March 2023 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 50560] New: Battle.net - starcraft 2
by WineHQ Bugzilla Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50560 Bug ID: 50560 Summary: Battle.net - starcraft 2 Product: Packaging Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-packages Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: ajsladek(a)protonmail.com CC: dimesio(a)earthlink.net Distribution: --- Created attachment 69236 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=69236 Battlenet error The program stops at login. It was previously installed and showed the same error at the end of the installation. It spontaneously opened and I was able to install Starcraft itself from the main panel of the "Battlenet.net" program. Now it stops before just logging in. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 6

[Bug 36199] New: valgrind shows several warnings under crypt32/tests/chain.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36199 Bug ID: 36199 Summary: valgrind shows several warnings under crypt32/tests/chain.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.17 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: crypt32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Created attachment 48320 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=48320 valgrind log A few in glibc: ==17802== Thread 2: ==17802== Invalid read of size 1 ==17802== at 0x40187FA: strcmp (strcmp.S:34) ==17802== by 0x4008925: _dl_map_object (dl-load.c:2113) ==17802== by 0x4013383: dl_open_worker (dl-open.c:224) ==17802== by 0x400F1F5: _dl_catch_error (dl-error.c:187) ==17802== by 0x4012D93: _dl_open (dl-open.c:650) ==17802== by 0x435093A: do_dlopen (dl-libc.c:87) ==17802== by 0x400F1F5: _dl_catch_error (dl-error.c:187) ==17802== by 0x4350A2A: dlerror_run (dl-libc.c:46) ==17802== by 0x4350AB0: __libc_dlopen_mode (dl-libc.c:163) ==17802== by 0x4221819: pthread_cancel_init (unwind-forcedunwind.c:52) ==17802== by 0x42219FB: _Unwind_ForcedUnwind (unwind-forcedunwind.c:129) ==17802== by 0x421F732: __pthread_unwind (unwind.c:129) ==17802== by 0x421A080: pthread_exit (pthreadP.h:280) ==17802== by 0x7BC8E1A9: terminate_thread (thread.c:349) ==17802== by 0x7BC87009: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==17802== by 0x6A5F357: ??? ==17802== by 0x4218F92: start_thread (pthread_create.c:309) ==17802== by 0x431D7ED: clone (clone.S:129) ==17802== Address 0x693d913 is on thread 1's stack ==17802== ==17802== Invalid read of size 4 ==17802== at 0x4352239: _Unwind_IteratePhdrCallback (unwind-dw2-fde-glibc.c:112) ==17802== by 0x43503E2: dl_iterate_phdr (dl-iteratephdr.c:76) ==17802== by 0x4352AF9: _Unwind_Find_FDE (unwind-dw2-fde-glibc.c:267) ==17802== by 0x6B9E336: ??? (in /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.8.2/32/libgcc_s.so.1) ==17802== by 0x6B9EB21: ??? (in /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.8.2/32/libgcc_s.so.1) ==17802== by 0x6B9F10F: _Unwind_ForcedUnwind (in /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.8.2/32/libgcc_s.so.1) ==17802== by 0x42219F1: _Unwind_ForcedUnwind (unwind-forcedunwind.c:137) ==17802== by 0x421F732: __pthread_unwind (unwind.c:129) ==17802== by 0x421A080: pthread_exit (pthreadP.h:280) ==17802== by 0x7BC8E1A9: terminate_thread (thread.c:349) ==17802== by 0x7BC87009: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==17802== by 0x6A5F357: ??? ==17802== by 0x4218F92: start_thread (pthread_create.c:309) ==17802== by 0x431D7ED: clone (clone.S:129) ==17802== Address 0x693c034 is on thread 1's stack ==17802== ==17802== Thread 1 crypt32_test.exe.so: ==17802== Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line ==17802== at 0x693E820: ??? (in /lib32/libresolv-2.19.so) ==17802== by 0x425F4E8: __run_exit_handlers (exit.c:82) ==17802== by 0x425F54C: exit (exit.c:104) ==17802== by 0x7BC68772: NtTerminateProcess (process.c:63) ==17802== by 0x7BC5941B: RtlExitUserProcess (loader.c:2538) ==17802== by 0x7B868D09: ??? (process.c:2668) ==17802== Address 0x693e820 is on thread 1's stack ==17802== and several possible leaks: ==17802== 20 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 50 of 427 ==17802== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==17802== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==17802== by 0x514398B: CryptMemAlloc (main.c:124) ==17802== by 0x511E0A9: CertAddStoreToCollection (collectionstore.c:519) ==17802== by 0x5164B4B: CRYPT_SysOpenStoreW (store.c:592) ==17802== by 0x5165ADF: CertOpenStore (store.c:907) ==17802== by 0x51136FD: CRYPT_CreateChainEngine (chain.c:130) ==17802== by 0x511394F: get_chain_engine (chain.c:175) ==17802== by 0x511ADC0: CertGetCertificateChain (chain.c:2894) ==17802== by 0x4E618AA: testVerifyCertChainPolicy (chain.c:4790) ==17802== by 0x4E61C4C: func_chain (chain.c:4844) ==17802== by 0x4EB7F67: run_test (test.h:584) ==17802== by 0x4EB8356: main (test.h:654) ==17802== ==17802== 60 bytes in 3 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 197 of 427 ==17802== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==17802== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==17802== by 0x514398B: CryptMemAlloc (main.c:124) ==17802== by 0x5157661: ContextPropertyList_SetProperty (proplist.c:132) ==17802== by 0x515788F: ContextPropertyList_Copy (proplist.c:215) ==17802== by 0x511E9AF: Context_CopyProperties (context.c:130) ==17802== by 0x510AB6C: Cert_clone (cert.c:139) ==17802== by 0x5163664: MemStore_addContext (store.c:151) ==17802== by 0x5163A35: MemStore_addCert (store.c:243) ==17802== by 0x510B119: add_cert_to_store (cert.c:263) ==17802== by 0x510B27F: CertAddCertificateContextToStore (cert.c:287) ==17802== by 0x510A852: CertAddEncodedCertificateToStore (cert.c:65) ==17802== by 0x515E94A: add_ms_root_certs (rootstore.c:732) ==17802== by 0x515EB12: create_root_store (rootstore.c:808) ==17802== by 0x515EC6C: CRYPT_RootOpenStore (rootstore.c:829) ==17802== by 0x516435C: CRYPT_SysRegOpenStoreW (store.c:435) ==17802== by 0x5165ADF: CertOpenStore (store.c:907) ==17802== by 0x5164BAF: CRYPT_SysOpenStoreW (store.c:604) ==17802== by 0x5165ADF: CertOpenStore (store.c:907) ==17802== by 0x51136FD: CRYPT_CreateChainEngine (chain.c:130) ==17802== ==17802== 96 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 294 of 427 ==17802== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==17802== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==17802== by 0x61ACD34: heap_alloc_zero (internet.h:121) ==17802== by 0x61ADCA1: create_netconn (netconnection.c:369) ==17802== by 0x619CFF2: open_http_connection (http.c:4826) ==17802== by 0x619D68C: HTTP_HttpSendRequestW (http.c:4972) ==17802== by 0x619EE2C: HttpSendRequestExW (http.c:5511) ==17802== by 0x61643F8: HTTP_RetrieveEncodedObjectW (cryptnet_main.c:933) ==17802== by 0x6165930: CryptRetrieveObjectByUrlW (cryptnet_main.c:1479) ==17802== by 0x5118CA0: CRYPT_FindIssuer (chain.c:2039) ==17802== by 0x51193A2: CRYPT_GetIssuer (chain.c:2168) ==17802== by 0x511952F: CRYPT_BuildSimpleChain (chain.c:2200) ==17802== by 0x511976F: CRYPT_GetSimpleChainForCert (chain.c:2247) ==17802== by 0x5119885: CRYPT_BuildCandidateChainFromCert (chain.c:2277) ==17802== by 0x511AE8B: CertGetCertificateChain (chain.c:2914) ==17802== by 0x4E5F02E: testGetCertChain (chain.c:3996) ==17802== by 0x4E61C51: func_chain (chain.c:4845) ==17802== by 0x4EB7F67: run_test (test.h:584) ==17802== by 0x4EB8356: main (test.h:654) ==17802== etc. (full log attached) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 8

