March 2023 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 53682] New: wineboot shows "user_check_not_lock BUG: holding USER lock" on aarch64 since wine-7.14
by WineHQ Bugzilla June 23, 2023

June 23, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53682 Bug ID: 53682 Summary: wineboot shows "user_check_not_lock BUG: holding USER lock" on aarch64 since wine-7.14 Product: Wine Version: 7.14 Hardware: aarch64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ntdll Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: PuetzKevinA(a)JohnDeere.com Distribution: --- I recently updated our builds to past wine-7.0, and began encountering a wineboot failure on aarch64 > 0040:err:system:user_check_not_lock BUG: holding USER lock(64) > s\system32\rundll32.exe: /home/yukondev/workspace/wine/dlls/win32u/sysparams.c:400: user_check_not_lock: Assertion `0' failed. > 0040:err:seh:call_function_handlers invalid frame 21f410 (0000000000022000-0000000000120000) > 0040:err:seh:NtRaiseException Exception frame is not in stack limits => unable to dispatch exception. After some bisecting, I narrowed this down to being a regression between 7.13 and 7.14, and then further narrowed it to https://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/commit/d50112b4b6e82782d3924a8dbd443… Somehow the call to KeUserModeCallback( NtUserLoadSysMenu,... ) at https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/blob/d50112b4b6e82782d3924a8dbd443f82… does not properly return. I think that commit is mostly a false lead though, the translation of syscall NtUserCreateWindowEx to a syscall just exposed a latent bug in KeUserModeCallback/__wine_syscall_dispatcher on aarch64, since having NtUserCreateWindowEx be a syscall means KeUserModeCallback can no longer use its "if we have no syscall frame, call the callback directly" simple path https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/blob/master/dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_ar… What seems to be actually at fault is that, inside of User32LoadSysMenu (the actual function invoked by KeUserModeCallback), is a call to NtUserCreateMenu - which is *also* a syscall. This call doesn't crash, and in fact all of User32LoadSysMenu runs to completion. But when it goes through __wine_syscall_dispatcher, the stack pointer is restored to be `$sp = arm64_thread_data()->syscall_frame` https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/blob/master/dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_ar… - i.e. it points to &callback_frame, back on the stack of KeUserModeCallback. And this is *not* the bottom of the stack; there's compiler-generated prologue/epilogue to restore various non-volatile registers. 0x0000ffffaa0247b4 <KeUserModeCallback+0>: sub sp, sp, #0x450 0x0000ffffaa0247b8 <KeUserModeCallback+4>: stp x29, x30, [sp] 0x0000ffffaa0247bc <KeUserModeCallback+8>: mov x29, sp 0x0000ffffaa0247c0 <KeUserModeCallback+12>: stp x19, x20, [sp, #16] 0x0000ffffaa0247c4 <KeUserModeCallback+16>: stp x21, x22, [sp, #32] 0x0000ffffaa0247c8 <KeUserModeCallback+20>: str w0, [sp, #56] 0x0000ffffaa0247cc <KeUserModeCallback+24>: str x1, [sp, #48] 0x0000ffffaa0247d0 <KeUserModeCallback+28>: str w2, [sp, #60] 0x0000ffffaa0247d4 <KeUserModeCallback+32>: mov x21, x3 0x0000ffffaa0247d8 <KeUserModeCallback+36>: mov x20, x4 0x0000ffffaa0247dc <KeUserModeCallback+40>: add x19, sp, #0x40 // x19=&callback_frame So any code that runs inside this syscall that uses the first 0x40 bytes of stack is trampling these variables in the frame of KeUserModeCallback. Eventually User32LoadSysMenu returns back into KiUserCallbackDispatcher, which passes it into NtCallbackReturn, which does a __wine_longjmp back into the KeUserModeCallback,and we exit from the __wine_setjmp for the second time (returning 0) and get to `return callback_frame.status` https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/blob/wine-7.17/dlls/ntdll/unix/signal…. But then the epilogue starts peeling off the stack => 0x0000ffffaa024864 <+176>: ldr w0, [sp, #1088] 0x0000ffffaa024868 <+180>: ldp x19, x20, [sp, #16] 0x0000ffffaa02486c <+184>: ldp x21, x22, [sp, #32] 0x0000ffffaa024870 <+188>: ldp x29, x30, [sp] 0x0000ffffaa024874 <+192>: add sp, sp, #0x450 0x0000ffffaa024878 <+196>: ret and the link register $x30 = (void *) 0xffffaa024984 <NtCallbackReturn+104>, rather than 0xffffa8f0ccdc <copy_sys_popup+44> as it was when it was pushed in the prologue. It's overwritten several times along