- Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 53469] New: RuneScape 3 : Game Crashes with page fault
by WineHQ Bugzilla Aug. 1, 2022

Aug. 1, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53469 Bug ID: 53469 Summary: RuneScape 3 : Game Crashes with page fault Product: Wine Version: 7.14 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: allan4229(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 72830 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=72830 backtrace provided by wine itself After installing the game, the game will randomly crash with page fault, as per the attached file. Some valuable mentions : - I'm using i3wm, so, for some testings I've added some workspace assignments to avoid "BadWindow" error. - Sometimes the page fault occurs at the address 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF instead of 0x0000000000000000 . Depending on the wine version being used. - For some versions of wine, I got the error "corrupted double-linked list". - For some versions of wine, I got the error "double free" related do malloc (I don't remember exactly the error message, but the default one when you try to call free() twice). - Wine custom version lutris-7.2-2-x86_64 lasts longer in-game before crashing. - I'm pretty sure it has something to do with the graphics, because : 1. It lasts longer before crashing if you set graphics to min value 2. It crashes when attempting to increase the graphic settings in-game - It STILL crashes on min graphics - I got "malloc(): unsorted double linked list corrupted" after 20 mins in-game, for example. Related to "Compatibility Mode": - "BadWindow" error still occurs in compatibility mode even when trying to set a global regex. After checking by monitoring windows' names I had noticed that it tries to open an unnamed window that may be the cause. - Even when the "BadWindow" error does not occur in Compatibility mode I got only black-screen/crash in-game. System : - Wine staging 7.14 (winehq mirror - https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/dists/) - Lutris to enable DXVK, VKD3D and D3D extras. - Debian testing - Kernel 5.18.0-9.1-liquorix-amd64 - amdgpu (POLARIS 10) - Program https://content.runescape.com/downloads/windows/RuneScape-Setup.exe ```sh sha1sum RuneScape-Setup.exe bee061914639601d7e602f9653f883bdac7da3a1 RuneScape-Setup.exe ``` PS : if you're wondering why using it instead of the native client... well... dxvk gets up to 5x more FPS (twice as dx native) and the latency is a lot better (at the native client it feels like 400ms of input lag). That's why. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 53463] New: Subnautica crashes at new game
by WineHQ Bugzilla July 31, 2022

July 31, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53463 Bug ID: 53463 Summary: Subnautica crashes at new game Product: Wine Version: 7.14 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: d3d Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: ozan.turkyilmaz(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 72827 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=72827 backtrace I have Subnautica version Feb-2021 68598 from Epic Store. I start the game and it starts fine. It even rightfully complains about my machines low specs. I then start a new game and then it crashes after working on for a while. The backstace is attached. ::::::: root(a)ozan.turkyilmaz.com ::::::::::::::::::: ------------------------ ::::::::::::::::::::::::: OS: Slackware 15.0 x86_64 x86_64 ::::::::cllcccccllllllll:::::: Host: LENOVO 20L5000AMH :::::::::lc dc::::::: Kernel: 5.15.38 ::::::::cl clllccllll oc::::::::: Uptime: 20 hours, 4 mins :::::::::o lc::::::::co oc:::::::::: Packages: 2115 (pkgtool), 11 (flatpak) ::::::::::o cccclc:::::clcc:::::::::::: Shell: bash 5.1.16 :::::::::::lc cclccclc::::::::::::: Resolution: 1920x1080 ::::::::::::::lcclcc lc:::::::::::: DE: KDE5 ::::::::::cclcc:::::lccclc oc::::::::::: WM: KWin ::::::::::o l::::::::::l lc::::::::::: Theme: GTK+ [GTK2], Adwaita [GTK3] :::::cll:o clcllcccll o::::::::::: Icons: Adwaita [GTK2/3] :::::occ:o clc::::::::::: Terminal: xfce4-terminal ::::ocl:ccslclccclclccclclc::::::::::::: Terminal Font: Monospace 12 :::oclcccccccccccccllllllllllllll::::: CPU: Intel i7-8550U (8) @ 4.000GHz ::lcc1lcccccccccccccccccccccccco:::: GPU: Intel UHD Graphics 620 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Memory: 5266MiB / 15889MiB :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::: -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 53467] New: evr:evr sometimes crashes on Windows
by WineHQ Bugzilla July 31, 2022

