October 2022 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 52676] New: enigma protected software fails to work properly
by WineHQ Bugzilla Aug. 21, 2023

Aug. 21, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52676 Bug ID: 52676 Summary: enigma protected software fails to work properly Product: Wine Version: 7.4 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: galtgendo(a)o2.pl CC: dark.shadow4(a)web.de Distribution: --- Created attachment 72003 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=72003 backtrace of the crash (note the garbage) As I've said in bug 49052, the trial that's supposed to work just crashes without displaying anything. Attaching console output. I've got one other trial that's also enigma protected - that one starts, but enters an infinite loop without displaying anything. That one is using an engine that's known to work here, so I suspect enigma being the reason of the failure. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 25

[Bug 52569] New: Zothero Error Launch XUL
by WineHQ Bugzilla Aug. 18, 2023

Aug. 18, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52569 Bug ID: 52569 Summary: Zothero Error Launch XUL Product: Wine Version: 7.1 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: blbenyamin9(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 71889 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=71889 Zothero Error Launch Zothero, and imidietly got this error Unhandled exception: page fault on read access to 0x00000000 in 32-bit code (0x0258904c). Register dump: CS:0023 SS:002b DS:002b ES:002b FS:0063 GS:006b EIP:0258904c ESP:0051cb84 EBP:0051dcec EFLAGS:00010206( R- -- I - -P- ) EAX:00000000 EBX:00000000 ECX:0051cb44 EDX:00990094 ESI:009d13e8 EDI:0bc9d478 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 48621] New: Civilization 6 crashes on startup.
by WineHQ Bugzilla Aug. 18, 2023

Aug. 18, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48621 Bug ID: 48621 Summary: Civilization 6 crashes on startup. Product: Wine Version: 5.2 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: charles2000wang(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 66468 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=66468 Game Log file Launching the game opens a black window before promptly crashes with the Firaxis Crash Reporter asking to submit a report. Digging around the game files, I found a log file (GameOverlayRenderer.log) with messages about "Aborting HookFunc because pRealFunctionAddr is null" and other errors. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 36564] New: 'Candytron' demo: certain objects are black with GLSL enabled
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 18, 2023

Aug. 18, 2023

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36564 Bug ID: 36564 Summary: 'Candytron' demo: certain objects are black with GLSL enabled Product: Wine Version: 1.6-rc1 Hardware: x86 URL: http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=9424 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, regression Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: directx-d3d Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: gyebro69(a)gmail.com CC: hverbeet(a)gmail.com Regression SHA1: 2014141a253a791fc9c79aae3c8ef3c35b73e658 Created attachment 48657 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=48657 screenshot (comparison) Some of the rectangles that appear in the demo nearly at 00:30 and at 01:10 are black. They should appear as glowing green rectangles as can be seen in the attached screenshot. Terminal output doesn't reveal anything interesting. Disabling GLSL is a workaround. This is a regression from Wine 1.6-rc1: 2014141a253a791fc9c79aae3c8ef3c35b73e658 is the first bad commit commit 2014141a253a791fc9c79aae3c8ef3c35b73e658 Author: Henri Verbeet <hverbeet(a)codeweavers.com> Date: Wed May 29 09:45:35 2013 +0200 wined3d: Add support for GLSL based fixed function vertex shaders. :040000 040000 d1b4b75f643d4851d4f51454aa47740261f7857f c46794f61b1952b1e78746272d838574c0948010 M dlls Fedora 20 Nvidia 250 gfx card / Nvidia binary drivers 337.19 wine-1.7.19-70-gd6a59f7 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 20

[Bug 52889] New: Freelancer with Crossfire mod crashes on startup
by WineHQ Bugzilla Aug. 18, 2023

