Aug. 24, 2026
6:04 p.m.
On Mon Aug 24 18:03:13 2026 +0000, Esme Povirk wrote:
We could also just make sure we return S_FALSE if it succeeds with fewer bytes read than requested. I just don't feel like we'd ever want to pass through a successful hr in the case where we read an unknown but non-zero number of bytes because we didn't pass in a variable to accept the amount. I guess if we're doing it that way, we can *always* make that guarantee about S_FALSE and we won't need to check bytesread when we get S_OK.
-- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/11730#note_149727