July 31, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53467 Bug ID: 53467 Summary: evr:evr sometimes crashes on Windows Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com evr:evr sometimes crashes on Windows: * 2022-07-05 w864-64 03f8:evr: 921 tests executed (0 marked as todo, 0 failures), 0 skipped. evr.c:3105: this is the last test seen before the exception 03f8:evr: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00007FFDBDCF7774 * 2022-07-06 w864-64 No trace from the child -> earlier crash? 092c:evr: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00007FFDBCA57764 * 2022-07-08 w1064-tsign-32 evr.c:2123: Test failed: Unexpected size 0 x 0. evr.c:2136: Test failed: Unexpected size 0 x 0. evr.c:2287: Test failed: Failed to create default presenter, hr 0x80070008. evr.c:2287: this is the last test seen before the exception 1bf0:evr: unhandled exception c0000005 at 004030FB The 3 crash modes all started happening at about the same time and seem to all still be happening. So it is likely they all have the same cause. The first Windows crash happened on 2022-07-05 and crashes are rare enough to not happen every day. So it is possible that the crashes are caused by the patch that fixed the Wine crashes (see bug 53201). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 53466] New: kernel32:sync sometimes crashes with STATUS_RESOURCE_NOT_OWNED on Windows
by WineHQ Bugzilla July 31, 2022

July 31, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53466 Bug ID: 53466 Summary: kernel32:sync sometimes crashes with STATUS_RESOURCE_NOT_OWNED on Windows Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: kernel32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com kernel32:sync sometimes crashes with STATUS_RESOURCE_NOT_OWNED on Windows: kernel32:sync start dlls/kernel32/tests/sync.c sync.c:596: memory resource notifications not supported 07bc:sync: unhandled exception c0000264 at 00007FFDCF54D1B0 https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#kernel32:sync This happens on all Windows versions, from Windows 7 to Windows 10 21H2. kernel32:sync also crashed once due to a stack overflow (2022-07-27 w10pro64-hi-u8-64): kernel32:sync start dlls/kernel32/tests/sync.c sync.c:596: memory resource notifications not supported kernel32:sync:16a8 done (-1073740791) in 2s Where -1073740791 == 0xc0000409 == STATUS_STACK_BUFFER_OVERRUN. It's not clear if these two are related. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 51182] New: test_write_console() fails in conhost:tty on Windows 1909
by WineHQ Bugzilla July 31, 2022

