- Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: Definition of IMessageFilter in objidl.h
by Dmitry Timoshkov Dec. 15, 2004

Dec. 15, 2004

"Serge S. Spiridonoff" <sss(a)corbina.net> wrote: > IMessageFilter::HandleInComingCall is defined as HandleIncomingCall in > include/wine/windows/objidl.h (.idl) > Note the capital 'C' in 'InComing' in MS headers. > Is it a misprint? Yes. Please send a patch. -- Dmitry.

2 1

Definition of IMessageFilter in objidl.h
by Serge S. Spiridonoff Dec. 15, 2004

Dec. 15, 2004

Hi, IMessageFilter::HandleInComingCall is defined as HandleIncomingCall in include/wine/windows/objidl.h (.idl) Note the capital 'C' in 'InComing' in MS headers. Is it a misprint? Thanks

1 0

Re: Should we get rid of the wine-license list?
by Ivan Leo Puoti Dec. 15, 2004

Dec. 15, 2004

> OK, I'll take it down. Shall I remove the archives as well? Or simply > leave them for historical type purposes? IMHO we should keep the archives. Ivan. ____________________________________________________________ Regala e regalati Libero ADSL: 3 mesi gratis, navighi veloce e scarichi a 1.2 Mega. Abbonati subito senza costi di attivazione su http://www.libero.it

1 0

State of the Msi
by Aric Stewart Dec. 15, 2004

Dec. 15, 2004

Hi all, Long time no post :) I just wanted to give an update that Mike M. and I have done alot of msi work over the first few weeks of December which caused a few significant changes to particularly action.c where we eliminated many of the static buffers for file paths and replaced them with dynamic buffers. Vitaly Lipatov's patchs reminded me that i should probably give you all a heads up about that. We where going to break them down and start submitting them but then Mike went off and got married and is on his Honeymoon. So when he gets back we are going to either break the changes down into smaller patches or try to get Alexandre to approve a big one. I will start trying to get some of the smaller ones broken down and submitted in the meantime. Vitaly Lipatov's patchs do not directly conflict with anything so we are just fine there. I will work them into our tree so that i can be sure they are not lost. But if anyone else is also doing msi work you may want to check in here so that we can make sure it all fits together ok. Thanks, -aric

1 0

Re: VERSION_GetLinkedDllVersion bug fix
by William Lahti Dec. 15, 2004

Dec. 15, 2004

Upon further review, the patch works. Stupid me. William

1 0

Re: Include file cleanup : dce.h
by Alexandre Julliard Dec. 15, 2004

Dec. 15, 2004

Rémi Assailly <remi.assailly(a)free.fr> writes: > Changelog: > * get rid of dce.h > --- dlls/x11drv/winpos.c 2004-12-09 19:10:35.000000000 +0100 > +++ dlls/x11drv/winpos.c 2004-12-11 19:46:03.000000000 +0100 > @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ > #include "x11drv.h" > #include "win.h" > #include "winpos.h" > -#include "dce.h" > #include "cursoricon.h" > #include "nonclient.h" > > @@ -49,6 +48,8 @@ > > WINE_DEFAULT_DEBUG_CHANNEL(x11drv); > > +extern BOOL DCE_InvalidateDCE( HWND, const RECT* ); The goal of the header files cleanup is not to mechanically remove the #includes by duplicating the definitions, if we wanted to do that it would have been done long ago. The real goal is to get rid of the inter-dll dependencies, the global headers are really just a symptom of the problem. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 6

Re: [winelib] Can't figure out a Winemaker error
by Michael Jung Dec. 15, 2004

Dec. 15, 2004

Scott, On Wednesday 15 December 2004 06:32, Scott Ritchie wrote: > Global symbol "%directories" requires explicit package name > at /usr/bin/winemaker line 423. > Global symbol "%directories" requires explicit package name > at /usr/bin/winemaker line 441. > Execution of /usr/bin/winemaker aborted due to compilation errors. > > What's going on here? Did I screw something up, or was this broken in > that release? This is with the December release. This is a problem, which seems to have been introduced in the december release and which is already fixed in cvs. If you don't want to use cvs you can just patch the winemaker script: Move the "my %directories" global variable declaration (somewhere around line 1060) above the "get_directory_contents" function declaration (ca. line 400). Ciao, Michael

1 0

[winelib] Can't figure out a Winemaker error
by Scott Ritchie Dec. 15, 2004

Dec. 15, 2004

As part of my effort to create a successful demonstration of how to port something, I tried out winelib. Unfortunately, I can't seem to get it working at all. I get this error whenever I run winemaker: Global symbol "%directories" requires explicit package name at /usr/bin/winemaker line 423. Global symbol "%directories" requires explicit package name at /usr/bin/winemaker line 441. Execution of /usr/bin/winemaker aborted due to compilation errors. What's going on here? Did I screw something up, or was this broken in that release? This is with the December release. Thanks, Scott Ritchie

2 1

Re: PATCH: revive FreeBSD support
by Alexandre Julliard Dec. 14, 2004

Dec. 14, 2004

Gerald Pfeifer <gerald(a)pfeifer.com> writes: > --- dlls/ntdll/virtual.c 11 Oct 2004 20:59:06 -0000 1.41 > +++ dlls/ntdll/virtual.c 3 Dec 2004 04:06:42 -0000 > @@ -119,6 +119,12 @@ static CRITICAL_SECTION csVirtual = { &c > /* Note: these are Windows limits, you cannot change them. */ > # define ADDRESS_SPACE_LIMIT ((void *)0xc0000000) /* top of the total available address space */ > # define USER_SPACE_LIMIT ((void *)0x80000000) /* top of the user address space */ > +# ifdef __FreeBSD__ > +# define LOW_SPACE_LIMIT ((void *)0x110000) /* lower address space limit */ > +# else > +# define LOW_SPACE_LIMIT NULL > +# endif > + > #else > static UINT page_shift; > static UINT page_mask; > @@ -600,7 +606,7 @@ static NTSTATUS map_view( struct file_vi > > for (;;) > { > - if ((ptr = wine_anon_mmap( NULL, view_size, VIRTUAL_GetUnixProt(vprot), 0 )) == (void *)-1) > + if ((ptr = wine_anon_mmap( LOW_SPACE_LIMIT, view_size, VIRTUAL_GetUnixProt(vprot), 0 )) == (void *)-1) Looks OK, but this is a job for wine_anon_mmap, it's supposed to abstract these sorts of platform dependencies so that the callers don't have to worry about it. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 1

Re: Includes: x11drv
by Rémi Assailly Dec. 14, 2004

Dec. 14, 2004

Jon Griffiths wrote : >Hi, > >x11drv: 8 includes removed. > >Cheers, >Jon > > +dlls/x11drv/text.c dlls/x11drv/window.c dlls/x11drv/winpos.c > dlls/x11drv/x11ddraw.c > Remove uneeded headers to reduce uneeded rebuilds. > > Hi Jon, As I am working on x11drv I can tell you some things : win.h is declared in x11drv.h so if you want to remove it, remove it from all files. But I think it is not a good idea : win.h is one of the header files which need to be moved so I think it is better to keep #include "win.h" where it is needed. It will be easier to find files which need definitions in win.h. For example you removed win.h from window.c which use the structure WND. I also noticed that you removed wingdi.h from x11ddraw.c. wingdi.h is declared in gdi.h which is a header file which need to be moved too ! So when we get rid of gdi.h we'll must redeclare wingdi.h in x11ddraw.c Regards Rémi

1 0