- Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: Problems with x11drv_main.c version 1.83
by Shachar Shemesh Dec. 20, 2003

Dec. 20, 2003

Sami Aario wrote: >I did some Googling and found this link which I believe is relevant: >http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2003/debian-kde-200305/msg00357.html. >I've been launching applications from the console, where DISPLAY is not set. >Under an X bash shell however, 'echo $DISPLAY' gives me ':0.0' as expected, >and I don't get the error I mentioned previously when launching wine. > >Is this how it's supposed to work, i.e. should I specify DISPLAY explicitly >on >the console if I want to launch wine applications from there? > > When launching X applications the "DISPLAY" variable should be set. Wine is such an application. When you launch Wine from a term launched within the X environment, this variable is already set. If you want to launch an X application from outside that environment, you need to make sure that the app knows which X server to connect to (the DISPLAY variable), as well as have the proper authorization. In your case, the authorization was probably not an issue, because the same user that was running the app from X is the one who started the server (and thus had authorization to do so). As such, nothing besides setting the DISPLAY var is neccessary. If you are going to complicate your setup further, however, I would recommend you RTFM "xauth", as well as the XAUTHORITY environment variable. A simpler but less safe solution is to use "xhost". I would recommend against, however. Shachar -- Shachar Shemesh Open Source integration & consulting Home page & resume - http://www.shemesh.biz/

1 0

Problems with x11drv_main.c version 1.83
by Sami Aario Dec. 20, 2003

Dec. 20, 2003

Hi list, Version 1.83 of dlls/x11drv/x11drv_main.c does not work for me. This patch removes the Display option in the config file, and now I get this error message: "x11drv: Can't open display: " (and no display name given). I've had to revert to version 1.81. Is the display name supposed to be given somewhere else (e.g. the registry) or are things supposed to happen automagically? My system is a debian woody, and XFree86 -version reports 4.1.0.1.

3 5

winver gone?
by Brett I. Holcomb Dec. 20, 2003

Dec. 20, 2003

I've tried using wine --winver win98 --hl.exe -console and wine spits out the help telling me what arguments I can use. Is winever no longer available?I've tried using wine --winver win98 --hl.exe -console and wine spits out the help telling me what arguments I can use. Is winever no longer available?

3 3

Re: [Resend 2] SHLWAPI fixes
by Dimitrie O. Paun Dec. 20, 2003

Dec. 20, 2003

On December 19, 2003 03:19 pm, Flameeyes wrote: > I hope this one is good. > I also removed the leading '?' list. A ChangeLog entry explaining what your changes are doing would also be good :) -- Dimi.

1 0

Re: wine/programs/winefile Makefile.in
by Martin Fuchs Dec. 20, 2003

Dec. 20, 2003

Hello, On 13.12.2003 04:21:30 Alexandre Julliard wrote: > ChangeSet ID: 10428 > CVSROOT: /opt/cvs-commit > Module name: wine > Changes by: julliard(a)wine.codeweavers.com 2003/12/12 21:21:30 > > Modified files: > programs/winefile: Makefile.in > > Log message: > Define __WINE__ to enable extensions (spotted by Martin Fuchs). > > Patch: http://cvs.winehq.com/patch.py?id=10428 > > Old revision New revision Changes Path > 1.4 1.5 +1 -0 wine/programs/winefile/Makefile.in It's not enough to define __WINE__ for the C compiler. We also need it for compiling the resource script: Index: Makefile.in =================================================================== RCS file: /home/wine/wine/programs/winefile/Makefile.in,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -d -r1.5 Makefile.in --- Makefile.in 13 Dec 2003 03:21:30 -0000 1.5 +++ Makefile.in 13 Dec 2003 08:13:41 -0000 @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ EXTRADEFS = -D__WINE__ +EXTRARCFLAGS = -D__WINE__ TOPSRCDIR = @top_srcdir@ TOPOBJDIR = ../.. SRCDIR = @srcdir@ -- Martin Fuchs martin-fuchs(a)gmx.net

3 4

Re: [Resend 2] SHLWAPI fixes
by Dmitry Timoshkov Dec. 20, 2003

Dec. 20, 2003

"Flameeyes" <dgp85(a)users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > I hope this one is good. Not really. Please review your patch for similar problems in other places. -- Dmitry.

1 0

Problems with ilink32
by Flameeyes Dec. 19, 2003

Dec. 19, 2003

Hi, I used to write applications for windows with Borland C++ Builder 6. The problem is that wine, either from cvs or release, froze when linking programs with ilink32. I fixed the problem with older releases using this patch: Index: dlls/ntdll/virtual.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/ntdll/virtual.c,v retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -3 -r1.9 virtual.c --- dlls/ntdll/virtual.c 12 Aug 2003 23:50:55 -0000 1.9 +++ dlls/ntdll/virtual.c 17 Aug 2003 11:15:57 -0000 @@ -1203,6 +1203,8 @@ return STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED; } + VirtualAlloc( 0x80000000, 0x1000, MEM_RESERVE | MEM_SYSTEM, PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE ); + base = ROUND_ADDR( addr, page_mask ); /* Find the view containing the address */ @@ -1255,6 +1257,8 @@ info->BaseAddress = (LPVOID)base; info->AllocationBase = (LPVOID)alloc_base; info->RegionSize = size - (base - alloc_base); + if ((info->BaseAddress + info->RegionSize) > 0xc0000000) + info->RegionSize = 0xc0000000 - (DWORD)info->BaseAddress; if (res_len) *res_len = sizeof(*info); return STATUS_SUCCESS; } the problem is that now the patch doesn't apply on wine. How can I do to continue working with BCB under wine? Thanks. -- Flameeyes <dgp85(a)users.sf.net> http://flameeyes.web.ctonet.it/

1 0

RPMs for Redhat 9 missing on SourceForge
by Paul Kopacz Dec. 19, 2003

Dec. 19, 2003

Trying to download the rpm for release 20031212 for Redhat 9. The release notes say that a RH9 version is available, but it's not listed in the files. Could someone direct me? Thanks, Paul -- Paul Kopacz <pkopacz(a)uoguelph.ca>

2 1

%HOME% - maybe works
by Brett I. Holcomb Dec. 19, 2003

Dec. 19, 2003

It appears that using %HOME% in a drive spec may not work well. I know winecheck says it can't find the drive but if I put in /home/myhome winecheck is happy. Wine doesn't seem to complain about it. Is this a winecheck or Wine problem?

2 1

wrc vs IDC_STATIC
by Ferenc Wagner Dec. 19, 2003

Dec. 19, 2003

Hello, wrc does not seem to grok IDC_STATIC. Isn't it supposed to work out of the box? It is defined to -1 in the MinGW headers. Sorry if I'm talking nonsense, first steps in Win32 GUI programming... Feri.

2 2