http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=146
tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-22 19:28 -------
I had a little difficulty getting Acrobat Reader 4.0 but I can verify this is
bug is fixed.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=146>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=900
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-22 16:48 -------
OK, I sent away for the cd and will do the testing when it gets here. They say
about 2 weeks or less.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=900>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=900
------- Additional Comments From hogger2(a)mushworld.dnsart.com 2002-07-22 15:34 -------
I've got a 233 with 64 megs of ram. THe CPU is ok for compiling in the
background. THe memory is a big problem, as is my only 16 GB of storage space
(of which, 800 MB is currently free. I do video recording with real time
compression on my computer, so I need all the CPU power I can get. Also, with
mozilla taking up 30 MB of memory, openoffice another 20MB, memory gets a bit
tight on this college workhorse. I've got summer school finals coming up right
now so I can't do much of my own testing. Upgrading from Debian potato to Debian
Woody is my next project. My main constraint though is the disk space.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=900>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-22 15:27 -------
Thankyou for the additional information. If you still see this with the latest
release of wine at least we have a couple of places to look at. I think that
this one is the most interesting, This is from Steve Varadi first post
> fixme:shdocvw:WBOC_GetControlInfo stub: LPCONTROLINFO = 0x4209df18
If I recall correctly shdocvw defaulted to "native, builtin" and only recently
(within the last couple of months) changed to the following.
"shdocvw" = "builtin, native"
This looks like a regression as well. In his next postSteve Varadi wrote the
following
> This way Quickenw is unusable. I never experiented this kind of problem with
> Quicken. It was working more than five years for me under wine.
> Could anyone give some hints what went wrong??
So I think that using a native shdocvw.dll might "solve" your problem but it
won't fix wine.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=143
Summary: Hangs when opening Excel97
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: VERIFIED
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: wine-binary
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: miguelan(a)idecnet.com
Hangs when opening Excel.exe 97
Gives the message
err:win32:fixup_imports No implementation for shlwapi.dll.0(StrRetToBufA),
setting to 0xdeadbeff
obtaining in winedbg the message
0xdeadbeef (SHLWAPI.DLL..reloc+0x1ef69eef): *** Invalid address 0xdeadbeef
(DHLWAPI.DLL..reloc+0x1ef69eef)
------- Additional Comments From miguelan(a)idecnet.com 2000-12-19 10:27 -------
in DLLOverides section in wine.conf change shell and shell32 to native, builtin
------- Additional Comments From jim(a)codeweavers.com 2000-12-21 15:52 -------
changed from "wine app DB" product to "Wine" itself. Especially since we don't
really have a wine Apps db yet;)
------- Additional Comments From andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2000-12-22 13:41 -------
StrRetToBufA has been implemented in Wine for ages.
Either the Wine version used is way too old
or a native shlwapi.dll was used which is lacking StrRetToBuf.
The debugger message ("SHLWAPI.DLL") seems to suggest
it is an insufficient native shlwapi.
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-22 14:11 -------
Since I cannot reproduce this with Excel 97 (MS Office 97) I am marking this as
Verified.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=143>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906
------- Additional Comments From JeffMay(a)earthlink.net 2002-07-22 14:00 -------
Thanks for the additional comments. Tonight when I get home I shall give a later version a try. I wonder if
it's related to recent kernels; I found these in the wine-users lists:
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-users/2002/07/0118.html
He's got one of the same symptoms I've seen, "I am using Quicken more than five years with most of the
features working, at least usable. Now since I upgrade SuSE 8.0 can not use quickenw because not let me type
in numbers:(( Always get error please type in number in nnnn.nn format. Certainly I did, but error message
come back again again..."
