December 2021 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 33198] New: Multiple applications ported to WinRT/ARM using msvcr110.dll require msvcrt.setjmp
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Dec. 8, 2021

Dec. 8, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33198 Bug #: 33198 Summary: Multiple applications ported to WinRT/ARM using msvcr110.dll require msvcrt.setjmp Product: Wine Version: 1.5.25 Platform: arm OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: msvcrt AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: focht(a)gmx.net Classification: Unclassified Hello folks, as the summary says ... --- snip --- $ wine ./Audacity.exe ... err:module:find_forwarded_export function not found for forward 'msvcrt.setjmp' used by L"C:\\windows\\system32\\msvcr110.dll". If you are using builtin L"msvcr110.dll", try using the native one instead. --- snip --- Currently implemented for x86 64-bit in msvcrt: http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/blob/14a81773c7ce865dd6d919ddee89cad3… --- snip --- 1371 @ cdecl -arch=x86_64 -norelay -private setjmp(ptr) MSVCRT__setjmp --- snip --- Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 6

[Bug 32992] New: ARM port of "WabbitEMU" wants KERNEL32.dll.RtlLookupFunctionEntry
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Dec. 8, 2021

Dec. 8, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32992 Bug #: 32992 Summary: ARM port of "WabbitEMU" wants KERNEL32.dll.RtlLookupFunctionEntry Product: Wine Version: 1.5.24 Platform: arm OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: kernel32 AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: focht(a)gmx.net Classification: Unclassified Hello folks, split from bug 32991 which is about unimplemented function KERNEL32.dll.RtlUnwindEx +module,+imports --- snip --- ... 0009:trace:module:load_dll looking for L"KERNEL32.dll" in L"Z:\\home\\linaro\\wine-apps\\wabbitemu;.;C:\\windows\\system32;C:\\windows\\system;C:\\windows;C:\\windows\\system32;C:\\windows;C:\\windows\\system32\\wbem" 0009:trace:module:load_dll Found L"C:\\windows\\system32\\KERNEL32.dll" for L"KERNEL32.dll" at 0x7b820000, count=19 0009:warn:module:import_dll No implementation for KERNEL32.dll.RtlUnwindEx imported from L"Z:\\home\\linaro\\wine-apps\\wabbitemu\\Wabbitemu.exe", setting to 0x41820000 0009:trace:imports:import_dll --- RtlUnwindEx KERNEL32.dll.1209 = 0x41820000 0009:trace:imports:import_dll --- GetCommandLineA KERNEL32.dll.481 = 0x7b846be0 0009:trace:imports:import_dll --- RtlPcToFileHeader KERNEL32.dll.1205 = 0x7bc69188 0009:warn:module:import_dll No implementation for KERNEL32.dll.RtlLookupFunctionEntry imported from L"Z:\\home\\linaro\\wine-apps\\wabbitemu\\Wabbitemu.exe", setting to 0x41820024 0009:trace:imports:import_dll --- RtlLookupFunctionEntry KERNEL32.dll.1203 = 0x41820024 0009:trace:imports:import_dll --- GetModuleFileNameW KERNEL32.dll.634 = 0x7b86b864 ... --- snip --- MSDN entry for KERNEL32.dll.RtlLookupFunctionEntry: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms680597%28v=vs.85%… ("ARM Definition") Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 4

[Bug 51974] New: Dialogs that apear when loading documents don't work
by WineHQ Bugzilla Dec. 8, 2021

Dec. 8, 2021

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51974 Bug ID: 51974 Summary: Dialogs that apear when loading documents don't work Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: tebicap(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 70961 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=70961 Corel Drax X3 portable, import options dialog. When Loading a file from Corel Draw or Adobe Illustrator (and may be others?) these programs show a dialog with import options, this dialog don't allow me to click on the buttons "OK", "CANCEL", nor any other stuff in the dialog. It's like the dialog's window don't get focused and dont interact with the mouse nor keyboard, instead, the application below (if there is any other window opened) receive the actions of my computer inputs. If I open these programs and open any document that don't need to show me an import dialog then the file opens OK. Dialogs in general works well, but not the import options dialog. Atached Images. This bug happen on all wine versions I tried (the last one was 6.17 stage) my system is: Operating System: Kubuntu 20.04 KDE Plasma Version: 5.18.5 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.68.0 Qt Version: 5.12.8 Kernel Version: 5.4.0-89-generic OS Type: 64-bit Processors: 4 × Intel® Core™ i3-3240 CPU @ 3.40GHz Memory: 5,8 GiB -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 50770] New: Unable to create symlinks to files in a nonexistent directory
by WineHQ Bugzilla Dec. 7, 2021