the way, but I don't think any of these call sites are at fault; they are just writing to what they think is their own stack frame, unaware that __wine_syscall_dispatcher adjusted $sp to too-high a value and they are overwriting space that belongs to KeUserModeCallback. The specific places that overwrote this entry on the stack were #0 0x0000ffffa8f37a48 in NtUserCallOneParam (arg=0, code=2) at /home/yukondev/workspace/wine/dlls/win32u/sysparams.c:5357 #1 0x0000ffffaa022cf0 in __wine_syscall_dispatcher () from /opt/wine/bin/../lib/wine/aarch64-unix/ntdll.so which set it to 0xffffaa022cf0 <__wine_syscall_dispatcher+272> #0 insert_menu_item (ret_pos=0x21f538, flags=1024, id=4294967295, handle=0x10042) at /home/yukondev/workspace/wine/dlls/win32u/menu.c:438 #1 NtUserThunkedMenuItemInfo (handle=0x10042, pos=4294967295, flags=1024, method=1, info=0x11f528 <opengl_func_names+680>, str=<optimized out>) at /home/yukondev/workspace/wine/dlls/win32u/menu.c:1297 #2 0x0000ffffaa022cf0 in __wine_syscall_dispatcher () from /opt/wine/bin/../lib/wine/aarch64-unix/ntdll.so which set it to NULL and 0x0000ffffaa023a0c in NtCurrentTeb () at /home/yukondev/workspace/wine/dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_arm64.c:1449 1449 { (gdb) bt #0 0x0000ffffaa023a0c in NtCurrentTeb () at /home/yukondev/workspace/wine/dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_arm64.c:1449 #1 0x0000ffffaa02493c in ntdll_get_thread_data () at /home/yukondev/workspace/wine/dlls/ntdll/unix/unix_private.h:70 #2 arm64_thread_data () at /home/yukondev/workspace/wine/dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_arm64.c:163 #3 NtCallbackReturn (ret_ptr=0x0, ret_len=0, status=65602) at /home/yukondev/workspace/wine/dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_arm64.c:784 #4 0x0000ffffaa022cf0 in __wine_syscall_dispatcher () from /opt/wine/bin/../lib/wine/aarch64-unix/ntdll.so which set it to 0xffffaa02493c <NtCallbackReturn+32>, and then 0xffffaa024978 <NtCallbackReturn+92> , then 0xffffaa024984 <NtCallbackReturn+104> The same sort of thing happens in the x86_64 dispatcher, but there it turns out to be pretty harmless. The key difference is that the function prologue on x86_64 used `push` instructions, and did so prior to the `sub` where it allocated space for locals, so the things popped by the epilogue ended up above callback_frame, rather than below it, and so are not smashed. 0x00007fd17b6dc1d2 <+0>: push %rbp 0x00007fd17b6dc1d3 <+1>: mov %rsp,%rbp 0x00007fd17b6dc1d6 <+4>: push %r14 0x00007fd17b6dc1d8 <+6>: push %r13 0x00007fd17b6dc1da <+8>: push %r12 0x00007fd17b6dc1dc <+10>: push %rdi 0x00007fd17b6dc1dd <+11>: push %rsi 0x00007fd17b6dc1de <+12>: push %rbx 0x00007fd17b6dc1df <+13>: sub $0xa0,%rsp 0x00007fd17b6dc1e6 <+20>: and $0xffffffffffffffc0,%rsp 0x00007fd17b6dc1ea <+24>: sub $0x560,%rsp There is still a 32-byte gap between the $rsp of KeUserModeCallback and &current_frame that is briefly at risk, but 1. This seems to be the register parameter area of the Windows x64 ABI, which is actually volatile space that belongs to the callee even though it's allocated by the caller, so the compiler is not expecting it to survive across function calls (in this case __wine_syscall_dispatcher_return). https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/stack-usage?view=msvc-170 discusses how this "contains at least 4 entries", i.e. 32 bytes: https://eli.thegreenplace.net/2011/09/06/stack-frame-layout-on-x86-64 2. It doesn't actually get smashed, because __wine_syscall_dispatcher subtracts 0x20 from the restored $rsp before actually making the syscall (https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/blob/d50112b4b6e82782d3924a8dbd443f82…) Which is presumably since the SysV ABI does *not* make any such reservation, and so __wine_syscall_dispatcher needs to do so to be following the ms_abi. So together, these mean that on x86_64, it would be OK if __wine_syscall_dispatcher used these 32 bytes between the correct $rsp of KeUserModeCallback and frame->syscall_table (though it doesn't seem to). And the eventual callee gets a $rsp that does *not* overlap with KeUserModeCallback (even though it would be legal for it to do so). I don't know that we have any actual guarantee that callback_frame will be at the bottom, but in practice it seems to be. But on aarch64, there's important stuff below callback_frame, so this doesn't work out. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 29

