September 2023 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 36146] New: valgrind shows several leaks in dlls/jscript/tests/caller.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36146 Bug ID: 36146 Summary: valgrind shows several leaks in dlls/jscript/tests/caller.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.17 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: jscript Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ==32653== 12 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 69 of 753 ==32653== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==32653== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==32653== by 0x697611F: ??? ==32653== by 0x69764DD: ??? ==32653== by 0x6976548: ??? ==32653== by 0x6977213: ??? ==32653== by 0x69793E6: ??? ==32653== by 0x6979560: ??? ==32653== by 0x69796F5: ??? ==32653== by 0x6979D90: ??? ==32653== by 0x6972401: ??? ==32653== by 0x4E4DA12: _call_change_type (dispex.h:686) ==32653== by 0x4E4DC08: test_change_type (caller.c:139) ==32653== by 0x4E4DFD6: test_change_types (caller.c:196) ==32653== by 0x4E4E3B6: test_caller (caller.c:238) ==32653== by 0x4E4EADA: Test_InvokeEx (caller.c:363) ==32653== by 0x695D3E5: ??? ==32653== by 0x69621D9: ??? ==32653== by 0x6966B58: ??? ==32653== by 0x6966F33: ??? ==32653== ==32708== 18 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 129 of 768 ==32708== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==32708== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==32708== by 0x6A2F11F: ??? ==32708== by 0x6A2F4DD: ??? ==32708== by 0x6A2F548: ??? ==32708== by 0x6A312DE: ??? ==32708== by 0x6A32C08: ??? ==32708== by 0x6A2B401: ??? ==32708== by 0x4E4E1D2: test_change_types (dispex.h:686) ==32708== by 0x4E4F1E2: run_scripts (caller.c:549) ==32708== by 0x4E4F3CB: func_caller (caller.c:585) ==32708== by 0x4E5ED5F: run_test (test.h:584) ==32708== by 0x4E5F14E: main (test.h:654) ==32708== ==2241== 28 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 233 of 768 ==2241== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==2241== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==2241== by 0x6A2F11F: ??? ==2241== by 0x6A2F4DD: ??? ==2241== by 0x6A2F548: ??? ==2241== by 0x6A2F1E3: ??? ==2241== by 0x6A2FE69: ??? ==2241== by 0x6A2BC3E: ??? ==2241== by 0x6A4ABD4: ??? ==2241== by 0x7BC52F48: ??? (loader.c:138) ==2241== by 0x7BC55586: MODULE_InitDLL (loader.c:1068) ==2241== by 0x7BC55904: process_attach (loader.c:1157) ==2241== by 0x7BC5856A: LdrLoadDll (loader.c:2129) ==2241== by 0x7B85A735: load_library (module.c:933) ==2241== by 0x7B85A8A3: LoadLibraryExW (module.c:990) ==2241== by 0x544D69A: COMPOBJ_DllList_Add (compobj.c:495) ==2241== by 0x544FB62: apartment_getclassobject (compobj.c:1335) ==2241== by 0x54532AC: get_inproc_class_object (compobj.c:2894) ==2241== by 0x545376B: CoGetClassObject (compobj.c:3032) ==2241== by 0x5453D2D: CoCreateInstance (compobj.c:3197) Also, possibly: ==2205== 64 bytes in 2 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 411 of 768 ==2205== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==2205== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==2205== by 0x4FE80B4: alloc_bstr (oleaut.c:162) ==2205== by 0x4FE844A: SysAllocStringLen (oleaut.c:324) ==2205== by 0x4FE8161: SysAllocString (oleaut.c:232) ==2205== by 0x6A15E31: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A1730E: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A174E2: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A17DBF: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A18017: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A18088: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A19957: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A17F2E: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A19D84: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A1A5F8: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A3A6D1: ??? ==2205== by 0x4E4EE13: _parse_script_a (activscp.h:1290) ==2205== by 0x4E4F186: run_scripts (caller.c:541) ==2205== by 0x4E4F3CB: func_caller (caller.c:585) ==2205== by 0x4E5ED5F: run_test (test.h:584) ==2205== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 3

[Bug 33257] New: Adobe Digital Editions does not recognize KOBO eReader.
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33257 Bug #: 33257 Summary: Adobe Digital Editions does not recognize KOBO eReader. Product: Wine Version: 1.4.1 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: peterharris20(a)sky.com Classification: Unclassified Adobe Digital Editions does not find the KOBO eReader when it is plugged in. Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes it and displays the folder and contents. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

