr:BITS_IBackgroundCopyJob_GetPriority Not implemented fixme:qmgr:BITS_IBackgroundCopyJob_AddFile Check for valid filenames and supported protocols fixme:wininet:InternetLockRequestFile STUB fixme:file:MoveFileWithProgressW MOVEFILE_WRITE_THROUGH unimplemented -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

3 7

[Bug 17414] New: user32/dde test crashes if +heap enabled
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17414 Summary: user32/dde test crashes if +heap enabled Product: Wine Version: 1.1.15 Platform: PC URL: http://test.winehq.org/data/6a1537c4b5037be5253c33021fda 3a02430533f7/wine_xp_ae-ub-810-heap/riched32:editor.html OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: user32 AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=19484) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=19484) backtrace in 1.1.15 wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0x00130000 at address 0x6045971b (thread 0009), starting debugger... ... =>0 0x6045971b CompareStringW+0x13b(lcid=1033, style=0, str1=0x130000, len1=0, str2=0x6074c780, len2=-1) [/home/austin/wine-git/dlls/kernel32/../../include/wine/unicode.h:216] in kernel32 (0x0032f848) 1 0x6045bed4 lstrcmpW+0x64(str1=<register EDI not in topmost frame>, str2=<register ESI not in topmost frame>) [/home/austin/wine-git/dlls/kernel32/locale.c:2834] in kernel32 (0x0032f878) 2 0x60681d7a dde_server_wndprocW+0x3da(hwnd=0xe0028, msg=1000, wparam=458798, lparam=<register EDI not in topmost frame>) [/home/austin/wine-git/dlls/user32/tests/dde.c:1215] in user32_test (0x0032f8b8) 3 0x6082337a WINPROC_wrapper+0x1a() in user32 (0x0032f8e8) 4 0x608237ca call_window_proc+0x6a(hwnd=<register EDI not in topmost frame>, msg=<register ESI not in topmost frame>, wp=458798, lp=1204994, result=0x32f998, arg=0x606819a0) [/home/austin/wine-git/dlls/user32/winproc.c:458] in user32 (0x0032f928) 5 0x60828af7 WINPROC_call_window+0xf7(hwnd=<register EDI not in topmost frame>, msg=1000, wParam=458798, lParam=1204994, result=0x32f998, unicode=1, mapping=WMCHAR_MAP_DISPATCHMESSAGE) [/home/austin/wine-git/dlls/user32/winproc.c:2218] in user32 (0x0032f968) 6 0x607e7ee6 DispatchMessageW+0x96(msg=<register EDI not in topmost frame>) [/home/austin/wine-git/dlls/user32/message.c:3122] in user32 (0x0032f9a8) 7 0x607a4037 WDML_SyncWaitTransactionReply+0xe7(hConv=0x1254b8, dwTimeout=<register ESI not in topmost frame>, pXAct=0x125508, ack=0x32fb84) [/home/austin/wine-git/dlls/user32/dde_client.c:1069] in user32 (0x0032fa08) 8 0x607a4b21 DdeClientTransaction+0x651(pData="test dde command", cbData=17, hConv=0x1254b8, hszItem=0xdead, wFmt=48879, wType=16464, dwTimeout=1000, pdwResult=0x32fb84) [/home/austin/wine-git/dlls/user32/dde_client.c:1225] in user32 (0x0032fa68) 9 0x60686158 test_dde_aw_transaction+0x638() [/home/austin/wine-git/dlls/user32/tests/dde.c:1374] in user32_test (0x0032fb98) ... 216 while (*s) s++; Attached is the backtrace...I've stripped out +heap, so the output is readable, but easily reproducible. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

3 21

[Bug 28816] New: kernel32/tests/loader.ok fails under valgrind
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28816 Bug #: 28816 Summary: kernel32/tests/loader.ok fails under valgrind Product: Wine Version: 1.3.30 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: kernel32 AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: dank(a)kegel.com Classification: Unclassified Under Valgrind, "make loader.ok" fails with log loader.c:375: Test failed: 2: 0x10002000 != 0 loader.c:376: Test failed: 2: 1 != 0 loader.c:378: Test failed: 2: 2000 != MEM_FREE loader.c:379: Test failed: 2: 20000 != 0 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

3 10