October 2022 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 28659] New: rpcrt4/server test crashes on 32-bit FreeBSD9
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 16, 2023

Nov. 16, 2023

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28659 Bug #: 28659 Summary: rpcrt4/server test crashes on 32-bit FreeBSD9 Product: Wine Version: 1.3.30 Platform: x86 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: rpc AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Classification: Unclassified Created attachment 36831 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=36831 backtrace The rpcrt4/rpc test fails as well, but that may be related to missing ntlm_auth (which I haven't found how to satisfy on FreeBSD). The server test shows that same error, but also crashes, so something nastier is going on. Backtrace attached. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 9

[Bug 53095] New: system:NtUserChangeDisplaySettings Changing L"\\\\.\\DISPLAY1" display settings returned -2
by WineHQ Bugzilla Nov. 15, 2023

Nov. 15, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53095 Bug ID: 53095 Summary: system:NtUserChangeDisplaySettings Changing L"\\\\.\\DISPLAY1" display settings returned -2 Product: Wine Version: 7.0 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: zizka(a)seznam.cz Distribution: --- Created attachment 72524 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=72524 1) Wine 7.0 crash; 2) Attempts to run with the Wine bundled by the vendor (i-deal Games) App: "Jagged Alliance 2 - Wildfire" from Steam Wine 7.0 Ubuntu 2022.04 I am trying to make Jagged Alliance run. The Wine distributed with Jagged Alliance seems not to work, because it has 36 byte long libwine.so and Wine doesn't even start. See the "JA 2 dist Wine log" below. So I tried with Wine 7.0 (current stable), and it failed with: system:NtUserChangeDisplaySettings Changing L"\\\\.\\DISPLAY1" display settings returned -2 Along that, the system switched to fullscreen, with the whole screen black. On a second run, Wine crashed - see the 1st part of the attached text. I will try to contact the company and ask if they could figure out. But in the meantime, I think this is a valid bug on an old Win32 game which could be present on some others. Thanks to anyone who takes a look. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 22904] New: Register URL protocol handlers under Linux
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 15, 2023

Nov. 15, 2023

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22904 Summary: Register URL protocol handlers under Linux Product: Wine Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: programs AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: kempe.marcus(a)gmail.com winemenubuilder is able to automatically register file type associations and build menus under Linux, when triggered by an application under wine. It would be great if the same thing were true for protocol handlers, so that these would become registered in much the same way as when using gconftool in gnome: gconftool -s /desktop/gnome/url-handlers/spotify/command 'wine c:\\spotify\\spotify.exe %s' --type String gconftool-2 -s /desktop/gnome/url-handlers/spotify/enabled --type Boolean true Would this be possible, hard, or maybe not a good idea? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 12

[Bug 20474] New: Wine can't be built with GCC in C99 mode
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 14, 2023

Nov. 14, 2023

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20474 Summary: Wine can't be built with GCC in C99 mode Product: Wine Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: build-env AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: yann(a)droneaud.fr For multiple reason, wine can't be built by GCC in C99 mode ( --std=c99 ). In particular, wine rely on GCC behavor regarding to extern inline. It produces errors regarding asm construct conflicting with extern inline symbols. It produces errors with multiple defination of inline function in object files. According to this, it seems that wine is not compatible with C99, but rely a lot on GCC specific behavor. See also bug #20306 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 26

[Bug 53216] New: d3d11:d3d11 - test_depth_bias() fails in the TestBot VMs
by WineHQ Bugzilla Nov. 13, 2023