3 13

[Bug 55206] New: COD MW Remastered (2016) crackling audio
by WineHQ Bugzilla Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55206 Bug ID: 55206 Summary: COD MW Remastered (2016) crackling audio Product: Wine Version: 8.11 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: winepulse.drv Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: brandowlucas(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 74806 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=74806 this is the audio log file until i hit the crackling on game. when using pulseaudio the game sounds like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmHY7uH1yzo when using pipewire, i don't even get audio at all: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71m5g4usSx0 i've tested this game in many distribution, different proton versions/wine versions and it seems a wine bug. i made this video test was on vanilla wine-8.11. I also attached the log files. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 8

[Bug 45147] New: Menu/Window Z order incorrect in trueSpace
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45147 Bug ID: 45147 Summary: Menu/Window Z order incorrect in trueSpace Product: Wine Version: 3.7 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: jcarthew(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 61334 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=61334 Screenshot showing rendering draw issue. When running Caligari TrueSpace, regardless of using OpenGL or software only rendering, the Z order of the file menu is incorrect. I have attached a screenshot showing the issue. The image on the left is how the program should look, the image on the right shows the flaw. The file/help menu is being overdrawn by a blue bar whenever a tool Window, or the editing viewspace is clicked on. the draw order temporarily resets to the correct behavior when alt-tab is pressed. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

3 8

[Bug 43388] New: valgrind shows a few definite leaks in dlls/winmm/tests/ mci.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43388 Bug ID: 43388 Summary: valgrind shows a few definite leaks in dlls/winmm/tests/mci.c Product: Wine Version: 2.12 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase, valgrind Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: winmm&mci Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Distribution: Gentoo ==2739== 0 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 6 of 1,022 ==2739== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==2739== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==2739== by 0x523E42B: IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:187) ==2739== by 0x523ECCB: IMalloc_Alloc (objidl.h:1405) ==2739== by 0x523ECCB: CoTaskMemAlloc (???:0) ==2739== by 0x1A4983D5: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D191: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D275: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D767: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49DC76: ??? ==2739== by 0x19B3BF99: ??? ==2739== by 0x7BC913B3: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==2739== by 0x7BC9143B: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2759) ==2739== by 0x7BC91391: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==2739== by 0x7BC9B3EE: start_thread (thread.c:487) ==2739== by 0x4244249: start_thread (pthread_create.c:333) ==2739== by 0x433FD6D: clone (clone.S:114) ==2739== ==2739== 0 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 7 of 1,022 ==2739== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==2739== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==2739== by 0x523E42B: IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:187) ==2739== by 0x523ECCB: IMalloc_Alloc (objidl.h:1405) ==2739== by 0x523ECCB: CoTaskMemAlloc (???:0) ==2739== by 0x1A4983D5: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D191: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D275: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D767: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49DC8D: ??? ==2739== by 0x19B3BF99: ??? ==2739== by 0x7BC913B3: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==2739== by 0x7BC9143B: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2759) ==2739== by 0x7BC91391: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==2739== by 0x7BC9B3EE: start_thread (thread.c:487) ==2739== by 0x4244249: start_thread (pthread_create.c:333) ==2739== by 0x433FD6D: clone (clone.S:114) ==2739== ==2739== 0 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 12 of 1,022 ==2739== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==2739== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==2739== by 0x523E42B: IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:187) ==2739== by 0x523ECCB: IMalloc_Alloc (objidl.h:1405) ==2739== by 0x523ECCB: CoTaskMemAlloc (???:0) ==2739== by 0x1A4983D5: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D191: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D275: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D767: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49DC76: ??? ==2739== by 0x19C52F99: ??? ==2739== by 0x7BC913B3: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==2739== by 0x7BC9143B: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2759) ==2739== by 0x7BC91391: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==2739== by 0x7BC9B3EE: start_thread (thread.c:487) ==2739== by 0x4244249: start_thread (pthread_create.c:333) ==2739== by 0x433FD6D: clone (clone.S:114) ==2739== ==2739== 0 bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 13 of 1,022 ==2739== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==2739== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==2739== by 0x523E42B: IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:187) ==2739== by 0x523ECCB: IMalloc_Alloc (objidl.h:1405) ==2739== by 0x523ECCB: CoTaskMemAlloc (???:0) ==2739== by 0x1A4983D5: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D191: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D275: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D767: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49DC8D: ??? ==2739== by 0x19C52F99: ??? ==2739== by 0x7BC913B3: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==2739== by 0x7BC9143B: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2759) ==2739== by 0x7BC91391: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==2739== by 0x7BC9B3EE: start_thread (thread.c:487) ==2739== by 0x4244249: start_thread (pthread_create.c:333) ==2739== by 0x433FD6D: clone (clone.S:114) ==2739== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 2

