September 2022 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 53633] New: Visual Novel Ninki Seiyuu no Tsukukurikata crashes on start throwing failed to call ConnectFilters (pSrc, pMPEG1Splitter)
by WineHQ Bugzilla Oct. 7, 2022

Oct. 7, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53633 Bug ID: 53633 Summary: Visual Novel Ninki Seiyuu no Tsukukurikata crashes on start throwing failed to call ConnectFilters (pSrc, pMPEG1Splitter) Product: Wine Version: 7.16 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: quartz Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: bugmetoo(a)protonmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 73031 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=73031 Crash log in a freshly created Wine Prefix On trying to launch the game, the game throws the following message "failed to call ConnectFilters (pSrc, pMPEG1Splitter).:[0x80004005] Error: 0x80004005" and application crashes. Running winetricks quartz fixes the issue. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 53718] New: WoW Beta/PTR get "Your 3D accelorator card is not supported"
by WineHQ Bugzilla Oct. 6, 2022

Oct. 6, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53718 Bug ID: 53718 Summary: WoW Beta/PTR get "Your 3D accelorator card is not supported" Product: Wine Version: 7.17 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: mckittrick.kaminski(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 73148 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=73148 Collection of Retail and Beta logs. I had be playing/testing the new Dragonflight expansion for WoW recently, and after this week's update, the game no longer launches, with the age old "Your 3D accelerator card is not supported" error. Research on previous occurrences of this error have been fruitless, usually having something to do with multiple GPUs and having the wrong one assigned. Being that the WoW client updating was the only change to cause this issue, and native Windows clients seem to have no issue, I can't help but think this lies somewhere in wine, dxvk, or vkd3d namespace. For information on my environment, I'm running via Lutris, and have tried both Lutris and Wine runners, a few releases from 5.x, 6.x, and 7.x, up to 7.17 staging. I'm using dxvk v1.10.3 and vkd3d v2.6. My graphics card is 3060Ti, and I get the error with both the 470xx and 515 nvidia drivers. The 3060Ti is the only VGA controller in my system, and I'm running Arch 5.19.9. Manually setting the 'gxApi "D3D11"' config line in Config.wtf doesn't change the behavior, which applies to D3D11, D3D11_LEGACY, as well as D3D12. I'll note that this error only occurs with Beta and PTR clients. (PTR is open to everyone, if you'd like to test, not sure if you need gametime). Retail and Classic both work just fine and haven't any issue, although, I've noticed the in-game option to use D3D12 has disappeared, leaving me with only D311 options. It used to be there, and I'm unsure when the option left. I've attached logs from both Beta and Retail, let me know what else I can provide/test for y'all. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 30

[Bug 48912] New: Allow blacklisting unreliable and always new failures
by WineHQ Bugzilla Oct. 6, 2022