[Bug 26609] New: Impulse: wrong window size
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26609 Summary: Impulse: wrong window size Product: Wine Version: 1.3.16 Platform: x86 URL: http://www.impulsedriven.com/downloads/impulse_setup_f ull.exe OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: pavel.ondracka(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=33874) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=33874) terminal output Impulse window size is smaller than it should be, (it is cut from right side and from the bottom) resulting in some content not being displayed. winetricks dotnet20 is required. wine-1.3.16-213-gda4ed47 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

3 12

[Bug 53564] New: wine Qt5Pdf.dll and Qt5Svg.dll
by WineHQ Bugzilla Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53564 Bug ID: 53564 Summary: wine Qt5Pdf.dll and Qt5Svg.dll Product: Wine Version: 7.15 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: doguhan7799(a)hotmail.com Distribution: --- <pre>0108:err:module:import_dll Library Qt5Pdf.dll (which is needed by L"C:\\shamela4_1\\1443.605\\lib\\PySide2\\plugins\\imageformats\\qpdf.dll") not found 0108:err:module:import_dll Library Qt5Svg.dll (which is needed by L"C:\\shamela4_1\\1443.605\\lib\\PySide2\\plugins\\imageformats\\qsvg.dll") not found</pre> -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 5

[Bug 46343] New: kernel32/ pipe tests shows uninitialized memory in test_SuspendProcessState()
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46343 Bug ID: 46343 Summary: kernel32/pipe tests shows uninitialized memory in test_SuspendProcessState() Product: Wine Version: 4.0-rc3 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase, valgrind Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: kernel32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- ==9035== Syscall param writev(vector[...]) points to uninitialised byte(s) ==9035== at 0x43567D3: writev (writev.c:26) ==9035== by 0x7BC75457: send_request (server.c:228) ==9035== by 0x7BC76158: server_call_unlocked (server.c:288) ==9035== by 0x7BC761AD: wine_server_call (server.c:321) ==9035== by 0x7BC945E5: NtWriteVirtualMemory (virtual.c:3439) ==9035== by 0x7B46392C: WriteProcessMemory (process.c:3914) ==9035== by 0x4B34A74: test_SuspendProcessState (process.c:3244) ==9035== by 0x4B36147: func_process (process.c:3873) ==9035== by 0x4B6E8E4: run_test (test.h:617) ==9035== by 0x4B6F322: main (test.h:701) ==9035== Address 0x4eaf5ee is on thread 1's stack ==9035== in frame #6, created by test_SuspendProcessState (process.c:3154) ==9035== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation ==9035== at 0x4B34742: test_SuspendProcessState (process.c:3154) ==9035== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 2

[Bug 43375] New: valgrind shows a definite leak in dlls/mshtml/tests/ script.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43375 Bug ID: 43375 Summary: valgrind shows a definite leak in dlls/mshtml/tests/script.c Product: Wine Version: 2.12 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase, valgrind Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: mshtml Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- ==28896== 24 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 702 of 4,375 ==28896== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==28896== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==28896== by 0x68FC382: heap_alloc (mshtml_private.h:1168) ==28896== by 0x68FE9BA: set_script_elem_readystate (script.c:762) ==28896== by 0x6900218: doc_insert_script (script.c:1290) ==28896== by 0x68B9905: run_insert_script (mutation.c:349) ==28896== by 0x68BA1B0: nsRunnable_Run (mutation.c:532) ==28896== by 0x6A83E0A0: ??? ==28896== by 0x68BAEB0: nsDocumentObserver_AttemptToExecuteScript (mutation.c:817) ==28896== by 0x6A912591: ??? ==28896== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 3

