- Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 2753] New: WM_NCCALCSIZE returns bogus values when WS_BORDER & (0,0;0,0)
by Wine Bugs Feb. 24, 2005

Feb. 24, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2753 Summary: WM_NCCALCSIZE returns bogus values when WS_BORDER & (0,0;0,0) Product: Wine Version: CVS Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: wine-gui AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: carl.sopchak(a)cegis123.com DefWindowProcA returns a window size of (1,1;1,1) when it processes message WM_NCCALCSIZE on a window with a rectangle size of (0,0;0,0) and a style of WS_BORDER. It should return (0,0;0,0). I tried using the wine-devel mailing list to get help with how to fix it, but I have not received a reply. Unfortunately, I'm not exactly sure HOW this should be fixed, without potentially causing colateral damage. The thread title is "Recent CVS update causes Quicken popup problem/Help please". Here is the final part of the thread, which explains what is happening within wine: On Monday, February 21, 2005 03:43 pm, Rein Klazes wrote: > On 10 Feb 2005 21:19:46 +0100, you wrote: > > Carl Sopchak <carl.sopchak_at_cegis123.com> writes: > > > I guess my problem is that I have NO CLUE as to how this SHOULD be > > > handled. Should the style be set to (style & ~WS_VISIBLE) when the > > > rectangle is {0,0;0,0}? Should {0,0;0,0} be considered a valid > > > rectangle in validate_window_rectangles()? Should > > > validate_window_rectangles() only get called if the rectangle is not > > > {0,0;0,0}? Or, very possibly, is there something else that should > > > happen? Just to see what happened, I commented out the call to > > > validate_window_rectangles, and the popup disappeared as it should. > > > > The client rectangle should have been set to {0,0;0,0} too. You should > > look at the WM_NCCALCSIZE processing (SWP_DoNCCalcSize in > > dlls/x11drv/winpos.c) and check what's happening there with the > > rectangles. > > Experimenting for another issue, I noticed today: > > If I execute this under Win2K for a window with the WS_BORDER style: > | MoveWindow( hwnd, 0,0,0,0,0); > | GetWindowRect ( hwnd, &rc); > | trace(" 1. %ld,%ld-%ld,%ld\n", rc.left,rc.top, rc.right, rc.bottom); > | DefWindowProcA(hwnd, WM_NCCALCSIZE, 0, (LPARAM)&rc); > | trace(" 2. %ld,%ld-%ld,%ld\n", rc.left,rc.top, rc.right, rc.bottom); > > this is the result: > > 1. 0,0-0,0 > 2. 1,1-1,1 > > It seems to me this should be allowed as valid. > > Rein. This is the same issue. I had sent the following under another subject, so it didn't get "attached" to this thread, but here is what I found upon further investigation: Ok, so what is happening is this: In dlls/x11drv/winpos.c, the pNewWindowRect is coming into SWP_DoNCCalcSize as (0,0;0,0), wndPtr->rectWindow is (182,977;662;998), and wndPty->rectClient is (183,978;661,997). Then winpos.c sends it's own WM_NCCALCSIZE message, and upon return, params.rgrc[0] is (1,1;1,1)! This, in turn, causes the third and fourth conditions in the section commented as "If the application sends back garbage, ignore it" to be true, which in turn causes the next condition to be false, so the client rectangle (pNewClientRect) does NOT get set. (Follow that?? <g>) Tracing through the processing of this WM_NCCALCSIZE, I find it ends up generating two WM_NCCALCSIZE messages, one being handled by DefWindowProc32. This leads me to ./windows/defwnd.c, which calls NC_HandleNCCalcSize in ./windows/nonclient.c. Within NC_HandleNCCalcSize, a call is made to NC_AdjustRectOuter, then the window's rectangle (winRect) is adjusted based on this call. It is this call and adjustment of winRect that changes winRect from (0,0;0,0) to (1,1;-1,-1), which is later "fixed" to (1,1;1,1). Diving deeper, into NC_AdjustRectOuter, I find that because the window style has WS_BOARDER set, adjust is set to 1, then InflateRect is called, which sets rect to (-1,-1;1,1) [returned to NC_HandleNCCalcSize tmpRect variable]. So, there's the problem. The new rectangle size is (0,0;0,0), but has WS_BOARDER set, so the WM_NCCALCSIZE message returns (1,1;1,1) erroneously. The only thing is, I'm still not sure where the "best" place would be to check for the new window rectangle of (0,0;0,0) and handle it appropriately - or what "appropriate" would be, for that matter... Further help would be appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 2752] New: Font too small / char invisible
by Wine Bugs Feb. 24, 2005