Oct. 6, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48912 Bug ID: 48912 Summary: Allow blacklisting unreliable and always new failures Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- A number of tests produce false positives because: * Either the failure message contains a value that changes with each run (e.g. an HWND). In some cases these values are really necessary for diagnosis and moving them to a separate line would make the code quite a bit more complex. * Or the test fails intermittently and is hard to fix. Sometimes the cause of the failures may also come from external factors such as bugs in QEmu (for instance long execution delays causing timeouts). * Sometimes the intermittent failure is the product of a new Windows version or configuration, which requires investigating before a fix is found. In all cases the tests should be fixed eventually, but a solution is needed for the interim so these tests to not make the TestBot so unreliable that its results are ignored. So the goal is to provide a way to blacklist some test failures so they do not cause a patch to be rejected. Some safeguards are needed to ensure that: * Failures are not blacklisted lightly. The preference should always be to fix the test. * The blacklist does not get so large that it becomes hard to maintain. * Once a test is fixed the corresponding blacklist entries are removed in a timely fashion. * There is still an incentive to fix the tests. So here is a proposal for implementing this blacklist: * Each blacklist entry should be associated with a Wine bug describing the issue. That bug should provide some minimal diagnosis: whether it's a new Windows behavior, a race condition or some issue that was reported to QEmu. That would ensure we know why the blacklist entry was added. One could also check the status of the bug when reviewing the blacklist entries. A closed bug would be a strong hint that the blacklist entry is no longer needed. * Rather than blacklisting whole test units, blacklist entries should target specific test failures via a regular expression. Besides being finer grained this would be useful for cases like user32:win which has different issues depending on the locale and where each should be linked to a different bug (bugs 48815, 48819 and 48820). * The TestBot should record when each blacklist entry was last used. This relies on having the above regular expression since without it the TestBot would not know anything beyond 'the test unit was run and had failures'. Also the regular expression would only be used against *new* failures. So this would really record the last time the blacklist entry was actually useful. An entry that was unused for a long time would be a prime candidate for reviewing the corresponding bug and for removal. (Note: The blacklist would also be used on WineTest reports so it would get a chance of matching its target at least 5 days / week). * The blacklist entries would only be needed for 'base' test configurations since they are the only ones wine-devel patches run on. * There should be a page listing the blacklist entries so developers have a good starting point to work on them. * Ideally the blacklist page would also point to the tasks where the blacklist was last used. Since most of the blacklisted failures are either intermittent or specific to a given test configuration this would make it easier for developers to find reports where the failure did happen. Note that Wine VMs often test multiple configurations per task (e.g. wow32 and wow64, different locales), each producing its own test report. So pointing at just the task would leave the developer guessing which report should be looked at. But that may be sufficient guidance. * (test:unit, testbot-vm) tuples make it impossible to target a specific Wine test configuration such as a specific locale since they all run on the same VM. Similarly it would make blacklisting bitness-blind on Windows VMs. If necessary the tuple could be extended either with the specific mission the blacklist applies to, or with the basename of the corresponding report (the latter being easier to use in comparisons). Whether that's practical and worth the effort remains to be determined. One complication for instance is that this would lead to more blacklist entries: many 64 bit VMs would need two entries, one for 32 bit tests and one for 64 bit tests. * Pseudo database schema and sample use: FailureBlacklists ----------------- PK Bug 48815 PK TestModule user32 PK TestUnit win Name 0x738 message FailureRegExp Test failed: hwnd [0-9A-F]{8,16} message 0738 LastUse 2020-03-27 FailureBlacklistVMs ------------------- PK Bug 48815 PK TestModule user32 PK TestUnit win PK VMName Entries for w1064v1709, w1064v1809, etc. (48815, user32, win, w1064v1709) (48815, user32, win, w1064v1809) (48815, user32, win, w1064v1809_2scr) ... FailureBlacklistUses (optionally) --------------------------------- PK Bug PK TestModule PK TestUnit PK JobId PK StepNo PK TaskNo (48815, user32, win, 68507, 1, 7) (48815, user32, win, 68508, 1, 7) ... -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 48209] New: Ignore random parts of test failure messages
by WineHQ Bugzilla Oct. 6, 2022

Oct. 6, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48209 Bug ID: 48209 Summary: Ignore random parts of test failure messages Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- The TestBot needs to detect if a patch introduces NEW test failures. To do so it compares the failure messages with those from reference WineTest runs. But in some cases part of the message changes from one run to the next, causing the failure to look new. Of course in all cases the ideal solution is to fix the test so it does not fail. Barring that there are also cases where the varying value is not really useful (e.g. handle or pointer values) and in that case it should just be removed from the message. But there may be cases where knowing the value is still useful. So one solution would be to tag such values so the TestBot knows it can ignore them when comparing failure messages. For instance they could be enclosed in double braces, curly braces, or other. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 52689] New: NVCUDA: Daz Studio 4.20 and CUDA SDK11 implementation
by WineHQ Bugzilla Oct. 4, 2022

Oct. 4, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52689 Bug ID: 52689 Summary: NVCUDA: Daz Studio 4.20 and CUDA SDK11 implementation Product: Wine-staging Version: 7.4 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: cybermax(a)dexter.no CC: leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com, z.figura12(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 72031 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=72031 Series of patches to implement basic SDK11 functionality Recently DAZ Studio4 updated to 4.20 and the Iray engine also got updated to the point it requires support for CUDA 11.4 I have worked through a great deal of the issues regarding support for SDK 11.4, aside from the D3D9/10/11 elements that have no equivalent Linux support. The result is adding a few functions to the nvcuda implementation in wine-staging. (Attachment with a series of 4 patches). I have not yet been able to get SDK 11.6 samples to run, as this will (for now) fail the CUDA runtime validation.. but DAZ Studio 4.20.1 is running fine. 2022-03-17 22:24:11.731 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER :: 1.1 IRAY rend info : NVIDIA display driver version: 510.54 2022-03-17 22:24:11.732 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER :: 1.1 IRAY rend info : Your NVIDIA driver supports CUDA version up to 11.6; iray requires CUDA version 11.4; all is good. 2022-03-17 22:24:11.732 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER :: 1.1 IRAY rend info : Using iray plugin version 5.3, build 349500.7063 n, 18 Jan 2022, nt-x86-64-vc142. 2022-03-17 22:24:11.768 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER :: 1.1 IRAY rend info : CUDA device 0 (NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070): compute capability 7.5, 7.773 GiB total, 7.229 GiB available, display attached I have built and run the main demo samples from the cuda-samples source github, aswell as 30 some samples in addition to that, compiled with VS2019 and using the SDK11.4 runtime library. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 53740] New: Space Rangers 2 - Dominators Reloaded (2.0) - stack overflow error
by WineHQ Bugzilla Oct. 2, 2022

