October 2003 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

loader crash
by Maxime Bellengé Oct. 10, 2003

Oct. 10, 2003

Hello, For two days, I have been having crash when I start wine. Here is an example of the backtrace Wine-dbg>bt Backtrace: =>0 0x40064525 (LdrInitializeThunk+0x205(main_file=0x4, unknown2=0x0, unknown3=0x0, unknown4=0x0) [loader.c:1805] in libntdll.dll.so) (ebp=40832f20) 1 0x4025b4bf (start_process+0x8f(arg=0x0) [process.c:171] in kernel32.dll.so) (ebp=40832ff4) 2 0x4009c9d1 (wine_switch_to_stack+0x11 in libwine.so.1) (ebp=00000000) Whatever executable I test, I get that. I suspect that the changes in loader.c are cause of that but it is out of my skills. loader:1805 is : NtTerminateProcess(GetCurrentProcess(), entry( peb)); and the debug message is : invalid address 0x00000037 so I suspect a null pointer in that line. I use a redhat 9, with nptl, if that can help. Anyone can give me an hint on how to investigate my problem. I have tried to recompile everything to be sure but that didn't solve the crash. -- Maxime Bellengé <maxime.bellenge(a)laposte.net>

1 1

DameWare Mini Remote Control vs Wine
by Tom Hibbert Oct. 10, 2003

Oct. 10, 2003

Hi guys, I'm running DameWare Mini Remote Control under Wine here. This is a pretty cool setup as some of our clients have no windows servers (only linux), and the idea is that we can VNC to a Linux firewall or file server and then use DameWare through Wine to take control of PCs that we need to remotely administer. DameWare has a handy function to actually install the service on a remote box using RPC. Just by looking at the debug logs, what it does is create a temporary share on the machine its running from and then connect to the remote box's admin$ share where it (presumably) executes the installer. Unfortunately wine's RPC implementation doesn't seem to go far enough for this to work. I've tried loading dlls natively (going all the way up to advapi32) and I get ever increasing errors. Mainly its complaining about missing implementations for (presumably) rarely used rpc functions. Maybe one of you RPC gurus would like to take a look at it. Tom Hibbert Technical Specialist Network Service Providers Ltd. Phone: +64-9-306-0230 Mobile: +64-27-430-7784 Email: tom(a)nsp.co.nz Website: http://www.nsp.co.nz The information in this email and any attachments is confidential. This information may be subject to legal, professional, or other privilege. It must not be disclosed to any person without our authority. If you are not the intended recipient you are not authorised to and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. Please return this message to the sender immediately and delete any and all copies from your system.

2 1

Purchase Viagra, Diet Pills, and other prescriptions with no Prescription i
by Pete Douglas Oct. 10, 2003

Oct. 10, 2003

1 0

Re: Problem with today's dlls/oleaut32 changes
by Jon Griffiths Oct. 10, 2003

Oct. 10, 2003

Hi, --- Gerald Pfeifer <gerald(a)pfeifer.com> wrote: > Would you mind having a look? Thanks, What version of gcc are you using? I don't get this warning. However, It will be gone shortly, all the conversion functions have been re-written (patches coming v. shortly). So I guess you can ignore this for now. Cheers, Jon ===== "Don't wait for the seas to part, or messiahs to come; Don't you sit around and waste this chance..." - Live jon_p_griffiths(a)yahoo.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com

2 6

re: DameWare Mini Remote Control vs Wine
by Dan Kegel Oct. 10, 2003

Oct. 10, 2003

There's source for a small regression test program at http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/8395/exploit/ which checks to make sure DameWare's server is giving unauthorized users administrator access :-) Might be fun to see if that works against a DameWare server running on Wine (if and when wine is improved to support DameWare)... - Dan -- Dan Kegel http://www.kegel.com http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045

1 0

Re: [janitor] programs/wcmd -Wwrite-strings cleanup
by Dimitrie O. Paun Oct. 10, 2003

Oct. 10, 2003

On 8 Oct 2003, Daniel Marmier wrote: > Fixed warnings with gcc option "-Wwrite-strings". BTW, how far away are we from always compiling with -Wwrite-strings? -- Dimi.

4 3

Re: wine/dlls/kernel kernel_main.c Makefile.in
by Dimitrie O. Paun Oct. 10, 2003

Oct. 10, 2003

On October 9, 2003 08:50 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > We can now use the standard DllMain as entry point. Cool, what about the one in user32: [dimi(a)dimi wine.src]$ grep DLLMAIN `find -name "Makefile.in"` ./dlls/user/Makefile.in:DLLMAIN = UserClientDllInitialize(a)12 It's the last one, we could get rid of the DLLMAIN stuff... -- Dimi.

1 0

Re: patch for error handling after driver callback calls.
by Alexandre Julliard Oct. 9, 2003

Oct. 9, 2003

Dave_Belanger(a)cimmetry.com writes: > (See attached file: patch_callbacks_return.txt) The idea is that the DC interface functions should behave just like the corresponding APIs, so if the API returns the old value the DC function should do that too. This way it guarantees that we can implement the full behavior of the API in the driver. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

1 0

Re: patch for EMFDRV_UpdateBBox
by Alexandre Julliard Oct. 9, 2003

Oct. 9, 2003

Dave_Belanger(a)cimmetry.com writes: > (See attached file: patch_emf_updatebbox.txt) Is there a reason you are not using LPtoDP() here? -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

1 0

Re: Detect alternatives to w3m
by Dimitrie O. Paun Oct. 9, 2003

Oct. 9, 2003

On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Francois Gouget wrote: > > I did not know about w3m before I saw this patch. More well-known and > widely spread alternatives are lynx and links which are command-line > compatible with w3m. So I propose to also look for them. Yeah, I didn't know about w3m either. Wouldn't a configure check be better here? -- Dimi.

4 6