[Bug 38441] New: valgrind shows a possible leak in comdlg32/itemdlg
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38441 Bug ID: 38441 Summary: valgrind shows a possible leak in comdlg32/itemdlg Product: Wine Version: 1.7.41 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase, valgrind Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: comdlg32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- ==6055== 8 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 67 of 1,238 ==6055== at 0x7BC49E0E: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==6055== by 0x7BC4E044: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1715) ==6055== by 0x7B842BF7: HeapAlloc (heap.c:271) ==6055== by 0x7B842E45: GlobalAlloc (heap.c:377) ==6055== by 0x4E70894: OLEClipbrd_Initialize (clipboard.c:1756) ==6055== by 0x4EA50F4: OleInitialize (ole2.c:214) ==6055== by 0x4883FA9: func_itemdlg (itemdlg.c:2264) ==6055== by 0x488711A: run_test (test.h:584) ==6055== by 0x4887554: main (test.h:666) ==6055== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 4

[Bug 36673] New: kernel32/tests/heap.c fails under valgrind
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36673 Bug ID: 36673 Summary: kernel32/tests/heap.c fails under valgrind Product: Wine Version: 1.7.19 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase, valgrind Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: kernel32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -T ../../.. -M kernel32.dll -p kernel32_test.exe.so heap && touch heap.ok preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00110000-68000000 preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 7f000000-82000000 preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00110000-68000000 preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 7f000000-82000000 preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00110000-68000000 preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 7f000000-82000000 heap.c:1138: Test failed: 0x10: got heap flags 00000002 expected 00000020 heap.c:1140: Test failed: 0x10: got heap force flags 00000000 expected 00000020 heap: 2 failures in child process preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00110000-68000000 preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 7f000000-82000000 heap.c:1138: Test failed: 0x20: got heap flags 00000002 expected 00000040 heap.c:1140: Test failed: 0x20: got heap force flags 00000000 expected 00000040 heap: 2 failures in child process preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00110000-68000000 preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 7f000000-82000000 heap.c:1138: Test failed: 0x40: got heap flags 00000002 expected 50000060 heap.c:1140: Test failed: 0x40: got heap force flags 00000000 expected 50000060 heap: 2 failures in child process preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00110000-68000000 preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 7f000000-82000000 heap.c:1138: Test failed: 0x80: got heap flags 00000002 expected 30000060 heap.c:1140: Test failed: 0x80: got heap force flags 00000000 expected 30000060 heap: 2 failures in child process heap.c:1138: Test failed: 0x200000: got heap flags 00000002 expected 00000080 heap: 1 failures in child process preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00110000-68000000 preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 7f000000-82000000 heap.c:1138: Test failed: 0x2000000: got heap flags 00000002 expected 01000002 heap.c:1140: Test failed: 0x2000000: got heap force flags 00000000 expected 01000002 heap: 2 failures in child process preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00110000-68000000 preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 7f000000-82000000 heap.c:1138: Test failed: 0xdeadbeef: got heap flags 00000002 expected 000000e0 heap.c:1140: Test failed: 0xdeadbeef: got heap force flags 00000000 expected 000000e0 heap: 2 failures in child process -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 2

