January 2017 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 40034] New: Trying to run a setup.exe from an installation disk for a linksys usb wireless adapter and it immediately opens the program error screen.
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Feb. 11, 2017

Feb. 11, 2017

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40034 Bug ID: 40034 Summary: Trying to run a setup.exe from an installation disk for a linksys usb wireless adapter and it immediately opens the program error screen. Product: Wine Version: 1.9.2 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: alyssianagrace(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 53486 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=53486 program error details report as generated by wine by pressing the 'show details' button on the program error screen Basically what it says in my summary. I inserted the disk into my disk drive and then had to navigate to the CD-ROM (I'm currently using Parrot Security OS if that matters). I right-clicked on the setup.exe and selected for it to run with 'a wine program'. When that opened the error code, I tried the other instance of 'a wine program', and then 'rundll32' and got the same error message. Attached is the backtrace.txt Wine generated when I tried 'rundll32'. Any help is appreciated but please note that I am very new to this OS and Wine. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 45

[Bug 26184] New: Program E-Mail Grabber Error
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Feb. 10, 2017

Feb. 10, 2017

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26184 Summary: Program E-Mail Grabber Error Product: Wine Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X 10.6 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: ghostknight22(a)gmail.com I can´t start the program "Email Grabber" (http://www.emailgrabber.de/) with wine. After a few seconds the program crashes. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 12

[Bug 39560] New: Thief Gold - Black screen when going underwater and accessing inventory
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Feb. 10, 2017

Feb. 10, 2017

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39560 Bug ID: 39560 Summary: Thief Gold - Black screen when going underwater and accessing inventory Product: Wine Version: 1.7.54 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: altiris28048(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 52708 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=52708 Wine output when running the game and reproducing the bugs listed. -Background Info- Thief Gold (with TFix patch) used to run exceptionally well (no issues/bugs/graphical errors) around September 18, 2015 on Arch Linux (with everything up to date, so I was using whatever wine and mesa versions were available at the time). I went on a hiatus from playing the game until yesterday (I still used my system and updated to the newer releases of things like wine and mesa, etc) and now whenever my character goes underwater the screen turns black, and when I try accessing the inventory it turns black also. -Bug- When going underwater my screen will turn black, if I surface back on top of the water the game appears normal (this will continue). If I try accessing my inventory, instead of the item showing the screen just turns black and it is impossible to get the game looking like it did before. -What I have tried to do- I have tried reverting back to older versions of Wine AND mesa but the problem persists. I am begininng to wonder whether it is something like an xorg server update causing the problem, if that is possible. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 42083] New: Chessmaster 9000 2d and 3d chess set rendering problems
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Feb. 10, 2017

Feb. 10, 2017

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42083 Bug ID: 42083 Summary: Chessmaster 9000 2d and 3d chess set rendering problems Product: Wine Version: 2.0-rc3 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: bkbk9(a)yahoo.ca Distribution: --- This bug might be related to an abandoned and unresolved one (Bug 10877). The hardware, OS and Wine versions are newer though. Chessmaster 9000 cannot draw any of its built-in 2d chess sets and some of its 3d sets. With 2d sets, either the board or the pieces (or both) are not rendered. With 3d sets, it depends on the chosen set, some board/pieces combinations are handled correctly and some are not. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 16

[Bug 15100] New: Google Talk cannot be "x"ed out
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Feb. 9, 2017

Feb. 9, 2017

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100 Summary: Google Talk cannot be "x"ed out Product: Wine Version: 1.1.2 Platform: PC-x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: benjamin.j.mccann(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=15783) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=15783) Output fron running "wine googletalk.exe" The "x" in the upper right hand corner of the Google Talk window does not work for closing the application. However, the minimization button does work. I'm unsure as to which feature has a bug or is unimplemented. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 14

[Bug 37425] New: After installing Ulead Gif Animator with wine I got the message that programm has to be closed immediately because of a unspecified bug. Please get information by attachment file.
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Feb. 9, 2017

Feb. 9, 2017

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37425 Bug ID: 37425 Summary: After installing Ulead Gif Animator with wine I got the message that programm has to be closed immediately because of a unspecified bug. Please get information by attachment file. Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: ua-holland(a)t-online.de Distribution: --- Ulead Gif Animator complete Installation with win does not run. See attached message. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 22

[Bug 38598] New: Crash when UpdateLayeredWindow with large window & complicated transparency
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Feb. 8, 2017

Feb. 8, 2017

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38598 Bug ID: 38598 Summary: Crash when UpdateLayeredWindow with large window & complicated transparency Product: Wine Version: 1.7.42 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gdi32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: m13253(a)hotmail.com Distribution: --- The program that causes the bug is here: https://gist.github.com/m13253/092b94c7bd526a9a4e57 A .exe executable is also included in the Git repo. The program is tested to be fine under Windows 10. Upon successful execution, the program creates a transparent panel with spotted background on the right half of the screen. Wine failed with the following messages: X Error of failed request: BadLength (poly request too large or internal Xlib length error) Major opcode of failed request: 33 (X_GrabKey) Serial number of failed request: 219 Current serial number in output stream: 227 Depending on the window size, the "major opcode" may vary. This issue only occurs when: Source line 72-76: The window size is large enough and Source line 115-131: The RGBA bitmap is complicated, especially the alpha channel Additional info: Distribution: ArchLinux It is a WINEARCH=win32 prefix. libx11: 1.6.3-1 xorg-server: 1.17.1-5 mesa: 10.5.4-1 gnome-shell: 3.16.1-2 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 21397] New: LookupAccountName cannot retrieve a 'groups' SID
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Feb. 8, 2017

