http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321
------- Additional Comments From jaco(a)puxedo.org 2002-10-26 08:45 -------
Patch submitted to wine-patches.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100
------- Additional Comments From johane(a)lysator.liu.se 2002-10-25 05:19 -------
I was not quite clear there. I mean that I've experienced the problem myself.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100
johane(a)lysator.liu.se changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
everconfirmed|0 |1
------- Additional Comments From johane(a)lysator.liu.se 2002-10-25 03:37 -------
I saw it too.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321
------- Additional Comments From andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2002-10-25 01:33 -------
Huh ? Ever heard of something called "DLL separation" ? ;-)
Anyway, many thanks for working on this !!
Please add a comment to each implementation where the two other implementations
can be found...
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101
------- Additional Comments From andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2002-10-25 01:28 -------
Nice picture, but that's unfortunately not quite what you'd expect...
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321
------- Additional Comments From jaco(a)puxedo.org 2002-10-25 00:07 -------
I'll grab this one, erm, I have grabbed this one... The first version of the
patch re-uses the code in user32 (and doesn't use user32 directly). I have
however found duplicated code in shlwapi and user32 and now msvcrt. Once the
first version of the patch is available, we will need to take a look at these
three to have one place/file in which to host these.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101
Summary: Microfocus Net Express 3.0 installer start and stop
Product: Wine
Version: 20020904
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows 2000
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: wine-binary
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: cesar(a)liws.com.br
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100
rbheineke(a)charter.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|test |wine-tools
------- Additional Comments From rbheineke(a)charter.net 2002-10-24 12:38 -------
When doing a clean cvs install for a Mandrake 9.0 PC without windows,
tools/install does not properly generate registry files. I keep the source in
/usr/src/wine. The messages I get are:
...(pruned for brevity)
Configuring Wine without Windows.
Some fake Windows directories must be created, to hold any .ini files, DLLs,
start menu entries, and other things your applications may need to install.
Where would you like your fake C drive to be placed?
(default is /home/heineke/c) /c
Configuring Wine for a no-windows install in /c...
Created /home/heineke/.wine/config using default Wine configuration.
You probably want to review the file, though.
Compiling regedit...
make: Nothing to be done for `all'.
Preparing to install default Wine registry entries...
Installing default Wine registry entries...
Warning: could not find wine config [Drive x] entry for current working
directory /usr/src/wine; starting in windows directory.
/usr/src/wine/miscemu/wine: cannot find 'programs/regedit/regedit.exe.so'
Registry install failed.
I saw a few people mention this problem and even a fix in the patches mailing
list. I could not find the fix in the patches mailing list. It also looks as
if these people thought it might be appropriate for a bug report.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.