September 2022 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 11531] New: Richard Burns Rally - Trees/buildings/ fences disappear after a while
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 25, 2022

Nov. 25, 2022

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11531 Summary: Richard Burns Rally - Trees/buildings/fences disappear after a while Product: Wine Version: CVS/GIT Platform: PC URL: http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version &iId=5934 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: directx-d3d AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: tuomo.kohvakka(a)iki.fi While playing Richard Burns Rally, trees/buildings/other stuff disappear after a couple of minutes. This still happens with latest wine, 0.9.55 that is. It would be nice if this wouldn't happen :) I pretty sure this is regression, however I can't verify this right now. Judging from appdb comments, problems have continued at least from 0.9.49. AppDB: http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=5934 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 63

[Bug 53017] New: user32:monitor killed by X Error on Debian 11 + Intel GPU
by WineHQ Bugzilla Nov. 25, 2022

Nov. 25, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53017 Bug ID: 53017 Summary: user32:monitor killed by X Error on Debian 11 + Intel GPU Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: user32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- user32:monitor gets killed by an X Error while running test_ChangeDisplaySettingsEx() on my Debian 11 + Intel GPU machine (see fg-deb64-*). This results in this type of failure: monitor.c:61: GetProcAddress(user32, DisplayConfigSetDeviceInfo) failed. user32:monitor:0834 done (0) in 0s The main process has no test summary line The lack of a summary line is what indicates that the process was summarily killed, typically by a Unix library call. Looking into some more details it is this call which causes the X Error: res = ChangeDisplaySettingsExA(devices[device].name, &dm3, NULL, CDS_RESET, NULL); And adding traces in winex11.drv shows more precisely that the crash happens because bad physical size values are passed to XRRSetScreenSize(): dmFields=BITSPERPEL,PELSWIDTH,PELSHEIGHT,DISPLAYFLAGS,DISPLAYFREQUENCY,DISPLAYORIENTATION dmBitsPerPel=8 dmPelsWidth=720 dmPelsHeight=400 dmDisplayFrequency=70 dmDisplayFlags=0 dmDisplayOrientation=0 0024:trace:x11settings:apply_display_settings handler:XRandR 1.4 changing L"\\\\.\\DISPLAY1" to position:(0,0) resolution:720x400 frequency:70Hz depth:8bits orientation:0. 0024:warn:xrandr:xrandr14_set_current_mode Cannot change screen color depth from 32bits to 8bits! 0024:trace:xrandr:set_screen_size mm_width=0 = 720 * 1 / 3840 0024:trace:xrandr:set_screen_size mm_height=0 = 400 * 2 / 2160 0024:trace:xrandr:xrandr14_set_current_mode 1638 X Error of failed request: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation) Major opcode of failed request: 140 (RANDR) Minor opcode of failed request: 7 (RRSetScreenSize) Value in failed request: 0x0 Serial number of failed request: 209 Current serial number in output stream: 210 So there are two questions: * Should set_screen_size() have defensive code that prevents using 0 as the physical sizes? Using 1 instead seems to avoid the crashes. * Why do DisplayWidthMM() and DisplayHeightMM() return bad values? Weirder, I just got a bunch of runs with correct Display*MM() values and now that I removed traces it's bad again. Memory corruption? Note that xrandr knows the right physical dimensions for my screen: $ xrandr Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 3840 x 2160, maximum 16384 x 16384 VGA-1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) HDMI-1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) DP-1 connected primary 3840x2160+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 698mm x 393mm 3840x2160 60.00*+ 30.00 25.00 24.00 29.97 23.98 29.98 2560x1600 59.94 2560x1440 59.95 1920x1080 60.00 60.00 50.00 59.94 30.00 25.00 24.00 29.97 23.98 1920x1080i 60.00 50.00 59.94 1680x1050 59.95 1600x900 60.00 1280x1024 75.02 60.02 1280x800 59.81 1152x864 75.00 1280x720 60.00 50.00 59.94 1024x768 75.03 60.00 832x624 74.55 800x600 75.00 60.32 720x576 50.00 720x480 60.00 59.94 640x480 75.00 60.00 59.94 720x400 70.08 HDMI-2 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) HDMI-3 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 39231] New: setupapi:devinst fails if privileges not high enough
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 24, 2022

