May 2022 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 52866] New: vbscript:run fails in Wine in Arabic and Hebrew
by WineHQ Bugzilla May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52866 Bug ID: 52866 Summary: vbscript:run fails in Wine in Arabic and Hebrew Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: vbscript Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- vbscript:run fails in Wine in Arabic and Hebrew: run.c:1888: Test failed: unexpected call OnScriptError run.c:2933: Test failed: expected global_success_d run.c:2934: Test failed: expected global_success_i run.c:2936: Test failed: parse_script failed: 800a000d run.c:1204: Test failed: api.vbs: L"Err.number = 13" run.c:1204: Test failed: api.vbs: L"Err.number = 13" run.c:1874: Error in line 1162: 0 L"Type mismatch" run.c:1888: Test failed: unexpected call OnScriptError run.c:2933: Test failed: expected global_success_d run.c:2934: Test failed: expected global_success_i run.c:2936: Test failed: parse_script failed: 800a000d https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#vbscript:run Incidentally these are our two right-to-left test locales so this may be related. A bisect shows that the failures started with this commit: commit ba43e4cfca97a9bba3e6575af82acbf011685862 Author: Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> Date: Tue Mar 29 22:11:32 2022 +0200 kernelbase: Reimplement number formatting values in GetLocaleInfoW/Ex using the locale.nls data. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 52857] New: msvcp140:msvcp140 fails in Windows 8.1 on the cw-rx460 machine
by WineHQ Bugzilla May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52857 Bug ID: 52857 Summary: msvcp140:msvcp140 fails in Windows 8.1 on the cw-rx460 machine Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: msvcp Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com msvcp140:msvcp140 fails in Windows 8.1 on the cw-rx460 machine msvcp140.c:1617: Test failed: Got unexpected err 87. msvcp140.c:1622: Test failed: Got unexpected err 87. https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#msvcp140:msvcp140 These are new tests so unsurprisingly the failures are caused by the commit that introduced them: commit d72d596070eb28fd5f747fb6120d36f66ff93bec Author: Paul Gofman <pgofman(a)codeweavers.com> Date: Mon Apr 11 21:44:35 2022 +0300 msvcp140: Implement _Copy_file(). Signed-off-by: Paul Gofman <pgofman(a)codeweavers.com> Signed-off-by: Piotr Caban <piotr(a)codeweavers.com> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> The fact that only this specific Windows 8.1 configuration fails makes sense because it is the only one to have msvcp140 and it is a relatively old version: it is installed by the Radeon driver. However: * The w7u VM does have (a much newer) msvcp140 and has no failure. * The w1064v1607 VM has the same msvcp140 version and has no failure either. Furthermore kernel32:file also fails in the same way in the same configuration and shouldn't depend on msvcp140. So it's possible the issue is not related to msvcp140 at all. Here is a summary of the msvcp140 versions on the Windows 7, 8.1 and older Windows 10 machines: Win Machine msvcp140 win7 w7u 14.29.30037.0 win7 w7pro64 missing (at least for 64-bit) win81 cw-gtx560 missing win81 cw-rx460 14.0.23026.0 win81 w8 missing win81 w864 missing win1507 cw-gtx560 missing win1507 cw-rx460 missing win1507 w1064v1507 missing win1607 w1064v1607 14.0.23026.0 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 52828] New: Incorrect instruments in MIDI playback over ALSA
by WineHQ Bugzilla May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52828 Bug ID: 52828 Summary: Incorrect instruments in MIDI playback over ALSA Product: Wine Version: 7.5 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: dark(a)darkok.xyz Distribution: --- Created attachment 72216 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=72216 MIDI file that is played noticably wrong Starting from Wine 7.5, some MIDIs aren't played back properly as they have the incorrect instruments, at least when I've tried playing them using aplaymidi on a VST using SAVIHost. Downloads: https://www.hermannseib.com/programs/savihostx64.zip https://cdn.roland.com/assets/media/zip/scva_win_trial.zip Steps to reproduce: 1. Execute "winetricks mfc90" to get a required DLL 2. Extract scva_win_trial.zip and install the Roland Sound Canvas VA VST 3. Extract savihostx64.zip, and move savihost.exe to "C:\Program Files\Roland\Sound Canvas VA" 4. Rename savihost.exe to "Sound Canvas VA.exe" 5. Run the renamed executable 6. Go to Devices>MIDI, and set Input Port 1 to "Midi Through Port-0" 7. Run "aplaymidi -p 14:0 smr_101.mid" to start playing the MIDI 8. In the VST, click "PART", and the correct instruments should be Vibraphone for the first three, and "KICK&SNARE" for the 11th. However, starting from Wine 7.5, these instruments are incorrectly set to "Piano 1" for the first three, and "Syn. Strings 1" for the 11th. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 14