Aug. 18, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52889 Bug ID: 52889 Summary: Freelancer with Crossfire mod crashes on startup Product: Wine Version: 6.19 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: poweroverwhelming982(a)gmail.com CC: jacek(a)codeweavers.com Regression SHA1: 6857cb56957d691bee76cfe28ef88714cca00f29 Distribution: Ubuntu Created attachment 72282 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=72282 Wine log at commit 6857cb56957d691bee76cfe28ef88714cca00f29 Since wine-6.19, Freelancer with Crossfire 2.0 mod crashes immediately on startup (as soon as the mod window is shown). Bisecting points to this commit: > commit 6857cb56957d691bee76cfe28ef88714cca00f29 > Author: Jacek Caban <jacek(a)codeweavers.com> > Date: Wed Sep 29 14:09:21 2021 +0200 > > gdi32: Move ntgdi functions to Unix library. I've attached the relevant logs, let me know if there's anything else I can do. Additional info: OS: Ubuntu Focal 20.04.3 LTS Kernel: 5.13.0-30-generic x86_64 Wine Prefix: 32 bit, clean GPU: NVIDIA Corporation GF108 [GeForce GT 730] (rev a1) Graphics Driver: Proprietary NVIDIA ver. 390.144 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 52474] New: ws2_32:sock fails intermittently - 'Test failed: expected timeout'
by WineHQ Bugzilla Aug. 18, 2023

Aug. 18, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52474 Bug ID: 52474 Summary: ws2_32:sock fails intermittently - 'Test failed: expected timeout' Product: Wine Version: 7.0 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: winsock Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: jinoh.kang.kr(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- The test_connect_events() function contains the following checks, where the check (2) fails intermittently: 1. check_events(ctx, FD_CONNECT, FD_WRITE, 200); 2. check_events(ctx, 0, 0, 0); A hypothesis for the cause of the test failure is that the WSAEnumNetworkEvents() call inside the check (1) races with the server setting the event. Note that WSAEnumNetworkEvents performs the following steps: a. It calls ResetEvent on the given event. b. It issues IOCTL_AFD_GET_EVENTS command on the socket to retrieve the events so far. It's possible that the event may be set by the server between (a) and (b), which lingers until the next call to WSAEnumNetworkEvents(). This explains why the event wait in check (2) is satisfied immediately but subsequent tests report no events. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 34678] New: Not all serial port work in wine
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 18, 2023

Aug. 18, 2023

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34678 Bug #: 34678 Summary: Not all serial port work in wine Product: Wine Version: 1.6 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: rewineland(a)gmail.com Classification: Unclassified I have wine 1.6 install on Ubuntu 12.04 with kernel 3.8.0-31-generial. I have 2 serial ports on board and an add-on card with 8 more.I can get the the on board and 7 of the add-on to work as 1 though 9 comports but com10 I can not get any data though. the port is listed as ttyCTI7, when I connect to that I have data going back and forth. It just wont go into the windows program. Any ideas on what to do. I need to have all 10 ports. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 10

[Bug 53171] New: advapi32:registry - test_performance_keys() sometimes fails due to time going backwards!
by WineHQ Bugzilla Aug. 18, 2023

Aug. 18, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53171 Bug ID: 53171 Summary: advapi32:registry - test_performance_keys() sometimes fails due to time going backwards! Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: advapi32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com advapi32:registry - test_performance_keys() sometimes fails due to time going backwards: registry.c:3757: Test failed: key FFFFFFFF80000004: value (null): got times 132999520626290092, 132999520626290092, 132967560392269933 registry.c:3763: Test failed: key FFFFFFFF80000004: value (null): got times 132999520626290092, 132999520626290000, 132967560392269933 https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#advapi32:registry This failure is pretty rate: I only found 4 cases (~0.9%): win2009_newtb-w1064-tsign, win21H1_newtb-w10pro64-mx-MX, 2x win21H2_fgtb-w10pro64. The failure lines above happened on w10pro64-mx-MX on 2022-06-17. Here are the corresponding timestamps: systime1 = 132999520626290092 = 2022-06-17 15:07:42.629009 file_time = 132999520626290000 = 2022-06-17 15:07:42.629000 systime2 = 132967560392269933 = 2022-05-11 15:20:39.226993 file_time is a little lower than systime1 which is normal due to its granularity. What is totally wrong however is that systime2 is way lower than systime1. The interesting part is that the live snapshot was created on 2022-05-11 which matches systime2. This scenario is confirmed it two of the other instances; the snapshot creation time for the last case is unknown but a match with systime2 is plausible. After restoring the VM from the live snapshot LibvirtTool sets the VM time through TestAgent::SetTime(): https://gitlab.winehq.org/winehq/tools/-/blob/master/testbot/bin/LibvirtToo… https://gitlab.winehq.org/winehq/tools/-/blob/master/testbot/src/testagentd… So it looks like in rare cases the system time gets reset backwards precisely between this test's two NtQuerySystemTime() calls, which is really unlucky... or lucky: maybe it happens in other cases causing less obvious failures. I don't know if TestAgentd sets the time wrong, if there's something wrong with Windows, or if this is an artifact of the QEmu clocks: <clock offset='localtime'> <timer name='rtc' tickpolicy='delay'/> <timer name='pit' tickpolicy='delay'/> <timer name='hpet' present='yes'/> <timer name='hypervclock' present='yes'/> </clock> -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 52492] New: stack overflow from GdipFlattenPath
by WineHQ Bugzilla Aug. 18, 2023