Nov. 24, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39231 Bug ID: 39231 Summary: setupapi:devinst fails if privileges not high enough Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: setupapi Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com The following failures only happen if the test is run in a restricted or limited user account. devinst.c:408: Test failed: SetupDiInstallClassA failed: 0000000d devinst.c:410: Test failed: Couldn't delete classkey devinst.c:462: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER, got 00000005 devinst.c:479: Test failed: Expected ERROR_CLASS_MISMATCH, got 00000005 devinst.c:491: Test failed: SetupDiCreateDeviceInfoA failed: 00000005 devinst.c:496: Test failed: Expected ERROR_DEVINST_ALREADY_EXISTS, got 00000005 devinst.c:502: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INVALID_USER_BUFFER, got 00000005 devinst.c:508: Test failed: SetupDiCreateDeviceInfoA failed: 00000005 devinst.c:516: Test failed: Expected 3 devices, got 0 devinst.c:601: Test failed: SetupDiCreateDeviceInfoA failed: 00000005 devinst.c:604: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER, got 00000057 devinst.c:608: Test failed: SetupDiGetDeviceInstanceIdA failed: 00000057 devinst.c:609: Test failed: Unexpected instance ID aö|4 devinst.c:613: Test failed: SetupDiCreateDeviceInfoA failed: 00000005 devinst.c:616: Test failed: SetupDiGetDeviceInstanceIdA failed: 00000057 devinst.c:618: Test failed: Unexpected instance ID aö|4 devinst.c:654: Test failed: SetupDiCreateDeviceInfoA failed: 5 devinst.c:721: Test failed: SetupDiCreateDeviceInfoA failed: 00000005 devinst.c:725: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INVALID_USER_BUFFER, got 00000057 devinst.c:729: Test failed: SetupDiCreateDeviceInterfaceA failed: 00000057 devinst.c:733: Test failed: SetupDiCreateDeviceInterfaceA failed: 00000057 devinst.c:736: Test failed: SetupDiCreateDeviceInterfaceA failed: 00000057 devinst.c:739: Test failed: SetupDiEnumDeviceInterfaces failed: 259 devinst.c:744: Test failed: expected 2 interfaces, got 0 devinst.c:247: We are most likely on Windows 2000 devinst.c:810: Test failed: SetupDiCreateDeviceInfoA failed: 00000005 devinst.c:814: Test failed: SetupDiCreateDeviceInterfaceA failed: 00000057 devinst.c:818: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER, got 87 devinst.c:828: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER, got 87 devinst.c:252: Test failed: Couldn't delete deviceclass key devinst.c:932: Test failed: SetupDiCreateDeviceInfoA failed: 00000005 devinst.c:934: Test failed: Expected registry key to exist devinst.c:950: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INVALID_FLAGS, got 87 devinst.c:955: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INVALID_FLAGS, got 87 devinst.c:961: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INVALID_FLAGS, got 87 devinst.c:967: Test failed: Expected ERROR_DEVINFO_NOT_REGISTERED, got 00000057 devinst.c:972: Test failed: SetupDiRegisterDeviceInfo failed: 00000057 devinst.c:977: Test failed: Expected ERROR_KEY_DOES_NOT_EXIST, got 00000057 devinst.c:984: Test failed: Expected ERROR_KEY_DOES_NOT_EXIST, got 00000057 devinst.c:997: Test failed: SetupDiCreateDevRegKey failed: 00000057 devinst.c:144: Test failed: SetupDiEnumDeviceInfo failed: 00000103 devinst.c:152: Test failed: SetupDiCallClassInstaller(DIF_REMOVE...) failed: 00000057 devinst.c:1027: Test failed: Expected the device to be removed: 00000000 devinst.c:1033: We are most likely on Wine devinst.c:1084: Test failed: SetupDiCreateDeviceInfoA failed: 00000005 devinst.c:1087: Test failed: SetupDiCreateDeviceInterfaceA failed: 00000057 devinst.c:1090: Test failed: SetupDiRegisterDeviceInfo failed: 00000057 devinst.c:1101: Test failed: SetupDiEnumDeviceInterfaces failed: 00000103 devinst.c:1104: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER, got 00000057 devinst.c:144: Test failed: SetupDiEnumDeviceInfo failed: 00000103 devinst.c:152: Test failed: SetupDiCallClassInstaller(DIF_REMOVE...) failed: 00000057 devinst.c:1143: Test failed: Expected the device to be removed: 00000000 devinst.c:1149: We are most likely on Wine devinst.c:1182: Test failed: SetupDiCreateDeviceInfoA failed: 00000005 devinst.c:1194: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INVALID_REG_PROPERTY, got 00000057 devinst.c:1204: Test failed: SetupDiSetDeviceRegistryPropertyA failed: 00000057 devinst.c:1216: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INVALID_REG_PROPERTY, got 00000057 devinst.c:1225: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER, got 00000057 devinst.c:1227: Test failed: Unexpected size: 0 devinst.c:1231: Test failed: SetupDiGetDeviceRegistryPropertyA failed: 00000057 devinst.c:1232: Test failed: Unexpected property devinst.c:1236: Test failed: SetupDiGetDeviceRegistryPropertyA failed: 00000057 devinst.c:1237: Test failed: Unexpected value of property devinst.c:1238: Test failed: Unexpected type of property: 0 devinst.c:1242: Test failed: SetupDiSetDeviceRegistryPropertyA failed: 00000057 devinst.c:1247: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INVALID_DATA, got 00000057 devinst.c:1288: Test failed: SetupDiCreateDeviceInfoW failed: 00000005 devinst.c:1300: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INVALID_REG_PROPERTY, got 00000057 devinst.c:1310: Test failed: SetupDiSetDeviceRegistryPropertyW failed: 00000057 devinst.c:1322: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INVALID_REG_PROPERTY, got 00000057 devinst.c:1331: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER, got 00000057 devinst.c:1333: Test failed: Unexpected size: 0 devinst.c:1337: Test failed: SetupDiGetDeviceRegistryPropertyW failed: 00000057 devinst.c:1338: Test failed: Unexpected property devinst.c:1342: Test failed: SetupDiGetDeviceRegistryPropertyW failed: 00000057 devinst.c:1343: Test failed: Unexpected value of property devinst.c:1344: Test failed: Unexpected type of property: 0 devinst.c:1348: Test failed: SetupDiSetDeviceRegistryPropertyW failed: 00000057 devinst.c:1353: Test failed: Expected ERROR_INVALID_DATA, got 00000057 In particular one can notice this bug on the following WineTest boxes: fg-win2000-rusr: Windows 2000 with a Restricted user account fg-win2000-susr: Windows 2000 with a Standard (Power) user account. fg-winxp-lusr: Windows XP with a Limited user account. Note however that it succeeds in regular user accounts on the following boxes for instance: fg-win7u64-1spie9usr: Windows 7 with a regular user account. See: https://test.winehq.org/data/tests/setupapi:devinst.html -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 2