[Bug 43384] New: valgrind shows a definite leak in dlls/rpcrt4/tests/ ndr_marshal.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43384 Bug ID: 43384 Summary: valgrind shows a definite leak in dlls/rpcrt4/tests/ndr_marshal.c Product: Wine Version: 2.12 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase, valgrind Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: rpc Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Distribution: Gentoo ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -T ../../.. -M rpcrt4.dll -p rpcrt4_test.exe.so ndr_marshall && touch ndr_marshall.ok ==32206== 44 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 207 of 413 ==32206== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==32206== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==32206== by 0x56B879E: RPCRT4_io_thread (rpc_server.c:559) ==32206== by 0x7BC913B3: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==32206== by 0x7BC9143B: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2759) ==32206== by 0x7BC91391: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==32206== by 0x7BC9B3EE: start_thread (thread.c:487) ==32206== by 0x4244249: start_thread (pthread_create.c:333) ==32206== by 0x433FD6D: clone (clone.S:114) ==32206== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 2

[Bug 36925] New: valgrind shows a couple unitialized variables in dlls/ieframe/tests/ie.c (bestBtreeIndex)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36925 Bug ID: 36925 Summary: valgrind shows a couple unitialized variables in dlls/ieframe/tests/ie.c (bestBtreeIndex) Product: Wine Version: 1.7.22 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase, valgrind Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ieframe Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ==14107== Thread 23: ==14107== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==14107== at 0x81258BAA: bestBtreeIndex (sqlite3.c:107585) ==14107== by 0x812848BD: sqlite3WhereBegin (sqlite3.c:109693) ==14107== by 0x812905EE: sqlite3Select (sqlite3.c:100747) ==14107== Uninitialised value was created by a client request ==14107== at 0x7BC4BF0A: mark_block_uninitialized (heap.c:209) ==14107== by 0x7BC4C075: initialize_block (heap.c:240) ==14107== by 0x7BC50981: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1717) ==14107== by 0x77D619E: msvcrt_heap_alloc (heap.c:70) ==14107== by 0x77D6D63: MSVCRT_malloc (heap.c:408) ==14107== by 0x812510B5: sqlite3MemMalloc (sqlite3.c:15744) ==14107== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==14107== at 0x8125A351: bestOrClauseIndex (sqlite3.c:106141) ==14107== by 0x8125948C: bestBtreeIndex (sqlite3.c:108056) ==14107== by 0x812848BD: sqlite3WhereBegin (sqlite3.c:109693) ==14107== by 0x812905EE: sqlite3Select (sqlite3.c:100747) ==14107== Uninitialised value was created by a client request ==14107== at 0x7BC4BF0A: mark_block_uninitialized (heap.c:209) ==14107== by 0x7BC4C075: initialize_block (heap.c:240) ==14107== by 0x7BC50981: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1717) ==14107== by 0x77D619E: msvcrt_heap_alloc (heap.c:70) ==14107== by 0x77D6D63: MSVCRT_malloc (heap.c:408) ==14107== by 0x812510B5: sqlite3MemMalloc (sqlite3.c:15744) ==14107== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 4

[Bug 36587] New: valgrind shows uninitialized memory use in user32/tests/winstation.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36587 Bug ID: 36587 Summary: valgrind shows uninitialized memory use in user32/tests/winstation.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.19 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: user32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -T ../../.. -M user32.dll -p user32_test.exe.so winstation && touch winstation.ok preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00110000-68000000 preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 7f000000-82000000 ==25156== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s) ==25156== at 0x4226CF3: __write_nocancel (syscall-template.S:81) ==25156== by 0x7BC7FD72: send_request (server.c:198) ==25156== by 0x7BC7FF91: wine_server_call (server.c:294) ==25156== by 0x519D2EE: send_hardware_message (message.c:3331) ==25156== by 0x5173BEB: SendInput (input.c:185) ==25156== by 0x4D9FB49: test_inputdesktop (winstation.c:530) ==25156== by 0x4DA2430: func_winstation (winstation.c:939) ==25156== by 0x4DA3978: run_test (test.h:584) ==25156== by 0x4DA3D67: main (test.h:654) ==25156== Address 0x510f6a8 is on thread 1's stack ==25156== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation ==25156== at 0x4D9F748: test_inputdesktop (winstation.c:492) ==25156== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 4