July 31, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51182 Bug ID: 51182 Summary: test_write_console() fails in conhost:tty on Windows 1909 Product: Wine Version: 6.8 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com test_write_console() fails in conhost:tty on Windows 1909, probably because conhost.exe is broken in Windows 10 <= 2004: tty.c:581: Test failed: 0: expected "abc" got "\x1b[H \x1b[32m0\x1b[41m1\x1b[30m2\x1b[m\x1b[20X\x1b[20C\r\n\x1b[30X\x1b[30C\r\n\x1b[30X\x1b[30C\r\n abc \x1b[30ma\x1b[m\x1b[17X\x1b[17C\r\n child z\r\nz\x1b[29X\x1b[29C\r\n bo\x1b[30m\r\nxxx890\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\x1b[30m\r\nx"... tty.c:586: Test failed: 0: expected " " got "\x1b[H \x1b[32m0\x1b[41m1\x1b[30m2\x1b[m\x1b[20X\x1b[20C\r\n\x1b[30X\x1b[30C\r\n\x1b[30X\x1b[30C\r\n abc \x1b[30ma\x1b[m\x1b[17X\x1b[17C\r\n child z\r\nz\x1b[29X\x1b[29C\r\n bo\x1b[30m\r\nxxx890\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\x1b[30m\r\nx"... tty.c:587: Test failed: 0: expected "t" got "\x1b[H \x1b[32m0\x1b[41m1\x1b[30m2\x1b[m\x1b[20X\x1b[20C\r\n\x1b[30X\x1b[30C\r\n\x1b[30X\x1b[30C\r\n abc \x1b[30ma\x1b[m\x1b[17X\x1b[17C\r\n child z\r\nz\x1b[29X\x1b[29C\r\n bo\x1b[30m\r\nxxx890\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\x1b[30m\r\nx"... tty.c:589: Test failed: expected empty buffer, got "\x1b[H \x1b[32m0\x1b[41m1\x1b[30m2\x1b[m\x1b[20X\x1b[20C\r\n\x1b[30X\x1b[30C\r\n\x1b[30X\x1b[30C\r\n abc \x1b[30ma\x1b[m\x1b[17X\x1b[17C\r\n child z\r\nz\x1b[29X\x1b[29C\r\n bo\x1b[30m\r\nxxx890\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\x1b[30m\r\nx"... tty.c:593: Test failed: 0: expected "\rr abc tx" got "\x1b[m\rr abc tx\x1b[4;2H\x1b[?25h" tty.c:595: Test failed: 0: expected "\x1b[4;2H" got "\x1b[m\rr abc tx\x1b[4;2H\x1b[?25h" tty.c:596: Test failed: 0: expected "\x1b[?25h" got "\x1b[m\rr abc tx\x1b[4;2H\x1b[?25h" tty.c:597: Test failed: expected empty buffer, got "\x1b[m\rr abc tx\x1b[4;2H\x1b[?25h" tty.c:666: Test failed: Read file failed: 996 tty.c:666: Test failed: 0: expected "\x1b[11;29H" got "\x08\x1b[?25h" tty.c:667: Test failed: 0: expected "\x1b[?25h" got "\x08\x1b[?25h" tty.c:669: Test failed: expected empty buffer, got "\x08\x1b[?25h" tty.c:694: Test failed: 0: expected "\r\nc" got "\x1b[?25h" tty.c:706: Test failed: 0: expected "\x1b[40;29H" got "\r\nc\x1b[29X\x1b[29C\x1b[40;29H\x1b[?25h" tty.c:708: Test failed: expected empty buffer, got "\r\nc\x1b[29X\x1b[29C\x1b[40;29H\x1b[?25h" tty.c:729: Test failed: 0: expected "\n" got "\x1b[?25h" tty.c:730: Test failed: 0: expected "\x1b[30X" got "\x1b[?25h" tty.c:731: Test failed: 0: expected "\x1b[30C" got "\x1b[?25h" tty.c:732: Test failed: 0: expected "\r" got "\x1b[?25h" tty.c:741: Test failed: 0: expected "\x1b[12;29H" got "\r\n\x1b[Habcchild z\r\n123\x1b[27X\x1b[27C\r\ncde bo\x1b[30m\r\nxxx890\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\x1b[30m\r\nxx5677\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\x1b[30m\r\n902344\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\r\n xxx\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\r\n\x1b[30X\x1b[30C\r\n "... tty.c:746: Test failed: 0: expected "43\x08" got "\r\n\x1b[Habcchild z\r\n123\x1b[27X\x1b[27C\r\ncde bo\x1b[30m\r\nxxx890\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\x1b[30m\r\nxx5677\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\x1b[30m\r\n902344\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\r\n xxx\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\r\n\x1b[30X\x1b[30C\r\n "... tty.c:748: Test failed: expected empty buffer, got "\r\n\x1b[Habcchild z\r\n123\x1b[27X\x1b[27C\r\ncde bo\x1b[30m\r\nxxx890\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\x1b[30m\r\nxx5677\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\x1b[30m\r\n902344\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\r\n xxx\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\r\n\x1b[30X\x1b[30C\r\n "... tty.c:752: Test failed: 0: expected "\x08" got "43\x1b[12;29H\x1b[?25h" tty.c:756: Test failed: expected hide cursor escape tty.c:757: Test failed: 0: expected "23" got "43\x1b[12;29H\x1b[?25h" tty.c:759: Test failed: 0: expected "\x1b[12;29H" got "43\x1b[12;29H\x1b[?25h" tty.c:760: Test failed: 0: expected "\x1b[?25h" got "43\x1b[12;29H\x1b[?25h" tty.c:761: Test failed: expected empty buffer, got "43\x1b[12;29H\x1b[?25h" tty.c:789: Test failed: 0: expected "\x1b[28C" got "\x1b[Habcchild z\r\n123\x1b[27X\x1b[27C\r\ncde bo\x1b[30m\r\nxxx890\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\x1b[30m\r\nxx5677\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\x1b[30m\r\n902344\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\r\n xxx\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\r\n\x1b[30X\x1b[30C\r\n "... tty.c:791: Test failed: expected empty buffer, got "\x1b[Habcchild z\r\n123\x1b[27X\x1b[27C\r\ncde bo\x1b[30m\r\nxxx890\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\x1b[30m\r\nxx5677\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\x1b[30m\r\n902344\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\r\n xxx\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\r\n\x1b[30X\x1b[30C\r\n "... tty.c:862: Test failed: 0: expected "\x1b[21;29H" got "\x1b[Habcchild z\r\n123\x1b[27X\x1b[27C\r\ncde bo\x1b[30m\r\nxxx890\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\x1b[30m\r\nxx5677\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\x1b[30m\r\n902344\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\r\n xxx\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\r\n\x1b[30X\x1b[30C\r\n "... tty.c:864: Test failed: expected empty buffer, got "\x1b[Habcchild z\r\n123\x1b[27X\x1b[27C\r\ncde bo\x1b[30m\r\nxxx890\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\x1b[30m\r\nxx5677\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\x1b[30m\r\n902344\x1b[m\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\r\n xxx\x1b[24X\x1b[24C\r\n\x1b[30X\x1b[30C\r\n "... These failures can be reproduced on cw-rx46-1909, wc-gtx560-1909 and the TestBot's w1064v1909: https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#conhost.exe:tty They don't happen on Windows 10 1809 and lower because the test detects that conhost.exe is broken there: tty.c:1645: Tests skipped: Skipping tty output tests on broken Windows version And the test succeeds on Windows 10 >= 2004 (or rather has unrelated failures). So it looks like 1909 fell between the cracks and that the test should skip too somehow. This test was introduced by the commit below: commit 5d96c5aac883b343ddcfbe6f6b1b96ad6827a46b Author: Jacek Caban <jacek(a)codeweavers.com> AuthorDate: Fri Sep 11 14:31:24 2020 +0200 Commit: Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> CommitDate: Fri Sep 11 16:55:40 2020 +0200 conhost/tests: Add WriteConsole tests. Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban <jacek(a)codeweavers.com> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 14797] New: Setting up SSL Email access
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 31, 2022