Feb. 24, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2752 Summary: Font too small / char invisible Product: Wine Version: 20050211 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-programs AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: vlsn(a)wanadoo.fr Bonjour, On my desktop (resolution 1280x1024, wine without M$), it is very difficult to read menu / title. Is it possible to allow the font configuration at the first start / with a wine-programme / control panel ? In french, special char é è ê ... doesn't appear with the default font. Thank a lot for your answer. Vincent from FRANCE PS.: i have un snapshot if necessary -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 2751] New: messages
by Wine Bugs Feb. 24, 2005

Feb. 24, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2751 Summary: messages Product: Wine Version: 20050111 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-loader AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: tamay.yugnuk(a)gmail.com When I install any program (office or win98) wiht wine "fixme:font:load_VDMX No suitable ratio found" give me this message and stop. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 66] PrgWin95: Custom cursor display bug
by Wine Bugs Feb. 23, 2005

Feb. 23, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66 ------- Additional Comments From us(a)the-edmeades.demon.co.uk 2005-23-02 16:11 ------- This is not going to be fixed in a hurry... I looked into this and the problem is the use of the XOR bits of the cursor. From the comment in x11drv/mouse.c: * We have to do some magic here, as cursors are not fully * compatible between Windows and X11. Under X11, there * are only 3 possible color cursor: black, white and * masked. So we map the 4th Windows color (invert the * bits on the screen) to black and an additional white bit on * an other place (+1,+1). This require some boolean arithmetic: If you look closely at the cursor, thats why it looks odd. The cursor is stripes of black, white, XOR and AND - The XOR is emulated by producing a shadow (which doesnt look great, but I suspect its the specific cursor being done here) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 2728] Dead City game page fault on execution - DirectX.c error?
by Wine Bugs Feb. 23, 2005

Feb. 23, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2728 us(a)the-edmeades.demon.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #772 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From us(a)the-edmeades.demon.co.uk 2005-23-02 15:10 ------- Created an attachment (id=773) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=773&action=view) Patch for both problems D'oh - Bug introduced as we get wined3d better supported. wined3d needs a temporary fix, please use this attachment which I'll submit to wine-patches as well -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 2728] Dead City game page fault on execution - DirectX.c error?
by Wine Bugs Feb. 23, 2005

Feb. 23, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2728 ------- Additional Comments From nyyr(a)seznam.cz 2005-23-02 14:50 ------- Created an attachment (id=772) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=772&action=view) WINEDEBUG=+d3d_caps...... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 2728] Dead City game page fault on execution - DirectX.c error?
by Wine Bugs Feb. 23, 2005

Feb. 23, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2728 ------- Additional Comments From nyyr(a)seznam.cz 2005-23-02 14:49 ------- So, i applied that patch. Now the game displayed 3D configuration window, i choosed D3D HAL using hardware acc. 16-bit depth and windowed mode. black window showing "loading" test appeared and then another exception was raised. So i put applied that patch also to directx.c in ddls/d3d8/. Now the game is running, but is terribly SLOW. On exit from the game it raises another exception - see log: -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 50] PrgWin95: Text justification needs beefing up
by Wine Bugs Feb. 23, 2005

Feb. 23, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50 ------- Additional Comments From us(a)the-edmeades.demon.co.uk 2005-23-02 14:47 ------- http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-cvs/2005/02/0447.html Can you test with this and see if its back to where it was originally please? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 2261] crash while running "The Game of Life" cdrom
by Wine Bugs Feb. 23, 2005

Feb. 23, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2261 ------- Additional Comments From swaters(a)luy.info 2005-23-02 13:19 ------- Nah, this is on Debian unstable. -s -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 2261] crash while running "The Game of Life" cdrom
by Wine Bugs Feb. 23, 2005

Feb. 23, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2261 ------- Additional Comments From Steven_Ed4153(a)yahoo.com 2005-23-02 11:45 ------- Does this happen to be on suse 9.2? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0