September 2015 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 36637] New: wininet/tests/http.c crashes under valgrind
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Oct. 2, 2015

Oct. 2, 2015

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36637 Bug ID: 36637 Summary: wininet/tests/http.c crashes under valgrind Product: Wine Version: 1.7.19 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wininet Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Created attachment 48678 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=48678 valgrind log/backtrace See also bug 36004 for a crash with warn+heap. wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0x04760000 at address 0x7bc4d939 (thread 0033), starting debugger... Backtrace: =>0 0x7bc4d939 HEAP_CreateFreeBlock+0xb5(subheap=0x46f0014, ptr=0x4755cb8, size=0xa348) [/home/austin/wine-valgrind/dlls/ntdll/heap.c:591] in ntdll (0x04d0eaa4) 1 0x7bc4dc61 HEAP_ShrinkBlock+0x42(subheap=0x46f0014, pArena=0x4755c88, size=0x28) [/home/austin/wine-valgrind/dlls/ntdll/heap.c:694] in ntdll (0x04d0eac8) 2 0x7bc50f6e RtlAllocateHeap+0x2fb(heap=<couldn't compute location>, flags=<couldn't compute location>, size=<couldn't compute location>) [/home/austin/wine-valgrind/dlls/ntdll/heap.c:1713] in ntdll (0x04d0eb58) 3 0x04d35001 heap_alloc+0x2b(len=0x20) [/home/austin/wine-valgrind/dlls/wininet/internet.h:116] in wininet (0x04d0eb98) 4 0x04d3f383 HttpQueryInfoA+0x13a(hHttpRequest=<couldn't compute location>, dwInfoLevel=<couldn't compute location>, lpBuffer=<couldn't compute location>, lpdwBufferLength=<couldn't compute location>, lpdwIndex=<couldn't compute location>) [/home/austin/wine-valgrind/dlls/wininet/http.c:3934] in wininet (0x04d0ebf8) 5 0x0495e5b8 InternetReadFile_test+0x16ef(flags=0, test=0x49a4780) [/home/austin/wine-valgrind/dlls/wininet/tests/http.c:639] in wininet_test (0x04d0fc98) I'll attach the full log here and file separate bugs for the leaks/etc. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 39287] New: Error in ntdll during hisuite Huawei install
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Oct. 2, 2015

Oct. 2, 2015

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39287 Bug ID: 39287 Summary: Error in ntdll during hisuite Huawei install Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Mac OS X Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ntdll Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: blackswanny(a)gmail.com Created attachment 52363 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=52363 stack trace of what has happened Error in ntdll during hisuite Huawei install -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 36571] New: valgrind shows some invalid memory use in shell32/tests/path.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Oct. 2, 2015

Oct. 2, 2015

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36571 Bug ID: 36571 Summary: valgrind shows some invalid memory use in shell32/tests/path.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.18 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: shell32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ==5658== Invalid read of size 1 ==5658== at 0x402EB35: bcmp (vg_replace_strmem.c:965) ==5658== by 0x4ED0EED: is_knownfolder (shellpath.c:3790) ==5658== by 0x4ED1052: foldermanager_GetFolder (shellpath.c:3819) ==5658== by 0x4CDAB24: test_knownFolders (shobjidl.h:16490) ==5658== by 0x4CDE323: func_shellpath (shellpath.c:2660) ==5658== by 0x4D14454: run_test (test.h:584) ==5658== by 0x4D14843: main (test.h:654) ==5658== Address 0x49cc458 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 1,664 free'd ==5658== at 0x7BC4C72C: notify_free (heap.c:263) ==5658== by 0x7BC51071: RtlFreeHeap (heap.c:1762) ==5658== by 0x5B02C4E: IMalloc_fnFree (ifs.c:265) ==5658== by 0x5B0311D: CoTaskMemFree (objidl.h:1242) ==5658== by 0x4CDA857: test_knownFolders (shellpath.c:2164) ==5658== by 0x4CDE323: func_shellpath (shellpath.c:2660) ==5658== by 0x4D14454: run_test (test.h:584) ==5658== by 0x4D14843: main (test.h:654) ==5658== ==5658== Invalid read of size 1 ==5658== at 0x402EB35: bcmp (vg_replace_strmem.c:965) ==5658== by 0x4ED0EED: is_knownfolder (shellpath.c:3790) ==5658== by 0x4ED1052: foldermanager_GetFolder (shellpath.c:3819) ==5658== by 0x4CDAFDC: test_knownFolders (shobjidl.h:16490) ==5658== by 0x4CDE323: func_shellpath (shellpath.c:2660) ==5658== by 0x4D14454: run_test (test.h:584) ==5658== by 0x4D14843: main (test.h:654) ==5658== Address 0x49cc458 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 1,664 free'd ==5658== at 0x7BC4C72C: notify_free (heap.c:263) ==5658== by 0x7BC51071: RtlFreeHeap (heap.c:1762) ==5658== by 0x5B02C4E: IMalloc_fnFree (ifs.c:265) ==5658== by 0x5B0311D: CoTaskMemFree (objidl.h:1242) ==5658== by 0x4CDA857: test_knownFolders (shellpath.c:2164) ==5658== by 0x4CDE323: func_shellpath (shellpath.c:2660) ==5658== by 0x4D14454: run_test (test.h:584) ==5658== by 0x4D14843: main (test.h:654) ==5658== ==5658== Invalid free() / delete / delete[] / realloc() ==5658== at 0x7BC4C72C: notify_free (heap.c:263) ==5658== by 0x7BC51071: RtlFreeHeap (heap.c:1762) ==5658== by 0x4ED0B05: foldermanager_Release (shellpath.c:3710) ==5658== by 0x4CDD44E: test_knownFolders (shobjidl.h:16477) ==5658== by 0x4CDE323: func_shellpath (shellpath.c:2660) ==5658== by 0x4D14454: run_test (test.h:584) ==5658== by 0x4D14843: main (test.h:654) ==5658== Address 0x49cc458 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 1,664 free'd ==5658== at 0x7BC4C72C: notify_free (heap.c:263) ==5658== by 0x7BC51071: RtlFreeHeap (heap.c:1762) ==5658== by 0x5B02C4E: IMalloc_fnFree (ifs.c:265) ==5658== by 0x5B0311D: CoTaskMemFree (objidl.h:1242) ==5658== by 0x4CDA857: test_knownFolders (shellpath.c:2164) ==5658== by 0x4CDE323: func_shellpath (shellpath.c:2660) ==5658== by 0x4D14454: run_test (test.h:584) ==5658== by 0x4D14843: main (test.h:654) ==5658== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 35553] New: Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War II: does not start, crypt:CertCreateContext dwFlags not implemented
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Oct. 2, 2015