July 31, 2022

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14797 Summary: Setting up SSL Email access Product: Wine Version: 1.0.0 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: msetzerii(a)gmail.com Pegasus Mail is a critical program that I use on my only windows 98, and am looking to move to complete linux. The regular email via port 25 and 110 seem to work fine, but with accounts like gmail, one must use secure ports 995 and 465. Attempts to do this result in no trace file. I'm not clear if and how these ports need to be activated in wine, or if some dll needs to be added. There isn't any error message, it just fails with no trace information available. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 66

[Bug 53202] New: shell32:autocomplete - test_custom_source() sometimes does not get autocompletion on Windows
by WineHQ Bugzilla July 31, 2022

July 31, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53202 Bug ID: 53202 Summary: shell32:autocomplete - test_custom_source() sometimes does not get autocompletion on Windows Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: shell32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com shell32:autocomplete - test_custom_source() sometimes does not get autocompletion on Windows: autocomplete.c:733: Test failed: Expected L"auto complete", got L"au" autocomplete.c:734: Test failed: Expected 1 reset, got 0 autocomplete.c:740: Test failed: Expected 1 reset, got 0 autocomplete.c:743: Test failed: Expected 1 reset, got 0 https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#shell32:autocomplete This is known to happen on Windows 10 1507 to 21H1 but the failure rate is pretty low. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 53459] New: wininet:http - test_security_flags() sometimes fails on Windows due to a security channel error
by WineHQ Bugzilla July 31, 2022