Another one: http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-users/2002/07/0124.html
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=136
Summary: typo in the configure
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: VERIFIED
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: wine-binary
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: oik(a)rocketmail.com
Looks like the configure script is missing a '-' for the linker options passed from gcc:
srp@box$ cvs diff configure
Index: configure
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/wine/configure,v
retrieving revision 1.174
diff -u -r1.174 configure
--- configure 2000/12/12 00:38:58 1.174
+++ configure 2000/12/12 23:39:06
@@ -4806,7 +4806,7 @@
echo "$ac_t""$ac_cv_c_dll_unixware" 1>&6
if test "$ac_cv_c_dll_unixware" = "yes"
then
- LDSHARED="\$(CC) -Wl,-G \$(SONAME:%=-Wl,h,\$(libdir)/%)"
+ LDSHARED="\$(CC) -Wl,-G \$(SONAME:%=-Wl,-h,\$(libdir)/%)"
LDDLLFLAGS="-Wl,-B,symbolic"
else
echo $ac_n "checking "whether we can build a NetBSD dll"""... $ac_c" 1>&6
srp@box$ cvs diff configure.in
Index: configure.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/wine/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.174
diff -u -r1.174 configure.in
--- configure.in 2000/12/12 00:38:58 1.174
+++ configure.in 2000/12/12 23:41:51
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@
])
if test "$ac_cv_c_dll_unixware" = "yes"
then
- LDSHARED="\$(CC) -Wl,-G \$(SONAME:%=-Wl,h,\$(libdir)/%)"
+ LDSHARED="\$(CC) -Wl,-G \$(SONAME:%=-Wl,-h,\$(libdir)/%)"
LDDLLFLAGS="-Wl,-B,symbolic"
else
AC_CACHE_CHECK("whether we can build a NetBSD dll",
Should be -Wl,-h,... instead of -Wl,h
Was just building for fun so am being too lazy to get myself set up with ssh etc... Sorry.
Cheers
srp
------- Additional Comments From andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2000-12-31 20:10 -------
Hmm, this has been fixed in the meantime somehow.
Thanks for mentioning it anyway.
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-22 13:57 -------
This is has been fixed for a long time. Verifying
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=136>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=135
Summary: winfile.exe triggers LoadMagicItem with magic=0
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: VERIFIED
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: wine-gui
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: nneul(a)umr.edu
winfile.exe from win98 triggers MENU_LoadMagicItem with a magic of 0.
fixme:menu:MENU_LoadMagicItem Magic 0x00000000 not implemented
It looks like this is undefined in the winuser.h header, only -1,1-11 are
defnied.
Maybe:
if((LOWORD((int)lpitem->text))<12)
that needs changed in controls/menu.c?
Adding a 'case 0: return 0' in the routine obviously makes warning go away, but
that probably isn't the best fix.
------- Additional Comments From andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2000-12-22 14:08 -------
Hmm, I can't reproduce that with W98SE winfile.exe.
I've never seen that problem with winfile.
How does it happen ?
More details please ! :-)
------- Additional Comments From nneul(a)umr.edu 2001-01-06 12:38 -------
Beats me, not seeing it any more with latest cvs 01/06.
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-22 13:55 -------
I am marking this verified. This issue does not exist anymore.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=135>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=133
Summary: install of winedbg
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: VERIFIED
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: wine-debug
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: nneul(a)umr.edu
The install attempts to symlink winedbg without unlinking it first.
This causes a failure on any subsequent install:
Wine build complete.
cd `dirname debugger/__install__` && gmake install
gmake[1]: Entering directory `/products/wine/wine/debugger'
[ -d /products/wine/linux/bin ] || mkdir -p /products/wine/linux/bin
/usr/bin/install -c winedbg.so /products/wine/linux/bin/winedbg.so
cd /products/wine/linux/bin && ln -s wine winedbg
ln: winedbg: File exists
gmake[1]: *** [install] Error 1
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/products/wine/wine/debugger'
gmake: *** [debugger/__install__] Error 2
You should make that make target ignore errors, or unlink it first.
I changed to this in Makefile:
install:: $(MODULE).so
[ -d $(bindir) ] || $(MKDIR) $(bindir)
$(INSTALL_PROGRAM) $(MODULE).so $(bindir)/$(MODULE).so
cd $(bindir) && $(RM) $(MODULE) && $(LN_S) wine $(MODULE)
------- Additional Comments From nneul(a)umr.edu 2001-01-06 12:43 -------
Looks to have been corrected on 1.23 or 1.24 update of debugger/Makefile for .so
build.
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-22 13:53 -------
This bug is Fixed. Verifying.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=133>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=122
tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-07-22 13:52 -------
As far as I can tell this isssue is fixed Verifying.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=122>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.