Nov. 13, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53216 Bug ID: 53216 Summary: d3d11:d3d11 - test_depth_bias() fails in the TestBot VMs Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: directx-d3d Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- d3d11:d3d11 - test_depth_bias() fails in the TestBot VMs: d3d11.c:28093: Test failed: Got depth 4.99374978e-003, expected 4.99999994e-003. d3d11.c:28093: Test failed: Got depth 4.99374978e-003, expected 4.99999994e-003. d3d11.c:28093: Test failed: Got depth 2.50997487e-003, expected 2.50999994e-003. d3d11.c:28093: Test failed: Got depth 7.48750009e-003, expected 7.49999994e-003. d3d11.c:28093: Test failed: Got depth 7.48750009e-003, expected 7.49999994e-003. d3d11.c:28093: Test failed: Got depth 2.50997487e-003, expected 2.50999994e-003. d3d11.c:28093: Test failed: Got depth 1.24749998e-002, expected 1.24999999e-002. d3d11.c:28093: Test failed: Got depth 1.24749998e-002, expected 1.24999999e-002. d3d11.c:28093: Test failed: Got depth 2.50997487e-003, expected 2.50999994e-003. d3d11.c:28093: Test failed: Got depth 6.40899956e-001, expected 6.42500000e-001. d3d11.c:28093: Test failed: Got depth 6.40899956e-001, expected 6.42500000e-001. d3d11.c:28093: Test failed: Got depth 2.50997487e-003, expected 2.50999994e-003. d3d11.c:28093: Test failed: Got depth 2.50997487e-003, expected 2.50999994e-003. d3d11.c:28093: Test failed: Got depth 2.50997487e-003, expected 2.50999994e-003. d3d11.c:27965: Test marked todo: Got 0xffffff00, expected 0x00ffffff at (0, 0, 0), sub-resource 0. d3d11.c:28101: Test failed: Got value 0x14745 (4.99373704e-003), expected 0x147ae (4.99999553e-003). d3d11.c:28101: Test failed: Got value 0x14745 (4.99373704e-003), expected 0x147ae (4.99999553e-003). d3d11.c:28101: Test failed: Got value 0x8528f (3.25097461e-002), expected 0x85293 (3.25099845e-002). d3d11.c:28101: Test failed: Got value 0x1eab3 (7.48747632e-003), expected 0x1eb85 (7.49999329e-003). d3d11.c:28101: Test failed: Got value 0x1eab3 (7.48747632e-003), expected 0x1eb85 (7.49999329e-003). d3d11.c:28101: Test failed: Got value 0x8528f (3.25097461e-002), expected 0x85293 (3.25099845e-002). d3d11.c:28101: Test failed: Got value 0x33190 (1.24750145e-002), expected 0x33333 (1.24999888e-002). d3d11.c:28101: Test failed: Got value 0x33190 (1.24750145e-002), expected 0x33333 (1.24999888e-002). d3d11.c:28101: Test failed: Got value 0x8528f (3.25097461e-002), expected 0x85293 (3.25099845e-002). d3d11.c:28101: Test failed: Got value 0xa41204 (6.40899935e-001), expected 0xa47ae1 (6.42500022e-001). d3d11.c:28101: Test failed: Got value 0xa41204 (6.40899935e-001), expected 0xa47ae1 (6.42500022e-001). d3d11.c:28101: Test failed: Got value 0x8528f (3.25097461e-002), expected 0x85293 (3.25099845e-002). d3d11.c:28101: Test failed: Got value 0x8528f (3.25097461e-002), expected 0x85293 (3.25099845e-002). d3d11.c:28101: Test failed: Got value 0x8528f (3.25097461e-002), expected 0x85293 (3.25099845e-002). d3d11.c:28110: Test failed: Got value 0x28e (9.97940032e-003), expected 0x290 (1.00099184e-002). d3d11.c:28110: Test failed: Got value 0x28e (9.97940032e-003), expected 0x290 (1.00099184e-002). d3d11.c:28110: Test failed: Got value 0x331 (1.24666209e-002), expected 0x334 (1.25123980e-002). d3d11.c:28110: Test failed: Got value 0x331 (1.24666209e-002), expected 0x334 (1.25123980e-002). d3d11.c:28110: Test failed: Got value 0x476 (1.74258030e-002), expected 0x47b (1.75020981e-002). d3d11.c:28110: Test failed: Got value 0x476 (1.74258030e-002), expected 0x47b (1.75020981e-002). d3d11.c:28110: Test failed: Got value 0xa411 (6.40894179e-001), expected 0xa47a (6.42496376e-001). d3d11.c:28110: Test failed: Got value 0xa411 (6.40894179e-001), expected 0xa47a (6.42496376e-001). https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#d3d11:d3d11 These failures: * Don't happen on Debian 11 + Intel / KDE * Happen on Debian 11 + QXL + single-monitor * Happen on Debian 11 + QXL + multi-monitor * Don't happen on Debian Testing + QXL + multi-monitor So they are probably caused by some bug in the Debian 11 QXL support. Note that despite being systematic these failures could cause false positives due to the test multi-threading (see bug 53212). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 16552] New: CreateIoCompletionPort fails in Chromium unit tests
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 11, 2023