Oct. 2, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53740 Bug ID: 53740 Summary: Space Rangers 2 - Dominators Reloaded (2.0) - stack overflow error Product: Wine Version: 7.18 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: VladimirVSC(a)yandex.ru Distribution: --- Created attachment 73182 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=73182 Space Rangers 2 Error output The game doesn't start, saying something about a "stack overflow 1156 bytes" in thread 0024 (this number is different every time starting the game). The bug is true for both development 7.18 and stable 7.0 versions. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 36103] New: kernel32/tests/loader shows lots of invalid reads in thread.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Oct. 1, 2022

Oct. 1, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36103 Bug ID: 36103 Summary: kernel32/tests/loader shows lots of invalid reads in thread.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.17 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ==9219== Invalid read of size 4 ==9219== at 0x7BC55D91: MODULE_DllThreadAttach (loader.c:1287) ==9219== by 0x7BC8E3D2: start_thread (thread.c:423) ==9219== by 0x4218F92: start_thread (pthread_create.c:309) ==9219== by 0x431D7ED: clone (clone.S:129) ==9219== Address 0x611eb04 is on thread 1's stack ==9219== ==9219== Invalid read of size 4 ==9219== at 0x7BC1EAF3: __x86.get_pc_thunk.bx (in /home/austin/wine-valgrind/dlls/ntdll/ntdll.dll.so) ==9219== by 0x7BC8E3D2: start_thread (thread.c:423) ==9219== by 0x4218F92: start_thread (pthread_create.c:309) ==9219== by 0x431D7ED: clone (clone.S:129) ==9219== Address 0x611eacc is on thread 1's stack ==9219== there's also one: ==30099== 2,020 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 225 of 244 ==30099== at 0x7BC4C735: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==30099== by 0x7BC50F79: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==30099== by 0x4E07A19: get_tls_data (test.h:244) ==30099== by 0x4E07B03: winetest_set_location (test.h:279) ==30099== by 0x4D836B8: dll_entry_point (loader.c:1433) ==30099== by 0x7BC52FC0: ??? (loader.c:138) ==30099== by 0x7BC555FE: MODULE_InitDLL (loader.c:1068) ==30099== by 0x7BC55DE7: MODULE_DllThreadAttach (loader.c:1281) ==30099== by 0x7BC8E446: start_thread (thread.c:423) ==30099== by 0x4EA7BD89: start_thread (in /usr/lib/libpthread-2.18.so) ==30099== by 0x4E95CA0D: clone (in /usr/lib/libc-2.18.so) ==30099== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 5

[Bug 53519] New: kernel32:comm - test_AbortWaitCts() once failed due to an unexpectedly short wait
by WineHQ Bugzilla Oct. 1, 2022

Oct. 1, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53519 Bug ID: 53519 Summary: kernel32:comm - test_AbortWaitCts() once failed due to an unexpectedly short wait Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: kernel32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com kernel32:comm - test_AbortWaitCts() once failed due to an unexpectedly short wait: comm.c:1586: Test failed: Unexpected time 171, expected around 500 https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#kernel32:comm This failure happened on 2022-08-05 on w10pro64-ko-64. Maybe the system time got changed during the test? (see bug 53516) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 53735] New: Battle.net does not log in, shows error log, in Bottles
by WineHQ Bugzilla Sept. 30, 2022

Sept. 30, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53735 Bug ID: 53735 Summary: Battle.net does not log in, shows error log, in Bottles Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: richardjecooke(a)pm.me Distribution: --- Created attachment 73172 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=73172 error log See attachment -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 53400] New: wine-gecko 2.47.3 fails to build on host systems with python 3.11
by WineHQ Bugzilla Sept. 28, 2022