[Bug 54442] New: experimental wow64 mode: doesn't show some graphical windows
by WineHQ Bugzilla June 23, 2023

June 23, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54442 Bug ID: 54442 Summary: experimental wow64 mode: doesn't show some graphical windows Product: Wine Version: 8.1 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: idarktemplar(a)mail.ru Distribution: --- Created attachment 73990 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=73990 SteamSetup.png When I'm building wine with new experimental wow64 mode, it is unable to properly show or render application windows for some applications. I've tried it both on clean prefix and on existing prefix. I've tried Steam setup and Battle.net setup, both failed. With Battle.net setup I see no window, with Steam setup I see black window with some artifacts. When using multilib wine built old way, everything works as usual. Happens both with wine 8.0 and 8.1. OS: Gentoo Linux amd64 (64bit) Graphics: X11 Videocard information: OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation OpenGL renderer string: Quadro K1000M/PCIe/SSE2 OpenGL core profile version string: 4.6.0 NVIDIA 470.161.03 OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 4.60 NVIDIA OpenGL core profile context flags: (none) OpenGL core profile profile mask: core profile Wine build options: ./configure --with-mingw --enable-archs='i386,x86_64' --prefix=/tmp/wineinstall Default wine output: $ WINEPREFIX=/tmp/wineprefix/prefix1 /tmp/wineinstall/bin/wine /tmp/SteamSetup.exe 0080:fixme:hid:handle_IRP_MN_QUERY_ID Unhandled type 00000005 0080:fixme:hid:handle_IRP_MN_QUERY_ID Unhandled type 00000005 0080:fixme:hid:handle_IRP_MN_QUERY_ID Unhandled type 00000005 0080:fixme:hid:handle_IRP_MN_QUERY_ID Unhandled type 00000005 0090:err:winediag:is_broken_driver Broken NVIDIA RandR detected, falling back to RandR 1.0. Please consider using the Nouveau driver instead. 0034:err:winediag:is_broken_driver Broken NVIDIA RandR detected, falling back to RandR 1.0. Please consider using the Nouveau driver instead. 010c:err:environ:init_peb starting L"Z:\\tmp\\SteamSetup.exe" in experimental wow64 mode 010c:err:winediag:is_broken_driver Broken NVIDIA RandR detected, falling back to RandR 1.0. Please consider using the Nouveau driver instead. 010c:fixme:imm:ImeSetActiveContext (00020046, 1): stub 010c:fixme:imm:ImmReleaseContext (00010052, 00020046): stub 0090:fixme:imm:ImeSetActiveContext (0000000000010026, 0): stub 0090:fixme:imm:ImmReleaseContext (0000000000010020, 0000000000010026): stub -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 54751] New: The 64-bit advapi32:registry breaks test_CoGetPSClsid() in ole32:compobj in Wine
by WineHQ Bugzilla June 23, 2023

June 23, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54751 Bug ID: 54751 Summary: The 64-bit advapi32:registry breaks test_CoGetPSClsid() in ole32:compobj in Wine Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ole32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- The 64-bit advapi32:registry breaks test_CoGetPSClsid() in ole32:compobj in Wine: compobj.c:1449: Test failed: CoGetPSClsid failed with error 0x80040155 compobj.c:1450: Test failed: got clsid {52222222-1234-1234-1234-56789abcdef0} See https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#ole32:compobj A bisect shows that this started with the commit below: commit 3f82f6ff59f4024f67e2d646883cbea223fba84a Author: Sven Baars <sbaars(a)codeweavers.com> Date: Fri Mar 17 16:52:51 2023 +0100 kernelbase: Use open_key() to obtain any existing Wow6432node in create_key(). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 54738] New: msi:action - The 64-bit test_register_class_info() fails in Wine
by WineHQ Bugzilla June 23, 2023