July 31, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53459 Bug ID: 53459 Summary: wininet:http - test_security_flags() sometimes fails on Windows due to a security channel error Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wininet Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com wininet:http - test_security_flags() sometimes fails on Windows due to a security channel error: http.c:6590: Test failed: req_error = 12157 http.c:6598: Test failed: expected status 30 (INTERNET_STATUS_SENDING_REQUEST) 1 times, received 0 times http.c:6599: Test failed: expected status 31 (INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_SENT) 1 times, received 0 times http.c:6600: Test failed: expected status 40 (INTERNET_STATUS_RECEIVING_RESPONSE) 1 times, received 0 times http.c:6601: Test failed: expected status 41 (INTERNET_STATUS_RESPONSE_RECEIVED) 1 times, received 0 times http.c:6606: Test failed: flags = 8, expected 0 http.c:6607: Test failed: INTERNET_OPTION_SECURITY_FLAGS flags = 1180, expected 20001181 http.c:6607: Test failed: INTERNET_OPTION_SECURITY_FLAGS(98) flags = 1180, expected 20001181 http.c:6612: Test failed: size = 0 https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#wininet:http This failure is quite rare (~1.2%) and seems to only happen on Windows 7 and 8. * 2022-04-27 cw-rx460 (win81) and w864 * 2022-05-18 cw-rx460 (win81) * 2022-05-19 w7u-el * 2022-07-29 w864 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 53457] New: Rosetta Stone 3.45 Failing to Launch
by WineHQ Bugzilla July 30, 2022

July 30, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 Bug ID: 53457 Summary: Rosetta Stone 3.45 Failing to Launch Product: Wine Version: 7.12 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: exDragon945(a)protonmail.com Distribution: --- I have tried running this program in Bottles, directly on system wine and PlayonLinux ( so I can use old Wine versions like 2.2.1-staging). The program launches into its GUI but its GUI throws an error that I have not been able to find an explanation for. Fatal Application Error: #2111 Error #2032 In any way I launch it, it always goes to the GUI to show these errors but the terminal errors change depending on how I launch it. When launching it with system wine, I get these errors: 0070:fixme:imm:ImeSetActiveContext (007BB960, 0): stub 0070:fixme:imm:ImmReleaseContext (00010020, 007BB960): stub 0100:fixme:imm:ImeSetActiveContext (00B31D80, 1): stub 0100:fixme:imm:ImmReleaseContext (0001006C, 00B31D80): stub 0100:fixme:ntdll:NtQuerySystemInformation info_class SYSTEM_PERFORMANCE_INFORMATION When launching with bottles, I get these errors: Windows path detected. Avoiding validation. 002c:err:wineboot:process_run_key Error running cmd L"C:\\windows\\system32\\winemenubuilder.exe -a -r" (126).\ When running it with PlayonLinux I get these errors: Gtk-CRITICAL **: 18:52:50.218: gtk_window_resize: assertion 'width > 0' failed Message: Notice: PlayOnLinux deliberately disables winemenubuilder. See http://www.playonlinux.com/fr/page-26-Winemenubuilder.html -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 53454] New: kernel32:loader - map_image_section() sometimes gets the test dll instead of fallback
by WineHQ Bugzilla July 30, 2022

July 30, 2022

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53454 Bug ID: 53454 Summary: kernel32:loader - map_image_section() sometimes gets the test dll instead of fallback Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: kernel32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com kernel32:loader - map_image_section() sometimes gets the test dll instead of fallback: loader.c:691: Test failed: 1444: got test dll but expected fallback https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#kernel32:loader Nowadays it only happens in 64-bit on w1064v1709 and w10pro64 (21H1). But in the past very similar failures happened in both 32-bit and 64-bit on cw-gtx560 and cw-rx460 when running Windows 10 1709. For instance: loader.c:716: Test failed: 1444: got test dll but expected fallback loader.c:716: Test failed: 1450: got test dll but expected fallback loader.c:716: Test failed: 1456: got test dll but expected fallback loader.c:716: Test failed: 1463: got test dll but expected fallback loader.c:716: Test failed: 1490: got test dll but expected fallback or loader.c:716: Test failed: 1330: got test dll but expected fallback loader.c:716: Test failed: 1337: got test dll but expected fallback loader.c:716: Test failed: 1344: got test dll but expected fallback loader.c:716: Test failed: 1352: got test dll but expected fallback loader.c:716: Test failed: 1359: got test dll but expected fallback loader.c:716: Test failed: 1369: got test dll but expected fallback loader.c:716: Test failed: 1374: got test dll but expected fallback loader.c:716: Test failed: 1379: got test dll but expected fallback loader.c:716: Test failed: 1384: got test dll but expected fallback loader.c:716: Test failed: 1389: got test dll but expected fallback But these machines have been retired. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1