[Bug 39232] New: setupapi:install fails if privileges not high enough
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 24, 2022

Nov. 24, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39232 Bug ID: 39232 Summary: setupapi:install fails if privileges not high enough Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: setupapi Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com This test systematically times out when run in a restricted or limited user account while it only times out in under 1% of the other runs. Coupled with the pair of messages saying it's skipping tests because it cannot install a service, this clearly indicates a permissions problem. install.c:303: Tests skipped: Not enough rights to install the service install.c:380: Tests skipped: Not enough rights to install the service test failed: timed out In particular one can notice this bug on the following WineTest boxes: fg-win2000-rusr: Windows 2000 with a Restricted user account fg-win2000-susr: Windows 2000 with a Standard (Power) user account. fg-winxp-lusr: Windows XP with a Limited user account. Note however that it succeeds in non-Restricted/Limited user accounts on the following boxes for instance: fg-win7u64-1spie9usr: Windows 7 with a regular user account. See: https://test.winehq.org/data/tests/setupapi:install.html -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 2

[Bug 20604] New: dsound tests fail under pulseaudio
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 24, 2022

Nov. 24, 2022

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20604 Summary: dsound tests fail under pulseaudio Product: Wine Version: 1.1.32 Platform: PC URL: http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/dsound:ds3d.html OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: directx-dsound AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=24580) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=24580) +dsound trace Ignoring the usual statements about pulesaudio for a bit, there's been a lot of work (thanks Maarten et al) to make Wine work a bit better with it. When I was on jaunty, I removed it, but under Karmic, you can't remove pulseaudio without foobaring gnome. So, I'm stuck with it...and since few people run winetest daily on wine aside from me, test.winehq.org shows a bunch of failures on dsound now. So, let's make it play better: http://test.winehq.org/data/f222a1654ea8f84bc678c9043ad3265b97207dde/wine_a… -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 19

[Bug 51315] New: The 64-bit webservices:writer test fails in Wine
by WineHQ Bugzilla Nov. 24, 2022