[Bug 36412] New: valgrind shows a possible leak in netprofm/tests/list.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36412 Bug ID: 36412 Summary: valgrind shows a possible leak in netprofm/tests/list.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.18 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ==3773== 28 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 159 of 560 ==3773== at 0x7BC50A9B: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:255) ==3773== by 0x4CD6BB8: apartment_getclassobject (compobj.c:526) ==3773== by 0x4CD9FC6: get_inproc_class_object (compobj.c:2894) ==3773== by 0x4CDCD2F: CoGetClassObject (compobj.c:3032) ==3773== by 0x4CDD4B7: CoCreateInstance (compobj.c:3197) ==3773== by 0x4B74D31: func_list (list.c:35) ==3773== by 0x4B75E84: run_test (test.h:584) ==3773== by 0x4B76272: main (test.h:654) ==3773== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 4

[Bug 36191] New: valgrind shows some potential leaks in crypt32/tests/cert.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36191 Bug ID: 36191 Summary: valgrind shows some potential leaks in crypt32/tests/cert.c Product: Wine Version: 1.3.13 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: comdlg32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Depends on: 36190 ==17318== 20 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 51 of 334 ==17318== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==17318== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==17318== by 0x4EE398B: CryptMemAlloc (main.c:124) ==17318== by 0x4EF7661: ContextPropertyList_SetProperty (proplist.c:132) ==17318== by 0x4EAC507: CertContext_SetProperty (cert.c:703) ==17318== by 0x4EAB7AF: CertContext_GetHashProp (cert.c:399) ==17318== by 0x4EAB9DB: CertContext_GetProperty (cert.c:445) ==17318== by 0x4EABFDA: CertGetCertificateContextProperty (cert.c:579) ==17318== by 0x4EADEF3: compare_cert_by_sha1_hash (cert.c:1368) ==17318== by 0x4EAE423: cert_compare_certs_in_store (cert.c:1530) ==17318== by 0x4EAEF02: CertFindCertificateInStore (cert.c:1794) ==17318== by 0x4EAAD3C: add_cert_to_store (cert.c:192) ==17318== by 0x4EAB27F: CertAddCertificateContextToStore (cert.c:287) ==17318== by 0x4EAA852: CertAddEncodedCertificateToStore (cert.c:65) ==17318== by 0x4CC9495: testAddCert (cert.c:198) ==17318== by 0x4CD8F2F: func_cert (cert.c:3976) ==17318== by 0x4D33F67: run_test (test.h:584) ==17318== by 0x4D34356: main (test.h:654) ==17318== ==17318== 20 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 52 of 334 ==17318== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==17318== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==17318== by 0x4EE398B: CryptMemAlloc (main.c:124) ==17318== by 0x4EF7661: ContextPropertyList_SetProperty (proplist.c:132) ==17318== by 0x4EF788F: ContextPropertyList_Copy (proplist.c:215) ==17318== by 0x4EBE9AF: Context_CopyProperties (context.c:130) ==17318== by 0x4EAAB6C: Cert_clone (cert.c:139) ==17318== by 0x4F03664: MemStore_addContext (store.c:151) ==17318== by 0x4F03A35: MemStore_addCert (store.c:243) ==17318== by 0x4EAB119: add_cert_to_store (cert.c:263) ==17318== by 0x4EAB27F: CertAddCertificateContextToStore (cert.c:287) ==17318== by 0x4EAA852: CertAddEncodedCertificateToStore (cert.c:65) ==17318== by 0x4CC9495: testAddCert (cert.c:198) ==17318== by 0x4CD8F2F: func_cert (cert.c:3976) ==17318== by 0x4D33F67: run_test (test.h:584) ==17318== by 0x4D34356: main (test.h:654) ==17318== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 10