[Bug 48048] New: urlmon:protocol - The ftp test fail on Vista to Windows 8
by WineHQ Bugzilla May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48048 Bug ID: 48048 Summary: urlmon:protocol - The ftp test fail on Vista to Windows 8 Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: urlmon Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com The ftp protocol test in urlmon:protocol fails frequently on Windows from Vista to Windows 8: protocol.c:1188: Test failed: hrResult = 800c0006, expected E_PENDING or S_OK protocol.c:1193: Test failed: dwError = 12111, expected ERROR_SUCCESS protocol.c:3656: Test failed: wait timed out urlmon:protocol:0700 done (258) in 120s Test failed: timed out Note: 800c0006 is INET_E_OBJECT_NOT_FOUND See https://test.winehq.org/data/tests/urlmon:protocol.html -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 18635] New: Menu bar is hidden in Adobe Lightroom 2.3
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18635 Summary: Menu bar is hidden in Adobe Lightroom 2.3 Product: Wine Version: 1.1.22 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: thomas+wine(a)stromberg.org With the Adobe Lightroom 2.3 demo, the menu bar titles (File, etc.) do not display. If you click on the area that they should be, the menu does appear however. Lightroom 2.3 can be downloaded from https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/tdrc/index.cfm?product=photoshop_lightroom (free Adobe login required) I'm not sure where to go about tracing the issue down to, but I did notice the following calls that show that it is calling DrawMenuBar(). 0009:Call user32.GetMenu(0002003c) ret=60030cbe 0009:Ret user32.GetMenu() retval=000000f0 ret=60030cbe 0009:Call user32.GetMenuBarInfo(0002003c,fffffffd,00000000,0032e1a4) ret=60030cec fixme:menu:GetMenuBarInfo (0x2003c,0xfffffffd,0x00000000,0x32e1a4) 0009:Ret user32.GetMenuBarInfo() retval=00000000 ret=60030cec 0009:Call user32.GetSystemMenu(0002003c,00000000) ret=60030beb 0009:Ret user32.GetSystemMenu() retval=00000280 ret=60030beb 0009:Call user32.GetSystemMenu(0002003c,00000000) ret=60030c06 0009:Ret user32.GetSystemMenu() retval=00000280 ret=60030c06 0009:Call user32.GetMenuItemInfoW(00000280,0000f060,00000000,0032e08c) ret=60030c22 0009:Ret user32.GetMenuItemInfoW() retval=00000001 ret=60030c22 0009:Call user32.DrawMenuBar(0002003c) ret=6008d171 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 21