June 23, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54738 Bug ID: 54738 Summary: msi:action - The 64-bit test_register_class_info() fails in Wine Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: msi Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- msi:action - The 64-bit test_register_class_info() fails in Wine: action.c:6025: Test failed: key not created action.c:6147: Test failed: key not created See https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#msi:action -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 48811] New: StarCraft II fails to load in staging, crashes after trying to start a game in stable
by WineHQ Bugzilla June 23, 2023

June 23, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48811 Bug ID: 48811 Summary: StarCraft II fails to load in staging, crashes after trying to start a game in stable Product: Wine Version: 5.4 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: dbghelp Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: wschmrdr(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 66725 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=66725 Output occurring when the application crashes. Ever since upgrading from 5.3 to 5.4, StarCraft II has ceased working. On staging, this occurs during the loading screen. I am able to get through the Battle.net app OK, but cannot get to my login authenticating. I have tried switching to stable, but when trying to load up a game, I see the same output issue. Selected the dbghelp component because that's the line that comes up in the output at the time of the crash. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 54742] New: The 64-bit advapi32:registry breaks the 32-bit test_redirection() in Wine
by WineHQ Bugzilla June 23, 2023

June 23, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54742 Bug ID: 54742 Summary: The 64-bit advapi32:registry breaks the 32-bit test_redirection() in Wine Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: advapi32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- The 64-bit advapi32:registry breaks the 32-bit test_redirection() in Wine. To reproduce run the following commands: $ rm -rf ~/.wine # start from a fresh wineprefix $ ./wow64/wine64 wow64/dlls/advapi32/tests/x86_64-windows/advapi32_test.exe registry 2>&1 | grep -E '(Test failed|tests executed)' 0020:registry: 6309 tests executed (156 marked as todo, 0 as flaky, 0 failures), 2 skipped. $ ./wow32/wine wow32/dlls/advapi32/tests/i386-windows/advapi32_test.exe registry 2>&1 | grep -E '(Test failed|tests executed)' registry.c:2837: Test failed: RegOpenKeyExA failed: 2 registry.c:2842: Test failed: RegOpenKeyExA failed: 2 registry.c:2861: Test failed: 00000000: wrong value 32/64 registry.c:2863: Test failed: 00000200: wrong value 32/64 registry.c:2868: Test failed: 00000000: wrong value 64/0 registry.c:2869: Test failed: 00000100: wrong value 64/0 registry.c:2870: Test failed: 00000200: wrong value 64/0 registry.c:3168: Test failed: RegOpenKeyExA failed: 2 registry.c:3174: Test failed: RegOpenKeyExA failed: 2 registry.c:3180: Test failed: RegOpenKeyExA failed: 2 registry.c:3206: Test failed: found equals 0 registry.c:3208: Test failed: found equals 0 registry.c:3210: Test failed: found equals 0 registry.c:3212: Test failed: found equals 1 registry.c:3214: Test failed: wrong number of subkeys: 10 registry.c:3216: Test failed: found equals 1 registry.c:3218: Test failed: found equals 0 registry.c:3220: Test failed: wrong number of subkeys: 10 registry.c:3222: Test failed: found equals 0 0128:registry: 7658 tests executed (74 marked as todo, 0 as flaky, 19 failures), 2 skipped. See https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#advapi32:registry The reason why this failure is only visible with the fg-deb64-wow32 is because this is the only test configuration that runs the 32-bit tests in the same wineprefix as the 64-bit tests. What this shows is that advapi32:registry does not correctly cleans up after itself which has the potential for breaking any test that follows (not just 32-bit ones). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 53431] New: widl generates enum forward declarations in typedefs which are not valid in C++
by WineHQ Bugzilla June 23, 2023