Feb. 8, 2017

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21397 Summary: LookupAccountName cannot retrieve a 'groups' SID Product: Wine Version: 1.1.36 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: advapi32 AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: us(a)edmeades.me.uk Debugging an application I found the cause of the first failure is that the software installs a 'group' (which fails with a fixme). Post install, I created a group (addgroup) but the application calls LookupAccountName to retrieve the SID of that created group. You can hack around this (if LookupAccountName fails, query the current user and re-call the function to get it's sid) but looking at the function there is complete support missing for anything other than the current user. Ideally it should call (something like getgrent?) and if it finds a group, map it to a SID somehow (perhaps end the SID with the gid?). It could handle querying other users as well in a similar way (getpwnam?) JEWMQ -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 10

[Bug 39988] New: winepath -w wrong output with path longer 260
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Feb. 8, 2017

Feb. 8, 2017

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39988 Bug ID: 39988 Summary: winepath -w wrong output with path longer 260 Product: Wine Version: 1.9.0 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: s3141p(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- When the input $pathname is longer than 260 characters wine -w $pathname 1. truncates the converted output path at 260 characters 2. appends some garbage characters to it 3. reports no error and exits with status 0 I think fixing #3 as a minimum is important; at least exit 1, possibly print an error message. Fixing #2? Why is it printing garbage characters? Buffer overrun? And please consider changing #1 by extending support to paths > 260 characters. After all, if I convert the same path by hand and feed it to a Windows application it has no problems dealing with it. So the 260-character limit of winepath -w seems rather artificial to me. I create long linux paths with mkdir -p /tmp/aaa/bbb/ccc/ddd/eee/ touch /tmp/aaa/bbb/ccc/ddd/eee/$(dd if=/dev/zero count=1 bs=260 | tr '\000' a) # which creates /tmp/aaa/bbb/ccc/ddd/eee/aaaaaaaa... Thanks. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 36199] New: valgrind shows several warnings under crypt32/tests/chain.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Feb. 7, 2017