Aug. 18, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52492 Bug ID: 52492 Summary: stack overflow from GdipFlattenPath Product: Wine Version: 7.1 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Mac OS X Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gdiplus Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: rjfeuerbach(a)gmail.com Created attachment 71787 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=71787 test patch to replicate the curves and stack overflow I have a third party application, unfortunately not available for download, that is generating a virtual stack overflow error. Using +replay and eventually +gdiplus messages, the cause was narrowed down to be due to calls to GdipFlattenPath. Attached is a patch to gdiplus/test/graphicspath.c to include the precise curves that cause the stack overflow. I believe the problem is due to the comparison of REALs with == in the flatten_bezier helper function. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 22

[Bug 44816] New: Cygwin/ MSYS2 `script -e` exit status forwarding randomly returns zero for non zero child process
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 18, 2023

Aug. 18, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44816 Bug ID: 44816 Summary: Cygwin/MSYS2 `script -e` exit status forwarding randomly returns zero for non zero child process Product: Wine Version: 3.4 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ntdll Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: focht(a)gmx.net Distribution: --- Hello folks, to track https://github.com/wine-staging/wine-staging/tree/master/patches/ntdll-Deal… Mentioned here: https://wine-staging.com/news/2015-08-23-release-1.7.50.html --- quote --- Do not allow to deallocate thread stack for current thread (MSYS2, Wine Staging Bug #241) --- quote --- After some archaeology I found the Cygwin mailing list discussion here: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-09/msg00114.html --- quote --- > Ah, ok. What OS does Wine emulate here? Have a look at > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=blob;f=winsup/cygwin/cygt… > > The terminate_thread_frees_stack flag is set to false for XP/2003 and to > true for any newer OS. I guess this is a double-free because Wine's > TerminateThread already freed the stack and Cygwin got the info it's > supposedly running under XP/2003, so it tries to workaround the fact > that TerminateThread on these systems didn't free the stack by themselves. > Wine emulates Windows XP here, I double checked Wine source code and I can confirm Wine doesn't free the stack: NtTerminateThread() -> abort_thread() -> terminate_thread() https://github.com/wine-compholio/wine-patched/blob/8b3a785e97a7e28ff58731b… Cygwin reports wincap as wincap_xpsp2 which is also correct here. > we need to know what address ret=61005767 is refering to. addr2line would help. As you point out, ret=61005767 is the call to VirtualFree() inside cygthread::terminate_thread () https://sourceware.org/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=blob;f=winsup/cygwin/cygt… After combine the information we have so far, I think the problem is clear now. It's not Cygwin's fault, it's Wine's fault. Wine's WaitForSingleObject() needs to wait long enough after the TerminateThread() call, so the target thread has enough time to finish the system cleanup and return correct exit_code before Cygwin call VirtualFree to free the stack. But in our current implementation Wine's WaitForSingleObject returns too early, it shouldn't return before the system thread cleanup done, as a result there is a race here. We are thinking of a solution in Wine. Thanks again for the great help! --- quote --- $ wine --version wine-3.4 Regards -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 9