Nov. 11, 2023

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16552 Summary: CreateIoCompletionPort fails in Chromium unit tests Product: Wine Version: 1.1.10 Platform: Other URL: http://chromium.org OS/Version: other Status: NEW Keywords: download, source Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wineserver AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: dank(a)kegel.com http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/base/message_pump_win.cc contains the code port_.Set(CreateIoCompletionPort(INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, NULL, NULL, 1)); DCHECK(port_.IsValid()); ... HANDLE port = CreateIoCompletionPort(file_handle, port_, key, 1); DCHECK(port == port_.Get()); The DCHECK fires when running one of the Chromium unit tests: wine Debug/ui_tests.exe ... 001b:Call KERNEL32.CreateFileW(00ed7208 L"\\\\.\\pipe\\chrome.ChromeTestingInterface:8.1",c0000000,00000000,00000000,00000003,40110000,00000000) ret=010e0220 001b:Ret KERNEL32.CreateFileW() retval=000000c0 ret=010e0220 ... 0021:Call KERNEL32.CreateIoCompletionPort(ffffffff,00000000,00000000,00000001) ret=01a304b3 0021:Ret KERNEL32.CreateIoCompletionPort() retval=000000c8 ret=01a304b3 0021:Call KERNEL32.CreateIoCompletionPort(000000c0,000000c8,00ed5aa0,00000001) ret=01a30760 trace:ntdll:NtSetInformationFile (0xc0,0x7cdee318,0x7cdee320,0x00000008,0x0000001e) 0021:Ret KERNEL32.CreateIoCompletionPort() retval=00000000 ret=01a30760 0021:Call KERNEL32.OutputDebugStringA(00ed95a8 "[26:33:1249:FATAL:message_pump_win.cc(428)] Check failed: port == port_.Get(). \r\n") ret=019a7af3 I think it's failing in wineserver for some reason during NtSetInformationFile in set_completion_info. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 5

[Bug 52792] New: Error messages for invalid .exe files could be improved
by WineHQ Bugzilla Nov. 11, 2023

Nov. 11, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52792 Bug ID: 52792 Summary: Error messages for invalid .exe files could be improved Product: Wine Version: 7.6 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: wineserver Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: aros(a)gmx.com Distribution: --- Trying to run a 0 byte .exe file under Wine will get you this: Application could not be started, or no application associated with the specified file. ShellExecuteEx failed: File not found. This doesn't look correct. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 48004] New: winserver memory overflow
by WineHQ Bugzilla Nov. 11, 2023

Nov. 11, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48004 Bug ID: 48004 Summary: winserver memory overflow Product: Wine Version: 4.0.2 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wineserver Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: heiko(a)stark-jena.de Distribution: --- with default and 'wineserver -d2 -f -p10' settings I run simulations with the software Opensim (https://opensim.stanford.edu/) and restart the Opensim one after the other with a script. This seems to cause a memory overflow (> 64 GB). Kill wineserver helps to fix the memory overflow. Is there a way to debug this? Best regards, Heiko -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 52716] New: Sending key stroke (using [System.Windows.Forms.SendKeys]::SendWait) fails (seems to go into a loop?)
by WineHQ Bugzilla Nov. 10, 2023