Dec. 7, 2021

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50770 Bug ID: 50770 Summary: Unable to create symlinks to files in a nonexistent directory Product: Wine-staging Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: martin(a)martin.st CC: erich.e.hoover(a)gmail.com, leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com, z.figura12(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 69562 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=69562 Testcase Creating a symlink pointing to a file that doesn't exist, succeeds as it should, e.g. CreateSymbolicLinkA("link", "nonexistentfile") succeeds. However, CreateSymbolicLinkA("link", "nonexistentdir\\nonexistentfile") fails. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 20

[Bug 52154] New: Jinx from (live-leds.de not working properly)
by WineHQ Bugzilla Dec. 7, 2021

Dec. 7, 2021

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52154 Bug ID: 52154 Summary: Jinx from (live-leds.de not working properly) Product: Wine Version: 6.2 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: signorettae(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Hello, I'm trying to run Jinx on Linux using both Arm and x86/x64 computers. I can start it properly but I'm unable to use the physical hardware. I.E. I can create a symlink between /dev/ttyUSB0 and COM 30, I can use the COM port on Putty (running on Wine obv.) but Jinx doesn't detect it. Please let my know if you need logs and so on. Thank you in advance -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 50625] New: Unhandled exception with try/catch
by WineHQ Bugzilla Dec. 7, 2021

Dec. 7, 2021

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50625 Bug ID: 50625 Summary: Unhandled exception with try/catch Product: Wine Version: 4.12.1 Hardware: arm OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: ntdll Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: david.paradis(a)us.abb.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 69319 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=69319 Test Project File Hello, I have run into a bug with try/catch blocks throwing an unhandled exception even though I have a catch all. I have attached a very simple test program that when started calls a method that just throws an exception class back to the caller. This very simple program works great in Windows and throws an unhandled exception in Wine and terminates the program. This is a critical path to my application as I have incorporated a 3rd party library that uses exceptions for program flow rather than function return codes. Without a fix our application becomes unstable and crashes when an intended exception is thrown. I would really like a solution for the version of Wine that we are running (4.12.1) as we have Wine running on thousands of remote computers with not easy solution to upgrade to newer versions. I can however deploy patches to Wine. Thank you for any assistance with addressing this issue as I have spent the last couple days annotating the Wine sources to try and find the root cause without success to this point. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 28

[Bug 52181] New: Shadowrun Returns: missing file warning for an existing file
by WineHQ Bugzilla Dec. 7, 2021

Dec. 7, 2021

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52181 Bug ID: 52181 Summary: Shadowrun Returns: missing file warning for an existing file Product: Wine Version: 6.23 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: blue-t(a)web.de Distribution: --- Shadowrun Returns claims that a dll can't be found although the file clearly exists 011c:err:module:import_dll Library steam_api.dll (which is needed by L"Z:\\media\\USERNAME\\Windows\\Spiele\\Shadowrun Returns\\Shadowrun_Data\\Plugins\\steamwrap.dll") not found from the same folder -rwxrwxrwx 2 USERNAME USERNAME 104872 Dez 6 09:39 steam_api.dll* -rwxrwxrwx 2 USERNAME USERNAME 227328 Dez 6 09:39 SteamworksNative.dll* -rwxrwxrwx 2 USERNAME USERNAME 27648 Dez 6 09:39 steamwrap.dll* -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 52178] New: Vip72
by WineHQ Bugzilla Dec. 6, 2021

Dec. 6, 2021

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 Bug ID: 52178 Summary: Vip72 Product: Wine Version: 6.22 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: activeds Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: Icarus3489(a)protonmail.com Distribution: --- Error 430 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 52156] New: Critical error during program execution about ntdll
by WineHQ Bugzilla Dec. 6, 2021

Dec. 6, 2021

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52156 Bug ID: 52156 Summary: Critical error during program execution about ntdll Product: Wine Version: 6.0.2 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: ntdll Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: sameer.nctp(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 71202 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=71202 A screenshot of error Hello to all developers I want to report a bug in wine 6.0.2. I am running Ashes Cricket 2009 using wine and it crashes just at the end of a match. It is showing a critical error about ntdll and the game stuck and after sometime, it crashes. I am attaching screenshot of error it is showing, kindly help me 'cause this is really annoying as I have to restart the program several times. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 52167] New: comctl32:rebar fails in test_layout() on Wine in the Japanese locale
by WineHQ Bugzilla Dec. 6, 2021