June 23, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53431 Bug ID: 53431 Summary: widl generates enum forward declarations in typedefs which are not valid in C++ Product: Wine Version: 7.13 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: tools Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: gfw.kra(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Hi everyone, I recently discovered an issue with C++ code in headers compiled from winrt idl's using widl. It does not compile when included, when tried using mingw g++ v12.1.0. There’s seems to be issue with how enum typedefs are translated within namespaces. Example: When tried to include windows.media.speechsynthesis.h compiled from windows.media.speechsynthesis.idl in cpp file, the following output is received (compiler output shows headers from mingw, but these look the same when compiled using widl in wine). ``` /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/windows.foundation.h:90:26: error: use of enum ‘PropertyType’ without previous declaration 90 | typedef enum PropertyType PropertyType; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/windows.foundation.h:164:18: error: using typedef-name ‘ABI::Windows::Foundation::PropertyType’ after ‘enum’ 164 | enum PropertyType { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/windows.foundation.h:90:39: note: ‘ABI::Windows::Foundation::PropertyType’ has a previous declaration here 90 | typedef enum PropertyType PropertyType; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/windows.media.speechsynthesis.h:218:30: error: use of enum ‘VoiceGender’ without previous declaration 218 | typedef enum VoiceGender VoiceGender; | ^~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/windows.media.speechsynthesis.h:476:22: error: using typedef-name ‘ABI::Windows::Media::SpeechSynthesis::VoiceGender’ after ‘enum’ 476 | enum VoiceGender { | ^~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/windows.media.speechsynthesis.h:218:42: note: ‘ABI::Windows::Media::SpeechSynthesis::VoiceGender’ has a previous declaration here 218 | typedef enum VoiceGender VoiceGender; | ^~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/windows.media.speechsynthesis.h:822:30: error: using typedef-name ‘ABI::Windows::Media::SpeechSynthesis::VoiceGender’ after ‘enum’ 822 | enum VoiceGender *value) = 0; | ^~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/windows.media.speechsynthesis.h:218:42: note: ‘ABI::Windows::Media::SpeechSynthesis::VoiceGender’ has a previous declaration here 218 | typedef enum VoiceGender VoiceGender; ``` windows.media.speechsynthesis.idl has typedef of enum VoiceGender, which is defined later. ``` namespace Windows { namespace Foundation { interface IClosable; } namespace Media { namespace SpeechSynthesis { typedef enum VoiceGender VoiceGender; ``` This is translated to following: ``` #ifdef __cplusplus namespace ABI { namespace Windows { namespace Media { namespace SpeechSynthesis { typedef enum VoiceGender VoiceGender; } } } } #else /* __cplusplus */ typedef enum __x_ABI_CWindows_CMedia_CSpeechSynthesis_CVoiceGender __x_ABI_CWindows_CMedia_CSpeechSynthesis_CVoiceGender; #endif /* __cplusplus */ ``` This typedef is not valid in C++. According to the standard, enum cannot be forward declared using typedef. This could be replaced with just simple enum declaration, but it would need to have type specifier (that goes for definition as well). Best regards. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 36079] New: loader fails to build with clang -faddress=sanitize
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org June 23, 2023

June 23, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36079 Bug ID: 36079 Summary: loader fails to build with clang -faddress=sanitize Product: Wine Version: 1.7.17 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: build-env Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Created attachment 48263 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=48263 make log I tried building wine with clang's address sanitizer enabled, which mostly worked, until the loader: make[1]: Entering directory '/home/austin/wine-gcc49-asan/loader' clang -fsanitize=address -m32 -o wine-preloader -static -nostartfiles -nodefaultlibs -Wl,-Ttext=0x7c400000 preloader.o ../libs/port/libwine_port.a /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.8.2/../../../../lib32/libpthread.a(pthread_mutex_lock.o): In function `__pthread_mutex_lock': /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.19/work/glibc-2.19/nptl/../nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:80: undefined reference to `__assert_fail' /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.19/work/glibc-2.19/nptl/../nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:116: undefined reference to `__assert_fail' /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.19/work/glibc-2.19/nptl/../nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:146: undefined reference to `__assert_fail' /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.19/work/glibc-2.19/nptl/../nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:151: undefined reference to `__assert_fail' .. austin(a)aw25 ~/wine-gcc49-asan $ clang --version clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final) Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Thread model: posix austin(a)aw25 ~/wine-gcc49-asan $ git describe wine-1.7.17-42-g24c5728 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 3

[Bug 49797] New: WIDL doesn't tolerate anonymous structs within interfaces
by WineHQ Bugzilla June 23, 2023

June 23, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49797 Bug ID: 49797 Summary: WIDL doesn't tolerate anonymous structs within interfaces Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: tools Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: kolan_n(a)mail.ru Distribution: --- IDLs in Windows SDKs sometimes contain anonymous structs within interfaces. WIDL fails to compile such IDLs. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 37346] New: New application , installed successfully , starts up fine , no data storing , BUSY WIN ACCOUNTING APP
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org June 23, 2023

June 23, 2023

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37346 Bug ID: 37346 Summary: New application , installed successfully , starts up fine , no data storing , BUSY WIN ACCOUNTING APP Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Mac OS X Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: lax.sunny(a)gmail.com Created attachment 49664 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=49664 Log created by wine on running the app , problem is with database storage and runtime functions Application named busy win very much famous accounting software tried using number of prefixes application installs smoothly when i run the app it starts up normally but crashes on adding a new company or detecting an old DATABASE -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 10