Nov. 10, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52716 Bug ID: 52716 Summary: Sending key stroke (using [System.Windows.Forms.SendKeys]::SendWait) fails (seems to go into a loop?) Product: Wine Version: 7.4 Hardware: x86-64 URL: https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell/releases/down load/v7.0.3/PowerShell-7.0.3-win-x64.msi OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: dotnet, download Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: xerox.xerox2000x(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 72077 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=72077 ps script Hi, I have a powershell script where I need to send a keystroke to a program. I found code snippet on the internet and made little script that I tested in windows (using powershell core) and it works. It sends ctrp^p to notepad, and that opens the printer-dialog correctly on windows. On wine however it doesn`t work, cpu-usage goes up so it seems to get into loop(???) Script (also see attachment): ################################################################### Start-Process "notepad.exe" Sleep 3 $WindowHandle = Get-Process | Where-Object { $_.MainWindowTitle -Match "Notepad" } | Select-Object -ExpandProperty MainWindowHandle [void][System.Reflection.Assembly]::LoadWithPartialName('System.Windows.Forms') [System.Windows.Forms.SendKeys]::SendWait("^{p}") ##################################################################### Steps to reproduce: 1. winetricks -q dotnet48 2. wget https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell/releases/download/v7.0.3/PowerShel… 3. wine PowerShell-7.0.3-win-x64.msi 4. Save the script from attachment as a.ps1 in current folder 5. wine pwsh -file ./a.ps1 Notepad opens but nothing really happens and cpu-usage goes up -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 53213] New: d3d11:d3d11 - test_texture() fails in the TestBot VMs
by WineHQ Bugzilla Nov. 10, 2023

Nov. 10, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53213 Bug ID: 53213 Summary: d3d11:d3d11 - test_texture() fails in the TestBot VMs Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: directx-d3d Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- d3d11:d3d11 - test_texture() fails in the TestBot VMs: d3d11.c:9837: Test failed: Test 60: Got unexpected color 0xff0000ff at (0, 0). d3d11.c:9837: Test failed: Test 60: Got unexpected color 0xff00ffff at (1, 0). d3d11.c:9837: Test failed: Test 60: Got unexpected color 0xff00ff00 at (2, 0). d3d11.c:9837: Test failed: Test 60: Got unexpected color 0xffffff00 at (3, 0). d3d11.c:9837: Test failed: Test 60: Got unexpected color 0xffff0000 at (0, 1). d3d11.c:9837: Test failed: Test 60: Got unexpected color 0xffff00ff at (1, 1). d3d11.c:9837: Test failed: Test 60: Got unexpected color 0xff000000 at (2, 1). d3d11.c:9837: Test failed: Test 60: Got unexpected color 0xff7f7f7f at (3, 1). d3d11.c:9837: Test failed: Test 60: Got unexpected color 0xffffffff at (0, 2). d3d11.c:9837: Test failed: Test 60: Got unexpected color 0xffffffff at (1, 2). d3d11.c:9837: Test failed: Test 60: Got unexpected color 0xffffffff at (2, 2). d3d11.c:9837: Test failed: Test 60: Got unexpected color 0xff000000 at (3, 2). d3d11.c:9837: Test failed: Test 60: Got unexpected color 0xffffffff at (0, 3). d3d11.c:9837: Test failed: Test 60: Got unexpected color 0xff000000 at (2, 3). d3d11.c:9837: Test failed: Test 60: Got unexpected color 0xff000000 at (3, 3). https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#d3d11:d3d11 These failures don't happen on my box which has an Intel graphics card instead of QEmu's QXL graphics card. Note also that these failures still happen on my debian11 VM which has a single monitor instead of the TestBot VMs' multi-monitor setup. So this seems to be related to the VMs QXL GPU. Note that despite being systematic these failures could cause false positives (see bug 53212). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5