Oct. 2, 2015

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35553 Bug ID: 35553 Summary: Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War II: does not start, crypt:CertCreateContext dwFlags not implemented Product: Wine Version: 1.7.12 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: crypt32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: abolte(a)systemsaviour.com Classification: Unclassified Created attachment 47474 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=47474 DOW2.EXE, Wine 1.7.12, +loaddll,+crypt I'm trying to get Dawn of War 2 working. There appear to be two obvious issues preventing it running. The first is worked around by using native wintrust and msasn1 DLLs, and restoring backups of content.cat before every program launch (which is Bug 35452). The second issue (exclusive to Dawn of War 2) is what I'm reporting in this ticket. The first bug applies to both Dawn of War 2 and Dawn of War 2: Retribution, but as stated has a work-around. However attempting the same work-around on plain Dawn of War 2 causes us to run into the second problem: trace:crypt:CertCreateContext (0x3, 0x10001, 0xce10000, 5861, 0x00000005, (nil)) fixme:crypt:CertCreateContext dwFlags 0x00000005 not handled fixme:advapi:RegisterTraceGuidsA (0x1bfce70, (nil), {d5b9ac76-d546-4891-bb8c-bfd865e5c7d5}, 3, 0x2142b00, (null), (null), 0x214f850): stub More history attached, in case you need it. Nothing further is printed to the console, but the following command is still running: C:\Program Files\Steam\steamapps\common\Dawn of War 2\dow2.exe -logs It's consuming 100% CPU, and will do so forever until it is manually killed. I have not been successful in any attempt at a work-around for this bug to date. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 32257] New: Castle Story Prototype v0.0.2 crashes when starting new game
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Sept. 30, 2015

Sept. 30, 2015

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32257 Bug #: 32257 Summary: Castle Story Prototype v0.0.2 crashes when starting new game Product: Wine Version: 1.5.17 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: Anxiety35(a)gmail.com Classification: Unclassified Created attachment 42567 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=42567 Backtrace from castle Story v0.0.2 crash Castle Story Prototype with update 0.0.2 crashes right after clicking a map to start a new game. The icons load on the screen and then it crashes with a page fault. It crashes regardless of the resolution, window, and graphics quality settings. Attached is the crash backtrace. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 7520] Lotus Notes display some fonts as normal instead of bold or italic
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Sept. 30, 2015

Sept. 30, 2015

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7520 --- Comment #33 from Sagawa <sagawa.aki+winebugs(a)gmail.com> --- Ah, my patch is for pure bitmap fonts by adding FT_GLYPH_FORMAT_BITMAP case in synthesize_bold_glyph. Possibly, I thought it wasn't useful nowadays or encountered difficulties. For embedded bitmaps, it seems to be off-topic. So, I'll reply to your mail in wine-devel. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 7520] Lotus Notes display some fonts as normal instead of bold or italic
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Sept. 30, 2015

Sept. 30, 2015

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7520 --- Comment #32 from Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> --- Sure, I didn't mean pure bitmap fonts by the way, but rather scalable fonts with embedded bitmaps for specific font sizes. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 7520] Lotus Notes display some fonts as normal instead of bold or italic
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Sept. 30, 2015