Feb. 7, 2017

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36199 Bug ID: 36199 Summary: valgrind shows several warnings under crypt32/tests/chain.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.17 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: crypt32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Created attachment 48320 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=48320 valgrind log A few in glibc: ==17802== Thread 2: ==17802== Invalid read of size 1 ==17802== at 0x40187FA: strcmp (strcmp.S:34) ==17802== by 0x4008925: _dl_map_object (dl-load.c:2113) ==17802== by 0x4013383: dl_open_worker (dl-open.c:224) ==17802== by 0x400F1F5: _dl_catch_error (dl-error.c:187) ==17802== by 0x4012D93: _dl_open (dl-open.c:650) ==17802== by 0x435093A: do_dlopen (dl-libc.c:87) ==17802== by 0x400F1F5: _dl_catch_error (dl-error.c:187) ==17802== by 0x4350A2A: dlerror_run (dl-libc.c:46) ==17802== by 0x4350AB0: __libc_dlopen_mode (dl-libc.c:163) ==17802== by 0x4221819: pthread_cancel_init (unwind-forcedunwind.c:52) ==17802== by 0x42219FB: _Unwind_ForcedUnwind (unwind-forcedunwind.c:129) ==17802== by 0x421F732: __pthread_unwind (unwind.c:129) ==17802== by 0x421A080: pthread_exit (pthreadP.h:280) ==17802== by 0x7BC8E1A9: terminate_thread (thread.c:349) ==17802== by 0x7BC87009: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==17802== by 0x6A5F357: ??? ==17802== by 0x4218F92: start_thread (pthread_create.c:309) ==17802== by 0x431D7ED: clone (clone.S:129) ==17802== Address 0x693d913 is on thread 1's stack ==17802== ==17802== Invalid read of size 4 ==17802== at 0x4352239: _Unwind_IteratePhdrCallback (unwind-dw2-fde-glibc.c:112) ==17802== by 0x43503E2: dl_iterate_phdr (dl-iteratephdr.c:76) ==17802== by 0x4352AF9: _Unwind_Find_FDE (unwind-dw2-fde-glibc.c:267) ==17802== by 0x6B9E336: ??? (in /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.8.2/32/libgcc_s.so.1) ==17802== by 0x6B9EB21: ??? (in /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.8.2/32/libgcc_s.so.1) ==17802== by 0x6B9F10F: _Unwind_ForcedUnwind (in /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.8.2/32/libgcc_s.so.1) ==17802== by 0x42219F1: _Unwind_ForcedUnwind (unwind-forcedunwind.c:137) ==17802== by 0x421F732: __pthread_unwind (unwind.c:129) ==17802== by 0x421A080: pthread_exit (pthreadP.h:280) ==17802== by 0x7BC8E1A9: terminate_thread (thread.c:349) ==17802== by 0x7BC87009: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==17802== by 0x6A5F357: ??? ==17802== by 0x4218F92: start_thread (pthread_create.c:309) ==17802== by 0x431D7ED: clone (clone.S:129) ==17802== Address 0x693c034 is on thread 1's stack ==17802== ==17802== Thread 1 crypt32_test.exe.so: ==17802== Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line ==17802== at 0x693E820: ??? (in /lib32/libresolv-2.19.so) ==17802== by 0x425F4E8: __run_exit_handlers (exit.c:82) ==17802== by 0x425F54C: exit (exit.c:104) ==17802== by 0x7BC68772: NtTerminateProcess (process.c:63) ==17802== by 0x7BC5941B: RtlExitUserProcess (loader.c:2538) ==17802== by 0x7B868D09: ??? (process.c:2668) ==17802== Address 0x693e820 is on thread 1's stack ==17802== and several possible leaks: ==17802== 20 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 50 of 427 ==17802== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==17802== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==17802== by 0x514398B: CryptMemAlloc (main.c:124) ==17802== by 0x511E0A9: CertAddStoreToCollection (collectionstore.c:519) ==17802== by 0x5164B4B: CRYPT_SysOpenStoreW (store.c:592) ==17802== by 0x5165ADF: CertOpenStore (store.c:907) ==17802== by 0x51136FD: CRYPT_CreateChainEngine (chain.c:130) ==17802== by 0x511394F: get_chain_engine (chain.c:175) ==17802== by 0x511ADC0: CertGetCertificateChain (chain.c:2894) ==17802== by 0x4E618AA: testVerifyCertChainPolicy (chain.c:4790) ==17802== by 0x4E61C4C: func_chain (chain.c:4844) ==17802== by 0x4EB7F67: run_test (test.h:584) ==17802== by 0x4EB8356: main (test.h:654) ==17802== ==17802== 60 bytes in 3 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 197 of 427 ==17802== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==17802== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==17802== by 0x514398B: CryptMemAlloc (main.c:124) ==17802== by 0x5157661: ContextPropertyList_SetProperty (proplist.c:132) ==17802== by 0x515788F: ContextPropertyList_Copy (proplist.c:215) ==17802== by 0x511E9AF: Context_CopyProperties (context.c:130) ==17802== by 0x510AB6C: Cert_clone (cert.c:139) ==17802== by 0x5163664: MemStore_addContext (store.c:151) ==17802== by 0x5163A35: MemStore_addCert (store.c:243) ==17802== by 0x510B119: add_cert_to_store (cert.c:263) ==17802== by 0x510B27F: CertAddCertificateContextToStore (cert.c:287) ==17802== by 0x510A852: CertAddEncodedCertificateToStore (cert.c:65) ==17802== by 0x515E94A: add_ms_root_certs (rootstore.c:732) ==17802== by 0x515EB12: create_root_store (rootstore.c:808) ==17802== by 0x515EC6C: CRYPT_RootOpenStore (rootstore.c:829) ==17802== by 0x516435C: CRYPT_SysRegOpenStoreW (store.c:435) ==17802== by 0x5165ADF: CertOpenStore (store.c:907) ==17802== by 0x5164BAF: CRYPT_SysOpenStoreW (store.c:604) ==17802== by 0x5165ADF: CertOpenStore (store.c:907) ==17802== by 0x51136FD: CRYPT_CreateChainEngine (chain.c:130) ==17802== ==17802== 96 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 294 of 427 ==17802== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==17802== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==17802== by 0x61ACD34: heap_alloc_zero (internet.h:121) ==17802== by 0x61ADCA1: create_netconn (netconnection.c:369) ==17802== by 0x619CFF2: open_http_connection (http.c:4826) ==17802== by 0x619D68C: HTTP_HttpSendRequestW (http.c:4972) ==17802== by 0x619EE2C: HttpSendRequestExW (http.c:5511) ==17802== by 0x61643F8: HTTP_RetrieveEncodedObjectW (cryptnet_main.c:933) ==17802== by 0x6165930: CryptRetrieveObjectByUrlW (cryptnet_main.c:1479) ==17802== by 0x5118CA0: CRYPT_FindIssuer (chain.c:2039) ==17802== by 0x51193A2: CRYPT_GetIssuer (chain.c:2168) ==17802== by 0x511952F: CRYPT_BuildSimpleChain (chain.c:2200) ==17802== by 0x511976F: CRYPT_GetSimpleChainForCert (chain.c:2247) ==17802== by 0x5119885: CRYPT_BuildCandidateChainFromCert (chain.c:2277) ==17802== by 0x511AE8B: CertGetCertificateChain (chain.c:2914) ==17802== by 0x4E5F02E: testGetCertChain (chain.c:3996) ==17802== by 0x4E61C51: func_chain (chain.c:4845) ==17802== by 0x4EB7F67: run_test (test.h:584) ==17802== by 0x4EB8356: main (test.h:654) ==17802== etc. (full log attached) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6