Nov. 24, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51315 Bug ID: 51315 Summary: The 64-bit webservices:writer test fails in Wine Product: Wine Version: 6.10 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- The 64-bit webservices:writer test fails in Wine: writer.c:371: Test failed: 2272: got 11 expected 10 writer.c:373: Test failed: 2272: got <t>:E-3</t> expected <t>1E-2</t> writer.c:371: Test failed: 2272: got 12 expected 11 writer.c:373: Test failed: 2272: got <t>-:E-3</t> expected <t>-1E-2</t> writer.c:373: Test failed: 2272: got <t>1.7976931348623156E+308</t> expected <t>1.7976931348623157E+308</t> writer.c:373: Test failed: 2272: got <t>-1.7976931348623156E+308</t> expected <t>-1.7976931348623157E+308</t> Note that these failures are systematic and only happen when running the 64-bit test in Wine. Also most of these failures also happen on armv7l (but armv7l has/had two more, see bug 49197). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 38060] New: Apps can't load custom fonts during runtime
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 24, 2022

Nov. 24, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38060 Bug ID: 38060 Summary: Apps can't load custom fonts during runtime Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gdi32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: masterofquebec(a)rocksplash.com Distribution: Debian Created attachment 50700 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=50700 WINEDEBUG=warn+all,fixme+all MTASA Calls to AddFontResourceEx seems to fails in various games. San Andreas Multiplayer: warn:font:new_ft_face Unable to load font "/home/samuel/.wine/dosdevices/c:/Program Files/Rockstar Games/GTA San Andreas/gtaweap3.ttf"/(nil) err = 2 Multi Theft Auto: warn:font:new_ft_face Unable to load font "/home/samuel/.wine/dosdevices/c:/Program Files/MTA San Andreas 1.4/MTA/cgui/pricedown.ttf"/(nil) err = 2 In both cases the fonts exist and seems to be valid. What is error 2? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 23

[Bug 14867] New: TrackMouseEvent thinko / valgrind warning?
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 24, 2022

Nov. 24, 2022

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14867 Summary: TrackMouseEvent thinko / valgrind warning? Product: Wine Version: CVS/GIT Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: user32 AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: dank(a)kegel.com An app I'm looking at is doing TRACKMOUSEEVENT tme; tme.cbSize = sizeof(TRACKMOUSEEVENT); tme.dwFlags = TME_LEAVE; tme.hwndTrack = my_hWnd; TrackMouseEvent(&tme); which causes the following valgrind complaint: Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) at TrackMouseEvent (input.c:1043) by MyTrackMouseLeave (in app) ... Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation at MyTrackMouseLeave (in app) Looking at git blame user32/input.c, I see line 1043 is the if: hover_time = ptme->dwHoverTime; if (hover_time == HOVER_DEFAULT || hover_time == 0 || !(ptme->dwHoverTime&TME_HOVER)) Squinting at that a bit, it get the feeling the bitmask check is a typo; shouldn't that be dwFlags, not dwHoverTime? Also, if TME_HOVER is not set, we probably shouldn't be looking at dwHoverTime, right? FWIW, that bitmask check was added by http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-October/031794.html Incidentally, while playing around, I noticed that the test crashes if you get too many events. I'll attach a little patch to fail more gracefully. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 15

[Bug 34342] New: Chronic crash of Guild Wars 2(out of memory)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 24, 2022

Nov. 24, 2022

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34342 Bug #: 34342 Summary: Chronic crash of Guild Wars 2(out of memory) Product: Wine Version: 1.7.0 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: nob.dir.info(a)gmail.com Classification: Unclassified Created attachment 45715 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=45715 ArenaNet log when crashing Hello, Since I'm playing Guild Wars 2 quite often, I have chronic crashes with an Out of Memory report, although there are still 4+Gb of free RAM(total 8Gb) and 1Gb of free VRAM(total 2Gb). As I'm using Wine in 64-bit mode on a 64-bit system, I thought that there shouldn't be any memory problem, but it doesn't seem to be true. I also tried out the 4Gb patcher, still no effect. I think it comes from Wine/the system, because I played sometimes on Windows(with also 8 Gb of total RAM), and I never crashed. Cordially. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 59

[Bug 47382] New: Nero CoverDesigner doesn't install - hangs at " checking for the latest version"
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 24, 2022

Nov. 24, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47382 Bug ID: 47382 Summary: Nero CoverDesigner doesn't install - hangs at "checking for the latest version" Product: Wine Version: 4.9 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: dark.shadow4(a)web.de Distribution: --- Follow up to bug 47371. The installer just stalls and doesn't seem to continue, even after I waited ~15min. "winetricks -q ie8 win7" helps. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 6