[Bug 36419] New: valgrind shows a possible leak in oleacc/tests/main.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36419 Bug ID: 36419 Summary: valgrind shows a possible leak in oleacc/tests/main.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.18 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ole Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ==4391== 28 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 58 of 262 ==4391== at 0x7BC50A9B: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:255) ==4391== by 0x4C32BB8: apartment_getclassobject (compobj.c:526) ==4391== by 0x4C35FC6: get_inproc_class_object (compobj.c:2894) ==4391== by 0x4C38D2F: CoGetClassObject (compobj.c:3032) ==4391== by 0x4C587E0: unmarshal_object (marshal.c:114) ==4391== by 0x4C58C3C: proxy_manager_get_remunknown.part.8 (marshal.c:1063) ==4391== by 0x4C578B7: ifproxy_release_public_refs (marshal.c:652) ==4391== by 0x4C57AA4: ifproxy_destroy (marshal.c:710) ==4391== by 0x4C5A34E: ClientIdentity_Release (marshal.c:1111) ==4391== by 0x482B256: func_main (main.c:432) ==4391== by 0x482D360: run_test (test.h:584) ==4391== by 0x482D74E: main (test.h:654) ==4391== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 5

[Bug 53697] New: Battle.net Agent.8009/Agent.exe not working (installing Battle.net client and updating games) (2022-09-17)
by WineHQ Bugzilla Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53697 Bug ID: 53697 Summary: Battle.net Agent.8009/Agent.exe not working (installing Battle.net client and updating games) (2022-09-17) Product: Wine Version: 7.17 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: kolAflash(a)kolahilft.de Distribution: --- Created attachment 73102 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=73102 STDOUT/STDERR log (Battle.net client installation) At about 2022-09-17 Blizzard released a new Agent.8009\Agent.exe (5.346.640 bytes) replacing the previous Agent.7984\Agent.exe (5.549.912 bytes) It's is usually placed in one of these folders: WINE C: ProgramData/Battle.net/Agent/ WINE C: users/Public/Application Data/Battle.net/Agent/ Note: This is NOT about the other file named "Agent.exe" (about 595.792 bytes) in the "Agent" folder above. DETAILS With the new Agent.8009/Agent.exe the Battle.net client isn't able to install. wine-7.17 and wine-staging-7.17: And an already installed Battle.net isn't able to update games. The progress is just stuck at 0%. It looks like Agent.exe is continuously crashing and being restarted in background. wine-7.17: When installing Battle.net with you get an hard error "BLZBNTAGT000008FC". wine-staging-7.17: The progress is just stuck at 0%. (similar to when updating games) REPRODUCTION OS: Debian-11 1. Download Battle.net client setup. https://eu.battle.net/download/getInstaller?os=win&installer=Battle.net-Set… https://www.battle.net/download/getInstallerForGame?os=win&gameProgram=BATT… Currently: 4.838.352 bytes 2. Run Battle.net-Setup.exe in a new Wine prefix and click trough the update process. 3. wine-7.17: You get the error "BLZBNTAGT000008FC". wine-staging-7.17: The installation process is stuck at "Installing Battle.net... (0%)". WORKAROUNDS Updating games: Replace Agent.exe in "Agent.8009\" folder with old "Agent.7984\Agent.exe". Installing Battle.net with wine-staging-7.17: Just replace the file while the installing process is being stuck. Afterwards the installation should automatically continue. Installing Battle.net with wine-7.17: DIFFICULT -> try to use wine-staging-7.17 instead! Run Battle.net-Setup.exe once until you get the "BLZBNTAGT000008FC" error. Then close the setup and place Agent.exe version 7984 in that folder an protect it from being overwritten. sudo chattr +i /path/to/Agent.8009/ (may only work on ext4 filesystems) Important: Use "chattr" on the folder "Agent.8009", not on the "Agent.exe" file. The run the Battle.net setup again. You won't be able to delete the "Agent.8009" folder until you run the reverse command sudo chattr -i /path/to/Agent.8009/ SEE ALSO https://www.reddit.com/r/linux_gaming/comments/xgb5fx/problems_with_battlen… https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/blizzard/t/last-update-completely-breaks-… -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 86