Sept. 30, 2015

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7520 --- Comment #31 from Sagawa <sagawa.aki+winebugs(a)gmail.com> --- Hi, Nikolay. I have some patchset for bitmap font case at that time, but I forgot to commit them. I'll send patch set. Could you review them? Thanks in advance. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 7520] Lotus Notes display some fonts as normal instead of bold or italic
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Sept. 30, 2015

Sept. 30, 2015

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7520 --- Comment #30 from Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> --- As a follow up on this - https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2015-September/142625.html. The way emboldening works now in Wine seems questionable to me, especially in a way that we ignore glyph bitmaps entirely and use outlines. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 36641] New: valgrind shows an anvalid read in wininet/tests/http.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Sept. 30, 2015

Sept. 30, 2015

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36641 Bug ID: 36641 Summary: valgrind shows an anvalid read in wininet/tests/http.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.19 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wininet Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Depends on: 36637 ==32063== Invalid read of size 2 ==32063== at 0x4D3E66E: HTTP_HttpQueryInfoW (http.c:3596) ==32063== by 0x4D3F1B0: HttpQueryInfoW (http.c:3883) ==32063== by 0x4D3F402: HttpQueryInfoA (http.c:3944) ==32063== by 0x495E46B: InternetReadFile_test (http.c:629) ==32063== by 0x497D687: func_http (http.c:5329) ==32063== by 0x4994B90: run_test (test.h:584) ==32063== by 0x4994F7F: main (test.h:654) ==32063== Address 0x471e21e is 0 bytes after a block of size 822 alloc'd ==32063== at 0x7BC4C75D: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==32063== by 0x7BC50FA1: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==32063== by 0x4D35000: heap_alloc (internet.h:116) ==32063== by 0x4D3FD2F: HTTP_build_req (http.c:4170) ==32063== by 0x4D36905: build_response_header (http.c:732) ==32063== by 0x4D3E5A4: HTTP_HttpQueryInfoW (http.c:3576) ==32063== by 0x4D3F1B0: HttpQueryInfoW (http.c:3883) ==32063== by 0x4D3F402: HttpQueryInfoA (http.c:3944) ==32063== by 0x495E46B: InternetReadFile_test (http.c:629) ==32063== by 0x497D687: func_http (http.c:5329) ==32063== by 0x4994B90: run_test (test.h:584) ==32063== by 0x4994F7F: main (test.h:654) ==32063== ==32063== Invalid read of size 4 ==32063== at 0x7BC4D939: HEAP_CreateFreeBlock (heap.c:591) ==32063== by 0x7BC4DC60: HEAP_ShrinkBlock (heap.c:694) ==32063== by 0x7BC50F6D: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1713) ==32063== by 0x4D35000: heap_alloc (internet.h:116) ==32063== by 0x4D3F382: HttpQueryInfoA (http.c:3934) ==32063== by 0x495E5B7: InternetReadFile_test (http.c:639) ==32063== by 0x497D6B3: func_http (http.c:5331) ==32063== by 0x4994B90: run_test (test.h:584) ==32063== by 0x4994F7F: main (test.h:654) ==32063== Address 0x4760000 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd ==32063== ==32063== Thread 4: ==32063== Invalid write of size 4 ==32063== at 0x7BC93356: NtQuerySystemTime (time.c:467) ==32063== by 0x7BC8A8FB: NtDelayExecution (sync.c:940) ==32063== by 0x7B876351: SleepEx (sync.c:108) ==32063== by 0x7B87630B: Sleep (sync.c:97) ==32063== by 0x4D358A2: collect_connections_proc (http.c:358) ==32063== by 0x7BC87137: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==32063== by 0x7BC87180: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2630) ==32063== by 0x7BC87115: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==32063== by 0x7BC8E560: start_thread (thread.c:428) ==32063== by 0x4EA7BD89: start_thread (in /usr/lib/libpthread-2.18.so) ==32063== by 0x4E95CA0D: clone (in /usr/lib/libc-2.18.so) ==32063== Address 0x658e8bc is on thread 1's stack ==32063== ==32063== Invalid read of size 4 ==32063== at 0x7BC1EB70: __x86.get_pc_thunk.bx (in /home/austin/wine-valgrind/dlls/ntdll/ntdll.dll.so) ==32063== by 0x7BC8A8FB: NtDelayExecution (sync.c:940) ==32063== by 0x7B876351: SleepEx (sync.c:108) ==32063== by 0x7B87630B: Sleep (sync.c:97) ==32063== by 0x4D358A2: collect_connections_proc (http.c:358) ==32063== by 0x7BC87137: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==32063== by 0x7BC87180: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2630) ==32063== by 0x7BC87115: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==32063== by 0x7BC8E560: start_thread (thread.c:428) ==32063== by 0x4EA7BD89: start_thread (in /usr/lib/libpthread-2.18.so) ==32063== by 0x4E95CA0D: clone (in /usr/lib/libc-2.18.so) ==32063== Address 0x658e8bc is on thread 1's stack ==32063== etc. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 9