http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55775 --- Comment #42 from Stian Low <wineryyyyy@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Austin English from comment #40)
Which part is passive aggressive and should be left off?
Thanks for clarifying. I was being blunt which may have come off as aggressive but not intended as in some passive way. I was explaining to reporter that I'll try to get these bugs fixed but I have spent considerable time tracking the history of this particular bug to better understand how best to fix it which includes: 1. Attempts by some codeweavers around the time Haven bug was originally reported back in 2020 to commit what was approved for proton but rejected for vanilla - https://list.winehq.org/hyperkitty/list/wine-devel@list.winehq.org/message/C... 2. MR-11398 which is a far more trivial fix/workaround but also at risk of being rejected - https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/11398#note_146433 So I may have over speculated about why dxvk exists. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.