[Bug 52967] New: gdi32:font - test_text_metrics() fails on Windows with en-AE-u8 and plain Hindi
by WineHQ Bugzilla May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52967 Bug ID: 52967 Summary: gdi32:font - test_text_metrics() fails on Windows with en-AE-u8 and plain Hindi Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gdi32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com gdi32:font - test_text_metrics() has a set of failures on Windows that only happen with the English Arab Emirates + UTF-8 locale (en-AE-u8), and in Hindi but without UTF-8 (hi): font.c:3441: Test failed: BIZ UDGothic: expected family 30 got 26. panose 2-11-4-0-... font.c:3441: Test failed: BIZ UDGothic: expected family 30 got 26. panose 2-11-4-0-... font.c:3441: Test failed: @BIZ UDGothic: expected family 30 got 26. panose 2-11-4-0-... font.c:3441: Test failed: @BIZ UDGothic: expected family 30 got 26. panose 2-11-4-0-... font.c:3441: Test failed: BIZ UDMincho Medium: expected family 30 got 16. panose 2-2-5-0-... font.c:3441: Test failed: BIZ UDMincho Medium: expected family 30 got 16. panose 2-2-5-0-... font.c:3441: Test failed: @BIZ UDMincho Medium: expected family 30 got 16. panose 2-2-5-0-... font.c:3441: Test failed: @BIZ UDMincho Medium: expected family 30 got 16. panose 2-2-5-0-... font.c:3993: Test failed: A: tmDefaultChar for UD Digi Kyokasho N-B got a5 expected 1f font.c:4015: Test failed: W: tmDefaultChar for UD Digi Kyokasho N-B got ff65 expected 1f font.c:3441: Test failed: UD Digi Kyokasho N-B: expected family 30 got 16. panose 2-2-7-0-... font.c:3993: Test failed: A: tmDefaultChar for @UD Digi Kyokasho N-B got a5 expected 1f font.c:4015: Test failed: W: tmDefaultChar for @UD Digi Kyokasho N-B got ff65 expected 1f font.c:3441: Test failed: @UD Digi Kyokasho N-B: expected family 30 got 16. panose 2-2-7-0-... font.c:3993: Test failed: A: tmDefaultChar for UD Digi Kyokasho NP-B got a5 expected 1f font.c:4015: Test failed: W: tmDefaultChar for UD Digi Kyokasho NP-B got ff65 expected 1f font.c:3993: Test failed: A: tmDefaultChar for @UD Digi Kyokasho NP-B got a5 expected 1f font.c:4015: Test failed: W: tmDefaultChar for @UD Digi Kyokasho NP-B got ff65 expected 1f font.c:3993: Test failed: A: tmDefaultChar for UD Digi Kyokasho NK-B got a5 expected 1f font.c:4015: Test failed: W: tmDefaultChar for UD Digi Kyokasho NK-B got ff65 expected 1f font.c:3993: Test failed: A: tmDefaultChar for @UD Digi Kyokasho NK-B got a5 expected 1f font.c:4015: Test failed: W: tmDefaultChar for @UD Digi Kyokasho NK-B got ff65 expected 1f font.c:3993: Test failed: A: tmDefaultChar for UD Digi Kyokasho N-R got a5 expected 1f font.c:4015: Test failed: W: tmDefaultChar for UD Digi Kyokasho N-R got ff65 expected 1f font.c:3441: Test failed: UD Digi Kyokasho N-R: expected family 30 got 16. panose 2-2-4-0-... font.c:3993: Test failed: A: tmDefaultChar for @UD Digi Kyokasho N-R got a5 expected 1f font.c:4015: Test failed: W: tmDefaultChar for @UD Digi Kyokasho N-R got ff65 expected 1f font.c:3441: Test failed: @UD Digi Kyokasho N-R: expected family 30 got 16. panose 2-2-4-0-... font.c:3993: Test failed: A: tmDefaultChar for UD Digi Kyokasho NP-R got a5 expected 1f font.c:4015: Test failed: W: tmDefaultChar for UD Digi Kyokasho NP-R got ff65 expected 1f font.c:3993: Test failed: A: tmDefaultChar for @UD Digi Kyokasho NP-R got a5 expected 1f font.c:4015: Test failed: W: tmDefaultChar for @UD Digi Kyokasho NP-R got ff65 expected 1f font.c:3993: Test failed: A: tmDefaultChar for UD Digi Kyokasho NK-R got a5 expected 1f font.c:4015: Test failed: W: tmDefaultChar for UD Digi Kyokasho NK-R got ff65 expected 1f font.c:3993: Test failed: A: tmDefaultChar for @UD Digi Kyokasho NK-R got a5 expected 1f font.c:4015: Test failed: W: tmDefaultChar for @UD Digi Kyokasho NK-R got ff65 expected 1f https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#gdi32:font So it's not UTF-8 that causes the failures (still fails in Hindi). It seems to be something that English Arab Emirates and Hindi have in common and that goes away in Hindi + UTF-8. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 52960] New: Damavand is being more CPU-intensive than DXVK
by WineHQ Bugzilla May 6, 2022