Dec. 6, 2021

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52167 Bug ID: 52167 Summary: comctl32:rebar fails in test_layout() on Wine in the Japanese locale Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: comctl32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- comctl32:rebar fails in test_layout() on Wine in the Japanese locale: rebar.c:566: Test failed: invalid rect (client) (0,0)-(672,40) - expected (0,0)-(672,44) rebar.c:566: Test failed: Height mismatch for row 0 - 22 vs 20 rebar.c:566: Test failed: Height mismatch for row 1 - 22 vs 20 rebar.c:566: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (0,0)-(118,20) - expected (0,0)-(118,22) rebar.c:566: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (118,0)-(188,20) - expected (118,0)-(188,22) rebar.c:566: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (188,0)-(428,20) - expected (188,0)-(428,22) rebar.c:566: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (428,0)-(672,20) - expected (428,0)-(672,22) rebar.c:566: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (0,20)-(672,40) - expected (0,22)-(672,44) rebar.c:568: Test failed: invalid rect (client) (0,0)-(672,40) - expected (0,0)-(672,44) rebar.c:568: Test failed: Height mismatch for row 0 - 22 vs 20 rebar.c:568: Test failed: Height mismatch for row 1 - 22 vs 20 rebar.c:568: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (0,0)-(118,20) - expected (0,0)-(118,22) rebar.c:568: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (118,0)-(231,20) - expected (118,0)-(231,22) rebar.c:568: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (231,0)-(428,20) - expected (231,0)-(428,22) rebar.c:568: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (428,0)-(672,20) - expected (428,0)-(672,22) rebar.c:568: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (0,20)-(672,40) - expected (0,22)-(672,44) rebar.c:570: Test failed: invalid rect (client) (0,0)-(672,40) - expected (0,0)-(672,44) rebar.c:570: Test failed: Height mismatch for row 0 - 22 vs 20 rebar.c:570: Test failed: Height mismatch for row 1 - 22 vs 20 rebar.c:570: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (0,0)-(118,20) - expected (0,0)-(118,22) rebar.c:570: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (118,0)-(321,20) - expected (118,0)-(321,22) rebar.c:570: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (321,0)-(504,20) - expected (321,0)-(504,22) rebar.c:570: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (504,0)-(672,20) - expected (504,0)-(672,22) rebar.c:570: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (0,20)-(672,40) - expected (0,22)-(672,44) rebar.c:572: Test failed: invalid rect (client) (0,0)-(672,40) - expected (0,0)-(672,44) rebar.c:572: Test failed: Height mismatch for row 0 - 22 vs 20 rebar.c:572: Test failed: Height mismatch for row 1 - 22 vs 20 rebar.c:572: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (0,0)-(118,20) - expected (0,0)-(118,22) rebar.c:572: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (118,0)-(171,20) - expected (118,0)-(171,22) rebar.c:572: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (171,0)-(504,20) - expected (171,0)-(504,22) rebar.c:572: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (504,0)-(672,20) - expected (504,0)-(672,22) rebar.c:572: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (0,20)-(672,40) - expected (0,22)-(672,44) rebar.c:574: Test failed: invalid rect (client) (0,0)-(672,40) - expected (0,0)-(672,44) rebar.c:574: Test failed: Height mismatch for row 0 - 22 vs 20 rebar.c:574: Test failed: Height mismatch for row 1 - 22 vs 20 rebar.c:574: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (0,0)-(118,20) - expected (0,0)-(118,22) rebar.c:574: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (118,0)-(321,20) - expected (118,0)-(321,22) rebar.c:574: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (321,0)-(504,20) - expected (321,0)-(504,22) rebar.c:574: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (504,0)-(672,20) - expected (504,0)-(672,22) rebar.c:574: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (0,20)-(672,40) - expected (0,22)-(672,44) rebar.c:576: Test failed: invalid rect (client) (0,0)-(672,40) - expected (0,0)-(672,44) rebar.c:576: Test failed: Height mismatch for row 0 - 22 vs 20 rebar.c:576: Test failed: Height mismatch for row 1 - 22 vs 20 rebar.c:576: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (0,0)-(118,20) - expected (0,0)-(118,22) rebar.c:576: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (118,0)-(321,20) - expected (118,0)-(321,22) rebar.c:576: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (321,0)-(504,20) - expected (321,0)-(504,22) rebar.c:576: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (504,0)-(672,20) - expected (504,0)-(672,22) rebar.c:576: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (0,20)-(672,40) - expected (0,22)-(672,44) rebar.c:593: Test failed: invalid rect (client) (0,0)-(672,40) - expected (0,0)-(672,44) rebar.c:593: Test failed: Height mismatch for row 0 - 22 vs 20 rebar.c:593: Test failed: Height mismatch for row 1 - 22 vs 20 rebar.c:593: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (0,0)-(118,20) - expected (0,0)-(118,22) rebar.c:593: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (118,0)-(321,20) - expected (118,0)-(321,22) rebar.c:593: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (321,0)-(504,20) - expected (321,0)-(504,22) rebar.c:593: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (504,0)-(672,20) - expected (504,0)-(672,22) rebar.c:593: Test failed: invalid rect (band) (0,20)-(672,40) - expected (0,22)-(672,44) https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#comctl32:rebar Note that, even in Wine, the test does not fail in Korean and Chinese. So it may not be a simple DBCS issue. It could however be a font one. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1