Sept. 28, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53400 Bug ID: 53400 Summary: wine-gecko 2.47.3 fails to build on host systems with python 3.11 Product: Wine-gecko Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-gecko-unknown Assignee: jacek(a)codeweavers.com Reporter: mike(a)cchtml.com Distribution: --- In similar vain as bug 51918 it is that time again. Fedora 37 (Rawhide, unreleased) has Python 3.11. There are currently two failures I have encountered. I've patched one. 1. inspect.getargspec() changes in Python 3.11 --- a/python/mach/mach/decorators.py 2022-07-12 08:33:06.000000000 -0500 +++ b/python/mach/mach/decorators.py 2022-07-22 08:55:21.510849725 -0500 @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ pass_context = False if inspect.isfunction(cls.__init__): - spec = inspect.getargspec(cls.__init__) + spec = inspect.getfullargspec(cls.__init__) if len(spec.args) > 2: msg = 'Mach @CommandProvider class %s implemented incorrectly. ' + \ 2. Setting up the python virtualenv fails. 0:01.29 checking for python3... /usr/bin/python3 0:01.29 Creating Python environment 0:01.31 /builddir/build/BUILD/wine-gecko-2.47.3/wine-gecko-2.47.3/python/mozbuild/mozbuild/virtualenv.py:10: DeprecationWarning: The distutils package is deprecated and slated for removal in Python 3.12. Use setuptools or check PEP 632 for potential alternatives 0:01.31 import distutils.sysconfig 0:01.31 /builddir/build/BUILD/wine-gecko-2.47.3/wine-gecko-2.47.3/python/mozbuild/mozbuild/virtualenv.py:10: DeprecationWarning: The distutils.sysconfig module is deprecated, use sysconfig instead 0:01.31 import distutils.sysconfig 0:01.34 /builddir/build/BUILD/wine-gecko-2.47.3/wine-gecko-2.47.3/python/virtualenv/virtualenv.py:24: DeprecationWarning: The distutils package is deprecated and slated for removal in Python 3.12. Use setuptools or check PEP 632 for potential alternatives 0:01.34 import distutils.spawn 0:01.35 /builddir/build/BUILD/wine-gecko-2.47.3/wine-gecko-2.47.3/python/virtualenv/virtualenv.py:25: DeprecationWarning: The distutils.sysconfig module is deprecated, use sysconfig instead 0:01.35 import distutils.sysconfig 0:01.37 Using base prefix '/usr' 0:01.37 New python executable in /builddir/build/BUILD/wine-gecko-2.47.3/wine-gecko-2.47.3-x86/_virtualenv/bin/python3 0:01.37 Not overwriting existing python script /builddir/build/BUILD/wine-gecko-2.47.3/wine-gecko-2.47.3-x86/_virtualenv/bin/python (you must use /builddir/build/BUILD/wine-gecko-2.47.3/wine-gecko-2.47.3-x86/_virtualenv/bin/python3) 0:01.37 ERROR: The executable /builddir/build/BUILD/wine-gecko-2.47.3/wine-gecko-2.47.3-x86/_virtualenv/bin/python3 is not functioning 0:01.37 ERROR: It thinks sys.prefix is '/usr' (should be '/builddir/build/BUILD/wine-gecko-2.47.3/wine-gecko-2.47.3-x86/_virtualenv') 0:01.37 ERROR: virtualenv is not compatible with this system or executable 0:01.38 Traceback (most recent call last): 0:01.38 File "/builddir/build/BUILD/wine-gecko-2.47.3/wine-gecko-2.47.3/python/mozbuild/mozbuild/virtualenv.py", line 486, in <module> 0:01.38 manager.ensure() 0:01.38 File "/builddir/build/BUILD/wine-gecko-2.47.3/wine-gecko-2.47.3/python/mozbuild/mozbuild/virtualenv.py", line 128, in ensure 0:01.38 return self.build() 0:01.38 ^^^^^^^^^^^^ 0:01.38 File "/builddir/build/BUILD/wine-gecko-2.47.3/wine-gecko-2.47.3/python/mozbuild/mozbuild/virtualenv.py", line 382, in build 0:01.38 self.create() 0:01.38 File "/builddir/build/BUILD/wine-gecko-2.47.3/wine-gecko-2.47.3/python/mozbuild/mozbuild/virtualenv.py", line 147, in create 0:01.38 raise Exception( 0:01.38 Exception: Failed to create virtualenv: /builddir/build/BUILD/wine-gecko-2.47.3/wine-gecko-2.47.3-x86/_virtualenv -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2