May 6, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52960 Bug ID: 52960 Summary: Damavand is being more CPU-intensive than DXVK Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: berillions(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Hi, I remarked on my laptop (Ryzen 5800H + Navi 6700M) that Damavand is more CPU-intensive than DXVK. I did a test with 3 games where i mesured the CPU temperature during 90 secondes. I attached all logs for Witcher 3, A Plague Tales Innocence & Control. For Control & Witcher 3, you can see that with Damavand, the temperature is higher between 10 and 20 degrees celcius. For "A Plague Tale Innocence", the difference is between 5 and 10 degrees celcius. These mesures were done with sensors -> "while true; do sensors | grep 'Tctl' >> APlagueTale_DXVK.txt; sleep 1; done" I'll try on my desktop (Ryzen 5600X + Navi 6700XT) if i have the same issue. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 10

[Bug 52949] New: gdi32:font - test_GetCharABCWidths() fails on Windows in Korean and Chinese
by WineHQ Bugzilla May 2, 2022

May 2, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52949 Bug ID: 52949 Summary: gdi32:font - test_GetCharABCWidths() fails on Windows in Korean and Chinese Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gdi32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com gdi32:font - test_GetCharABCWidths() fails on Windows in Korean and Chinese: (see w10pro64-ko and w10pro64-zh-CN) font.c:1238: Test failed: GetCharABCWidthsA 100 - 100 should have failed font.c:1238: Test failed: GetCharABCWidthsA ffff - ffff should have failed font.c:1244: Test failed: GetCharABCWidthsA ff should match. codepage = 0 font.c:1244: Test failed: GetCharABCWidthsA ff should match. codepage = 129 https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#gdi32:font Note that Japanese does not get these failures. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 52947] New: gdi32:font - "Small Fonts" has unexpected {First,Break}Char on Windows in Arabic
by WineHQ Bugzilla May 2, 2022

May 2, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52947 Bug ID: 52947 Summary: gdi32:font - "Small Fonts" has unexpected {First,Break}Char on Windows in Arabic Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gdi32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com gdi32:font - "Small Fonts" has unexpected {First,Break}Char on Windows in Arabic, resulting in failures: font.c:996: Test failed: Small Fonts(12): tm.tmFirstChar = 00 font.c:1002: Test failed: Small Fonts(12): tm.tmBreakChar = 00 font.c:996: Test failed: Small Fonts(13): tm.tmFirstChar = 00 font.c:1002: Test failed: Small Fonts(13): tm.tmBreakChar = 00 font.c:1189: Test failed: GetCharABCWidthsW should have failed https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#gdi32:font Maybe this can happen in other locales, but among those that are tested this only happens with the Arabic one (w10pro64-ar). In particular the Hebrew locale (w10pro64-he) does not have this issue. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 52946] New: gdi32:font - test_bitmap_font_metrics() fails on Windows in the Greek & Japanese system locales
by WineHQ Bugzilla May 2, 2022

May 2, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52946 Bug ID: 52946 Summary: gdi32:font - test_bitmap_font_metrics() fails on Windows in the Greek & Japanese system locales Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gdi32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com gdi32:font - test_bitmap_font_metrics() fails on Windows in the Japanese and Greek system locales: Greek [w7u-el]: font.c:993: Test failed: Small Fonts(3): tm.tmInternalLeading 1 != 0 font.c:995: Test failed: Small Fonts(3): tm.tmAveCharWidth 2 != 1 font.c:1008: Test failed: Small Fonts(8): tm.tmMaxCharWidth 8 != 7 Japanese and Mixed locale (Japanese system locale) [w10pro64-ja w10pro64-mx-MX]: font.c:993: Test failed: Small Fonts(12): tm.tmInternalLeading 0 != 2 font.c:995: Test failed: Small Fonts(12): tm.tmAveCharWidth 7 != 5 font.c:993: Test failed: Small Fonts(13): tm.tmInternalLeading 0 != 2 font.c:995: Test failed: Small Fonts(13): tm.tmAveCharWidth 8 != 6 font.c:1189: Test failed: GetCharABCWidthsW should have failed https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#gdi32:font So these failures entirely come down to the system locale, but only a few of them, and this can happen on any Windows version. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1