May 20, 2026
11:39 a.m.
On Wed May 20 08:12:26 2026 +0000, Huw Davies wrote:
Actually, is `next_glyph_index` appropriate here? Looks more like the previous glyph, or perhaps `mark2_glyph`? I think there are other similar instances below. It is not really the glyph it is the index to the glyph. The glyph itself is `glyphs[next_glyph_index]` so personally I think calling it `mark2_glyph` would be confusing.
-- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/10660#note_140780